#include <stdio.h>
#include <signal.h>
#include <stdlib.h>
#include <unistd.h>
#include <sys/wait.h>
#include <sys/types.h>
void handler(int sig)
{
pid_t pid;
int status;
while( (pid = waitpid(-1, &status, WNOHANG)) > 0 )
printf("%d\n", pid);
}
int main(void)
{
struct sigaction act;
pid_t pid;
int ch;
act.sa_handler = handler;
sigemptyset(&act.sa_mask);
act.sa_flags = 0;
sigaction(SIGCHLD, &act, 0);
pid = fork();
if( pid == 0 ) {
exit(0);
}
else {
if( (ch = fgetc(stdin)) == EOF )
printf("EOF\n");
}
}
Hello, I want to know about sigaction function. If I execute this program, the result is like below.
[process id]
EOF
Why EOF is in stdin buffer after processing SIGCHLD signal ? I don't know why this happen. or Maybe I don't know how to use sigaction function ?
fgetc() returns EOF if the file is at end-of-file or an error occurs while trying to read the character. In this case, read() being interrupted by a signal is an error, and the SA_RESTART option to sigaction() prevents this error.
To distinguish between EOF and error, use feof() or ferror(), or test the variable errno. errno will be 0 for the EOF case, non-zero for an error (EINTR in this case).
Related
I am getting unusual results while writing and reading from a pipe. The runtime error is Program terminated by signal: 13. I searched about this error and found that this error is due to there are no readers to read from pipe while i am reading from the pipe in the child process. Here is my code:
#include <sys/types.h>
#include <stdio.h>
#include <unistd.h>
#include <string.h>
#include <stdlib.h>
#define BUFFER_SIZE 50
#define READ_END 0
#define WRITE_END 1
int main()
{
int pipe_fd[2];
pid_t pid;
pid = fork();
char message[BUFFER_SIZE] = "Greetings";
char read_message[BUFFER_SIZE];
if( pipe(pipe_fd) == -1)
{
perror("Error in creating the pipe \n");
exit(-1);
}
if(pid==-1)
{
perror("Error in creating the child! \n");
exit(-1);
}
if(pid==0) // Child process
{
close(pipe_fd[WRITE_END]);
read(pipe_fd[READ_END], read_message , BUFFER_SIZE);
printf("The message read by the child is: %s", read_message);
close(pipe_fd[READ_END]);
}
if(pid>0) // Parent process
{
close(pipe_fd[READ_END]); //Closing the read end of the pipe
write(pipe_fd[WRITE_END], message, BUFFER_SIZE); // Writing to pipe on write_end
close(pipe_fd[WRITE_END]);
}
return 0;
}
Any suggestions how to solve this runtime error?
You need to open your pipe before you fork a child process. Otherwise your processes aren't talking to the same pipe.
Thus move your pipe creation code above the fork() call as follows:
if( pipe(pipe_fd) == -1)
{
perror("Error in creating the pipe \n");
exit(-1);
}
pid_t pid;
pid = fork();
char message[BUFFER_SIZE] = "Greetings";
char read_message[BUFFER_SIZE];
if(pid==-1)
{
perror("Error in creating the child! \n");
exit(-1);
}
I am learning about signals and wrote a simple programs that plays with them.
So i am inputting a number then using fork i create a process.The parent process is supposed to send the number as a signal to the child process,then the child_signal handler is supposed to send back the number squared as a signal.
This is the code.
#include <iostream>
#include <signal.h>
#include <sys/types.h>
#include <unistd.h>
#include <sys/wait.h>
#include <string.h>
#include <errno.h>
using namespace std;
void child_handler(int sig_num){
cout<<"Child recieved a signal"<<endl;
pid_t ppid = getppid();
if(kill(ppid,sig_num*sig_num) == -1){
cout<<"Childs signal handler failed to send a signal "<<endl;
}
cout<<"Sent a sgnal to the parent"<<endl;
return;
}
void parent_handler(int sig_num){
cout<<"Parent recieved a signal "<<endl;
cout<<sig_num<<endl;
return;
}
int main(){
int n;
cin>>n;
pid_t pid = fork();
if(pid != 0){
struct sigaction sa2;
memset(&sa2,0,sizeof(sa2));
sa2.sa_handler = parent_handler;
if(sigaction(n,&sa2,NULL) == -1){
cout<<"Parents sigaction failed "<<endl;
}
if(kill(pid,n) == -1){
cout<<"Kill failed "<<endl;
}
cout<<"Sent a signal to the child"<<endl;
waitpid(pid,0,0);
}
else{
struct sigaction sa1;
memset(&sa1,0,sizeof(sa1));
sa1.sa_handler = child_handler;
if(sigaction(n,&sa1,NULL) == -1){
cout<<"Childs sigaction failed eerno:"<<errno<<endl;
}
sleep(20);
return 0;
}
return 0;
}
The output is this.
Sent a signal to the child.
And it doesn't say anything about sigaction.
In your code a child process can receive a signal before setting a handler.
I'm trying to monitor syscalls for a binary using ptrace. The binary sleeps in pselect() and without ptrace, a SIGQUIT makes it return from pselect. The mask of blocked signals passed to pselect includes SIGQUIT.
When executed with ptrace, it exits from sys_pselect6 but not all the way out of glibc's pselect. What am I doing that prevents sys_pselect6 from exiting out to user code ?
Tracer:
#include <stdio.h>
#include <sys/ptrace.h>
#include <sys/reg.h>
#include <err.h>
#include <wait.h>
#include <unistd.h>
int main(int argc, char *argv[])
{
int pid = fork(), sys_in = 1, status;
if (pid == 0) {
if (ptrace(PTRACE_TRACEME, getppid(), NULL, NULL) < 0)
err(1, "TRACEME()");
execl("./child", "./child", NULL);
err(1, "execl()");
}
if (waitpid(pid, &status, 0) != pid) err(1, "wait()");
for (;; sys_in ^= 1) {
if (ptrace(PTRACE_SYSCALL, pid, NULL, NULL) < 0) err(1, "SYSCALL");
if (waitpid(pid, &status, 0) != pid) err(1, "wait()");
if (sys_in) {
long long sys_no = ptrace(PTRACE_PEEKUSER, pid, 8 * ORIG_RAX, NULL);
printf("syscall entry %lld\n", sys_no);
}
else printf("syscall exit\n");
}
return 0;
}
Child:
#include <stdio.h>
#include <sys/select.h>
#include <signal.h>
#include <err.h>
void handle_sigquit(int sig, siginfo_t* info, void *ctx)
{
}
int main()
{
sigset_t mask;
sigset_t orig_mask;
struct sigaction sa = {};
sa.sa_flags = SA_SIGINFO;
sa.sa_sigaction = handle_sigquit;
sigaction(SIGQUIT, &sa, NULL);
sigemptyset(&mask);
sigaddset(&mask, SIGQUIT);
if (sigprocmask(SIG_BLOCK, &mask, &orig_mask) < 0) err(1, "sigprocmask()");
pselect(0, NULL, NULL, NULL, NULL, &orig_mask);
warn("pselect()");
return 0;
}
ptrace(PTRACE_SYSCALL, pid, NULL, NULL)
Whenever your debugger gets a notification, you just assume that that notification is about a system call, and handle it accordingly. That is not the case.
Some of the notifications you receive using wait are for signals that your debugee has received. When those happen, the last NULL in your PTRACE_SYSCALL call eliminates, effectively masks, the signal from arriving at the debugee process.
When processing ptrace results, you need to check the signal that caused your debugger to wake up. At the very least, check if it's a SIGTRAP or something else. If it is something else, the best bet is to pass it on to the debugee process.
Check out this small program to see a simple way of doing it.
I have been struggling to find what I'm doing wrong and I can't seem to find the issue. When I compile the code below, I get an I/O error.
e.g: /usr/bin/sort: read failed: -: Input/output error
#include <stdio.h>
#include <stdlib.h>
#include <string.h>
#include <unistd.h>
int main(int argc, char **argv, char **envp)
{
int fd[2];
pid_t pid;
pipe(fd);
pid = fork();
if (pid == -1) {
exit(EXIT_FAILURE);
}
if (pid == 0) { /* child */
char *exe[]= { "/usr/bin/sort", NULL };
close(fd[0]);
execve("/usr/bin/sort", exe, envp);
}
else {
char *a[] = { "zilda", "andrew", "bartholomeu", NULL };
int i;
close(fd[1]);
for (i = 0; a[i]; i++)
printf("%s\n", a[i]);
}
return 0;
}
dup2(fd[0], 0) in the child.
dup2(fd[1], 1) in the parent.
close the other fd.
i am running valgrind in a bash script to use it for automated testing. I already added the option to return an exit code on error and to trace children.
/usr/bin/valgrind --error-exitcode=1 --trace-children=yes ./test_prog
My programm forks other processes and I can see the output of valgrind running the different processes in the terminal. The problem is, that the exit code option only seems to work when there is an error in the parent process. Because even though there is an error (SIGSEGV) in one of the child processes the exit code of valgrind is still 0, which means it is useless for the automated testing of several processes.
So is there any option, that would make the parent valgrind catch the error in the child and return it? I already looked into the man page. Maybe there would be another solution to this problem, like grepping the output of the children to the terminal for any error messages?
Thanks in advance.
it's important to implement a proper error handling in the code. Compare following two pieces of code.
A:
#include <stdio.h>
#include <unistd.h>
#include <stdlib.h>
#include <time.h>
#include <string.h>
#include <signal.h>
#define BUFSIZE 1024
int incr=0;
int loop=1;
void runTicks(const char *n) {
time_t t;
char buf[BUFSIZE+1];
pid_t pid;
int counter;
pid=getpid();
counter=0;
while(loop) {
sleep(1);
t=time(NULL);
strftime(buf,BUFSIZE,"%Y.%m.%d %H:%M:%S",localtime(&t));
printf("%s[%d] %s\n",n,pid,buf);
counter+=incr;
if(counter>5) memcpy((void *)1,buf,1); /* this line is for causing SEGV */
}
}
void handler(int s) {
if(s==SIGCHLD) {
printf("Received SIGCHLD\n");
loop=0;
}
}
void setHandler() {
struct sigaction sa;
sa.sa_handler=handler;
sigemptyset(&sa.sa_mask);
sa.sa_flags=SA_NOCLDSTOP;
if(sigaction(SIGCHLD,&sa,NULL)!=0) {
printf("Cannot set signal handler, there is no purpose in running the test\n");
exit(0);
}
}
int main() {
pid_t pid;
printf("start\n");
pid=fork();
if(pid==-1) {
printf("fork failed\n");
exit(10);
}
if(pid==0) {
printf("child\n");
incr=1;
usleep(500000);
runTicks("C");
exit(1);
} else {
printf("parent spawned child pid=%d\n",pid);
setHandler();
runTicks("P");
exit(0);
}
}
B:
#include <stdio.h>
#include <unistd.h>
#include <stdlib.h>
#include <time.h>
#include <string.h>
#include <signal.h>
#include <sys/wait.h>
#define BUFSIZE 1024
int incr=0;
int loop=1;
void runTicks(const char *n) {
time_t t;
char buf[BUFSIZE+1];
pid_t pid;
int counter;
pid=getpid();
counter=0;
while(loop) {
sleep(1);
t=time(NULL);
strftime(buf,BUFSIZE,"%Y.%m.%d %H:%M:%S",localtime(&t));
printf("%s[%d] %s\n",n,pid,buf);
counter+=incr;
if(counter>5) memcpy((void *)1,buf,1); /* this line is for causing SEGV */
}
}
void handler(int s) {
if(s==SIGCHLD) {
int status;
printf("Received SIGCHLD\n");
wait(&status);
printf("Exit code from child: %d\n",status);
if(status!=0) exit(status);
loop=0;
}
}
void setHandler() {
struct sigaction sa;
sa.sa_handler=handler;
sigemptyset(&sa.sa_mask);
sa.sa_flags=SA_NOCLDSTOP;
if(sigaction(SIGCHLD,&sa,NULL)!=0) {
printf("Cannot set signal handler, there is no purpose in running the test\n");
exit(0);
}
}
int main() {
pid_t pid;
printf("start\n");
pid=fork();
if(pid==-1) {
printf("fork failed\n");
exit(10);
}
if(pid==0) {
printf("child\n");
incr=1;
usleep(500000);
runTicks("C");
exit(1);
} else {
printf("parent spawned child pid=%d\n",pid);
setHandler();
runTicks("P");
exit(0);
}
}
Run those first without valgrind and compare the exit code of both programs. Then run them under valgrind and enjoy.
Using such construction you even don't need to run it under valgrind, to catch segfaults from child processes.