How can I get a list of linked work item IDs for a set of work items?
Excel-hosted queries preferred. API Sample is acceptable.
Direct DB table query is acceptable (read-only and unsupported of course!)
Many thanks in advance! -Zephan
MORE INFORMATION
UPDATE: No answers for my original Q so broadening scope of acceptable answers as follows:
Answer for TFS2015 (migrating very shortly) or TFS2013 (potentially useful for TFS2015) is preferred over TFS2010
Coding acceptable if there are any APIs or PowerShell cmdlets (MS or community).
Connecting directly (read-only!) to TFS DB tables is acceptable (source tables and related relationship link table names). Yes, directly referencing TFS DB tables is VERY unsupported, read-only, and "AT YOUR OWN RISK." Still beats having to manually copy/paste data or reconstruct list of links in Excel.
ORIGINAL QUESTION & DETAILS
My team uses TFS2010 (soon 2013 or hoping 2015) and VS2010-2015. I need to support traceability reports and analyze/quantify our coverage of ~300 Test Case work items linked to ~400 Requirement work items. Direct Link and Tree queries are close but don't give me related links on the same row as parent work item. Many thanks in advance for your suggestions and any related code fragments.
Example:
3 test cases (Test1, Test2, Test3)
4 Requirements (Req1, Req2, Req3, Req4)
For simplicity let's just use TFS work item IDs to represent each TestN and ReqN. In actuality, I have a keyword to identify my validation requirements (separate from the 1,000's of other requirements in this Team Project). The only Test Case WI I care about for this problem are those linked to one or more Validation Requirement trace-ability.
Scenarios:
1:1 (simple) Test1 is linked to Req1
1:2 (1:n) Test2 is linked to Req2 and Req3
2:1 (n:1) Test3 (and Test2) are both linked to Req3
0:1 (Requirement missing Test coverage) Req4 has no test case links
I have a good coverage gap query by creating a Direct Link query for all Requirements then set "linking filters" to Only return items that do not have the specified links.
Desired output (all tests with list of related work items):
|Test1 | Req1 |
|Test2 | Req2, Req3 |
|Test3 | Req3 |
For row #2 I am OK with other separators or even entire list using same separator (.CSV or TAB delimited).
Skip right to answer now if you have a tidy answer. If not then I added considerable RELATED RESEARCH info below to help kick-start an idea that fits the need! Especially since this hasn't been discoverably solved in the last 5 years :-).
RELATED RESEARCH (loooong but may be useful)
1. Visual Studio Queries
Flat Queries should support a list of linked items out-of-the-box... but it does not. RelatedLinkCount field is handy for knowing if there are any links to chase, but that's it for flat queries.
Direct Link queries give a list of all direct links, but the related IDs are on rows below the parent work item. I am seriously considering creating a formula to look on the next X rows to build a list of IDs, but this would be fragile especially when over 3 requirements are linked to same test. Still might solve 80% of my tracing needs.
Tree Queries also show links, but on different rows. Additionally they tend to follow just one link type. Ideally I will need list of User Requirements linked to Functional Requirements linked to Test Case(s).
2. Tools / Plug-ins
SmartExcel4TFS (eDEVTech, http://www.modernrequirements.com/smartexcel4tfs/) has 3 reports it supports, but none get me the core data I need in easily used format. At least it is FREE if you have an MSDN Premium subscription.
Requirements to Tests Trace Matrix is super-interesting. Alass, right now I need to go the other way (Requirements linked to a given test case). Also it merges cells and has sub-sections that are hard to manipulate I think. (I may revisit this option though.)
Intersection Traceability Matrix report is WAY too wide for a full 300 x 400 grid :-O.
Work Item Decomposition Matrix also didn't give me desired contents. (though frankly I've forgotten this report layout from when I checked ~1 month ago.)
3. TFS API calls
I have actually avoided this route in favor of native Excel solution... but if I can get an example of Excel VBA code (or other code with link to calling within Excel) I may go this route. At this point I don't have time to dig into rolling my own... but this would be cool assuming performance is acceptable.
Relevant API/code fragments:
Retrieving TFS Results from a Tree Query (Blogs.msdn.com 2012.02.22) - Looks like this would get me the data I need, but it is not in Excel so I'd need a bridge example of some sort calling this within Excel.
Retrieving work items and their linked work items in a single query using the TFS APIs (stackoverflow.com 2012.01.12) - Also looks very promising, but not connected to Excel. Gives hints for 2 level and 3 level nested links and performance consideration (don't make second call for each item returned!)
Retrieving work items using the Team Foundation Server API (pwee167.github.io 2012.09.18) - Excellently written introductory walkthrough blog posting to learn how to build an (ASP.Net MVC3) app that calls TFS APIs to run Flat or Tree queries. Start here if writing C# (which I could do but don't have time/justification unless easy example to integrate with Excel).
How can I query work items and their linked changesets in TFS? (stackoverflow.com 2011.05.10) - I don't need changesets but this has VB code to instantiate new TfsTeamProjectCollection which might work directly in Excel VBA (assuming proper reference is found and added)
var projectCollection = new TfsTeamProjectCollection(
new Uri("http://localhost:8080/tfs"),
new UICredentialsProvider());
OK, that's everything I have gathered on this problem. Please help contribute with the missing magic tool/snippet or follow the info above to build that last bit I have not had time to prototype & debug. Many thanks in advance!! -Zephan
Related
I have a data set of about 1 million employer names. These names are from a free-form text field so they include misspellings and variations in the way they are inputted (e.g. "Amazon" .. "Amzaon" .. "Amazon.com" .. "Amazon Web Services" .. "AWS").
I want to either A) group these 1 million so I have a somewhat accurate sense of how many unique employers are in the data set or B) be able to find all variations of any given employer.
So far, I've been using the data in Tableau, then filtering on "employer name" and searching all variations of the name I can think of. But it's tedious and I'm pretty sure I'm leaving many out.
I've also used the fuzzy add-in for excel but it hasn't worked that well on misspellings, special characters...
Tableau just isn't suited for doing this kind of analysis straight out of the box, and I would highly recommend doing some pre-processing on your data before putting trying to build a workbook around it.
Like another commenter said, you could look into using Tableau Prep Builder for a one-time transformation on your data set, but if you wanted to automate this process it costs extra to add functionality to whatever Tableau Server installation you have.
If you're familiar with Python or R (and the integration between Tableau Server and those services is supported by your organization), you could look into building a script to run the transformation real-time, but it probably won't be too efficient.
Try experimenting with Tableau Prep Builder - the companion tool that comes with your Tableau Creator license. It has a group feature that is designed for just these problems.
In Prep Builder, you’ll just need to connect to your data, add a cleaning step, and then add a group to your cleaning step.
I posted this question on Stack Exchange here: (https://sharepoint.stackexchange.com/questions/249418/filtering-sharepoint-list-by-another-sharepoint-list), but just realized I should have posted it to Stack Overflow instead. Hope it's not bad form to cross-post (I'll add a link to this post in the other post).
I've been searching the forums and doing research online with no luck- apologies if this has been answered before.
I have a list with several thousand items in it. I often receive bulk update requests where I need to update several hundred of these items at a time (let's say for this example that we're using a field called "Case ID").
Here's what I've tried:
Searching cases individually, or up to three at a time in datasheet view; this is not time effective
Exporting the list and manually manipulating the data in Excel, then pasting in (and writing over) the data in the column that needs to be updated; this approach is not user friendly, is not necessarily time effective, and has potential side effects (causing errors for users currently modifying items that I am changing in bulk)
Lastly- I know I can create custom views that isolate this data; the problem is that the lists of cases I need to modify generally do not have enough commonalities to isolate them using the view filter logic
So- my guess is that I need two lists, likely connected with a web part. The first list would exist solely for the purpose of querying the second list. I would enter the Case IDs I wanted to filter by in the first list, and the second list would filter to show only the Case IDs in the first list. All items would be deleted from the first list between queries.
I'm not married to this approach- it's just my best guess. I'm open to creative and alternative approached, but the final process needs to be user friendly (business partners will be using it).
Does anyone know how I can accomplish this? I've tried to get something implemented several times over the past few years and have never been successful; posting here is my last resort before I throw in the towel.
I have SP 2013, and have SharePoint Designer; please let me know if I need to add any other information.
Thanks in advance for the support,
Chad
I'd suggest to create a JSOM application that will do all updates. It can query only items for update and do item-by-item update.
NB. This question might be a bit similar to another one but still result in a different answer, hence the division in two.
I'd like to print out the contents of an entity, consisting of a subset of the fields and including some rudimentary information on its associated entities.
E.g. I'd like to print a lead by displaying its name and phone number but also a list of associated instances of type new_somesome (their new_name and new_size, for example) connected to it.
How can I do that?
I've tried cheating by using mail template but that doesn't include the related entities. I'm not sure how to edit the default print view to include the associatees neither.
Is it acceptable for you to use reports?
For this purpose you can try free MS ReportBuilder. MS allows to build reports without using such large tool as MS Buisness Intelligence. These custom reports appears to be more flexible than system ones. Another way is to try Mail merge functionality.
What can be done about negative numbers in library item counts? ItemCount is a read-only property, what are you supposed to do when it is drastically incorrect?
Earlier last week, I was doing some testing involving the copying and moving of files and folders from one document library to another. I was transfering the items from our actual document library to a sandbox "Test" library that I used to run all sorts of object model and workflow testing in before migrating to the public lists and libraries. I noticed that with files, things worked correctly, but when I copied a folder that had a file inside it (using SPFolder.CopyTo()), the item count for the test library did not actually update. Since this testing was mostly playing around, I paid it little heed.
Today I was back in the test library to test a different workflow (regarding PDF conversion). While I was there, I decided to delete the folder I left last week since I didn't need it anymore. And that's when I saw the item count for the list drop to -1 in the All Site Content View. When I deleted the new PDF I had just uploaded, it then dropped to -2! I even checked with the object model... getting an instance of the library I checked the ItemCount property... lo and behold it was also -2.
Is there any process which runs in the background, kinda like the one that cleans up workflow history, which will correct this kind of issue? Or is a programmer expected to keep watch for this kind of situation and come up with calculations to compensate the "count penalty", as it were?
There are lots of references on the web about similar things to this. Example:
http://pholpar.wordpress.com/2008/03/15/negative-item-count-in-document-libraries/
You are most likely running into bugs in the SharePoint software or you are using the Object Model in ways that MS never intended.
I'm building a network business model in excel. A similar model is that of Gawker Media.
In my model I have a number properties that have some over lap of audience. Each property attracts users, which in turn affords cross promotional opportunities. In the case of Gawker they have a series of blogs whose audience will likely read several of their blogs in their network.
If gawker launched a new blog they're able to direct traffic from their blog network.
Creating a model for a single blog is fairly simple - although the initial assumptions are harder. The next step is to model the network effect.
Excel provides a scenarios manager that allows me to vary the key assumptions in the basic model. This is almost perfect, I can model the launch of 10 properties, each with different launch assumptions and see the summary.
Where I need help is figuring out how I can vary the initial number of users for the launch of each property. In other words, once the network is established, its possible to drive people to any new property launched on the network.
I don't believe the scenario manager will do what I need.
So, I'm wondering if its possible to use the model work sheet as a UDF? The UDF would need to spit out the monthly revenue and unique users given a number of input assumptions.
I would then be able to create my own summary sheet for the 10 properties and using the total uniques for each property get a summary for the network. This network summary would be used to determine how many people could be driven to the launch of a new property.
In effect, the only difference to the scenario manager is that I need one of my input variables (initial users) to be programmatically generated as a function of the number of people in the network at the time of launch.
I'm hoping its possible to achieve something along these lines in excel. I could drop down and create the whole model in Java, but then its much harder to share with business colleagues!
Thanks - Matt.
You could try Data Table.
It only allows you to analyse the effect of varying 2 input parameters, but you can create several data tables, and each parameter can take hundreds of different values.
It's little know, but efficient and available since Excel 3.0.
There is a product that I have researched but never used - search for calc4web. It takes a sheet of formulas and generates code (C++) that can be compiled into an XLL add-in. Then you can call a function that does what your sheet does. But of course then you have an XLL to distribute, and a build step every time you change your logic, which defeats much of the point of using a spreadsheet.
In my case, I wound up writing some very simple VBA code to vary my sheet "inputs" using the scenario manager, and capture my "outputs". This works if you have a batch of inputs that you can just point your macro at and step through.
EDIT:
See here for a VBA-only example of doing this:
using a sheet in an excel user defined function