While executing this test case, following error I'm facing...
Please anyone suggests me in overcoming this issue.
AbortedJobImportTest
testAbortedJobAddedSuccessfullyToExcludedRun
Unknown entity: java.util.LinkedHashMap
org.hibernate.MappingException: Unknown entity: java.util.LinkedHashMap
at com.rsa.test.crawler.CrawlerTestBase.setUp(CrawlerTestBase.groovy:42)
at com.rsa.test.crawler.AbortedJobImportTest.setUp(AbortedJobImportTest.groovy:19)
/*
***
CrawlerTestBase
public class CrawlerTestBase extends GroovyTestCase {
static transactional = false;
def productsModel;
protected JenkinsJobCrawlerDTO jenkinsCrawlerDTO;
def jenkinsJobService;
def httpClientService;
def sessionFactory;
def productModelsService;
protected String JENKINS_URL = "http://10.101.43.253:8080/jenkins/";
protected String JENKINS_JOB_CONSTANT= "job";
protected String JUNIT_TEST_PARAMETERS = "type=junit";
protected String CUSTOM_JUNIT_SELENIUM_TEST_PARAMETERS = "type=selenium,outputfile=Custom-junit-report*";
protected String DEFAULT_PRODUCT = "AM";
public void setUp(){
deleteDataFromTables();
Date date = new Date();
productsModel = new ProductModel(product:DEFAULT_PRODUCT,jenkinsServers:"10.101.43.253",date:date);
if (productsModel.validate()) {
productsModel.save(flush:true);
log.info("Added entry for prodct model for "+DEFAULT_PRODUCT);
}
else {
productsModel.errors.allErrors.each { log.error it }
}
jenkinsCrawlerDTO = new JenkinsJobCrawlerDTO();
productModelsService.reinitialise();
sessionFactory.currentSession.save(flush:true);
sessionFactory.currentSession.clear();
}
public void tearDown(){
deleteDataFromTables();
}
protected void deleteDataFromTables(){
Set<String> tablesToDeleteData = new HashSet<String>();
tablesToDeleteData.add("ExcludedJenkinsRuns");
tablesToDeleteData.add("TestRuns");
tablesToDeleteData.add("ProductModel");
tablesToDeleteData.add("SystemEvents");
tablesToDeleteData.add("JenkinsJobsToCrawl");
tablesToDeleteData.add("TestSuitesInViewList");
tablesToDeleteData.add("JenkinsJobsToCrawl");
(ApplicationHolder.application.getArtefacts("Domain") as List).each {
if(tablesToDeleteData.contains(it.getName())){
log.info("Deleting data from ${it.getName()}");
it.newInstance().list()*.delete()
}
}
sessionFactory.currentSession.flush();
sessionFactory.currentSession.clear();
}
public void oneTimeSetUp(){
}
public void oneTimeTearDown(){
}
}
AbortedJobImportTest
public class AbortedJobImportTest extends CrawlerTestBase {
private String jobUrl = JENKINS_URL+JENKINS_JOB_CONSTANT+"/am-java-source-build/69/";
#Before
public void setUp() {
super.setUp();
jenkinsCrawlerDTO.setJobUrl(jobUrl);
}
#After
public void cleanup() {
super.tearDown();
}
#Test
public void testAbortedJobAddedSuccessfullyToExcludedRun() {
int countBeforeImport = ExcludedJenkinsRuns.count();
jenkinsJobService.handleTestResults(jobUrl,JUNIT_TEST_PARAMETERS);
int countAfterImport = ExcludedJenkinsRuns.count();
Assert.assertEquals(countBeforeImport+1, countAfterImport);
ExcludedJenkinsRuns excludedRun = ExcludedJenkinsRuns.findByJobNameLike(jenkinsCrawlerDTO.jobName);
Assert.assertNotNull(excludedRun);
Assert.assertEquals(jobUrl, excludedRun.jobUrl);
Assert.assertEquals(jenkinsCrawlerDTO.jobName, excludedRun.jobName);
Assert.assertEquals(jenkinsCrawlerDTO.jenkinsServer, excludedRun.jenkinsServer);
Assert.assertEquals(jenkinsCrawlerDTO.buildNumber.toInteger(), excludedRun.buildNumber);
Assert.assertEquals("Build Aborted", excludedRun.exclusionReason);
}
}
*/
I cant figure out the issue in this code. Can anyone help me?
While executing this test case, following error I'm facing...
Please anyone suggests me in overcoming this issue.
It means that you try to put a LinkedHashMap in constructor of Product Model but there is no constructor with LinkedHashMap parameter.
I guess the problem is your Unit Test. The Model constructor will be added by grails framework. You aren`t running grails framework in your Unit Test, because you use GroovyTestCase instead of Spock.
Lock here https://grails.github.io/grails-doc/3.0.5/guide/single.html#unitTesting
Related
I have done some tests on these two classes. Could someone please help to determine if these two classes are threadsafe? Could someone help to identify if not using concurrentHashMap, but use HashMap would it cause any concurrent issue. How can I make it more threadsafe? What is the best approach to testing it with concurrent testing?
I tested it with Hashmap only and it works fine. However, my scale of test is around 20 req/s for 2 mins.
Can anyone suggest if I should increase the req rate and try again or can point somewhere that must require fix.
#Component
public class TestLonggersImpl
implements TestSLongger {
#Autowired
YamlReader yamlReader;
#Autowired
TestSCatalog gSCatalog;
#Autowired
ApplicationContext applicationContext;
private static HashMap<String, TestLonggerImpl> gImplHashMap = new HashMap<>();
private static final Longger LONGER = LonggerFactory.getLongger(AbstractSLongger.class);
#PostConstruct
public void init() {
final String[] sts = yamlReader.getTestStreamNames();
for (String st : sts) {
System.out.println(st);
LONGER.info(st);
}
HashMap<String, BSCatalog> statsCatalogHashMap = gSCatalog.getCatalogHashMap();
for (Map.Entry<String, BSCatalog> entry : statsCatalogHashMap.entrySet()) {
BSCatalog bCatalog = statsCatalogHashMap.get(entry.getKey());
//Issue on creating the basicCategory
SProperties sProperties = yamlReader.getTestMap().get(entry.getKey());
Category category = new BasicCategory(sProperties.getSDefinitions(),
bCatalog.getVersion(),
bCatalog.getDescription(), new HashSet<>());
final int version = statsCatalogHashMap.get(entry.getKey()).getVersion();
getTestImplHashMap().put(entry.getKey(),
applicationContext.getBean(TestLonggerImpl.class, category,
entry.getKey(),
version));
}
}
#Override
public void logMessage(String st, String message) {
if (getTestImplHashMap() != null && getTestImplHashMap().get(st) != null) {
getTestImplHashMap().get(st).log(message);
}
}
#VisibleForTesting
static HashMap<String, TestLonggerImpl> getTestImplHashMap() {
return gImplHashMap;
}
}
*** 2nd class
#Component
public class GStatsCatalog {
#Autowired
YamlReader yamlReader;
private static HashMap<String, BStatsCatalog> stCatalogHashMap = new HashMap<>();
#PostConstruct
public void init() {
String[] streams = yamlReader.getGSNames();
for (String stream : streams) {
BStatsCatalog bCatalog = new BStatsCatalog();
SProperties streamProperties = yamlReader.getGMap().get(stream);
bCatalog.setSName(stream);
int version = VERSION;
try {
version = Integer.parseInt(streamProperties.getVersion());
} catch (Exception e) {
System.out.println(e.getMessage());
}
bCatalog.setVersion(version);
bCatalog.setDescription(streamProperties.getDescription());
stCatalogHashMap.put(stream, bCatalog);
}
}
public static HashMap<String, BStatsCatalog> getCatalogHashMap() {
return stCatalogHashMap;
}
public void setYamlReader(YamlReader yamlReader) {
this.yamlReader = yamlReader;
}
}
I think the methods under #postconstruct are threadsafe. It only runs once after the bean created in the whole lifecircle of the bean.
Hi everyone I am studying C# but ran into some compiler errors:
I am getting the error: 'LinkedList' does not implement interface member 'IEnumerable.GetEnumerator()'
I think I did.
Below is the code:
using System;
using System.Collections.Generic;
namespace LinkedListGenericsExample
{
public class LinkedListNode<T>
{
//constructor
public LinkedListNode(T value)
{
//code here
}
//code here
}
//LinkedList class with generics. It inherit the IEnumerable class with
//generics. Should I use IEnumerable or IEnumerable<T>?
public class LinkedList<T>: IEnumerable<T>
{
//code here
}
public LinkedListNode<T> AddLast(T node)
{
//code here
}
public IEnumerator<T> GetEnumerator()
{
//code here
}
//here I think the GetEnumerator() method is implemented
IEnumerator IEnumerable.GetEnumerator()
{
return GetEnumerator();
}
//Trying this but not working. Also I am confused.
/*
IEnumerator IEnumerable<T>.GetEnumerator()
{
return GetEnumerator();
}
*/
//Main() below
}
I am using the Visual Studio Code to compile the code.
Error ecountered:
'LinkedList' does not implement interface member 'IEnumerable.GetEnumerator()'
Using the generic type 'IEnumerator' requires 1 type arguments
Using the generic type 'IEnumerable' requreis 1 type arguments
'IEnumerable' in explicit interface declaration is not an interface
Question:
1) Should I inherit the IEnumerable class or IEnumerable class with generic?
2) How can I implement the "IEnumerable.GetEnumerator()" It looks like the compiler is not recognized my GetEnumerator() implementation but I am not sure why....
Need some help here. Thank you!
Updating the complete code below. It works!!
using System;
using System.Collections; //using System.Collections instead
namespace LinkedListGenericsExample
{
//Linked list node class in Generics form
public class LinkedListNode<T>
{
//LinkedListNode constructor
public LinkedListNode(T value)
{
this.Value = value;
}
public T Value;
public LinkedListNode<T> Next {get; internal set;}
public LinkedListNode<T> Prev {get; internal set;}
}
public class LinkedList<T>: IEnumerable
{
public LinkedListNode<T> First {get; private set;}
public LinkedListNode<T> Last {get; private set;}
public LinkedListNode<T> AddLast(T node)
{
var newNode = new LinkedListNode<T>(node);
if (First == null)
{
First = newNode;
Last = First;
}
else
{
Last.Next = newNode;
Last = newNode;
}
return newNode;
}
public IEnumerator GetEnumerator()
{
LinkedListNode<T> current = First;
while(current != null)
{
yield return current.Value;
current = current.Next;
}
}
IEnumerator IEnumerable.GetEnumerator()
{
return GetEnumerator();
}
/*
IEnumerator IEnumerable<T>.GetEnumerator()
{
}
*/
}
class Program
{
static void Main(string[] args)
{
//Console.WriteLine("Hello World!");
var list2 = new LinkedList<int>();
var list3 = new LinkedList<String>();
list2.AddLast(1);
list2.AddLast(3);
list2.AddLast(5);
//Go throuhg entire list of numbers
foreach(int i in list2)
{
Console.WriteLine(i);
}
Console.WriteLine();
list3.AddLast("2");
list3.AddLast("four");
list3.AddLast("foo");
//Go through entire list of strings
foreach(string s in list3)
{
Console.WriteLine(s);
}
}
}
}
Regarding your two questions, here are 2 cents.
1. I would suggest you implement the generic version. This would ensure type-safety and other benefits. You can read more on advantages of generics in this link. . Since you are learning C#, it would be a good idea to read about it.
Your implementation looks good.Please add reference to System.Collections namespace to your code for fixing the compile errors.
using System.Collections;
Android Studio 2.3
I have the following method I want to test inside my model class:
public class RecipeListModelImp implements RecipeListModelContract {
private Subscription subscription;
private RecipesAPI recipesAPI;
private RecipeSchedulers recipeSchedulers;
#Inject
public RecipeListModelImp(#NonNull RecipesAPI recipesAPI, #NonNull RecipeSchedulers recipeSchedulers) {
this.recipesAPI = Preconditions.checkNotNull(recipesAPI);
this.recipeSchedulers = Preconditions.checkNotNull(recipeSchedulers);
}
#Override
public void getRecipesFromAPI(final RecipeGetAllListener recipeGetAllListener) {
subscription = recipesAPI.getAllRecipes()
.subscribeOn(recipeSchedulers.getBackgroundScheduler())
.observeOn(recipeSchedulers.getUIScheduler())
.subscribe(new Subscriber<List<Recipe>>() {
#Override
public void onCompleted() {
}
#Override
public void onError(Throwable e) {
recipeGetAllListener.onRecipeGetAllFailure(e.getMessage());
}
#Override
public void onNext(List<Recipe> recipe) {
recipeGetAllListener.onRecipeGetAllSuccess(recipe);
}
});
}
#Override
public void shutdown() {
if(subscription != null && !subscription.isUnsubscribed()) {
subscription.unsubscribe();
}
}
}
Inside my test class I am testing like this:
public class RecipeListModelImpTest {
#Mock Subscription subscription;
#Mock RecipesAPI recipesAPI;
#Mock RecipeListModelContract.RecipeGetAllListener recipeGetAllListener;
#Mock List<Recipe> recipes;
#Inject RecipeSchedulers recipeSchedulers;
private RecipeListModelContract recipeListModel;
#Before
public void setup() {
TestBusbyComponent testBusbyComponent = DaggerTestBusbyComponent.builder()
.mockRecipeSchedulersModule(new MockRecipeSchedulersModule())
.build();
testBusbyComponent.inject(RecipeListModelImpTest.this);
MockitoAnnotations.initMocks(RecipeListModelImpTest.this);
recipeListModel = new RecipeListModelImp(recipesAPI, recipeSchedulers);
}
#Test(expected = NullPointerException.class)
public void testShouldThrowExceptionOnNullParameter() {
recipeListModel = new RecipeListModelImp(null, null);
}
#Test
public void testRecipeListModelShouldNotBeNull() {
assertNotNull(recipeListModel);
}
#Test
public void testShouldGetRecipesFromAPI() {
when(recipesAPI.getAllRecipes()).thenReturn(Observable.just(recipes));
recipeListModel.getRecipesFromAPI(recipeGetAllListener);
verify(recipesAPI, times(1)).getAllRecipes();
verify(recipeGetAllListener, times(1)).onRecipeGetAllSuccess(recipes);
verify(recipeGetAllListener, never()).onRecipeGetAllFailure(anyString());
}
#Test
public void testShouldFailToGetRecipesFromAPI() {
when(recipesAPI.getAllRecipes())
.thenReturn(Observable.<List<Recipe>>error(
new Throwable(new RuntimeException("Failed to get recipes"))));
recipeListModel.getRecipesFromAPI(recipeGetAllListener);
verify(recipesAPI, times(1)).getAllRecipes();
verify(recipeGetAllListener, times(1)).onRecipeGetAllFailure(anyString());
verify(recipeGetAllListener, never()).onRecipeGetAllSuccess(recipes);
}
#Test
public void testShouldShutdown() {
when(subscription.isUnsubscribed()).thenReturn(false);
final Field subscriptionField;
try {
subscriptionField = recipeListModel.getClass().getDeclaredField("subscription");
subscriptionField.setAccessible(true);
subscriptionField.set(recipeListModel, subscription);
} catch(NoSuchFieldException e) {
e.printStackTrace();
}
catch(IllegalAccessException e) {
e.printStackTrace();
}
recipeListModel.shutdown();
verify(subscription, times(1)).unsubscribe();
}
}
However, the problem is the Subscription in my model class is always null so will never enter the if blook. Is there any way to test this with using Mockito or spys?
Many thanks for any suggestions,
You should for testing recipeListModel class, where you have shutdown() method , set mock into this class.
If you don't have set method for subscription in recipeListModel , or constructor param.... ),you can set mock object with reflection like :
#Test
public void testShouldShutdown() {
Subscription subscription = mock(Subscription.class);
when(subscription.isUnsubscribed()).thenReturn(false);
Field subscriptionField = recipeListModel.getClass().getDeclaredField("subscription");
subscriptionField.setAccessible(true);
subscriptionField.set(recipeListModel, subscriptionMock);
recipeListModel.shutdown();
verify(subscription, times(1)).unsubscribe();
}
after your update :
if you can't change way of creation , you should mock it like (full way of creation) , i don't know your api , so it's just idea:
Subscription subscription = mock(Subscription.class);
when(subscription.isUnsubscribed()).thenReturn(false);
// preparation mock for create Subscription
//for recipesAPI.getAllRecipes()
Object mockFor_getAllRecipes = mock(....);
when(recipesAPI.getAllRecipes()).thenReturn(mockFor_getAllRecipes );
//for subscribeOn(recipeSchedulers.getBackgroundScheduler())
Object mockFor_subscribeOn = mock();
when(mockFor_getAllRecipes.subscribeOn(any())).thenReturn(mockFor_subscribeOn);
//for .observeOn(recipeSchedulers.getUIScheduler())
Object mockFor_observeOn = mock();
when(mockFor_subscribeOn .observeOn(any())).thenReturn(observeOn);
// for .subscribe
when(observeOn.subscribe(any()).thenReturn(subscription);
I'm trying to use Spring Caching annotations #Cacheable and #CacheEvict together with the GuavaCacheManager.
I've created a test case with these two tests:
cachesById - verifies that two invocations to a method annotatted with #Cacheable returns the same object
evict - verifies that two different instances are returned if a method annotated with #CacheEvict is called in-between those two invocations
Both work fine when i don't specify a key for #CacheEvict, however when I do i get the following exception:
java.lang.NullPointerException
at com.google.common.base.Preconditions.checkNotNull(Preconditions.java:210)
at com.google.common.cache.LocalCache$LocalManualCache.invalidate(LocalCache.java:4764)
at org.springframework.cache.guava.GuavaCache.evict(GuavaCache.java:135)
at org.springframework.cache.interceptor.AbstractCacheInvoker.doEvict(AbstractCacheInvoker.java:95)
at org.springframework.cache.interceptor.CacheAspectSupport.performCacheEvict(CacheAspectSupport.java:409)
at org.springframework.cache.interceptor.CacheAspectSupport.processCacheEvicts(CacheAspectSupport.java:392)
at org.springframework.cache.interceptor.CacheAspectSupport.execute(CacheAspectSupport.java:362)
at org.springframework.cache.interceptor.CacheAspectSupport.execute(CacheAspectSupport.java:299)
at org.springframework.cache.interceptor.CacheInterceptor.invoke(CacheInterceptor.java:61)
at org.springframework.aop.framework.ReflectiveMethodInvocation.proceed(ReflectiveMethodInvocation.java:179)
at org.springframework.aop.framework.CglibAopProxy$DynamicAdvisedInterceptor.intercept(CglibAopProxy.java:653)
at com.myorg.caching.CacheTest$Repo$$EnhancerBySpringCGLIB$$eed50f3e.update(<generated>)
at com.myorg.caching.CacheTest.evict(CacheTest.java:50)
This can be reproduced by executing the below test.
#RunWith(SpringJUnit4ClassRunner.class)
#ContextConfiguration(
classes = { Repo.class, CacheTest.SpringConfig.class },
loader = AnnotationConfigContextLoader.class)
public class CacheTest {
private static final String CACHE_NAME = "cacheName";
#Inject
private Repo repo;
#Test
public void cachesById() {
Entity aResult1 = repo.getEntity(1);
Entity aResult2 = repo.getEntity(1);
assertEquals(aResult1.getId(), aResult2.getId());
assertSame(aResult1, aResult2);
}
#Test
public void evict() {
Entity aResult1 = repo.getEntity(1);
repo.update(aResult1);
Entity aResult2 = repo.getEntity(1);
assertEquals(aResult1.getId(), aResult2.getId());
assertNotSame(aResult1, aResult2);
}
/** Mock repository/entity classes below. */
#Component
public static class Repo {
#Cacheable(value = CACHE_NAME, key = "#id")
public Entity getEntity(int id) {
return new Entity(id);
}
#CacheEvict(value = CACHE_NAME, key = "#id")
public void update(Entity e) {
}
}
public static class Entity {
private int id;
public Entity(int id) {
super();
this.id = id;
}
public int getId() {
return id;
}
public void setId(int id) {
this.id = id;
}
}
/** Guava Cachemanager Spring configuration */
#Configuration
#EnableCaching
public static class SpringConfig {
#Bean
public CacheManager cacheManager() {
GuavaCacheManager manager = new GuavaCacheManager(CACHE_NAME);
manager.setCacheBuilder(CacheBuilder.newBuilder().expireAfterWrite(
1, TimeUnit.MINUTES).recordStats());
return manager;
}
}
}
However the test passes if I change
#CacheEvict(value = CACHE_NAME, key = "#id")
public void update(Entity e) {
into:
#CacheEvict(value = CACHE_NAME)
public void update(Entity e) {
..but then I'm missing the point where I need to specify the cache key for Entity. Does anyone know what I'm missing?
Thanks!
You have to fix you component class from
#Component
public static class Repo {
#Cacheable(value = CACHE_NAME, key = "#id")
public Entity getEntity(int id) {
return new Entity(id);
}
#CacheEvict(value = CACHE_NAME, key = "#id")
public void update(Entity e) {
}
}
to
#Component
public static class Repo {
#Cacheable(value = CACHE_NAME, key = "#id")
public Entity getEntity(int id) {
return new Entity(id);
}
#CacheEvict(value = CACHE_NAME, key = "#e?.id")
public void update(Entity e) {
}
}
Why? In getEntity method you're caching an Entity object using int id, you have to pass the same int id into the #CacheEvict annotated method. You don't have to change method's signature - by using SPEL you can "get into" entity and use its id field.
Hope I helped.
I am trying to figure out a way to have a class full of static objects which each can have a variety of static properties.
I want to be able to pass these properties around and even set them as static properties of other object and I also want to be able to switch through the objects.
Here is an example illustrating what I mean:
Creating and Sending a Message
class Program
{
static void Main(string[] args)
{
MarketOrder Order = new MarketOrder("DELL", MessageProperties.SecurityType.Equity, MessageProperties.ExchangeDestination.ARCA.PostOnly);
SendOrder(Order);
Console.ReadLine();
}
public static void SendOrder(MarketOrder Order)
{
switch (Order.SecurityType)
{
case MessageProperties.SecurityType.Equity:
// Equity sending logic here
break;
case MessageProperties.SecurityType.Option:
// Option sending logic here
break;
case MessageProperties.SecurityType.Future:
// Future sending logic here
break;
}
}
}
This does not want to compile because it won't let me switch the Order.SecurityType object.
MarketOrder Class
public class MarketOrder
{
public readonly string Symbol;
public readonly MessageProperties.SecurityType SecurityType;
public readonly MessageProperties.ExchangeDestination ExchangeDestination;
public MarketOrder(string Symbol, MessageProperties.SecurityType SecurityType, MessageProperties.ExchangeDestination ExchangeDestination)
{
this.Symbol = Symbol;
this.SecurityType = SecurityType;
this.ExchangeDestination = ExchangeDestination;
}
}
MessageProperties Class
public abstract class MessageProperties
{
public class ExchangeDestination
{
public readonly string Value;
public readonly double ExchangeFee;
public ExchangeDestination(string Value, double ExchangeFeed)
{
this.Value = Value;
this.ExchangeFee = ExchangeFee;
}
public abstract class ARCA
{
public static ExchangeDestination Only = new ExchangeDestination("ARCA.ONLY", 0.01);
public static ExchangeDestination PostOnly = new ExchangeDestination("ARCA.ONLYP", 0.02);
}
public abstract class NYSE
{
public static ExchangeDestination Only = new ExchangeDestination("NYSE.ONLY", 0.01);
public static ExchangeDestination PostOnly = new ExchangeDestination("NYSE.ONLYP", 0.03);
}
}
public class SecurityType
{
public readonly string Value;
public SecurityType(string Value)
{
this.Value = Value;
}
public static SecurityType Equity = new SecurityType("EQ");
public static SecurityType Option = new SecurityType("OPT");
public static SecurityType Future = new SecurityType("FUT");
}
}
Enums work perfectly for what I am trying to do except it is hard to have multiple properties of an enum value. I considered using Attributes on Enums to set the properties but getting those vs. getting static properties of objects is substantially slower and my application is extremely speed/latency sensitive.
Is there perhaps a better way of accomplishing what I am trying to do?
Thanks in advance for your help!
William