Error and problems after publishing ASP.NET 5 vNext RC2 to Azure - azure

When I publish to Azure my tiny, tiny test project, configured in the latest vNext RC2, I get the following error upon first load after an extremely long wait:
The specified CGI application encountered an error and the server terminated the process.
Subsequently if the app is anything more than the very simple "Hello World" project below, i.e. it uses some MVC etc. then the app is extremely unresponsive, failing to load some images, taking minutes to load each page. Although sometimes it's suddenly fast for a little while, then slow again.
In RC2 there were some changes to the hosting setup, but all these have been implemented in my tiny test project.
I have also seen this question and ensured I am publishing the exact correct version of the CLR, in fact for information the same result happens if I use full or core CLR.
Here is the example project (publishing profiles removed):
https://www.dropbox.com/s/hpkrj6c74eaytjz/TinyProject.zip?dl=1
If I create a new RC1 project, the problem doesn't surface, but as soon as I update it to RC2 the problem persists.

In the end I solved this by creating an App Service Plan that was anything other than the free or shared option, in my case B1 (screenshot from Visual Studio Azure SDK):

Has your Azure Web app instance had a RC1 instance uploaded to it prior to your RC2? Your project looks ok to me, I can't see anything wrong at first glimpse with your project.json, Startup.cs or hosting.json files. I had an instance of RC1 on a Web App, and when trying to upload RC2, nothing would work, just a long long wait until eventually it would time out with a 503 error. I deleted the Web App, and just published the RC2 (using same DNX build as yourself) and everything works fine (so far!).
Also, if you turn on Diagnostic logging in your Web App, does that provide any more info?

Related

Azure App Services Web App not registering update

I have a Azure App Service app that I'm trying to get deployed.
Today I ran into an issue where .NET informed me (via the yellow screen of death when I browse to the URL of my app) that I had a missing DLL (for the purposes of this question I don't think it really matters).
I used FileZilla to publish my changes in an attempt to do a manual deployment first and then work my way to automate it.
After so many attempts to fix it I later realized that the error message never changed. I did something more severe and renamed my bin folder into something completely different and the exact same error message would appear.
I've stopped the service, restarted it, and as mentioned, renamed folders, etc. and still the exact same error message persisted.
I also decided to open up the Azure Portal Console for my App Service app to browse a bit and to my amazement, nothing seemed to have reflected at all. The FTP shows one thing and the Console shows another.
Would anyone have any idea as to why this is happening?
I eventually got it to work and I will share what I tried.
I deleted the web app and created it again (I found this to be important the first time around). This was quite time consuming and did help but it wasn't long before the same problem happened again.
Then I finally found a solution that seems to give me consistent results:
I kept on editing the Web.config which seems to force a recompile and clear some sort of cache. So each time the web app stopped updating, I would make a slight change in the Web.config, upload it via FTP and the app finally updates.
If anyone has any more details on this, it would be greatly appreciated.

Object removed from assembly still referred to after deploy to Azure, local is fine

ASP.NET Core 2.1
We have a shared dll, that is used in a few projects (via project reference)
We have class in that was named Proofer, and is now named ProofReader.
This was done through mass find and replace.
Nowhere in our source files locally exists any files containing the text Proofer.
VSTS builds the application without issue, then we send it via a release pipeline to Azure. All succeed.
Despite this we attempt to run the web app and get the following:
An unhandled exception occurred while processing the request.
TypeLoadException: Could not load type
'MainShared.Models.Proofer' from assembly 'MainShared,
Version=1.0.0.0, Culture=neutral, PublicKeyToken=null'.
System.Reflection.CustomAttribute._CreateCaObject(RuntimeModule
pModule, IRuntimeMethodInfo pCtor, Byte** ppBlob, Byte* pEndBlob,
Int32* pcNamedArgs)
We are having trouble determining if this is in the build, maybe something not being rebuilt when it should be, or something still cached on Azure that isn't being overwritten.
A few places I can suggest you look into -
If you are using app service web apps in azure , we can use the kudu (web app extension to remove/clean the files) to make sure you have a clean destination.
Check the VSTS Release logs if you have access to , it shows the files which are overwritten and the ones which could not be. Once i had a similar issue and found that the logs were already warning me that a few could not be overwritten.
If you are using VM's for your app deployment if has access to it , remove/backup the files under your site folder.
I had a similar problem after some redesign for a Web App using ASP.NET Core 2.2 (hosted on Azure), that some old not even anymore existing references causing the Load type exceptions to happen and the Web App simply refused to come up. I tried to clean everything up in Visual Studio, even deleted the bin and object directories, but the old reference was still looked for. In Kudu on the Azure portal I saw the *.PrecompiledViews.dll and *.PrecompiledViews.pdb files, which were very old. I simply removed them directly on the Azure server and could then simply start up my app and everything came up again. This fault should be fixed from the source. If I do a complete rebuild, I expect this old garbage to be taken care of during the publishing to the website. This is something that Microsoft should fix and as I can see this happened to others over half a year ago. Thanks Mark Johnson for your very useful hint about those files!

msbuild is failing at CheckAzureNet46Support for a webjob

I'm trying to build and publish web job via MSBuild and it is failing at
'_CheckAzureNet46Support' with error VerifyAzureNet46Support -
[VerifyAzureNet46Support] C:\Program Files
(x86)\MSBuild\Microsoft\VisualStudio\v14.0\Web\Microsoft.Web.Publishing.targets(4755,
7): Your hosting provider does not yet support ASP.NET 4.6, which your
application is configured to use.
I've published other projects as web job to this web app with no issue but intermittently this issue occurs, is it something with my configuration of web app.
MSBuild arguments used for build is
/P:Configuration=Release /p:DeployOnBuild=true
/P:PublishProfileRootFolder="%heckoutDir\BuildConfigurations\publishProfile"
/p:PublishProfile="WebsitePublishProfile"
/P:Password=WebsitepublishProfilePassword
/P:outputdirectory=Bin/Release
If the app service plan is having high RAM or CPU utilization this issue occurs.
To mitigate this you can Scale Up app service plan to avoid this issue.
It is highly unlikely this has nothing to do with the App Service plans. That analysis simply does not make sense.
Rather, a build-time check fails verifying whether the deployment target in Azure supports ASP.NET 4.6. This is done by performing an HTTP GET request to a hard-coded URL at http://go.microsoft.com/fwlink/?LinkID=613106&clcid=0x409. If said request returns 200 OK, the check fails.
Therefore, the more likely explanation is that the support page in question was back up for a few hours by mistake. We had the same problem, but it seems to work now.

How to further debug a 500 Internal Server Error after upgrade to ASP.NET 5 beta5

I had a site running asp.net 5 beta4, and decided to upgrade to beta5. The site runs locally fine. I pushed the changes to master and it was picked up from bitbucket and deployed successfully.
When I try to hit the site in azure, I get a 500 Internal Server Error. I've tried a number of things, but can't seem to track down the root cause of the failure. I'm looking for suggestions as I'm hitting a wall. From what I've tried below it seems like some fundamental initialization is failing.
Here's what I've tried:
Enabling customerrors="off". I added a web.config to the wwwroot folder with system.web/customErrors mode="Off". I've verified that the web.config is populated correctly in the deployed wwwroot and had the appsettings containing the dnxversion etc merged correctly.
Customizing the custom error page, adding runtimeinfo. I have the following set in my Startup.cs:
app.UseErrorHandler("/Home/Error");. I also have set the error page to display the exception. This doesn't seem to be hit.
Attached to the remote process to debug. Visual studio eventually freezes, so haven't gotten anywhere with this.
Enabled application insights. This registers events when I debug locally, but doesn't capture anything from the azure instance.
Enabled application logs and request failure tracing. The detailed errors show a 500.0, without much detailed information.
Imgur
Imgur
I've also verified through the console that the runtime is set correctly to beta5.
Update:
I set the ASPNET_ENV to Development and it loaded with appsettings loaded via the azure portal. Setting ASPNET_ENV to something else isn't working. I also removed any custom code from startup.cs pertaining to the non-development environments, with no help. I'm still looking for a means of capturing the original error.
Assuming you are targeting DNX451 and not dnxcore50, there is a good chance Azure it still trying to run it against the beta4 runtime instead of beta5. If that's the case, you won't get a decent error message.
Try adding an environment variable in Azure "SCM_DNX_VERSION" and set it to 1.0.0-beta5. It looks like kudu was recently upgraded to support beta5 https://github.com/projectkudu/kudu/commit/55175a017779bf493ff8e6ce87b96dd1451f7d7b, so you might want to try to redeploy from bitbucket in the case that the Kudu team has already deployed this change.
For a little more detail, you can check out my previous answer (although it is very dated and references the old "K" names) here:
Deploying ASP.NET vNext beta 2 on Azure with Kudu
Every time you update to a new beta, you will have to update your SCM_DNX_VERSION environment variable.

Azure Mobile Services on Local IIS rather than IIS Express

OK, I've created an Azure Mobile Services project in Visual Studio 2013.
I run it up as-is, then in the browser I test it by adding a todo item via the simple browser app that seems to get baked into these service projects. It gives me a '201 success' message - brilliant.
I then convert the project from IIS Express to Local IIS as the web host, recompile and try again, and although I get the same smiley face app telling me that everything is OK, when I try and add a todo item I get a 404 error. This is contrary to the Microsoft article that gives these instructions, which clearly says I am able to choose either IIS Express or Local IIS when setting up the project.
My guess is that web.config is missing something when this project runs on the local IIS server.
I'm hoping someone already has a solution before I spend hours trying to work out how to configure IIS for this type of project.
I've already wasted a load of time working through loads of bugs and gotchas with Azure Mobile, and I'm starting to run out of steam - so I'm hoping someone can help me before I go and grab an account at Parse.com
Many thanks in anticipation.
Dean
The easiest approach for your situation might be to just deploy to the cloud, and use that service for your testing. Visual Studio 2013 Update 2 makes it easy to deploy your app and connect to it for remote debugging. It is a little slower than using a local instance, but you are also assured that there will be no surprises when you eventually go live (since you are live the whole time).
That said, we will investigate the issue you are seeing with using IIS directly. Some things you might want to try on your own:
Verify that you can view the web side from your Mac's browser, to make sure that the firewall is letting the requests through.
Try using the "Getting Starting" link from the smiley-face page, to see if the REST endpoints are behaving correctly.

Resources