I have created my first azure webjob that runs continously;
I'm not so sure this is a code issue, but for the sake of completeness here is my code:
static void Main()
{
var host = new JobHost();
host.CallAsync(typeof(Functions).GetMethod("ProcessMethod"));
host.RunAndBlock();
}
And for the function:
[NoAutomaticTrigger]
public static async Task ProcessMethod(TextWriter log)
{
log.WriteLine(DateTime.UtcNow.ToShortTimeString() + ": Started");
while (true)
{
Task.Run(() => RunAllAsync(log));
await Task.Delay(TimeSpan.FromSeconds(60));
}
log.WriteLine(DateTime.UtcNow.ToShortTimeString() + "Shutting down..");
}
Note that the async task fires off a task of its own. This was to ensure they were started quite accurately with the same interval. The job itself is to download an url, parse and input some data in a db, but that shouldnt be relevant for the multiple instance issue I am experiencing.
My problem is that once this has been running for roughly 5 minutes a second ProcessMethod is called which makes me have two sessions simoultaniously doing the same thing. The second method says it is "started from Dashboard" even though I am 100% confident I did not click anything to start it off myself.
Anyone experienced anything like it?
Change the instance count to 1 from Scale tab of WebApp in Azure portal. By default it is set to 2 instances which is causing it to run two times.
I can't explain why it's getting called twice, but I think you'd be better served with a triggered job using a CRON schedule (https://azure.microsoft.com/en-us/documentation/articles/web-sites-create-web-jobs/#CreateScheduledCRON), instead of a Continuous WebJob.
Also, it doesn't seem like you are using the WebJobs SDK, so you can completely skip that. Your WebJob can be as simple as a Main that directly does the work. No JobHost, no async, and generally easier to get right.
Related
I have a few Azure WebJobs that run to completion, once my business logic is done I call await StopAsync(stoppingToken);
However, Azure Portal continues to show their status as "Running" until eventually the jobs terminated after the default 120 second timeout.
How can I correctly tell Azure Portal/Kudu that the job is in fact finished?
Here is an example that shows the issue:
namespace MyService
{
public class MyService : BackgroundService
{
protected override async Task ExecuteAsync(CancellationToken stoppingToken)
{
// same issue whether or not I call this:
await StopAsync(stoppingToken);
}
}
}
A week after posting this question my jobs are now mysteriously completing successfully even though no changes were made, I assume someone at Microsoft fixed something on their end.
I have a Webjob that I want to be time triggered:
public class ArchiveFunctions
{
private readonly IOrderArchiver _orderArchiver;
public ArchiveFunctions(IOrderArchiver orderArchiver)
{
_orderArchiver = orderArchiver;
}
public async Task Archive([TimerTrigger("0 */5 * * * *")] TimerInfo timer, TextWriter log)
{
log.WriteLine("Hello world");
}
}
My program.cs:
public static void Main()
{
var config = new JobHostConfiguration
{
JobActivator = new AutofacJobActivator(RegisterComponents())
};
config.UseTimers();
var host = new JobHost(config);
// The following code ensures that the WebJob will be running continuously
host.RunAndBlock();
}
my publish-setting.json:
{
"$schema": "http://schemastore.org/schemas/json/webjob-publish-settings.json",
"webJobName": "OrdersArchiving",
"runMode": "OnDemand"
}
Here is what it looks like on azure portal:
My problem is that the job runs, I have the hello world, but the job keeps in run state and it get to a time out error message:
[02/05/2018 15:34:05 > f0ea5f: ERR ] Command 'cmd /c ""Ores.Contr ...' was aborted due to no output nor CPU activity for 121 seconds. You can increase the SCM_COMMAND_IDLE_TIMEOUT app setting (or WEBJOBS_IDLE_TIMEOUT if this is a WebJob) if needed.
What can I do to fix this?
I have a wild guess RunAndBlock could be a problem.. but I do not see a solution..
Thanks!
Edit:
I have tested Rob Reagan answer, it does help with the error, thank you!
On my same service, I have one other time triggerd job (was done in core, while mine is not).
You can see the Webjob.Missions is 'triggered', and status update on last time it ran. You can see as well the schedule on it.
I would like to have the same for mine 'OrdersArchiving'.
How can I achieve that?
Thanks!
Change your run mode to continuous and not triggered. The TimerTrigger will handle executing the method you've placed it on.
Also, make sure that you're not using a Free tier for hosting your WebJob. After twenty minutes of inactivity, the app will be paused and will await a new HTTP request to wake it up.
Also, make sure you've enabled Always On on your Web App settings to prevent the same thing from happening to a higher service tier web app.
Edit
Tom asked how to invoke methods on a schedule for a Triggered WebJob. There are two options to do so:
Set the job up as triggered and use a settings.json file to set up the schedule. You can read about it here.
Invoke a method via HTTP using an Azure Scheduler. The Azure Scheduler is a separate Azure service that you can provision. It has a free tier which may be sufficient for your use. Please see David Ebbo's post on this here.
I have a queue trigger azure function with DurableOrchestrationClient. I am able to start a new execution of my orchestration function, which triggers multiple activitytrigger functions and waits for them all to process. Everything works great.
My issue is that I am unable to check on the status of my orchestration function("TestFunction"). GetStatusAsync always returns as null. I need to know when the orchestration function is actually complete and process the return object (bool).
public static async void Run([QueueTrigger("photostodownload", Connection = "QueueStorage")]PhotoInfo photoInfo, [OrchestrationClient]DurableOrchestrationClient starter, TraceWriter log)
{
var x = await starter.StartNewAsync("TestFunction", photoInfo);
Thread.Sleep(2 * 1000);
var y = await starter.GetStatusAsync(x);
}
StartNewAsync enqueues a message into the control queuee, it doesn't mean that the orchestration starts immediately.
GetStatusAsync returns null if the instance either doesn't exist or has not yet started running. So, probably the orchestration just doesn't start yet during those 2 seconds of sleep that you have.
Rather than having a fixed wait timeout, you should either periodically poll the status of your orchestration, or send something like a Done event from the orchestration as the last step of the workflow.
Are you using function 1.0 or 2.0? A similar issue has been reported for Function 2.0 runtime on Github.
https://github.com/Azure/azure-functions-durable-extension/issues/126
Also when you say everything works great do you mean activityTrigger functions complete execution?
Are you running functions locally or is it deployed on Azure?
Is there any way to configure triggers without attributes? I cannot know the queue names ahead of time.
Let me explain my scenario here.. I have one service bus queue, and for various reasons (complicated duplicate-suppression business logic), the queue messages have to be processed one at a time, so I have ServiceBusConfiguration.OnMessageOptions.MaxConcurrentCalls set to 1. So processing a message holds up the whole queue until it is finished. Needless to say, this is suboptimal.
This 'one at a time' policy isn't so simple. The messages could be processed in parallel, they just have to be divided into groups (based on a field in message), say A and B. Group A can process its messages one at a time, and group B can process its own one at a time, etc. A and B are processed in parallel, all is good.
So I can create a queue for each group, A, B, C, ... etc. There are about 50 groups, so 50 queues.
I can create a queue for each, but how to make this work with the Azure Webjobs SDK? I don't want to copy-paste a method for each queue with a different ServiceBusTrigger for the SDK to discover, just to enforce one-at-a-time per queue/group, then update the code with another copy-paste whenever another group is needed. Fetching a list of queues at startup and tying to the function is preferable.
I have looked around and I don't see any way to do what I want. The ITypeLocator interface is pretty hard-set to look for attributes. I could probably abuse the INameResolver, but it seems like I'd still have to have a bunch of near-duplicate methods around. Could I somehow create what the SDK is looking for at startup/runtime?
(To be clear, I know how to use INameResolver to get queue name as at How to set Azure WebJob queue name at runtime? but though similar this isn't my problem. I want to setup triggers for multiple queues at startup for the same function to get the one-at-a-time per queue processing, without using the trigger attribute 50 times repeatedly. I figured I'd ask again since the SDK repo is fairly active and it's been a year..).
Or am I going about this all wrong? Being dumb? Missing something? Any advice on this dilemma would be welcome.
The Azure Webjob Host discovers and indexes the functions with the ServiceBusTrigger attribute when it starts. So there is no way to set up the queues to trigger at the runtime.
The simpler solution for you is to create a long time running job and implement it manually:
public class Program
{
private static void Main()
{
var host = new JobHost();
host.CallAsync(typeof(Program).GetMethod("Process"));
host.RunAndBlock();
}
[NoAutomaticTriggerAttribute]
public static async Task Process(TextWriter log, CancellationToken token)
{
var connectionString = "myconnectionstring";
// You can also get the queue name from app settings or azure table ??
var queueNames = new[] {"queueA", "queueA" };
var messagingFactory = MessagingFactory.CreateFromConnectionString(connectionString);
foreach (var queueName in queueNames)
{
var receiver = messagingFactory.CreateMessageReceiver(queueName);
receiver.OnMessage(message =>
{
try
{
// do something
....
// Complete the message
message.Complete();
}
catch (Exception ex)
{
// Log the error
log.WriteLine(ex.ToString());
// Abandon the message so that it can be retry.
message.Abandon();
}
}, new OnMessageOptions() { MaxConcurrentCalls = 1});
}
// await until the job stop or restart
await Task.Delay(Timeout.InfiniteTimeSpan, token);
}
}
Otherwise, if you don't want to deal with multiple queues, you can have a look at azure servicebus topic/subscription and create SqlFilter to send your message to the right subscription.
Another option could be to create your own trigger: The azure webjob SDK provides extensibility points to create your own trigger binding :
Binding Extensions Overview
Good Luck !
Based on my understanding, your needs seems to be building a message batch system in parallel. The #Thomas solution is good, but I think Azure Batch service with Table storage may be better and could be instead of the complex solution of ServiceBus queue + WebJobs with a trigger.
Using Azure Batch with Table storage, you can control the task creation and execute the task in parallel and at scale, even monitor these tasks, please refer to the tutorial to know how to.
I am developing a triggered webjob that use TimerTrigger.
Before the webjob stops, I need to dispose some objects but I don't know how to trigger the "webjob stop".
Having a NoAutomaticTrigger function, I know that I can use the WebJobsShutdownWatcher class to handle when the webjob is stopping but with a triggered job I need some help...
I had a look at Extensible Triggers and Binders with Azure WebJobs SDK 1.1.0-alpha1.
Is it a good idea to create a custom trigger (StopTrigger) that used the WebJobsShutdownWatcher class to fire action before the webjob stops ?
Ok The answer was in the question :
Yes I can use the WebJobsShutdownWatcher class because it has a Register function that is called when the cancellation token is canceled, in other words when the webjob is stopping.
static void Main()
{
var cancellationToken = new WebJobsShutdownWatcher().Token;
cancellationToken.Register(() =>
{
Console.Out.WriteLine("Do whatever you want before the webjob is stopped...");
});
var host = new JobHost();
// The following code ensures that the WebJob will be running continuously
host.RunAndBlock();
}
EDIT (Based on Matthew comment):
If you use Triggered functions, you can add a CancellationToken parameter to your function signatures. The runtime will cancel that token when the host is shutting down automatically, allowing your function to receive the notification.
public static void QueueFunction(
[QueueTrigger("QueueName")] string message,
TextWriter log,
CancellationToken cancellationToken)
{
...
if(cancellationToken.IsCancellationRequested) return;
...
}
I was recently trying to figure out how to do this without the
WebJobs SDK which contains the WebJobShutdownWatcher, this is what I
found out.
What the underlying runtime does (and what the WebJobsShutdownWatcher referenced above checks), is create a local file at the location specified by the environment variable %WEBJOBS_SHUTDOWN_FILE%. If this file exists, it is essentially the runtime's signal to the webjob that it must shutdown within a configurable wait period (default of 5 seconds for continuous jobs, 30 for triggered jobs), otherwise the runtime will kill the job.
The net effect is, if you are not using the Azure WebJobs SDK, which contains the WebJobsShutdownWatcher as described above, you can still achieve graceful shutdown of your Azure Web Job by monitoring for the shutdown file on an interval shorter than the configured wait period.
Additional details, including how to configure the wait period, are described here: https://github.com/projectkudu/kudu/wiki/WebJobs#graceful-shutdown