According to this article some support for older versions of Azure are going away:
https://azure.microsoft.com/en-us/blog/microsoft-azure-storage-service-version-removal/
We have a vs2008 application that is uploading files to Azure. {Using Azure 1.2 (for VS2008) - Microsoft.WindowsAzure.StorageClient v1.0.0 - Runtime v2.0.50727}.
We can't have this break since we are using this in production.
I need to know if there is a clear way to know if this is going to stop working.
I would really like to know if there is a way to upgrade the vs2008 project to use a compatible version of the StorageClient without migrating the project to vs2015.
Your version of the library should still be supported after the service removal. You can confirm which version of the service you are hitting by running requests through Fiddler and checking the x-ms-version. As you can see in the most recent post regarding our service deprecation, we are only removing version 2009-07-17 and older as of August 1, 2016.
Related
We build our web app with Azure DevOps pipelines and deploy into Azure with an Azure DevOps release. I think today netcore got updated to netcore 3.1.4 on our build agent. But now our Azure DevOps deployment fails, because the netcore 3.1.4 runtime is not yet installed on our app service in Azure.
The error message we are getting:
Could not find 'aspnetcorev2_inprocess.dll'. Exception message:
It was not possible to find any compatible framework version
The framework 'Microsoft.AspNetCore.App', version '3.1.4' was not found.
- The following frameworks were found:
2.2.8 at [D:\Program Files\dotnet\shared\Microsoft.AspNetCore.App]
3.0.3 at [D:\Program Files\dotnet\shared\Microsoft.AspNetCore.App]
3.1.1 at [D:\Program Files\dotnet\shared\Microsoft.AspNetCore.App]
3.1.3 at [D:\Program Files\dotnet\shared\Microsoft.AspNetCore.App]
You can resolve the problem by installing the specified framework and/or SDK.
This makes sense and can happen, but what is the best way to go about fixing this?
I could fix my build to a specific netcore version. But I don't like this, because we do want to keep updating to newer versions, but we don't want a version that is not available in Azure app service.
Am I correct in thinking that we would have to install our services self contained, because otherwise we could get into this issue more often when Azure DevOps is faster with installing patches than Azure?
Or is there a way to force update Azure app service to the new netcore 3.1.4 security patch which would be ideal I think?
I just need some guidance in what is the best approach to fix this issue?
Or is there a way to force update Azure app service to the new netcore 3.1.4 security patch which would be ideal I think?
AFAIK, there is no such a way to force update Azure app service to the new netcore 3.1.4.
We could keep track on the latest releases on the https://aspnetcoreon.azurewebsites.net/, but we could not update it at this moment.
To resolve this issue, we recommend that you publish your app as self-contained produces an application, which includes the .NET Core runtime and libraries, and your application and its dependencies. Users of the application can run it on a machine that doesn't have the .NET Core runtime installed.
Publishing your app as self-contained produces a platform-specific executable. The output publishing folder contains all components of the app, including the .NET Core libraries and target runtime. The app is isolated from other .NET Core apps and doesn't use a locally installed shared runtime. The user of your app isn't required to download and install .NET Core.
You could check this document .NET Core application publishing overview for some more details.
Hope this helps.
If you want version of netcore to be automatically updated as an updated version is available, building our service as self-container seems like a good option: no need to have anything installed on the machine running (ie the version on Azure DevOps and Azure Web App don't have to match).
The main downside of this approach is that the build is going to less deterministic: running your build twice with on the same commit might create different binaries depending on what is currently install on the build agent. if you want to know more, here is an interesting post arguing about why deterministic build is important.
To keep the build determinitic, you can use the Use .Net Core task at the beginning of the build (that will make sure that the desired version of the dotnet sdk is on the agent). You could also add a global.json in your repository to lock for both the build on your dev box and in Azure Dev Ops.
This is a common topic of discussion, and you can find a lot of blogs advocating one or another side.
There were big discussions started when Microsoft released LTS net core 3.1 and it took some time before Azure start supporting the 3.1 runtime as well.
You could find a lot of blogs strongly suggesting to deploy your web apps as self-contained (runtime is ~100MB in size) and cut loose the dependency towards Microsoft supporting the latest runtime. While others advocate that the applications should remain as light weight as possible and the runtime should be set in the pipeline. But that is still up on you. I, myself prefer to deploy self-contained apps after my bad experience with net-core 3.1.
There is no established best practice.
In the past , I've run into the same situation, you can fix this by manually setting the value from RunTime Stack drop down. If you manually update the build processes .yml file
RuntimeStack: 'DOTNETCORE|3.1'
I'm migrating from VS2015 to VS2017, and updating a repo's solutions to be able to be compatible with VS2017. In the process, I'm also updating the Azure SDK version from 2.7 to 3.0.
I'm setting up a fresh dev environment, and installed Azure SDK 3.0 via VS2017's Azure development workload.
When I opened the solution file in the repo, I got one notice per cloud service project that its Microsoft Azure Tools version was getting upgraded from 2.7 to 2.9...
...and the ProductVersion tag in the corresponding .csproj files was updated from 2.7 to 2.9.
Questions:
Why wasn't this updated to 3.0?
Is there anyway for me to update it
to 3.0 without manually editing the csproj file? I don't see an
option to do so in Properties when I right click the cloud service
projects in Solution Explorer.
Is there some reason I shouldn't be
doing this?
"Microsoft Azure Tools - v2.9" mentioned in your screenshot is just a little misleading.
Underlying reason is that Microsoft hasn't really changed the version number of most components as part of 3.0 SDK release. Even the binaries get installed in the same folder as 2.9.
Good news is that you don't need to do anything special apart from converting the project to target latest version, which you're already getting prompted for.
So once you do convert your project as per the prompt, you're essentially working with SDK 3.0, even though version string says v2.9, because as the links explain, most of the components haven't changed major version number as part of SDK 3.0 version (when comparing with 2.9)
Here are some of the links which talk about this -
Azure SDK for .NET 3.0 Release Summary
No breaking changes to the Azure SDK 3.0 have been introduced in this
release. There is also no upgrade process needed to leverage this SDK
with existing Cloud Service projects. To allow use of the Azure SDK
3.0 without requiring an upgrade process, Azure SDK 3.0 installs to the same directories as Azure SDK 2.9. Most the components did not
change the major version from 2.9 but instead just updated the build
number.
Visual Studio 2017 latest installer does not install Azure SDK 3.0
In this link look at the response from Devin Breshears - MSFT
Azure 3.0 SDK Install Weirdness
An independent blog talking about the same issue.
When I try to run (debug) functions in Visual Studio 2017 on one of our machines, the following dialog pops up!
The target framework for the project is <TargetFramework>net461</TargetFramework>. For some reasons I am not able to install .NET 4.7.1 and now I am completely lost. I am sure it was functioning in the past on the same machine. Probably one of the updates caused it.
Any idea how to resolve it?
This is because the latest version of the Azure Functions Tools for Visual Studio now requires .NET Framework 4.7.1 (as of February 2018).
Note that this does not impact the target framework that you compile against - only the target framework your code runs against. Similarly, when you run in Azure, you can expect the .NET runtime version to be .NET Framework 4.7.1 (at the time of writing).
I tried implementing the solution mentioned in comment. However, it didn't work for me. However, reverting the Azure Functions Tools to previous version worked. Thanks Chris for pointing that it was Azure Tools and not any packages that caused it.
If anyone else should come across this.
For me, the issue was the actual func.exe config that needed to be upgraded.
Navigate to:
C:\Users[USER]\AppData\Local\AzureFunctionsTools\Releases[VERSION]\cli
.. my version was 1.4.0
Modify the func.exe.config to match the .net version installed
.. it was 4.7.1
I am a beginner in Azure and have come across a task to change the storage version.I basically found that the versions are obsolete and need to upgrade them as per http://blogs.msdn.com/b/windowsazurestorage/archive/2014/08/05/microsoft-azure-storage-service-version-removal.aspx
So, in one of the paragraphs its mentioned
"What to change
If you find any log entries which show that version to be removed is being used, you will need to find that component and either validate that it will continue to work (unversioned requests may continue to work as their implicit version will simply increase – see above), or take appropriate steps to change the version being used. Most commonly, one of the following two steps will be used:
1) Change the version specified in the request, typically by migrating to a later version of the libraries/tools. When possible, migrate to the latest version to get the most improvements and fixes.
2) Set the default service version to one of the supported versions now so that the behavior can be verified prior to removal. This only applies to anonymous requests with no explicit version. "
Question is, how to go about implementing point 1 and 2 ?
Thanks
Since your code is written in C# and uses Azure SDK your best bet is to upgrade it to a "new enough" SDK. It's unclear whether version 2.0 or 2.1 is the lowest required. So your route is the following:
First, check if you really have to do anything.
You check which Azure SDK your service uses. If it's 2.1 or higher you don't need to worry yet. If your're unsure - use Fiddler to validate the version headers as explained in the linked to post.
If you use Azure SDK 2.0 you'd better check the version headers as explained in the linked to post.
If you use Azure SDK prior to 2.0 you are surely affected and have to upgrade.
So if you found you do need to upgrade you'll have to download and install the newer SDK and then remove references to old SDK assemblies from your projects and add references to new SDK assemblies. Then you try to build your code and maybe fix a lot of calls because SDK interfaces have changed (that's what I see migrating from 1.8 to 2.4). Once it builds you test it works fine and then you remove the old SDK version to ensure the code builds without it present.
There was a breaking change between 2.1 and 2.2 - the latter only support Visual Studio 2012 and higher. There was another set of changes in Azure Diagnostics functioning between 2.4 and 2.5 which are so long to read that I chose to migrate to 2.4 instead of 2.5.
My existing project, uses Azure .NET SDK 2.1. I wanted to upgrade the SDK to 2.4, so i dowloaded the latest from here for VS 2012. After successfull installation, when i opened up my solution, the cloud projects did not load. Thats ok, as they have been created using a lower version. So i removed them and created newer cloud projects.
But the thing which astonishes me is, there are many places in the worker role project where its throwing build error as it is not able to find out the assemblies and methods. Is there any easier way to upgrade to sdk 2.4 without making code changes. Which i think is a bad idea to make changes to the stable code, just for SDK upgrade.
When you open a project created using 2.1 SDK and try to open it using 2.4 SDK, you should see the project upgrade dialog which gives you the option to either download 2.1 SDK or convert existing project to target 2.4. Selecting the convert option should upgrade the project to 2.4. Any errors in this process will be reported in the project migration summary report.
If you are not seeing this dialog, then you might still have 2.1 sdk on your machine in addition to 2.4 sdk. In that case, you can go the Azure project properties. That will give you the option to upgrade your project to 2.4.
In regard to the build errors that you are getting for new projects, the error details will help in identifying the root cause.