I have developed a Microsoft Teams App Bot. Im running it in Firebase as a function.
This is the function:
exports.teamsBot = functions
.region("europe-west1")
.https.onRequest(async (req, res) => {
await adapter.process(req, res,
(context) => bot.run(context)
);
});
adapter is a CloudAdapter.
I have a card with 3 actions:
{
"type": "ActionSet",
"actions": [
{
"type": "Action.Submit",
"title": "👍",
"data": {
"action": "feedback-up",
"feedbackId": feedback.id
}
},
{
"type": "Action.Submit",
"title": "👎",
"data": {
"action": "feedback-down",
"feedbackId": feedback.id
}
},
{
"type": "Action.Submit",
"title": "😕 Did not attend",
"data": {
"action": "feedback-no-show",
"feedbackId": feedback.id
}
}
]
}
I retrieve the result in onMessage in my bot. I do some magic and store the values and reply with:
await context.sendActivity("Thanks for your valuable feedback... 🚀");
The process works however I get a strange annoying issue.
First when I click the button I direct get: "Unable to reach app. Please try again." and then like 1 second later when my reply hits it changes to I guess the correct one "Your response was sent to the app".
So from a user perspective it looks like something is first wrong then its correct. It feels like the Action is waiting for some sort of first reply that Im missing. Then when my reply comes it feels like ouuu its okay now.
Anybody has any Idea on this?
I am new to this swagger and i created a small demo project in node-js to see how swagger will really works. I created 5 api's which 4 are working perfectly and when it comes to PUT api I am getting error ,but when i tried in postman it is working. Please look at the code below.
export let updateUser = async(req: Request, resp: Response) => {
try{
const use = await User.findById(req.params.id);
use.name = req.body.name;
// use.email = req.body.email;
const a1 = await use.save();
resp.json("successfully updated");
} catch(err) {
resp.send('Error')
}
}
this is the api which is calling above method in app.ts
//put-request
app.put('/user/update/:id',controller.updateUser);
This is the the swagger json of put API
"/user/update/{id}": {
"put": {
"tags": [
"Update-Api"
],
"summary": "Update-user",
"description": "To updatre the particular user",
"operationId": "updateUser",
"consumes": ["application/json"],
"parameters":[
{
"name":"Id",
"in":"path",
"description":"enter the id of the user",
"required":true,
"type":"string"
},
{
"name":"body",
"in":"body",
"description":"Enter the update value",
"required":true,
"$schema": {
"type": "#/definations/User"
}
}
],
"responses": {
"400": {
"description": "Invalid user supplied"
},
"404": {
"description": "User not found"
}
}
}
}
If you paste your API definition into https://editor.swagger.io, it will flag 2 syntax errors in the PUT operation. Make sure to fix these errors before testing your API.
In the parameter definition, change "name":"Id" to "name":"id" (lowercase id) to match the parameter letter case in the path template.
In the body parameter, change $schema to schema.
👋I just started playing around with Swagger and everything is amazing. I was able to document all API in an hour or so but I got stuck solving one last issue.
How can I tell swagger to show ApiBadRequestResponse in the format below?
#ApiOkResponse({
type: User,
})
#ApiBadRequestResponse({
type: {
error: String,
message: ValidationError[]
}
})
#Post('/signup')
signUp(
#Body(ValidationPipe) authCredentialsDto: CredentialsDTO
): Promise<User> {
return this.userService.signUp(authCredentialsDto)
}
From what I understand swagger doesn't know how to work with interfaces instead I have to use classes. Is there a simple way to document bad request response triggered by ValidationPipe. This is all native #nestjs behavior so I would assume there must be an easy solution.
This is what gets actually returned from API:
"statusCode": 400,
"error": "Bad Request",
"message": [
{
"target": {
"username": "somename",
"password": "****"
},
"value": "****",
"property": "password",
"children": [], // ValidationError[]
"constraints": {
"matches": "password too weak"
}
}
]
I have an Entity that is supposed to be updated on a per-session basis with user-specific information. This had worked when I was using Dialogflow v1, and I thought it had worked with v2, but I'm now having significant problems with it.
I believe I am setting the Session Entity information correctly, but for the Intent that uses it, it only matches when a value from the Developer Entity is used.
How can I get it to use the Session Entity? Am I doing something wrong when updating it? Am I using the wrong Session ID? Is there a way I can better verify or test that I'm using the correct ID or that I'm updating the Entity correctly? Is this just a bug?
Documentation of everything follows.
The project is configured to use v2 and to allow for beta features, although I've tried this without the beta features as well.
There are only three Intents. A Fallback Intent to capture failures, a Welcome Intent that gets the welcome event, and the "entry" intent that is supposed to capture the entry code which should match the "code" Entity. All of them use a webhook for fulfillment.
The Fallback Intent
The Welcome Intent
The "entry" Intent
As shown in the "entry" Intent, it uses the "code" Entity, which is the only Developer Entity in the system
The code has most of the Dialogflow specific work in a separate module that uses the "dialogflow" module from npm to set the Session Entity. (Note this is different than the dialogflow-fulfillment module, which is used to handle fulfillment. I'm using the multivocal library for fulfillment, but that shouldn't matter.) (It also uses firebase functions to run on, but I don't think any of these are relevant.)
From the package.json:
"dependencies": {
"dialogflow": "^0.9.0",
"firebase-admin": "~7.0.0",
"firebase-functions": "^2.2.0",
"multivocal": "^0.11.1"
},
This is imported as dialogflow, specifying the API version to use:
const dialogflow = require('dialogflow').v2beta1;
The functions I show below call envToConfig(env) which takes the environment (a multivocal concept that just stores relevant information, including the Dialogflow parent and certificate information) and returns the configuration that needs to be passed to dialogflow.SessionEntityTypesClient( config ). Given no errors are thrown in further calls, it appears to work correctly.
The makeEntityType( name, entityMap ) function takes a map of values to be used for the entities in a SessionEntityType and returns an object that will be used to build a full SessionEntityType. The name provided here is the display name.
function makeEntityType( name, entityMap ){
let ret = {
displayName: name,
entities: []
};
Object.keys( entityMap ).map( key => {
let val = entityMap[key];
let entity = {
value: key,
synonyms: [key, ...val]
};
ret.entities.push( entity );
});
return ret;
}
exports.makeEntityType = makeEntityType;
The result from this is passed to setSessionEntity( env, entityType ) along with the multivocal environment, which contains some information we use in the session. It makes sure the name and entityOverrideMode are set correctly in the entityType and then tries to create it. I've tried using PATCH as well, and it behaves the same way. It also does a bunch of logging, that I'll show later when it runs to prove it actually works.
function setSessionEntity( env, entityType ){
const config = envToConfig( env );
const client = new dialogflow.SessionEntityTypesClient( config );
let parent = env.dialogflow.parent;
if( entityType.displayName && !entityType.name ){
entityType.name = `${parent}/entityTypes/${entityType.displayName}`;
}
if( !entityType.entityOverrideMode ){
entityType.entityOverrideMode = 'ENTITY_OVERRIDE_MODE_OVERRIDE';
}
console.log('setSessionEntity parent',parent);
const request = {
parent: parent,
sessionEntityType: entityType
};
console.log('setSessionEntity request',JSON.stringify(request,null,1));
return client.createSessionEntityType( request )
.then( create => {
console.log('setSessionEntity created',JSON.stringify(create,null,1));
return Promise.resolve( env );
})
.catch( err => {
console.error('setSessionEntity problem creating',err);
return Promise.resolve( env );
})
}
exports.setSessionEntity = setSessionEntity;
For debugging, I also have a function that lists the session entities:
function listSessionEntities( env ){
let parent = env.dialogflow && env.dialogflow.parent;
console.log('listSessionEntities parent', parent);
if( !parent ){
return Promise.resolve( env );
}
const config = envToConfig( env );
const client = new dialogflow.SessionEntityTypesClient( config );
const request = {
parent: parent
};
return client.listSessionEntityTypes(request)
.then( result => {
console.log('listSessionEntities', JSON.stringify(result,null,1));
})
.catch( err => {
console.log('listSessionEntities err', err);
})
.then( () => Promise.resolve( env ) );
}
exports.listSessionEntities = listSessionEntities;
The code that calls this imports it as Dialogflow:
const Dialogflow = require('./dialogflow');
As part of all the webhook calls, the listSessionEntities() function is called before any specific handler is:
function debugSessionEntities( env ){
return Dialogflow.listSessionEntities( env );
}
When the Welcome Intent is triggered, it sets the "code" Session Entity to have two new types that should override the type that was defined in the "code" Developer Entity:
function handleWelcome( env ){
const entityType = Dialogflow.makeEntityType('code',{
'alpha': [],
'bravo': []
});
return Dialogflow.setSessionEntity( env, entityType )
.then( env => Multivocal.handleDefault( env ) );
}
When I run this through the simulator, it doesn't pick up on the Session Entity Types that are set, but do still respond to the Developer Entity Type. (Using a real device works the same way.)
In the simulator, this is what it reports in the Request tab for the Welcome Intent:
{
"responseId": "55a9eb06-ce05-48f9-8a56-b993fa512aee",
"queryResult": {
"queryText": "GOOGLE_ASSISTANT_WELCOME",
"action": "multivocal.welcome",
"parameters": {},
"allRequiredParamsPresent": true,
"fulfillmentText": "Hello! How can I help you?",
"fulfillmentMessages": [
{
"text": {
"text": [
"Greetings! How can I assist?"
]
}
}
],
"outputContexts": [
{
"name": "projects/session-test-XXXXX/agent/sessions/ABwppHFGTpcFtHOOo6ehQfKys9AnH14V5-RhzrNKsea6y6L5zgv4eN-j3IesfuqSsKMc7qRt1CAOhkUYA9XXXXXX/contexts/google_assistant_welcome"
},
{
"name": "projects/session-test-XXXXX/agent/sessions/ABwppHFGTpcFtHOOo6ehQfKys9AnH14V5-RhzrNKsea6y6L5zgv4eN-j3IesfuqSsKMc7qRt1CAOhkUYA9XXXXXX/contexts/actions_capability_screen_output"
},
{
"name": "projects/session-test-XXXXX/agent/sessions/ABwppHFGTpcFtHOOo6ehQfKys9AnH14V5-RhzrNKsea6y6L5zgv4eN-j3IesfuqSsKMc7qRt1CAOhkUYA9XXXXXX/contexts/actions_capability_audio_output"
},
{
"name": "projects/session-test-XXXXX/agent/sessions/ABwppHFGTpcFtHOOo6ehQfKys9AnH14V5-RhzrNKsea6y6L5zgv4eN-j3IesfuqSsKMc7qRt1CAOhkUYA9XXXXXX/contexts/actions_capability_account_linking"
},
{
"name": "projects/session-test-XXXXX/agent/sessions/ABwppHFGTpcFtHOOo6ehQfKys9AnH14V5-RhzrNKsea6y6L5zgv4eN-j3IesfuqSsKMc7qRt1CAOhkUYA9XXXXXX/contexts/google_assistant_input_type_keyboard"
},
{
"name": "projects/session-test-XXXXX/agent/sessions/ABwppHFGTpcFtHOOo6ehQfKys9AnH14V5-RhzrNKsea6y6L5zgv4eN-j3IesfuqSsKMc7qRt1CAOhkUYA9XXXXXX/contexts/actions_capability_media_response_audio"
},
{
"name": "projects/session-test-XXXXX/agent/sessions/ABwppHFGTpcFtHOOo6ehQfKys9AnH14V5-RhzrNKsea6y6L5zgv4eN-j3IesfuqSsKMc7qRt1CAOhkUYA9XXXXXX/contexts/actions_capability_web_browser"
}
],
"intent": {
"name": "projects/session-test-XXXXX/agent/intents/ca79c951-4d75-4b2b-acd4-7dac2f81856e",
"displayName": "welcome"
},
"intentDetectionConfidence": 1,
"languageCode": "en-us"
},
"originalDetectIntentRequest": {
"source": "google",
"version": "2",
"payload": {
"isInSandbox": true,
"surface": {
"capabilities": [
{
"name": "actions.capability.SCREEN_OUTPUT"
},
{
"name": "actions.capability.ACCOUNT_LINKING"
},
{
"name": "actions.capability.AUDIO_OUTPUT"
},
{
"name": "actions.capability.MEDIA_RESPONSE_AUDIO"
},
{
"name": "actions.capability.WEB_BROWSER"
}
]
},
"requestType": "SIMULATOR",
"inputs": [
{
"rawInputs": [
{
"query": "Talk to my test app",
"inputType": "KEYBOARD"
}
],
"intent": "actions.intent.MAIN"
}
],
"user": {
"userStorage": "{\"UserId\":\"ABwppHHd40lIZ1o0bRERAKlHNtNcS2qFtz7NbRQnb31AQDFuV41VPFQivXwwpQGtv_5SlsZNp0N3kxalIIXXXXXX\",\"NumVisits\":1}",
"lastSeen": "2019-05-18T19:12:38Z",
"locale": "en-US",
"userId": "ABwppHHd40lIZ1o0bRERAKlHNtNcS2qFtz7NbRQnb31AQDFuV41VPFQivXwwpQGtv_5SlsZNp0N3kxalIIXXXXXX"
},
"conversation": {
"conversationId": "ABwppHFGTpcFtHOOo6ehQfKys9AnH14V5-RhzrNKsea6y6L5zgv4eN-j3IesfuqSsKMc7qRt1CAOhkUYA9XXXXXX",
"type": "NEW"
},
"availableSurfaces": [
{
"capabilities": [
{
"name": "actions.capability.AUDIO_OUTPUT"
},
{
"name": "actions.capability.WEB_BROWSER"
},
{
"name": "actions.capability.SCREEN_OUTPUT"
}
]
}
]
}
},
"session": "projects/session-test-XXXXX/agent/sessions/ABwppHFGTpcFtHOOo6ehQfKys9AnH14V5-RhzrNKsea6y6L5zgv4eN-j3IesfuqSsKMc7qRt1CAOhkUYA9XXXXXX"
}
Most notable from that is the session attribute set at the bottom from that. The code uses this as the parent and session values when building the
The request objects for the other two Intents are similar, and all have the same value for session. None of the response objects are notable in any way.
When the Welcome Intent is triggered, the call to listSessionEntities(), unsurprisingly, shows there aren't any yet:
info: listSessionEntities parent projects/session-test-XXXXX/agent/sessions/ABwppHFGTpcFtHOOo6ehQfKys9AnH14V5-RhzrNKsea6y6L5zgv4eN-j3IesfuqSsKMc7qRt1CAOhkUYA9XXXXXX
info: listSessionEntities [
[],
null,
null
]
The parent appears to have the correct value from the session however.
When the handler for the Welcome Intent goes and creates the Session Entity, things appear to work ok:
info: setSessionEntity request {
"parent": "projects/session-test-XXXXX/agent/sessions/ABwppHFGTpcFtHOOo6ehQfKys9AnH14V5-RhzrNKsea6y6L5zgv4eN-j3IesfuqSsKMc7qRt1CAOhkUYA9XXXXXX",
"sessionEntityType": {
"displayName": "code",
"entities": [
{
"value": "alpha",
"synonyms": [
"alpha"
]
},
{
"value": "bravo",
"synonyms": [
"bravo"
]
}
],
"name": "projects/session-test-XXXXX/agent/sessions/ABwppHFGTpcFtHOOo6ehQfKys9AnH14V5-RhzrNKsea6y6L5zgv4eN-j3IesfuqSsKMc7qRt1CAOhkUYA9XXXXXX/entityTypes/code",
"entityOverrideMode": "ENTITY_OVERRIDE_MODE_OVERRIDE"
}
}
info: setSessionEntity created [
{
"entities": [
{
"synonyms": [
"alpha"
],
"value": "alpha"
},
{
"synonyms": [
"bravo"
],
"value": "bravo"
}
],
"name": "projects/session-test-XXXXX/agent/sessions/ABwppHFGTpcFtHOOo6ehQfKys9AnH14V5-RhzrNKsea6y6L5zgv4eN-j3IesfuqSsKMc7qRt1CAOhkUYA9XXXXXX/entityTypes/code",
"entityOverrideMode": "ENTITY_OVERRIDE_MODE_OVERRIDE"
},
null,
null
]
The parent appears to be the same as the session, and the name appears to follow the correct format, including the additional part that has the "/entityTypes/" followed by the display name.
When I try calling it with the code "alpha", which should trigger the "entry" Intent, it instead triggers the Fallback Intent. The call to listSessionEntities() seems to show the "code" Entity with the Entity Types we expect, even tho there was no match for "alpha".
info: listSessionEntities parent projects/session-test-XXXXX/agent/sessions/ABwppHFGTpcFtHOOo6ehQfKys9AnH14V5-RhzrNKsea6y6L5zgv4eN-j3IesfuqSsKMc7qRt1CAOhkUYA9XXXXXX
info: listSessionEntities [
[
{
"entities": [
{
"synonyms": [
"alpha"
],
"value": "alpha"
},
{
"synonyms": [
"bravo"
],
"value": "bravo"
}
],
"name": "projects/session-test-XXXXX/agent/sessions/ABwppHFGTpcFtHOOo6ehQfKys9AnH14V5-RhzrNKsea6y6L5zgv4eN-j3IesfuqSsKMc7qRt1CAOhkUYA9XXXXXX/entityTypes/code",
"entityOverrideMode": "ENTITY_OVERRIDE_MODE_OVERRIDE"
}
],
null,
null
]
Again, everything looks correct. When I try it again with "zulu", it shows the same thing for the call to listSessionEntites(), but this time it matches the "entry" Intent, since "zulu" is one of the Entity Types for "code" that is defined as a Developer Entity.
This is where I am stuck. Everything looks correct. It looks like the Session Entity should be set correctly for this session. It looks like it should be using those values. But it never seems to do so.
What is going on? All help would be greatly appreciated. (Did you even read till the end of the question? If so - thank you! I know it's long, but wanted to be as complete as possible.)
This appears to be a bug - I've gotten feedback from other developers that they're seeing the same problem, sometimes on previously working code.
A bug has been opened at https://issuetracker.google.com/issues/133166381 to track the issue. Star it to indicate you have similar problems and to track progress.
I am trying to implement Sandbox Paypal Payment Gateway refund functionality. I am using Laravel 5.6.12 and Package: "paypal/rest-api-sdk-php": "^1.13"
I have no issue in doing payment. Below is the response received after successful payment done.
{
"id": "PAY-94141048LX592642PLLYUVMA",
"transactions": [
{
"related_resources": [
{
"sale": {
"id": "0KH341752J2209342",
"state": "completed",
"links": [
{
"href": "https://api.sandbox.paypal.com/v1/payments/sale/0KH341752J2209342",
"rel": "self",
"method": "GET"
},
{
"href": "https://api.sandbox.paypal.com/v1/payments/sale/0KH341752J2209342/refund",
"rel": "refund",
"method": "POST"
},
{
"href": "https://api.sandbox.paypal.com/v1/payments/payment/PAY-94141048LX592642PLLYUVMA",
"rel": "parent_payment",
"method": "GET"
}
],
"soft_descriptor": "PAYPAL *PANKAJGARGS"
}
}
]
}
]
}
From the above JSON, I took Sale_ID = 0KH341752J2209342 and wrote the below code to implement refund.
$refund = new Refund();
$refund->setAmount(200);
$sale = new Sale();
$sale->setId("0KH341752J2209342");
try {
$apiContext = $this->_api_context;
$refundedSale = $sale->refund($refund, $apiContext);
} catch (Exception $ex) {
\Log::info($ex);
exit(1);
}
and got the below error.
Got Http response code 400 when accessing https://api.sandbox.paypal.com/v1/payments/sale/0KH341752J2209342/refund.
Can you please suggest something if there is anything wrong? Please let me know if you need more info. I removed some unnecessary sections from above JSON to make it short
Error Details.
Status Code : 400 Response: {"name":"MALFORMED_REQUEST","message":"Incoming JSON request does not map to API request","information_link":"developer.paypal.com/webapps/developer/docs/api/…;}PayPal\Exception\PayPalConnectionException: Got Http response code 400 when accessing https://api.sandbox.paypal.com/v1/payments/sale/3FM030155Y9829603/refund
You should add the following catch, so you can see the real error message:
} catch (PayPal\Exception\PayPalConnectionException $ex) {
echo $ex->getCode();
echo $ex->getData(); // Prints the detailed error message
die($ex);
}
I added below three lines
$amt = new Amount();
$amt->setTotal(10)
->setCurrency('INR');
in the below code and everything is working now.
$refund = new Refund();
$refund->setAmount($amt);
$sale = new Sale();
$sale->setId("0KH341752J2209342");
try {
$apiContext = $this->_api_context;
$refundedSale = $sale->refund($refund, $apiContext);
} catch (Exception $ex) {
\Log::info($ex);
exit(1);
}