I'm trying to make a bash script that behaves differently based on the terminal program that someone is using (Putty, mobaxterm, etc). Is there any way to retrieve this kind of information from a bash script?
I was searching around online but I was not able to find anything (or I'm just wording it incorrectly, which could be a distinct possibility).
thank you
You need to understand that these are terminal emulators. There is a simple, crude identification function for (most?) modern line terminals (now that's an oxymoron!) but it will return something like vt102 or xterm i.e. whatever the emulator is emulating; not the identity of the program performing this emulation. Incidentally, this is usually used when the session is initiated, and reflected in the value of the $TERM environment variable.
The common way to do this is the environment variable TERM. Try
echo $TERM
That should output the terminal emulator's type, indicating its capabilities. Often, though not always, the value of TERM will be the name of the terminal emulator. For example, xterm may set TERM to xterm, or to xterm-color, depending on configuration.
Note that the user can change this variable, so it may contain something completely different.
That said, if you want to do fancy things with the terminal from a script, you don't need to build support for different terminals by hand. There are various libraries that offer all the usual functions (clear terminal, resize window, change font etc.). The most popular one is terminfo; there are various packages that build on terminfo.
Related
I only need to set a color that will only effect a particular directory not globally.
If you are using Bash in a terminal that supports colors and would like to change the default color for text output to the terminal (not specifically the output of ls) while inside this directory, there is one thing you could do.
The PROMPT_COMMAND variable can be set to execute a command just before printing the prompt. You could use that to check for the current directory and change the terminal color (for instance by assigning the PS1 variable with a prompt that contains non-displayable special codes for selecting a color or echoing said special codes).
PROMPT_COMMAND is documented in the Bash manual: https://www.gnu.org/software/bash/manual/bashref.html
As for how to assign colors, you should look that up if interested.
This solution may not be what you are looking for, will probably have side effects, and generally speaking, I am not sure it will be that useful changing terminal colors depending on the current directory. The usual solution is to have a prompt that shows the current directory path (or at least the last portion of the path).
I use something similar to the above to change text color depending on which machine I am executing Bash on, as I use ssh a lot from one machine to another over several terminal windows, and color (on a black background) is a good way to remember what machine any given window is connected to.
I am looking to implement a remote client in golang which connects to Linux through nc and starts bash. So I need to tell bash what features I can parse from the stdout that it sends to me, and how I am going to send keycodes and other stuff to its stdin, so that it could parse them too.
This is done with TERM=something environment variable, which I need to set to some value. If I don't set it, then various programs start to complain:
$ mc
The TERM environment variable is unset!
I found that I can set TERM to dumb to say that my client is really limited. And still it seems that I am missing something.
$ export TERM=dumb
$ mc
Your terminal lacks the ability to clear the screen or position the cursor.
From here it looks like dumb terminal don't have these two abilities, but what abilities it is still expected to have? Is there a specification or some de-facto standard about it?
Going to the source can help. The terminal database has comments. Here is a slice from that:
#### Specials
#
# Special "terminals". These are used to label tty lines when you don't
# know what kind of terminal is on it. The characteristics of an unknown
# terminal are the lowest common denominator - they look about like a ti 700.
#
dumb|80-column dumb tty,
am,
cols#80,
bel=^G, cr=^M, cud1=^J, ind=^J,
unknown|unknown terminal type,
gn, use=dumb,
The "dumb" and "unknown" terminal types are assumed, but rarely used:
"dumb" has automargins (text "wraps" at the right margin), is assumed to have 80 columns, and an ASCII BEL and carriage return. For lack of something better, cud1 (cursor down) is an ASCII line-feed. The ind (index) value is the same, implying that text scrolls up when you reach the bottom of the screen.
There is no cursor-addressing (cup) nor alternates (such as moving along a row or column arbitrarily).
"unknown" adds the "generic" flag, which marks it as unsuitable for use by curses applications. Think of it as a printer.
As for minimum requirements, that actually depends upon the individual application. ncurses can manage to move around the screen without actually having cup. It works with a half-dozen strategies. If you read the source for mvcur, you can get an idea of what it needs.
However, applications such as mc do not simply rely upon ncurses to decide if it works, since (in this case) it may link with slang (which doesn't check that closely). So mc does its own checks, which may add restrictions.
In practice, unless you choose a limited terminal description such as "dumb", most of the terminals you are likely to encounter will work.
Further reading:
terminfo - terminal capability data base
curses interfaces to terminfo database (including mvcur)
ncurses/tty/lib_mvcur.c
Your best source of information will be the terminfo entry, easily viewed with the infocmp tool:
infocmp dumb
# Reconstructed via infocmp from file: /lib/terminfo/d/dumb
dumb|80-column dumb tty,
am,
cols#80,
bel=^G, cr=^M, cud1=^J, ind=^J,
which makes it pretty clear that the dumb terminal is quite limited ...
I'm doing some work using Linux server, after I log on to the server,the tutorial says:
If you need to run any program which will open a window, like xterm, from these servers, you need to set display first.
To do that, I need to execute setenv DISPLAY name:portnum.What does this command really do?If I don't execute this command,what will happen?And what is xterm?
setenv is specific and peculiar to csh and derivatives. The modern portable syntax is
DISPLAY=:0.0
though if your shell is csh or tcsh, this will not work, and you do need setenv after all.
Depending on the use case, you may need to export DISPLAY as well.
Environment variables are a simple way to pass configuration information between programs. The DISPLAY variable indicates to graphical programs on which screen or graphical terminal to display their GUI.
For X Window System, it is a server/client architecture, usually, server side is called display, the tutorials means you should launch server side and specify launch parameter for server side.
read here for more details.
Xterm is just a terminal. And setenv, is used to set Environment variables, which are basically variables used to define the behavior of the terminal. For example, you have the variable PATH, which is used by the terminal to find the path where to execute binaries. Because if you type the command "ls", your terminal has to go into the "env", look for the variable "PATH", and use the value stored in this variable "PATH" to find the path of the ls binary. But I don't know if it's necessary in your situation, could you give more details about the context?
Many terminal programs will behave differently depending on the STDOUT destination, either terminal or pipe or file. Usually they will remove colors. There are usually command line options for some of them to keep colors or formatting or anything else that is intended only for direct terminal output. But those options are not always present and it takes time to find them thus I need a generic way to trick the program so that it thinks that STDOUT is terminal, not a pipe. How to achieve this?
There are several tools for this, they basically create a pty for your command.
The best known is probably expect: http://expect.sf.net
Alternatively, empty: http://empty.sf.net
There are several examples in that page, have a look.
For simple cases, script -c 'mycommand' may be a viable alternative.
And tmux, which is powerful and pretty easy to script.
I've created a couple of very simple bash scripts for a home-made games arcade (input configuration, updating stuff etc). I've got a launcher, so it's not a problem to direct the user to run the wanted shell script, but while running a bash script functionality-wise gives me everything I need, the default low-res text-on-black look scares the end user.
What is the simplest way to "prettify" fullscreen shell scripts? Something that'll run the script in 1080p, use bigger bubbly antialiased fonts, add a fancy animated background etc., but still pretty much lets me stick to write good-old shell scripts?
I guess another way to ask is: Does a prettier, more modern GUI-looking alternative to whiptail exist?
I am running from the terminal, so the GUI library it would have to be as fully self-contained as possible.
The ability of a shell script to display a quit within the terminal window itself is limited entirely to the graphical capabilities of the terminal (and to what termcap/terminfo has support for).
Most terminals max out at 256 colors (though supposedly konsole has support for arbitrary RGB colors somehow).
Control over font sizing/etc. from the shell is limited to the escape sequences that the terminal is willing to respond to (and I don't know if those are at all standard or discoverable at runtime).
The best option for this might be to have your script re-exec itself in a new terminal window to which it passes appropriate arguments to control font selection, window geometry, color selection, etc.
That being said even reliably doing that isn't necessarily the easiest thing in the world (I'm not sure how portable the command line options are between different terminal emulators or how many more advanced features they expose).
You could use python with the library Gooey that makes easy to turn CLI applications to GUI:
It can be customized and it takes only one line for the magic to happen:
from gooey import Gooey
#Gooey <--- all it takes! :)
def main():
# rest of code