I'm trying to add a custom 'discount' list to my spreadsheet.
I've got a table that contains all the data, and has costs for the standard 'used' value, then also the values at a 5% discount and a 10% discount.
Example:
+---------+-------------------+------+------------+-------------+
| Code | Role | Used | Used - 5% | Used - 10% |
+=========+===================+======+============+=============+
| Test001 | Employee | 5.67 | | |
+---------+-------------------+------+------------+-------------+
| Test002 | Junior Technician | 9.80 | 9.31 | 8.38 |
+---------+-------------------+------+------------+-------------+
| Test003 | Project Manager | 15 | | |
+---------+-------------------+------+------------+-------------+
| Test004 | Engineer | 20 | 19 | 17.10 |
+---------+-------------------+------+------------+-------------+
I've then got a Data validation list which returns all other the 'Roles' to select from. On the back of this this populates the Cost cell.
Example:
+----------+----------+----------+-------+
| Role | VLOOKUP | Discount | Cost |
+==========+==========+==========+=======+
| Employee | | | 5.67 |
+----------+----------+----------+-------+
| Engineer | 5%,10% | 10% | 15.10 |
+----------+----------+----------+-------+
What I want to do is have a list to be populated with 5%, 10% if there is that option. I'd like to achieve this without vba (I could easily achieve this with vba but trying to keep it all in the worksheet)
My VLOOKUP Column is populated using:
=CONCATENATE(IF(VLOOKUP(A2,INDIRECT("Test[[Role]:[Used - 10%]]"), 3, FALSE) <> "", "5%", ""),
IF(VLOOKUP(A2,INDIRECT("Test[[Role]:[Used - 10%]]"), 4, FALSE) <> "", ",10%", ""))
The issue comes when trying to do the data validation. It accepts the formula (tried using the above to no avail in the data validation) but populates the drop down list with just the one value of 5%,10% instead of interpreting it as a csv.
I'm currently using this to attempt to populate the Discount Drop Down
=OFFSET(INDIRECT(ADDRESS(ROW(), COLUMN())),0, -1)
It is possible assuming your version of Excel has access to the dynamic functions FILTER and UNIQUE. Let's go through a couple of things, and here is a google doc where this is demonstrated. I also included an online excel file*.
It isn't necessary to calculate the cost in the setup table (A:E). You can just use a character to mark availability (and in some versions it was difficult to make the FILTER work with comparisons like <>"", etc, when ="x" worked fine).
You can get an array of available discounts by using FILTER, INDEX and MATCH. See Col P. You use INDEX/MATCH to return a single row of the array containing the discounts (in this case D:E), and then use that row to filter the top row (D1:E1) which has the friendly discount names and return it as an array.
It isn't necessary to concat the discount list the way you're doing. You can use TEXTJOIN, FILTER, INDEX and MATCH. See Col I. You just wrap the calculation that generates the array of discount names (step 2) in TEXTJOIN to get a string.
The validation is accomplished by referencing the output of step 2. I don't think that the data validation dialog can handle the full formula, so I pointed it to Cols O:Q. Col O is included in the validation so that you can get an empty spot at the top of the list, but Google Docs seems to strip it out.
You can just calculate the discounted cost from the selected option. See Col K. I included the original cost in Col L so you can see it.
you will need a microsoft account to view
Related
I am trying to achieve a fairly simple task in Excel, but I do not get the results that I want. I have a simple schedule in which I assign one of a pool of coaches to a series of matches, by filling out a simple table. Here is scaled-down version:
Match | John | Pete | Chris |
-------|------|------|-------|-------
1 | X | | | John
2 | | X | | Pete
3 | A | | X | Chris
4 | X | | A | Chris (!)
5 | | X | A | Pete
Legend: X: will coach; A: is available.
I used the table to register availability and then changed one A to an X in each row, to select the person that will actually coach the match.
For an overview, I decided to add a column in which the selected coach would appear. I used the following formula: =LOOKUP("X"; B2:D2; B$1:D$1) for row 2 and copied it to the other rows so that the row numbers of each row corresponded with the row in which the formula was placed.
To my surprise, match 4 became assigned to Chris, whereas John has an X and Chris only an A.
When I read Microsoft's documentation on LOOKUP, I noticed a few things:
LOOKUP has a vector form and an array form. Microsoft recommends using HLOOKUP for the array form, but I use the vector form. I do not think that HLOOKUP is useful for me, as it only looks for values in the first row of the specified array, whereas my first row contains the values to be returned.
It reads: "A range that contains only one row or one column.", but also "Important: The values in lookup_vector must be placed in ascending order: ..., -2, -1, 0, 1, 2, ..., A-Z, FALSE, TRUE; otherwise, LOOKUP might not return the correct value. Uppercase and lowercase text are equivalent."
I think that 2. is what causes the issue. I am not sure how to sort a range parameter like A2:A4. Microsoft documents a SORT function, but it's beta. Also, I think that sorting the search row will mess up the match, anyway.
The workaround I found is changing my codes to A: assigned and B: backup, in which A and B are chosen to be alphabetically ascending. If I change the formulas to use lookup value "A", this gives me:
Match | John | Pete | Chris |
-------|------|------|-------|-------
1 | A | | | John
2 | | A | | Pete
3 | B | | A | Chris
4 | A | | B | John
5 | | A | B | Pete
which is the result I want.
Can anyone shed some light on this completely counter-intuitive behavior and/or describe alternative ways to achieve this?
Notes:
I take care of only putting 1 X in each row.
I have seen this in Microsoft Excel for Office 365 MSO (16.0.11328.20362) 64-bit and in Microsoft Excel 2016 MSO (16.0.12130.20232) 32-bits.
LOOKUP is doing exactly what it was designed to, per the documentation. You should use INDEX and MATCH:
=INDEX($B$1:$D$1;MATCH("X";B2:D2;0))
The final 0 argument to MATCH means that you are looking for an exact match so the data doesn't need to be sorted.
LOOKUP does a binary search and therefore it returns A. We have had a long discussion on Chandoo.org forum which you can read here:
https://chandoo.org/forum/threads/how-vlookup-works.18378/
And here's another discussion here: http://www.ashishmathur.com/return-an-exact-value-via-the-lookup-function/
Basically, it keeps looking for an equal or lower value and then keeps slicing through data and therefore it needs data to be sorted.
You can still use LOOKUP by tweaking like below.
=LOOKUP(2;1/(B2:D2="X");B$1:D$1)
I have a wide excel file with price data, looking like this
Product | 2015-08-01 | 2015-09-01 | 2015-09-01 | 2015-10-01
ABC | 13 | 12 | 15 | 14
CDE | 69 | 70 | 71 | 67
FGH | 25 | 25 | 26 | 27
The date 2015-09-01 can be found twice, which in the context is valid but obviously messes up my workflow.
It can be understood that the first value is the minimum price, the second one the maximum price. If there is only one column, min and max are the same.
Is there a way to resolve this issue?
An idea I had was the following:
I also have cells that contain a value like "38 - 42", again indicating min and max. I resolved this by spliting it based on a Regex expression. What could be a solution is to join two columns that have the same header, to afterwards split the values according to my rules. That however would require me to detect dynamically if the headers are duplicates.
Is that something that is possible in Alteryx or is there an easier solution for this problem?
And of course asking the supplier of the file to change it is not really an option, unfortunatelly.
Thanks
EDIT:
Just got another idea:
I transpose the table to have the format
Product | Date | Price Low | Price High
So if I could check for duplicates in that table and somehow merge these records into one, that would do the trick as well.
EDIT2:
Since I seem to haven't made that clear, my final result should look like the transposed table in EDIT1. If there is only one value it should go in "Price Low" (and then I will probably copy it to "Price High" anyway. If there are two values they should go in the according columns. #Poornima's suggestion resolves the duplicate issue in a more sophisticated form than putting a "_2" behind the column name, but doesn't put the value in the required column.
If this format works for you:
Product | Date | Price Low | Price High
Then:
- Transpose with Product as a key field
- Use a select tool to truncate your Name field to 10 characters. This will remove any _2 values that Alteryx has automatically renamed.
- Summarize:
Group by Product
Group by Name
Then apply Min and Max operations to value.
Result is:
Product | Name | Min_Value | Max_Value
ABC | 2015-08-01 | 13 | 13
ABC | 2015-09-01 | 12 | 15
ABC | 2015-10-01 | 14 | 14
For this problem, you can leverage the native Excel (.xlsx) driver available in Alteryx 9.1. If multiple columns in Excel use the same string, then they are renamed by the native driver with an underscore at the end e.g., 2015-09-01, 2015-09-01_1. By leveraging this, we can reformat the data in three steps:
As you suggested, we start by transposing the data so that we can leverage the column headers.
We can then write a formula with the Formula Tool that evaluates whether the column header for the date is the first or the last one based on the header length.
The final step would be to bring the data back into the same format as before, which can be via the Crosstab Tool.
You can review the configurations for each of these tools here. The end result would be as follows.
Hope this helps.
Regards,
Poornima
I have a parts list with competitor pricing. One part number brings multiple brands up with the location of the company.
As you can see from the picture, I have part numbers for one item with three companies. I want to sort by part type. So for example I want to list only the brake pads. When I do this the blanks get sent to the bottom, but the blanks are not really blanks because they have additional info with them for that part number.
Column 1 | Column 2 | Column 3 | Column 4 | Column 5 | Column 6 | Column 7
Part No | Company A | Price | Company B | Price | Company C | Price
4656546 | Brand A | $5 | Brand A | $5 | Brand A | $5
(BLANK) | Brand b | $8 | Brand b | $8 | Brand b | $8
I have tried to use a helper column, but I have 1,000+ rows.
Does anyone know if you can link or have a relationship between two+ rows?
I hope you understand and if not. I can try to explain better.
I asume that a "blank" in PartNo means "take the PartNo from the cell above" ...
In order to normalize the PartNo (= get rid of the blanks) use another PartNo-Normalized column (e.g. [K:K]) and normalize as following:
K1 ="PartNo-Normalized"
K2:Kxx =IF(A2<>"",A2,K1)
Next convert all formulas in [K:K] into values !!! (Copy / PasteAs - Values) before sorting ... as a sort operation will destroy the calculated values.
After conversion to values it's save to sort, and you may create a filter on that column.
Depending on how well organized your data is, it might be a good idea to add one more column and fill it with 1, 2, 3, 4, 5 ... before any sorting so you can restore the original sort order just in case something nasty happens.
I need to do a total sum based on a look up, however the look up is dynamic. To be more specific I have a totals table like so:
Type | Total
Charges | 633.86
Costs |
Misc |
This needs to sum up figures based on certain code in a look up table:
Type | Code
Charges | N77RE
Charges | N5762
Charges | M7YRE
Costs | M888
Costs | O999
MISC | ABCS12
MISC | ABCs13
MISC | ABCS14
The financial data is presented like so:
Transaction | Code | Costs
123456 | N77RE | 19.99
123454 | O999 | 24.99
123452 | N5762 | 458.99
123450 | O999 | 487.55
123448 | N5762 | 45.55
So to sum it up I need to do a look up function to check to see what code has what value and then sum it up?
This image is based on the answer, it only seems to sum up the first Code?
Assuming your second table (Types and Codes) is in D1:E9 and the third table (Transactions, Codes and Costs) is in G1:I6 then with "Charges" in A2 use this "array formula" in B2
=SUM(SUMIF(H$2:H$6,IF(D$2:D$9=A2,E$2:E$9),I$2:I$6))
confirm with CTRL+SHIFT+ENTER
and copy down as required
The IF function provides a list of the valid codes for the type in A2 then SUMIF sums the costs for each code. This gives you an array of totals which SUM then sums to give your final answer.
For the example shown I'd expect to get 524.53 as the total for Charges
I'm trying to generate a table that shows a count of how many items are in any given status on any given day. My result table has a set of Dates down column A and column headers are various statuses. A sample of my data table with headers looks like this:
Product | Notice | Assigned | Complete | In Office | In Accounting
1 | 5/5/13 | 5/7/13 | 5/9/13 | 5/10/13 | 5/11/13
2 | 5/5/13 | 5/6/13 | 5/8/13 | 5/9/13 | 5/10/13
3 | 5/6/13 | 5/9/13 | 5/10/13 | 5/10/13 | 5/10/13
4 | 5/4/13 | 5/5/13 | 5/7/13 | 5/8/13 | 5/9/13
5 | 5/7/13 | 5/8/13 | 5/10/13 | 5/11/13 | 5/11/13
If my output table were to contain a set of dates in the first column with the statuses as headers, I need a count of how many rows were at the given status and had not yet transitioned to the next status so that in the Notice column, I'd have a count of rows where the Notice Date was <= X AND where the Assigned, Complete, In Office, In Accounting are all greater than X.
I've used a Sum(if(frequency(if statement to get me REALLY close but I feel like I need to have an AND statement within the second IF like this =SUM(IF(FREQUENCY(IF(AND
Here's what I have that won't work:
=SUM(IF(FREQUENCY(IF(AND(Table1[Assigned]<=A279,Table1[[Complete]:[In Accounting]]<=A279),ROW(Table1[[Complete]:[In Accounting]])),ROW(Table1[[Complete]:[In Accounting]]))>0,1))
If I take the "AND" portion out, this works fine except I need it to ONLY count rows where the given status actually has a date so if an "Assigned" date is empty, I don't want that row to be counted for the Assigned column.
Here's an example of what I'd expect to see in the results. I've listed the count in the each column as well as the corresponding product numbers in parenthesis. The corresponding product numbers are for reference only and won't actually be in the result table.
Date | Notice | Assigned | Complete
5/6 | 2 (1,3) | 2 (2,4) | 0
5/7 | 2 (3,5) | 2 (1,2) | 1 (4)
5/8 | 1 (3) | 2 (1,5) | 1 (2)
OK, assuming you have the original data in A1:F6 then with 2nd table headers in B9:D9 and row labels in A10:A12 then you can use this "array formula" in B10
=SUM((B$2:B$6<=$A10)*(MMULT((C$2:$F$6>$A10)+(C$2:$F$6=""),TRANSPOSE(COLUMN(C$2:$F$6)^0))=COLUMNS(C$2:$F$6)))
confirmed with CTRL+SHIFT+ENTER and copied down and across (see screenshot below)
As you can see the results are as per your requirement. If you replace dates with blanks it will still work
MMULTis a way to get a single value from each row even when you are looking at multiple columns.
I used cell references because I think that's easier, especially when copying the formula across and having a reducing range.......but you can use structured references if you want
Have you tried using COUNTIFS to count based on multiple criteria. It is fairly well documented here: http://office.microsoft.com/en-us/excel-help/countifs-function-HA010047494.aspx (2007+ only)
Basically, you use it like
=COUNTIFS(first_range_to_check, value_you_want_in_first_range, ...)
where the ... represents as many pairs as you want (up to 127 total pairs), note the conditions are AND connection so if you have two pairs, the first pair AND the second pair must return true for that row to count.