I am working on hosting a SaaS solution on Azure that is using elastic sql auzre for multi-tenant scenario. The client will communicate with the back-end via Azure Mobile Services. Mobile services provides auto scale capabilities on standard tier. My question is that will this auto-scale be sufficient for a product app with thousands of API calls? or should I consider some other setup such as multiple mobile services in different locations? CDN's etc.
Yes, absolutely. Azure App Service Mobile Apps can scale up to 10,000 API requests per second. Beyond that, you need to think more closely about architecture, which is a bigger question.
Related
I have a client coming on board to Azure from other cloud service provider. They would like to host up to 10 web apps on Azure and cost is really an issue for them.
Normally I'm suppose to create VM's that would host each of these web Apps; but they can't afford the price. Hence the choice of deploying all of them on the same Azure App service plan.
I think Azure App service offers only 50gb storage. The 10 Web Apps would require storage capacity far more than 50gb; is it scalable or can we link each of these Apps to an Azure storage account. And also is there any implications for deploying multiple web Apps on an Azure App Service plan
An App Service Plan is capable to run multiple Web Apps, each in its own sandbox. It's like a VM but as a PaaS service. Note that the storage included in the plan will be shared across all Web Apps so you'll have to use Azure Storage if you want to store more data.
An App Service Plan is designed to handle multiple web apps/Function apps, use BLOB Storage or similar for your data it will scale to whatever you need, depending on your needs you can add further services like Azure Front Door to load balance multiple apps on multiple app service plans
One important thing to remember is that the app service plan has limitations with outbound connections so even if each of your webapps are not so busy the sum of them all might bring you over the limit so be very careful how you handle your outbound connections.
I have a SaaS web app developed with Angular 8 and Asp.net Core Web API. I have deployed web api to a azure web app and deployed angular front-end web app to another azure web app as well.
The users are from China and Australia and other countries. I want to have region load balance like Chinese users uses web app on china azure region and australian users use Australian azure region web app so that it has best performance. Azure SQL DB will be in one place (in australia).
In addition, i want to prevent attacking to web front app and web api like d-dos, web scraping and SQL injection. For web scraping, i want to add access rate limitation from one ip.
Can you please advise what service i should use? I saw the blog talking about azure application gateway, azure load balancer, azure front door and azure traffic manager. It is a bit confusing to me. I need a best practise based on my this real world scenario. Should I use one of the service or should I use multiple services?
Based on your requirement:
Since the Backend Resource is Web App, you can ignore Load balancer (Layer 4) where you can only add VMs or VMSS
Your another requirement is WAF, and it is only available in AFD and AppGW. But you can use Traffic Manager as first Tier Load balancing and have AppGW in the different regions to provide high resilience.
As you want users from specific country to reach nearest backend resource, it seems like, the best solution for you is AFD.
AFD is a global Load balancer. It has WAF capability. It can Cache the data and provide quicker responses(CDN functionality). AFD uses an intelligent probing mechanism, through which it chooses the endpoint which is closer to the client who is making the request.
Hope this helps.
I have an azure mobile service that is running on top of SQLAzure DB. The Database is geo-replicated. I am looking to setup a failover for mobile service in case if the primary endpoint goes down. I have looked into traffic manager but it does not support mobile service endpoints also setting up another mobile service that talks to the replicated DB not possible as the replicated copy is read-only.
What are the possibilities of setting up a failover for mobile services endpoints.
There are several mechanisms for hosting mobile APIs on Azure - Azure Mobile Services is tied to a single region, so you can't fail that over. Azure Mobile Apps is the next generation of Azure Mobile Services and is built on top of Azure App Service Web Apps - it's an extension of the work there. As a result, you can leverage all the cool features of Azure App Service for your mobile service. If you haven't taken a look yet, then take a look at migrating your service to Azure App Service Web Apps.
Once there, Traffic Manager is definitely what you want. You can read about the process of using Traffic Manager with an Azure web app here: http://blogs.msdn.com/b/benjaminperkins/archive/2014/06/02/using-traffic-manager-with-microsoft-azure-web-site.aspx
I have created an Azure Web App today and it has a Mobile section in the Settings which contains Push notification, Mobile Authentication, etc. You can even download the source code for a mobile client app. I know that this used to be part of Mobile App (Mobile Service). I have created an Azure Mobile App to compare with Web App and they look the same in terms of Settings and Tools. Even the Icon is the same.
My question is what is what is the difference between Azure Web App and Azure Mobile App?
Like you, I couldn't get my head around the difference between the different types of App Service apps (Web Apps / Mobile Apps / API Apps). Judging by the fact that no one has really answered your question, it looks like we weren't the only ones.
It made no sense to me that Web Apps, Mobile Apps and API apps were distinct things: surely the whole point is that you should be able to expose an API that serves your web site, your mobile apps, any other kind of client, making use of whichever features you need for your use case?
And, lo and behold, buried deep in the Azure docs:
The only difference between the three app types (API, web, mobile) is the name and icon used for them in the Azure portal.
Yep: they're exactly the same.
In old days of Azure, they had 2 offerings - Azure Websites and Azure Mobile services. Some time ago, both of them got rolled into something called Azure App Service which also included two more kinds of apps - API Apps and Logic Apps.
To answer your question specifically, Azure Web App is new name for Azure Websites that you can use to build websites in multiple languages where as Azure Mobile App is the new name for Azure Mobile Service that provides backend infrastructure for mobile applications (or in other words, Azure Mobile App is Mobile Backend-as-a-Service [MBaaS] offering from Azure).
Mobile Service is the "classic" version and is only available in the classic portal. Mobile Apps is part of App Service is only available in the preview portal.
App Service includes Web Apps, Mobile Apps, API Apps and Logic Apps is deployed as one unit. Using the classic way, you would have to create and pay let's say for a Web App and a Mobile Service so you can save money using the App Service. You also get a larger selection of VMs.
Not all Mobile Services features have been migrated yet to Mobile Apps. If you use a Node.js backend, there's no nice UI built-in in the new portal to manage your JS code.
Note that Microsoft has not announced that it will deprecate Mobile Services.
I have found some subtle, but key, differences. Assuming a C# backend, the Mobile App Service controllers will inherit from TableController - which provides out-of-the-box CRUD operations on a table, compared to the Web Api 2 style ApiController (which you can still use in a Mobile App Service). Any less confused now?
Sorry for the late reply. They all are really the same thing. If you look in Azure Resource Explorer (available in the application menu of your app or resources.azure.com) you will see the indication of how we display a different icon for it - "kind": "mobileapp", for Mobile Apps for example. We leverage the different kinds to provide different quick-starts. You can certainly create an Azure Web App and load Azure Web App code to it to get the Mobile Functionality.
I am developing a mobile application that makes extensive and continuous use of SignalR to communicate to a SignalR service.
I have previously assumed that I would use a Web Role to host the service, and then add more Web Roles backed by a backplane of Service Bus or Redis as and when the service needs to scale out. Using a Web Role would also allow me to significantly scale up if I wanted to avoid possible latency issues with the backplane.
However when I compare the pricing of the Web Role to Azure Mobile Services it appears that the Mobile Services may be cheaper.
So can Mobile Services be used instead?
And if so what are the pros and cons of doing so?
We are close to rolling out an update to Azure Mobile Services .NET backend which comes with some neat integration with SignalR built in. I'll be posting a blog on it on http://blogs.msdn.com/b/azuremobile/ (and of course on twitter #frystyk) when it's there and how to use it.
Henrik