Populate Aggregation Results of Child Schema in Mongoose - node.js

I have the following (simplified) Schema
var options = {discriminatorKey:'kind'};
var activitySchema = new Schema(
{
title:{type:String}
},options
);
var Activity = mongoose.model('Activity', activitySchema);
var dateActivitySchema = new Schema({
postedBy:{type:Schema.Types.ObjectId,ref:'User',required:true}
},options);
var eventActivitySchema = new Schema({
details:{
eventType:{type:String, enum:['mixed','women','men']}
}
},options);
I have a function that returns a mix of both child documents - date activities and event activities. However when I try to populate the postedBy field it does not populate the data as expected.
Activity.aggregate([
{
$match:{
$or:[{
postedBy:{$in:results[0].userIDs}
},
{
'details.eventType':eventGenderInterestedInMapper(user.gender,user.preferences.interestedInGenders),
kind:'Event'
}]
}
}
],function(err,results){
Activity.populate(results,{path:'postedBy'},function(err,results){
if (err) return cb(err,null);
return cb(null,results);
});
});
Any way I can populate this child field from the base schema call or do I have to include the field in the base schema? I'm using the latest version of mongoose and from what I've found this functionality seems to be supported but it's not populating.
Edit: It populates only if the returned documents are ALL date activities. If there is one event activity then it populates none of the documents

Related

what is the Mongoose find query using nodejs?

This is my players model
var mongoose = require('mongoose'),Schema = mongoose.Schema;
var playerSchema = Schema({
name: String,
password: String,
country: String
});
mongoose.model('players', playerSchema);
This is my countries model
var mongoose = require('mongoose'),Schema = mongoose.Schema;
var countrySchema = Schema({
name: String,
isActive: Boolean
});
mongoose.model('countries', countrySchema);
And this is app.js
mongoose.model('players').find({}, function (err, players) {
console.log(players);
if (err) {
return console.error(err);
} else {
res.format({
html: function(){
res.render('players/index', {
title: 'Players List',
"players" : players
});
},
json: function(){
res.json(players);
}
});
}
});
In players model I have countryId and in countries model I have corresponding countryName. Now I want to find players with country name with same find() query.
you can use mongoose populate method
refer this link: mongoose populate
in your example, it something like this:
mongoose.model('players').find().populate('country').exec(function(err,players){
});
this will give you result of both countryID and Name
mongodb is nosql-database, not a relational database like mysql/postgre. So modelling your data is not like relationaldatabses where you can make one query that joins two tables (in mongodb, "tables" are called collections).
In MongoDB and your current Schema you will first need to find the countryId of the country you want. And then find the players that have that country.
Alternatives;
you can store the countryName directly on the player collection
you can store the playerId's in an array within the the country collection
further more, in your playerSchema, country should be a ObjectId, not a String.

How to populate the User object with Mongoose and Node

I am trying to add a couple of attributes to the scaffolded MEAN.js User entity.
locationName: {
type: String,
trim: true
}
I also have created another entity Book connected with User. Unfortunately, I think I do not quite grasp the concept behind the populate method because I am not able to "populate" the User entity with the locationName attribute.
I tried the following:
/**
* List of Books
*/
exports.list = function(req, res) {
Book.find().sort('-created').populate('user', 'displayName', 'locationName').exec(function(err, books) {
if (err) {
return res.status(400).send({
message: errorHandler.getErrorMessage(err)
});
} else {
res.jsonp(books);
}
});
};
Unfortunately, I get the following error:
/home/maurizio/Workspace/sbr-v1/node_modules/mongoose/lib/connection.js:625
throw new MongooseError.MissingSchemaError(name);
^
MissingSchemaError: Schema hasn't been registered for model "locationName".
Any suggestion?
Thanks
Cheers
The error is clear, you should have a schema for the locationName.
If your location is just a string property in your user model and does not refer to separate model, you don't need and shouldn't use populate with it, it will simply be returned as a property of the returned user object from mongoose find() method.
If your want to make your location a stand alone entity (different mongodb document), you should have a mongoose model that defines your location object, aka have a file in your app\models name for example: location.server.model.js that contains something like:
var mongoose = require('mongoose'),
Schema = mongoose.Schema;
var LocationSchema = new Schema({
_id: String,
name: String
//, add any additional properties
});
mongoose.model('Location', LocationSchema);
Note that the _id here replaces the auto generated objectId, so this has to be unique, and this the property you should refer to in your User object, meaning if you have a location like this:
var mongoose = require('mongoose'),
Location = mongoose.model('Location');
var _location = new Location({_id:'de', name:'Deutschland'});
you should refer to it in your User object like this:
var _user=new User({location:'de'});
//or:
var _user=new User();
_user.location='de';
then you should be able to populate your location object with your user, like this:
User.find().populate('location').exec(function(err, _user) {
if (err) {
//handle error
} else {
//found user
console.log(_user);
//user is populated with location object, makes you able to do:
console.log(_user.location.name);
}
});
I suggest you to further read in mongodb data modeling and mongoose Schemas, Models, Population.

Mongoose - get _id of a newly saved inner record

There is a Mongoose Schema with sub-documents. I want to be able to push sub-document and process newly created inner item after parent saving.
Is there any easy way to get an _id of a newly created inner item? Here is the code:
var trackSchema = mongoose.Schema({
title: String
});
var userSchema = mongoose.Schema({
displayName: String,
tracks: [trackSchema]
});
var Track = mongoose.model('Track', trackSchema);
var User = mongoose.model('User', userSchema);
var track = new Track({
title: 'Sunrise'
});
user.tracks.push(track); // assume 'user' was returned by User.findById()
user.save(function (err, userUpdated) {
// ... is there any way to find _id of pushed 'track' ???
});
Easiest way is to create ObjectId in code and assign it to _id property of inner item on object creation

Dynamically create collection with Mongoose

I want to give users the ability to create collections in my Node app. I have really only seen example of hard coding in collections with mongoose. Anyone know if its possible to create collections dynamically with mongoose? If so an example would be very helpful.
Basically I want to be able to store data for different 'events' in different collections.
I.E.
Events:
event1,
event2,
...
eventN
Users can create there own custom event and store data in that collection. In the end each event might have hundreds/thousands of rows. I would like to give users the ability to perform CRUD operations on their events. Rather than store in one big collection I would like to store each events data in a different collection.
I don't really have an example of what I have tried as I have only created 'hard coded' collections with mongoose. I am not even sure I can create a new collection in mongoose that is dynamic based on a user request.
var mongoose = require('mongoose');
mongoose.connect('localhost', 'events');
var schema = mongoose.Schema({ name: 'string' });
var Event1 = mongoose.model('Event1', schema);
var event1= new Event1({ name: 'something' });
event1.save(function (err) {
if (err) // ...
console.log('meow');
});
Above works great if I hard code 'Event1' as a collection. Not sure I create a dynamic collection.
var mongoose = require('mongoose');
mongoose.connect('localhost', 'events');
...
var userDefinedEvent = //get this from a client side request
...
var schema = mongoose.Schema({ name: 'string' });
var userDefinedEvent = mongoose.model(userDefinedEvent, schema);
Can you do that?
I believe that this is a terrible idea to implement, but a question deserves an answer. You need to define a schema with a dynamic name that allows information of 'Any' type in it. A function to do this may be a little similar to this function:
var establishedModels = {};
function createModelForName(name) {
if (!(name in establishedModels)) {
var Any = new Schema({ any: Schema.Types.Mixed });
establishedModels[name] = mongoose.model(name, Any);
}
return establishedModels[name];
}
Now you can create models that allow information without any kind of restriction, including the name. I'm going to assume an object defined like this, {name: 'hello', content: {x: 1}}, which is provided by the 'user'. To save this, I can run the following code:
var stuff = {name: 'hello', content: {x: 1}}; // Define info.
var Model = createModelForName(name); // Create the model.
var model = Model(stuff.content); // Create a model instance.
model.save(function (err) { // Save
if (err) {
console.log(err);
}
});
Queries are very similar, fetch the model and then do a query:
var stuff = {name: 'hello', query: {x: {'$gt': 0}}}; // Define info.
var Model = createModelForName(name); // Create the model.
model.find(stuff.query, function (err, entries) {
// Do something with the matched entries.
});
You will have to implement code to protect your queries. You don't want the user to blow up your db.
From mongo docs here: data modeling
In certain situations, you might choose to store information in
several collections rather than in a single collection.
Consider a sample collection logs that stores log documents for
various environment and applications. The logs collection contains
documents of the following form:
{ log: "dev", ts: ..., info: ... } { log: "debug", ts: ..., info: ...}
If the total number of documents is low you may group documents into
collection by type. For logs, consider maintaining distinct log
collections, such as logs.dev and logs.debug. The logs.dev collection
would contain only the documents related to the dev environment.
Generally, having large number of collections has no significant
performance penalty and results in very good performance. Distinct
collections are very important for high-throughput batch processing.
Say I have 20 different events. Each event has 1 million entries... As such if this is all in one collection I will have to filter the collection by event for every CRUD op.
I would suggest you keep all events in the same collection, especially if event names depend on client code and are thus subject to change. Instead, index the name and user reference.
mongoose.Schema({
name: { type: String, index: true },
user: { type: mongoose.Schema.Types.ObjectId, ref: 'User', index: true }
});
Furthermore I think you came at the problem a bit backwards (but I might be mistaken). Are you finding events within the context of a user, or finding users within the context of an event name? I have a feeling it's the former, and you should be partitioning on user reference, not the event name in the first place.
If you do not need to find all events for a user and just need to deal with user and event name together you could go with a compound index:
schema.index({ user: 1, name: 1 });
If you are dealing with millions of documents, make sure to turn off auto index:
schema.set('autoIndex', false);
This post has interesting stuff about naming collections and using a specific schema as well:
How to access a preexisting collection with Mongoose?
You could try the following:
var createDB = function(name) {
var connection = mongoose.createConnection(
'mongodb://localhost:27017/' + name);
connection.on('open', function() {
connection.db.collectionNames(function(error) {
if (error) {
return console.log("error", error)
}
});
});
connection.on('error', function(error) {
return console.log("error", error)
});
}
It is important that you get the collections names with connection.db.collectionNames, otherwise the Database won't be created.
This method works best for me , This example creates dynamic collection for each users , each collection will hold only corresponding users information (login details), first declare the function dynamicModel in separate file : example model.js
/* model.js */
'use strict';
var mongoose = require('mongoose'),
Schema = mongoose.Schema;
function dynamicModel(suffix) {
var addressSchema = new Schema(
{
"name" : {type: String, default: '',trim: true},
  "login_time" : {type: Date},
"location" : {type: String, default: '',trim: true},
}
);
return mongoose.model('user_' + suffix, addressSchema);
}
module.exports = dynamicModel;
In controller File example user.js,first function to create dynamic collection and second function to save data to a particular collection
/* user.js */
var mongoose = require('mongoose'),
function CreateModel(user_name){//function to create collection , user_name argument contains collection name
var Model = require(path.resolve('./model.js'))(user_name);
}
function save_user_info(user_name,data){//function to save user info , data argument contains user info
var UserModel = mongoose.model(user_name) ;
var usermodel = UserModel(data);
usermodel.save(function (err) {
if (err) {
console.log(err);
} else {
console.log("\nSaved");
}
});
}
yes we can do that .I have tried it and its working.
REFERENCE CODE:
app.post("/",function(req,res){
var Cat=req.body.catg;
const link= req.body.link;
const rating=req.body.rating;
Cat=mongoose.model(Cat,schema);
const item=new Cat({
name:link,
age:rating
});
item.save();
res.render("\index");
});
I tried Magesh varan Reference Code ,
and this code works for me
router.post("/auto-create-collection", (req, res) => {
var reqData = req.body; // {"username":"123","password":"321","collectionName":"user_data"}
let userName = reqData.username;
let passWord = reqData.password;
let collectionName = reqData.collectionName;
// create schema
var mySchema = new mongoose.Schema({
userName: String,
passWord: String,
});
// create model
var myModel = mongoose.model(collectionName, mySchema);
const storeData = new myModel({
userName: userName,
passWord: passWord,
});
storeData.save();
res.json(storeData);
});
Create a dynamic.model.ts access from some where to achieve this feature.
import mongoose, { Schema } from "mongoose";
export default function dynamicModelName(collectionName: any) {
var dynamicSchema = new Schema({ any: Schema.Types.Mixed }, { strict: false });
return mongoose.model(collectionName, dynamicSchema);
}
Create dynamic model
import dynamicModelName from "../models/dynamic.model"
var stuff = { name: 'hello', content: { x: 1 } };
var Model = await dynamicModelName('test2')
let response = await new Model(stuff).save();
return res.send(response);
Get the value from the dynamic model
var Model = dynamicModelName('test2');
let response = await Model.find();
return res.send(response);

What are Mongoose (Nodejs) pluralization rules?

I am a newbie to the Node.js, Mongoose and Expressjs. I have tried to create a table "feedbackdata" using the Mongoose in MongoDB via the following code. But it is created as "feedbackdata*s*". By Googling, I found that the Mongoose uses pluralization rules. Anyone please help me to remove the pluralization rules? or how my code should be for the "feedbackdata" table?
Below is my code:
app.post("/save",function(req,res){
mongoose.connect('mongodb://localhost/profiledb');
mongoose.connection.on("open", function(){
console.log("mongo connected \n");
});
// defining schemar variables
Schema = mongoose.Schema,
ObjectId = Schema.ObjectId;
// define schema for the feedbackdata table
var feedback_schema = new Schema({
_id: String,
url:String,
username:String,
email:String,
subscribe:String,
types:String,
created_date: { type: Date, default: Date.now },
comments: String
});
// accessing feeback model object
var feedback_table = mongoose.model('feedbackdata', feedback_schema);
var tableObj = new feedback_table();
var URL = req.param('url');
var name = req.param('name');
var email = req.param('email');
var subscribe = req.param('subscribe');
var choices = req.param('choices');
var html = req.param('html');
var receipt = req.param('receipt');
var feedbackcontent = req.param('feedbackcontent');
tableObj._id = 3;
tableObj.url = URL;
tableObj.username = name;
tableObj.email = email;
tableObj.subscribe = subscribe;
tableObj.types = choices;
tableObj.comments = feedbackcontent;
tableObj.save(function (err){
if(err) { throw err; }else{
console.log("Saved!");
}
mongoose.disconnect();
})
res.write("<div style='text-align:center;color:green;font-weight:bold;'>The above values saved successfully! <br><a href='/start'>Go back to feedback form</a></div>");
res.end();
});
The pluralization rules are in this file: https://github.com/LearnBoost/mongoose/blob/master/lib/utils.js
You can add your schema name to the 'uncountables' list, then mongoose will not pluralize your schema name.
Provide the name for the collection in options while creating schema object, then Mongoose will not do pluralize your schema name.
e.g.
var schemaObj = new mongoose.Schema(
{
fields:Schema.Type
}, { collection: 'collection_name'});
For more Info: http://mongoosejs.com/docs/guide.html#collection
The pluralization rules is here to ensure a specific naming convention.
The collection name should be plural, all lowercase and without spacing.
What are naming conventions for MongoDB?
I think you should ask yourself if you want to follow the main rule (ensured by mongoose as a default behavior) or get rid of it.
What are the perks ? What are the good points ?
You design first what is an user (User model) and then you store users into a collection. It totally make sense.
Your call.
If you ask yourself how to get the final name of the collection after the pluralization :
const newName = mongoose.pluralize()('User');

Resources