Say I have some routes (I have a lot more, but this should explain):
router.post('/post');
router.get('/post/:id');
router.get('/posts/:page?');
router.get('/search');
For the /post ones I know I could do something like
app.use('/post', postRoutes)
Where postRoutes is the actual post routes in another file. However, I'd like to group all post related routes into a postRoutes component (so /post and /posts), search into a search component and so on. Is there a way to do something like
router.use(postRoutes); // includes routes 1-3 above
router.use(searchRoutes); // only the 4th route above
And so on? That would let me keep the top level file much cleaner.
Yes it is simple. You can even make more nesting levels. I think it is good to separate routes, especially when you have dozens of routes.
in your first file (server.js)
app.use(require("./allpost"));
app.use(require("./allqueries"));
in allpost.js
var express = require('express');
var router = new express.Router();
router.post('/post', function (req, res) {
//your code
});
router.get('/post/:id', function (req, res) {
//your code
});
router.get('/posts/:page?', function (req, res) {
//your code
});
when you want more nesting
router.use(require("./deeper"));
or when you want use path part
router.use("/post2/", require("./messages/private"));
module.exports = router;
You could do that by creating a special route file. Here's an example of such file
module.exports = (function() {
var express = require('express');
var router = express.Router();
router.get("/:id", function (request, response, next) {
request.body.id = request.params["id"];
// Do something ...
});
router.post("/someRoute", function (request, response, next) {
// Do something ...
});
// And so on ...
return router;
})();
Next, in you server.js file, include it like this
app.use('/post', require('./routes/postRoutes'));
The problem was I was thinking about this wrong. First off, don't use singular and plural. It makes it a headache and also makes it hard for people to remember the API.
Once I used all plural I had a setup like this in my index.js file:
// The API routes all start with /api and we pass app here so we can have some
// sub routes inside of api
app.use('/api', require('./app/api')(app));
And then in my api/index.js
var express = require('express');
var router = express.Router({ mergeParams: true });
var routeInit = function (app) {
app.use('sessions', require('./sessions')(router));
app.use('users', require('./users')(router));
return router;
};
module.exports = routeInit;
You can see that I'm passing the router manually each time. Then finally:
var routeInit = function (router) {
router.post('/blah', function (req, res, next) {
// Do stuff
});
return router;
};
module.exports = routeInit;
This allowed me to nest routes infinitely deep.
Related
I have the following route in my express (version 4.17.1) API in a postTimecardCompany.js file:
const mongoose = require('mongoose');
const Timecard = require('./../models/timecard');
function postTimecardCompany(server) {
server.post('/api/v1/timecard/:userId', (req, res) => {
// Insert timecard data into the database
Timecard.create(data, (error, result) => {
// Check for errors
if (error) {
res.status(500).end();
return;
}
// Respond
res.status(200).send({timecardId: result._id});
});
});
}
module.exports = postTimecardCompany;
The route (among other routes) is loaded via the following mechanism by server.js file:
[
'postTimecardCompany',
'anotherRoute',
'someOtherRoute',
'andSoOn...'
].map((route) => {
require('./core/routes/' + route + '.js').call(null, server)
});
I have a middleware (in server.js file) where I check which route is being called.
server.use((req, res, next) => {
// If route is "/api/v1/timecard/:userId" do something
});
I have found various solutions which do nearly what I am looking for, but not exactly.
For example, if I post to the route with a data parameter userId value of "123f9b" then req.originalUrl gives an output of "/api/v1/timecard/123f9b."
What i'm looking to get is the original route path with the parameters in it so for a request of "/api/v1/timecard/123f9b" it would be: "/api/v1/timecard/:userId."
How do I get this functionality in express or extend express to get the original route path with parameters in the request object?
if you want to use from your approach, it's is impossible, after that your approach is not standard in express check the documentation, if you want get routes in a middleware you should try like this:
server.js
const express = require('express')
const server = express()
const postTimecardCompany = require('./routes/postTimecardCompany.js')// don't use map()
server.use("/",postTimecardCompany)//use the routes
server.listen(6565,()=>console.log(`Listening to PORT 6565`))
routes of postTimecardCompany.js
use Router of express and export router, and you can use middleware before each route you want, there are many ways to use middleware in routes, check the documentation
const express = require("express");
const router = express.Router();
const middleware = require('../middleware');//require middlewares
router.post("/api/v1/timecard/:userId", middleware,(req, res) => {
// Insert timecard data into the database
console.log(req.route.path);
});
module.exports = router;
middleware.js
module.exports = ((req, res, next) => {
console.log(req.route.path);
next()
});
I'm using node and express to create a rest api. I followed a tutorial where all the routes and its logic are saved in a routes.js file like this:
SERVER JS:
var express = require('express');
var app = express();
(...)
require('./app/routes.js')(app, port, express);
ROUTES.JS
module.exports = function(app, port, express) {
var apiRoutes = express.Router();
(...)
//Sample route
apiRoutes.get('/userfiles', function(req, res) {
UserFile.find({ owner: req.decoded.user.email }, function(err, filesList) {
if (err)
return done(err);
res.json({ success: true, files: filesList });
});
});
My problem is twofold:
1 - Routes can easily contain code thats 150 lines long, some of them far longer. It doesn't feel clean to have route declarations and the logic grouped together. Is it a good practice to do something like this instead?
apiRoutes.post('/randomRoute', function(req, res) {
return res.json(functionThatContainsTheActualCode(req));
});
(and then have an functionThatContainsTheActualCode function with all the logic in a different file).
2 - I have middleware that applies to some functions (for example, some routes are only accessible for logged in users and those routes go through an authentication middleware). Currently way I do it is declaring public routes before the middleware declaration and private routes after, which feels incredibly hacky. How can I separate public and private routes (and the middleware itself) in different files?
Problem 1:
We need to go deeper.
Change the route file to just require the actual router logic.
routes.js
// where app = express();
module.exports = (app) => {
// index.js happens to be a file exporting the router.
app.use('/', require('./index'));
// this is basically the idea. Create a separate file for the actual logic.
app.use('/route', require('.path/to/file'));
};
and in file.js
const express = require('express'),
router = express.Router();
router.verb('/path/', (req, res, next) => {
// do whatever
});
// this is required
module.exports = router;
Problem 2:
Middleware is basically a function taking in request, response, next as 3 params, doing something with the request and either sending out a response or moving on to the next middleware. That's why you need to call next if you want to move to next middleware in the chain.
Now all you need is a file that exports a function which takes request, response, next as params.
// lets call this auth.js
module.exports = function(req, res, next) {
// do logic
if () {
return res.send(); // or res.somethingThatSendsOutAHttpResponse()
}
// next middelware
next();
};
Since express routes are also middlewares, (mind blown), you can mount them top down.
To authenticate a route, just put the auth.js middleware on top of that route.
router.get('/', require('./auth'));
router.get('/', require('./log'));
router.get('/', (req, res, next) => {
// yolo
});
Now since this is web dev, you still got problems.
Now all your boring database queries are scattered everywhere.
Fear not, you can solve it, by, guess, creating another file.
apiRoutes.get('/userfiles', function(req, res) {
const userFile = require('/path/to/model/with/userfile/methods/exported/out');
// do something with userFile's methods
});
UPDATE 2: I just noticed that if on the app file I change the line:
app.use('/', home);
to:
app.use('/anything', home);
then all of the sub routes "roots" work fine.
UPDATE 3: I just realized something else. A method on the home.js file that I did not originally include below since I didn't think was relevant turns out to be the cause of the problem.
router.get('/:adventureId', (req, res) => {
var data;
//Irrelevant content that sets data as a JSON object.
res.json(data);
});
Turns out that every single sub route "root" is passing through here and since on the other routes adventureId is undefined then data is just an empty JSON object.
So the real question is: If this router bound to "/" and the other "roots" are bound to "/adventure" and "/test" why are all of them going through "/:adventrueId"?
I have a very simple ExpressJS application on which all of the "roots" in each and every single route other than home are not being handled and they always display an empty JSON object on the page.
In some posts it was mentioned that it could be a caching issue since these routes always return a 304 status, but I've tried doing an "Empty cach and hard reload" on Chrome and even with the 200 status I still get a blank page with an empty JSON object displayed on it. I tried it with MS Edge and got the exact same behavior.
Here's what I have:
On my app file
var app = express();
var home = require('./routes/home');
var adventure = require('./routes/adventure');
var test = require('./routes/test');
app.use('/', home);
app.use('/adventure', adventure);
app.use('/test', test);
On home.js file:
var express = require('express');
var router = express.Router();
router.get('/', (req, res) => {
console.log("This works fine with http://localhost:3000.");
res.render('home');
});
router.get('/:adventureId', (req, res) => {
var data;
//Irrelevant content that sets data as a JSON object.
res.json(data);
});
module.exports = router;
On the adventure.js file:
var express = require('express');
var router = express.Router();
router.use('/:id', (req, res) => {
console.log("This works fine with http://localhost:3000/adventure/5.");
next();
});
router.get('/:id', (req, res) => {
console.log("This works fine with http://localhost:3000/adventure/5.");
res.render('adventure');
});
//I've also tried putting this before the other routes and the result is the same.
router.get('/', (req, res) => {
console.log("This is never written in the console with http://localhost:3000/adventure.");
res.send("This is never rendered in the page.");
});
On the test.js file:
var express = require('express');
var router = express.Router();
router.use('/', (req, res) => {
console.log("This is never written on the console with http://localhost:3000/test.");
res.send("Hello from the test root route");
});
module.exports = router;
In the ExpressJS Router documentation and every single blog and example I've found it says that this is how it should work so I am really at a loss here.
Thank you.
If this router bound to "/" and the other "roots" are bound to "/adventure" and "/test" why are all of them going through "/:adventrueId"?
Because Express doesn't match routes based on which one matches best, it matches on which one matches first.
In your case, the route /:advertureId was declared before the routes for /adventure or /test. And /adventure and /test both match /:advertureId, so the handler for that route is called.
If you want to prevent this, declare more specific routes first:
app.use('/adventure', adventure);
app.use('/test', test);
app.use('/', home);
After much going around, several updates on the question and banging my head against the keyboard I finally understood what the problem is:
By having the routers set up like this:
app.use('/', home);
app.use('/adventure', adventure);
app.use('/game', gameService);
app.use('/test', test);
and on the "home" router having this method signature:
router.get('/:adventureId', (req, res) => {
var data;
//Irrelevant content that sets data as a JSON object.
res.json(data);
});
Every single sub route "root" was being interpreted as the parameter of the previous method so:
/adventure
/test
/anything
would be handled as:
adventrueId = adventrue
adventureId = test
adventrueId = anything
The solution was to do this:
app.use('/adventure', adventure);
app.use('/game', gameService);
app.use('/test', test);
app.use('/', home);
And now everything works.
In my small chat application, when I make a HTTP call to an endpoint ending in "users" I want my room router to take over. This be with a preceding room name, or with nothing at all.
routes.js:
module.exports = function(app) {
var roomRoute = require('./routes/room');
app.use('/:roomname/users', roomRoute);
app.use('/users', roomRoute);
};
Now when my room router takes over, I want to be able to access the room name if it exists in the url. Something like:
./routes/room.js:
var express = require('express');
var router = express.Router();
router.get('/info', function(req, res) {
console.log('the roomname is ' + req.roomname);
res.end();
});
module.exports = router;
Is there any way to easily pass this room name along? I could probably extract it from the baseUrl but I think there is probably a better way...
The router needs to set the mergeParams option to true.
http://expressjs.com/en/4x/api.html#express.router
let router = express.Router({ mergeParams: true });
The very next thing I read after I posted had the answer...
In routes.js:
var roomRoute = require('./routes/room');
app.use('/:roomname/users', function (req, res, next) {
req.roomname = req.params.roomname;
next();
}, roomRoute);
app.use('/users', roomRoute);
I'm making a nodeJS module, and I want to use expressJS as a framework for it.
I'm trying to see, how I could go by, including a function inside and app.get(); and call it via another file, such as the actual app.
var express = require("express");
var app = express();
app.get("/", function (req, res) {
exports.type = function (text) {
console.log(req.ip);
console.log(text);
}
});
now when I use this, and i call it on the actual app like:
var web = require("directory_to_file");
var express = require("express");
var app = express();
var http = require("http").Server(app);
app.get("/", function (req, res) {
web.type("Hello, world");
});
http.listen(10022, function () {
console.log("server is up");
});
I get an error:
TypeError: Property 'type' of object #<Object> is not a function
anyone know a way to make it so I can call the function?
There are generally two things you want to export as a module - an API and a Middleware. The classic example of middleware is an authentication module. To do the middleware, just export the middleware. I tend to do a little more than that so I can configure the middleware later. Something along the lines of this:
module.exports = exports = function(config) {
// Do something with config here
return function(req, res, next) {
// your middleware here
};
};
You can then use your middleware in your main program like this:
var app = require('express')(),
mymodule = require('./mymodule');
var config = {}; // replace with whatever config you need
app.use(mymodule(config));
app.listen(process.env.PORT || 3000);
To implement an API, you will create a Router object, then attach your routes to the Router object. You can then "mount" your router in your main program. For example, you could have a file called 'myroutes.js' with the following contents:
var express = require('express'),
myroutes = express.Router();
myroutes.get('/foo', (req, res) => {
res.status(200).type('application/json').send({ myparam: 'foo' });
});
module.exports = exports = myroutes;
Have the following in your main program:
var app = require('express')(),
myroutes = require('./myroutes');
app.use('/api', require('./myroutes'));
app.listen(process.env.PORT || 3000);
Here, in 'myroutes.js', I'm defining a sub-route of /foo and then in the main program, I'm mounting that on /api - so I would access /api/foo to access that API.
In your directory_to_file you are only exporting on app.get('/') which will never be called.
You could add in your directory_to_file the following code
var express = require('express');
var router = express.Router();
router.get('/', function(req, server) {
console.log(req.ip);
});
module.exports = router;
And in your main file you could use app.use('/', web)
A short explanation:
You are creating a new express app / config in your directory_to_file file which won't be launched or used. So your app.get event won't be fired once.
That's why web.type is not a function. You are not exporting anything.
Use the way I provided. This is a commonly used method.
You could call the code I provided a "route". Create multiple routes / route files and include them in your main method.
Your code just looks confused. If I understand you correctly, what you are really trying to do (at least in Node/express terminology) is write your own middleware.
Express is designed with this in mind and it's pretty straightforward e.g.
ipLogger.js
module.exports = function(req, res, next) {
console.log(req.ip);
next();
}
app.js
var http = require("http")
, express = require("express");
, app = express()
, server = http.Server(app)
, ipLogger = require("./ipLogger.js");
app.use(ipLogger()); // log IP of all requests
// handle routes
server.listen(10022, function() {
console.log("server is up");
});