Could someone please explain what is the difference in Haxe syntax when it comes to functions and variables.
public var theName;
vs
static public var theName;
or
static private var theName;
vs
private var theName;
and same for function for ex.
static private function(){} vs private function(){}
There are two scopes
static
which refers to the class. That is that it can be referenced by the class reference and the name.
ClassName.reference();
would be:
class ClassName{
static public function reference(){
return "hello world";
}
}
And the other, which refers to a class instance constructed using the new operator.
new ClassName().reference();
Which would be:
class ClassName{
public function new(){
//We need a constructor.
}
public function reference(){
return "hello world"
}
The other is a choice:
public / private
refers to the availability of the reference outside of the type scope.
private function reference(){
return "hello world";
}
Would only be available when called where the this variable refers to the class instance in question. so: this.reference() compiles but new ClassName().reference() will not.
static private function ....
has a similar effect, in that it is only available where the class is local
class MyClass{
private static function unavailable(){
return "available";
}
public static function available(){
return something();
}
}
class Main(){
static public function main(){
MyClass.unavaliable()//will not compile
MyClass.available()//good to go.
}
}
static : the field belongs to the Class itself and not to instances of this class. Static identifiers can be used directly in the class itself. Outside of the class, it must be used with the class name (for example : my.pack.MyClass.name).
http://old.haxe.org/ref/oop
Related
Unit test noob here.
I have three classes: Db1Dao, Db2Dao, ExecuteClass where Db1Dao, Db2Dao are database access objects for two different databases. My goal is to fetch some data from db1 using Db1Dao and run executeClass.execute() to "put" the processed data into db2 using Db2Dao.
My ExecuteClass looks like this:
class ExecuteClass {
private Db1Dao db1Dao;
private Db2Dao db2Dao;
public void execute() {
...
List<String> listOfString = getExternalData(someParam);
List<Metadata> metadatum = db1Dao.get(someInputs);
... I do something to generate a list of new class `A` based on listOfString & metadatum ...
try {
db2Dao.put(listOfA);
} catch (PutException e){
...
}
}
public List<String> getExternalData(SomeClass someParam){
... do something
return listOfString;
}
}
Now I want to test:
Given a specific listOfString (returned by getExternalData) and a specific metadatum (returned by db1Dao.get):
Will I get the desired listOfA?
Am I able to call db2Dao.put and its input parameter is listOfA?
Particularly, I have hard-coded sample listOfString and metadatum and desired listOfA (and they will be passed via an object MockData, see the following code) but I don't know how to write the test using Mockito. The following is a test class I wrote but it does not work:
class TestClass extends BaseTest {
#Mock
private Db1Dao db1Dao;
#Mock
private Db2Dao db2Dao;
private ExecuteClass executeClass;
#BeforeEach
public void setUp() {
MockitoAnnotations.initMocks(this);
executeClass = new ExecuteClass(db1Dao, db2Dao);
}
#ParameterizedTest
#MethodSource("MockDataProvider")
public void executeClassTest(final MockData mockData) throws PutException {
Mockito.when(db1Dao.get(Mockito.any(), ...))
.thenReturn(mockData.getMetadatum());
ExecuteClass executeClassSpy = Mockito.spy(executeClass);
Mockito.when(executeClassSpy.getExternalData(Mockito.any()))
.thenReturn(mockData.getListOfString());
executeClassSpy.execute();
// executeClass.execute(); not working neither...
List<A> listOfA = mockData.getDesiredListOfA();
Mockito.verify(db2Dao).put(listOfA);
}
}
Could anyone please let me know? Thank you in advance!!
You should not create a spy of the same class you want to test. Instead, try to write a unit test for the smallest amount of code (e.g. a public method) and mock every external operator (in your case Db1Dao and Db2Dao).
If testing a public method involves calling another public method of the same class, make sure to mock everything inside the other public method (in your case getExternalData). Otherwise, this other public method might be a good candidate for an extra class to have clear separation of concerns.
So, remove the ExecuteClass executeClassSpy = Mockito.spy(executeClass); and make sure you setup everything with Mockito what's called within getExternalData.
To now actually, verify that Db2Dao was called with the correct parameter, either use your current approach with verifying the payload. But here it's important to 100% create the same data structure you get while executing your application code.
Another solution would be to use Mockito's #Captor. This allows you to capture the value of why verifying the invocation of a mock. Later on, you can also write assertions on the captured value:
#Captor
private ArgumentCaptor<ClassOfListOfA> argumentCaptor;
#Test
public void yourTest() {
Mockito.verify(db2Dao).put(argumentCaptor.capture());
assertEquals("StringValue", argumentCaptur.getValue().getWhateverGetterYouHave);
}
The following code worked for me.
I partially accepted #rieckpil's answer. I used #Captor which is very handy.
The reason I had to mock getExternalData() is because its implementation is still a "TODO".
class TestClass extends BaseTest {
#Mock
private Db1Dao db1Dao;
#Mock
private Db2Dao db2Dao;
#Captor
private ArgumentCaptor<List<A>> argumentCaptor;
private ExecuteClass executeClass;
#BeforeEach
public void setUp() {
MockitoAnnotations.initMocks(this);
executeClass = new ExecuteClass(db1Dao, db2Dao);
}
#ParameterizedTest
#MethodSource("MockDataProvider")
public void executeClassTest(final MockData mockData) throws PutException {
Mockito.when(db1Dao.get(Mockito.any(), ...))
.thenReturn(mockData.getMetadatum());
ExecuteClass executeClassSpy = Mockito.spy(executeClass);
Mockito.when(executeClassSpy.getExternalData(Mockito.any()))
.thenReturn(mockData.getListOfString());
executeClassSpy.execute();
List<A> listOfA = mockData.getDesiredListOfA();
Mockito.verify(db2Dao).put(argumentCaptor.capture());
assertEquals(listOfA, argumentCaptor.getValue());
}
}
How to bind mock of final class in Jukito ?
For example :
public final class SomeFinalClass(){
public SomeFinalClass(String someString){
}
}
//Testing class
#Runwith(JukitoRunner.class)
public class TestingClass(){
#Inject
private SomeFinalClass someFinalClassMock;
public static class TestModule extends JukitoModule {
#Override
protected void configureTest() {
// bind(SomeClient.class).in(TestSingleton.class);
}
#Provides
public SomeFinalClass getSomkeFinalClass() {
return Mokito.mock(SomeFinalClass.class); //throws error
}
}
}
Is there a way i can use PowerMockito with JukitoRunner ?
You can mock a final class if you're using Mockito 2. From Mockito 2 Wiki:
Mocking of final classes and methods is an incubating, opt-in feature. It uses a combination of Java agent instrumentation and subclassing in order to enable mockability of these types. As this works differently to our current mechanism and this one has different limitations and as we want to gather experience and user feedback, this feature had to be explicitly activated to be available ; it can be done via the mockito extension mechanism by creating the file src/test/resources/mockito-extensions/org.mockito.plugins.MockMaker containing a single line: mock-maker-inline.
After you created this file, Mockito will automatically use this new engine and one can do :
final class FinalClass {
final String finalMethod() { return "something"; }
}
FinalClass concrete = new FinalClass();
FinalClass mock = mock(FinalClass.class);
given(mock.finalMethod()).willReturn("not anymore");
assertThat(mock.finalMethod()).isNotEqualTo(concrete.finalMethod());
I am trying to do some dependency injection for my tests using nUnit. I'm new to TDD and nUnit so it's possible I am missing something simple. So basically I've created a SetUp method for my interfaces. I originally was using a constructor but I read it's bad to do this when doing TDD so I now using a method.
When I run my test I construct an object and assign it to the interface and then I call a method using that interface. I want to test if it can parse a string decimal.
When I run my test it says test failed and the message is:Invalid signature for SetUp or TearDown method
See below for the actual code:
public class DonorTests
{
private IDonor _Donor;
private IValidateInput _ValidInput;
//DonorTests(IDonor donor, IValidateInput validInput)
//{
// _Donor = donor;
// _ValidInput = validInput;
//}
[SetUp]
void Setup(IDonor donor, IValidateInput validInput)
{
_Donor = donor;
_ValidInput = validInput;
}
[Test]
public void HandleStringNotDecimal()
{
_ValidInput = new ValidateInput();
Assert.IsTrue(_ValidInput.IsDecimal("3445.3450"));
}
}
My class that uses this interface
public class ValidateInput : IValidateInput
{
public decimal RoundTwoDecimalPlaces(decimal amount)
{
return Math.Round(amount);
}
public bool IsDecimal(string amount)
{
decimal ParsedDecimal;
return Decimal.TryParse(amount, out ParsedDecimal);
}
public decimal ConvertToString(string value)
{
decimal ParsedDecimal;
Decimal.TryParse(value, out ParsedDecimal);
return ParsedDecimal;
}
}
You're injecting dependencies using constructor injection previously, right? I think you will not be able to perform dependency injection using method decorated with SetUpAttribute because such method has to be parameterless. Also Setup method has to be public, see this SO thread.
How are we typically dealing with similar situations in our company is:
[TestFixture]
public class DonorTests
{
private IDonor _Donor;
private IValidateInput _ValidInput;
[SetUp]
public void Setup()
{
_Donor = new Donor();
_ValidInput = new ValidateInput();
}
[Test]
public void HandleStringNotDecimal()
{
Assert.IsTrue(_ValidInput.IsDecimal("3445.3450"));
}
}
Or if construction of ValidInput and Donor is cheap then we simply create new instance for each test, having special method for that purpose so when we decide to test another implementation of IValidateInput then it is enough to change it in one place only:
[TestFixture]
public class DonorTests
{
[Test]
public void HandleStringNotDecimal()
{
var validInput = CreateValidateInput();
Assert.IsTrue(validInput .IsDecimal("3445.3450"));
}
private static IValidateInput CreateValidateInput()
{
return new ValidateInput();
}
}
Besides the cause mentioned in the accepted answer, I have met the same error when leaving method as non-public (private or protected).
NUnit most probably relies on reflection and does not deal with non-public methods, so special methods (i.e. decorated with NUnit specific attributes) must be public.
I have a class CalculationManager which is instantiated by a BackgroundWorker and as such has a CancellationRequested property.
This CalculationManager has an Execute() method which instantiates some different Calculation private classes with their own Execute() methods which by their turn might or might not instantiate some SubCalculation private classes, in sort of a "work breakdown structure" fashion where each subclass implements a part of a sequential calculation.
What I need to do is to make every of these classes to check, inside the loops of their Execute() methods (which are different from one another) if some "global" CancellationRequested has been set to true. I put "global" in quotes because this property would be in the scope of the topmost CalculationManager class.
So, question is:
How can I make a property in a class visible to every (possibly nested) of its children?
or put down another way:
How can I make a class check for a property in the "root object" of its parent hierarchy? (well, not quite, since CalculationManager will also have a parent, but you got the general idea.
I would like to use some sort of AttachedProperty, but these classes are domain objects inside a class library, having nothing to do with WPF or XAML and such.
Something like this ?
public interface IInjectable {
ICancelStatus Status { get; }
}
public interface ICancelStatus {
bool CancellationRequested { get; }
}
public class CalculationManager {
private IInjectable _injectable;
private SubCalculation _sub;
public CalculationManager(IInjectable injectable) {
_injectable = injectable;
_sub = new SubCalculation(injectable);
}
public void Execute() {}
}
public class SubCalculation {
private IInjectable _injectable;
public SubCalculation(IInjectable injectable) {
_injectable = injectable;
}
}
private class CancelStatus : ICancelStatus {
public bool CancellationRequested { get; set;}
}
var status = new CancelStatus();
var manager = new CalculationManager(status);
manager.Execute();
// once you set status.CancellationRequested it will be immediatly visible to all
// classes into which you've injected the IInjectable instance
I tried to understand how it works but i am very slow with this(( so i decided ti ask here. In my prohramm i have static public class with different variables arrays, tabControls, Sizes, Pens an so on. But i need to set and get values of the variables from different threads how could i do it?
i have a class
public static class GLOBAL_STATIC_DATA
{
//.....
private static Size _get_Active_Project_ViewPort_Size()
{
//.....
}
public static Size Active_Project_ViewPort_Size
{
get
{
return _get_Active_Project_ViewPort_Size();
}
}
public static int Get_Panorama_Original_Image_Width()
{
}
public static TabControl MainTab = new TabContol();
public static int someInt = 100;
}
I need to write and to read all of that from different threads, could somebody help how shoud i change this static class to be able do that.
You just precede the public static entries with the class name...for example:
Size sz = GLOBAL_STATIC_DATA.Active_Project_ViewPort_Size;