Can win32 GetCurrentThreadId fail? [closed] - multithreading

Closed. This question is not reproducible or was caused by typos. It is not currently accepting answers.
This question was caused by a typo or a problem that can no longer be reproduced. While similar questions may be on-topic here, this one was resolved in a way less likely to help future readers.
Closed 7 years ago.
Improve this question
When debugging I found my program in a state indicating that GetCurrentThreadId had previously returned (DWORD)-1.
Looking at MSDN it seems that the function cannot fail, since there is no section on Error.
Is that correct? Or can it return an error-value in some conditions?

In all currently shipping versions of Windows, GetCurrentThreadId cannot fail.
The function simply reads the current thread ID value out of the thread information block and returns it.

Related

Compile error: Sub or Function not defined - I want to add an Enter button to my form [closed]

Closed. This question is not reproducible or was caused by typos. It is not currently accepting answers.
This question was caused by a typo or a problem that can no longer be reproduced. While similar questions may be on-topic here, this one was resolved in a way less likely to help future readers.
Closed 2 years ago.
Improve this question
Compile error: Sub or Function not defined - I want to add an Enter button to my form
Change "STE" to "SET"
It happens to the best of us :-)

COUNTIF function with wild cards isn't working [closed]

Closed. This question is not reproducible or was caused by typos. It is not currently accepting answers.
This question was caused by a typo or a problem that can no longer be reproduced. While similar questions may be on-topic here, this one was resolved in a way less likely to help future readers.
Closed 3 years ago.
Improve this question
Have an excel sheet, I am trying to do a =COUNTIF(29:29, *TBB*). however these wild cards dont seem to be working. Any Ideas.
Try this
=COUNTIF(29:29,"*TBB*")

Problem with compiling the code by terminal in linux [closed]

Closed. This question is not reproducible or was caused by typos. It is not currently accepting answers.
This question was caused by a typo or a problem that can no longer be reproduced. While similar questions may be on-topic here, this one was resolved in a way less likely to help future readers.
Closed 3 years ago.
Improve this question
I have a problem with compiling the code in the terminal. As in the photo, When I compile the code, it shows the same answer
The file elnur.c is not saved, because it has (*elnur.c), the '*' sign means that the file is not save.
Save the file and run again.

What happens if I type > / on linux [closed]

Closed. This question is not reproducible or was caused by typos. It is not currently accepting answers.
This question was caused by a typo or a problem that can no longer be reproduced. While similar questions may be on-topic here, this one was resolved in a way less likely to help future readers.
Closed 7 years ago.
Improve this question
When I type > file.extension I know that the file is replaced by a empty file.
What if then I type > / ? My / partition will be erased and I'll lost everything in it?
I'm curious and wondering if someone already tried this.
You cannot redirect to a directory

Unable to get output after passing functions in node js program? [closed]

Closed. This question is not reproducible or was caused by typos. It is not currently accepting answers.
This question was caused by a typo or a problem that can no longer be reproduced. While similar questions may be on-topic here, this one was resolved in a way less likely to help future readers.
Closed 8 years ago.
Improve this question
Here is my program
function say(word) {
console.log(word);
}
function execute(someFunction, value) {
someFunction(value);
}
execute(say, "Hello");
How the value is getting printed through someFunction(value);
Probably, you meant execute to be like this:
function execute(someFunction, value) {
someFunction(value);
}
As it is, your code just calls execute recursively, forever. (Well, until the stack overflows.)
word is not reserved.

Resources