Suppose I have code like:
x = 0
y = 1
z = 2
my_list = [x, y, z]
for item in my_list:
print("handling object ", name(item)) # <--- what would go instead of `name`?
How can I get the name of each object in Python? That is to say: what could I write instead of name in this code, so that the loop will show handling object x and then handling object y and handling object z?
In my actual code, I have a dict of functions that I will call later after looking them up with user input:
def fun1():
pass
def fun2():
pass
def fun3():
pass
fun_dict = {'fun1': fun1,
'fun2': fun2,
'fun3': fun3}
# suppose that we get the name 'fun3' from the user
fun_dict['fun3']()
How can I create fun_dict automatically, without writing the names of the functions twice? I would like to be able to write something like
fun_list = [fun1, fun2, fun3] # and I'll add more as the need arises
fun_dict = {}
for t in fun_list:
fun_dict[name(t)] = t
to avoid duplicating the names.
Objects do not necessarily have names in Python, so you can't get the name.
When you create a variable, like the x, y, z above then those names just act as "pointers" or "references" to the objects. The object itself does not know what name(s) you are using for it, and you can not easily (if at all) get the names of all references to that object.
However, it's not unusual for objects to have a __name__ attribute. Functions do have a __name__ (unless they are lambdas), so we can build fun_dict by doing e.g.
fun_dict = {t.__name__: t for t in fun_list)
That's not really possible, as there could be multiple variables that have the same value, or a value might have no variable, or a value might have the same value as a variable only by chance.
If you really want to do that, you can use
def variable_for_value(value):
for n,v in globals().items():
if v == value:
return n
return None
However, it would be better if you would iterate over names in the first place:
my_list = ["x", "y", "z"] # x, y, z have been previously defined
for name in my_list:
print "handling variable ", name
bla = globals()[name]
# do something to bla
This one-liner works, for all types of objects, as long as they are in globals() dict, which they should be:
def name_of_global_obj(xx):
return [objname for objname, oid in globals().items()
if id(oid)==id(xx)][0]
or, equivalently:
def name_of_global_obj(xx):
for objname, oid in globals().items():
if oid is xx:
return objname
As others have mentioned, this is a really tricky question. Solutions to this are not "one size fits all", not even remotely. The difficulty (or ease) is really going to depend on your situation.
I have come to this problem on several occasions, but most recently while creating a debugging function. I wanted the function to take some unknown objects as arguments and print their declared names and contents. Getting the contents is easy of course, but the declared name is another story.
What follows is some of what I have come up with.
Return function name
Determining the name of a function is really easy as it has the __name__ attribute containing the function's declared name.
name_of_function = lambda x : x.__name__
def name_of_function(arg):
try:
return arg.__name__
except AttributeError:
pass`
Just as an example, if you create the function def test_function(): pass, then copy_function = test_function, then name_of_function(copy_function), it will return test_function.
Return first matching object name
Check whether the object has a __name__ attribute and return it if so (declared functions only). Note that you may remove this test as the name will still be in globals().
Compare the value of arg with the values of items in globals() and return the name of the first match. Note that I am filtering out names starting with '_'.
The result will consist of the name of the first matching object otherwise None.
def name_of_object(arg):
# check __name__ attribute (functions)
try:
return arg.__name__
except AttributeError:
pass
for name, value in globals().items():
if value is arg and not name.startswith('_'):
return name
Return all matching object names
Compare the value of arg with the values of items in globals() and store names in a list. Note that I am filtering out names starting with '_'.
The result will consist of a list (for multiple matches), a string (for a single match), otherwise None. Of course you should adjust this behavior as needed.
def names_of_object(arg):
results = [n for n, v in globals().items() if v is arg and not n.startswith('_')]
return results[0] if len(results) is 1 else results if results else None
If you are looking to get the names of functions or lambdas or other function-like objects that are defined in the interpreter, you can use dill.source.getname from dill. It pretty much looks for the __name__ method, but in certain cases it knows other magic for how to find the name... or a name for the object. I don't want to get into an argument about finding the one true name for a python object, whatever that means.
>>> from dill.source import getname
>>>
>>> def add(x,y):
... return x+y
...
>>> squared = lambda x:x**2
>>>
>>> print getname(add)
'add'
>>> print getname(squared)
'squared'
>>>
>>> class Foo(object):
... def bar(self, x):
... return x*x+x
...
>>> f = Foo()
>>>
>>> print getname(f.bar)
'bar'
>>>
>>> woohoo = squared
>>> plus = add
>>> getname(woohoo)
'squared'
>>> getname(plus)
'add'
Use a reverse dict.
fun_dict = {'fun1': fun1,
'fun2': fun2,
'fun3': fun3}
r_dict = dict(zip(fun_dict.values(), fun_dict.keys()))
The reverse dict will map each function reference to the exact name you gave it in fun_dict, which may or may not be the name you used when you defined the function. And, this technique generalizes to other objects, including integers.
For extra fun and insanity, you can store the forward and reverse values in the same dict. I wouldn't do that if you were mapping strings to strings, but if you are doing something like function references and strings, it's not too crazy.
Note that while, as noted, objects in general do not and cannot know what variables are bound to them, functions defined with def do have names in the __name__ attribute (the name used in def). Also if the functions are defined in the same module (as in your example) then globals() will contain a superset of the dictionary you want.
def fun1:
pass
def fun2:
pass
def fun3:
pass
fun_dict = {}
for f in [fun1, fun2, fun3]:
fun_dict[f.__name__] = f
Here's another way to think about it. Suppose there were a name() function that returned the name of its argument. Given the following code:
def f(a):
return a
b = "x"
c = b
d = f(c)
e = [f(b), f(c), f(d)]
What should name(e[2]) return, and why?
And the reason I want to have the name of the function is because I want to create fun_dict without writing the names of the functions twice, since that seems like a good way to create bugs.
For this purpose you have a wonderful getattr function, that allows you to get an object by known name. So you could do for example:
funcs.py:
def func1(): pass
def func2(): pass
main.py:
import funcs
option = command_line_option()
getattr(funcs, option)()
I know This is late answer.
To get func name , you can use func.__name__
To get the name of any python object that has no name or __name__ method. You can iterate over its module members.
Ex:.
# package.module1.py
obj = MyClass()
# package.module2.py
import importlib
def get_obj_name(obj):
mod = Obj.__module__ # This is necessary to
module = module = importlib.import_module(mod)
for name, o in module.__dict__.items():
if o == obj:
return name
Performance note: don't use it in large modules.
Variable names can be found in the globals() and locals() dicts. But they won't give you what you're looking for above. "bla" will contain the value of each item of my_list, not the variable.
Generally when you are wanting to do something like this, you create a class to hold all of these functions and name them with some clear prefix cmd_ or the like. You then take the string from the command, and try to get that attribute from the class with the cmd_ prefixed to it. Now you only need to add a new function/method to the class, and it's available to your callers. And you can use the doc strings for automatically creating the help text.
As described in other answers, you may be able to do the same approach with globals() and regular functions in your module to more closely match what you asked for.
Something like this:
class Tasks:
def cmd_doit(self):
# do it here
func_name = parse_commandline()
try:
func = getattr('cmd_' + func_name, Tasks())
except AttributeError:
# bad command: exit or whatever
func()
I ran into this page while wondering the same question.
As others have noted, it's simple enough to just grab the __name__ attribute from a function in order to determine the name of the function. It's marginally trickier with objects that don't have a sane way to determine __name__, i.e. base/primitive objects like basestring instances, ints, longs, etc.
Long story short, you could probably use the inspect module to make an educated guess about which one it is, but you would have to probably know what frame you're working in/traverse down the stack to find the right one. But I'd hate to imagine how much fun this would be trying to deal with eval/exec'ed code.
% python2 whats_my_name_again.py
needle => ''b''
['a', 'b']
[]
needle => '<function foo at 0x289d08ec>'
['c']
['foo']
needle => '<function bar at 0x289d0bfc>'
['f', 'bar']
[]
needle => '<__main__.a_class instance at 0x289d3aac>'
['e', 'd']
[]
needle => '<function bar at 0x289d0bfc>'
['f', 'bar']
[]
%
whats_my_name_again.py:
#!/usr/bin/env python
import inspect
class a_class:
def __init__(self):
pass
def foo():
def bar():
pass
a = 'b'
b = 'b'
c = foo
d = a_class()
e = d
f = bar
#print('globals', inspect.stack()[0][0].f_globals)
#print('locals', inspect.stack()[0][0].f_locals)
assert(inspect.stack()[0][0].f_globals == globals())
assert(inspect.stack()[0][0].f_locals == locals())
in_a_haystack = lambda: value == needle and key != 'needle'
for needle in (a, foo, bar, d, f, ):
print("needle => '%r'" % (needle, ))
print([key for key, value in locals().iteritems() if in_a_haystack()])
print([key for key, value in globals().iteritems() if in_a_haystack()])
foo()
You define a class and add the Unicode private function insert the class like
class example:
def __init__(self, name):
self.name = name
def __unicode__(self):
return self.name
Of course you have to add extra variable self.name which is the name of the object.
Here is my answer, I am also using globals().items()
def get_name_of_obj(obj, except_word = ""):
for name, item in globals().items():
if item == obj and name != except_word:
return name
I added except_word because I want to filter off some word used in for loop.
If you didn't add it, the keyword in for loop may confuse this function, sometimes the keyword like "each_item" in the following case may show in the function's result, depends on what you have done to your loop.
eg.
for each_item in [objA, objB, objC]:
get_name_of_obj(obj, "each_item")
eg.
>>> objA = [1, 2, 3]
>>> objB = ('a', {'b':'thi is B'}, 'c')
>>> for each_item in [objA, objB]:
... get_name_of_obj(each_item)
...
'objA'
'objB'
>>>
>>>
>>> for each_item in [objA, objB]:
... get_name_of_obj(each_item)
...
'objA'
'objB'
>>>
>>>
>>> objC = [{'a1':'a2'}]
>>>
>>> for item in [objA, objB, objC]:
... get_name_of_obj(item)
...
'objA'
'item' <<<<<<<<<< --------- this is no good
'item'
>>> for item in [objA, objB]:
... get_name_of_obj(item)
...
'objA'
'item' <<<<<<<<--------this is no good
>>>
>>> for item in [objA, objB, objC]:
... get_name_of_obj(item, "item")
...
'objA'
'objB' <<<<<<<<<<--------- now it's ok
'objC'
>>>
Hope this can help.
Based on what it looks like you're trying to do you could use this approach.
In your case, your functions would all live in the module foo. Then you could:
import foo
func_name = parse_commandline()
method_to_call = getattr(foo, func_name)
result = method_to_call()
Or more succinctly:
import foo
result = getattr(foo, parse_commandline())()
Python has names which are mapped to objects in a hashmap called a namespace. At any instant in time, a name always refers to exactly one object, but a single object can be referred to by any arbitrary number of names. Given a name, it is very efficient for the hashmap to look up the single object which that name refers to. However given an object, which as mentioned can be referred to by multiple names, there is no efficient way to look up the names which refer to it. What you have to do is iterate through all the names in the namespace and check each one individually and see if it maps to your given object. This can easily be done with a list comprehension:
[k for k,v in locals().items() if v is myobj]
This will evaluate to a list of strings containing the names of all local "variables" which are currently mapped to the object myobj.
>>> a = 1
>>> this_is_also_a = a
>>> this_is_a = a
>>> b = "ligma"
>>> c = [2,3, 534]
>>> [k for k,v in locals().items() if v is a]
['a', 'this_is_also_a', 'this_is_a']
Of course locals() can be substituted with any dict that you want to search for names that point to a given object. Obviously this search can be slow for very large namespaces because they must be traversed in their entirety.
Hi there is one way to get the variable name that stores an instance of a class
is to use
locals()
function, it returns a dictionary that contains the variable name as a string and its value
player_list= {'peter':0, 'karel':0}
naam = input("Welke speler moet een score + 1 krijgen?")
for key, value in player_list.items():
player_list[naam] = value + 1
print(player_list)
Can someone explain me I why get the correct value whenever I enter "peter" but not when I enter "karel"?
I assume, that you'd like to increment dict value of the key which is same as the string that user provides via input. Ask yourself, do you really need to iterate over dict items to do such thing? Dict is key-value structure, and you can access value of the key whenever you provide this key directly.
>>> player_list = {'peter':0, 'karel':0}
>>> player_list['peter']
0
Setting value to the existing dict key is easy. All you need to do is:
>>> player_list['peter'] = 3
>>> player_list['peter']
3
If you'd like to increment value for 'peter' you need to take whatever is stored under 'peter' and add one, but there is no need to iterate over dict items to do that. Like with any other variable, dict element is kind of placeholder for some space of memory that you can access via that placeholder. So in case of any variable you'd do something as:
>>> x = 1
>>> x = x + 1 # or x += 1 for short
...and in case of dict element, you can do the same:
>>> player_list['peter'] = player_list['peter'] + 1 # or:
>>> player_list['peter'] += 1
If you're curious why your current code doesn't work as you expected, run your code using debugger or just add print function:
for key, value in player_list.items():
print("Current key: {}, current value: {}".format(key, value))
player_list[naam] = value + 1
In fact, it's always good to use some debugging tools whenever you don't know why your code execution is different than your expected result.
So here is the problem I am having. I am trying to iterate the makeAThing class, and then create a list for the iteration using the makeAList class. Instead of making seperate lists for each iteration of makeAThing, it is making one big global list and adding the different values to it. Is there something I am missing/don't know yet, or is this just how python behaves?
class ListMaker(object):
def __init__(self,bigList = []):
self.bigList = bigList
class makeAThing(object):
def __init__(self,name = 0, aList = []):
self.name = name
self.aList = aList
def makeAList(self):
self.aList = ListMaker()
k = []
x = 0
while x < 3:
k.append(makeAThing())
k[x].name = x
k[x].makeAList()
k[x].aList.bigList.append(x)
x += 1
for e in k:
print(e.name, e.aList.bigList)
output:
0 [0, 1, 2]
1 [0, 1, 2]
2 [0, 1, 2]
the output I am trying to achieve:
0 [0]
1 [1]
2 [2]
After which I want to be able to edit the individual lists and keep them assigned to their iterations
Your init functions are using mutable default arguments.
From the Python documentation:
Default parameter values are evaluated from left to right when the
function definition is executed. This means that the expression is
evaluated once, when the function is defined, and that the same
“pre-computed” value is used for each call. This is especially
important to understand when a default parameter is a mutable object,
such as a list or a dictionary: if the function modifies the object
(e.g. by appending an item to a list), the default value is in effect
modified. This is generally not what was intended. A way around this
is to use None as the default, and explicitly test for it in the body
of the function, e.g.:
def whats_on_the_telly(penguin=None):
if penguin is None:
penguin = []
penguin.append("property of the zoo")
return penguin
In your code, the default argument bigList = [] is evaluated once - when the function is defined - the empty list is created once. Every time the function is called, the same list is used - even though it is no longer empty.
The default argument aList = [] has the same problem, but you immediately overwrite self.aList with a call to makeAList, so it doesn't cause any problems.
To verify this with your code, try the following after your code executes:
print(k[0].aList.bigList is k[1].aList.bigList)
The objects are the same.
There are instances where this behavior can be useful (Memoization comes to mind - although there are other/better ways of doing that). Generally, avoid mutable default arguments. The empty string is fine (and frequently used) because strings are immutable. For lists, dictionaries and the sort, you'll have to add a bit of logic inside the function.
I have
def func1(var):
if var == 0:
return
else
var = var - 1
func1(var)
PROPOSAL = 1
def func2():
func1(PROPOSAL)
print(PROPOSAL)
In the recursive calls in func1, will the variable PROPOSAL be decremented, meaning the print statement will print 0?
Edit: I should've asked, why doesn't it do this?
No, the PROPOSAL global variable will not be decremented by your code. This isn't really because of scope, but because of how Python passes arguments.
When you call a function that takes an argument, the value of the argument you pass is bound to a parameter name, just like an assignment to a variable. If the value is mutable, an in-place modification through one name will be visible through the other name, but if the variable is immutable (as ints are in Python), you'll never see a change to one variable effect another.
Here's an example that shows functions and regular assignment working the same way:
x = 1
y = x # binds the y to the same value as x
y += 1 # modify y (which will rebind it, since integers are immutable)
print(x, y) # prints "1 2"
def func(z): # z is a local variable in func
z += 1
print(x, z)
func(x) # also prints "1 2", for exactly the same reasons as the code above
X = [1]
Y = X # again, binds Y to the same list as X
Y.append(2) # this time, we modify the list in place (without rebinding)
print(X, Y) # prints "[1, 2] [1, 2]", since both names still refer to the same list
def FUNC(Z):
Z.append(3):
print(X, Z)
FUNC(X) # prints "[1, 2, 3] [1, 2, 3]"
Of course, rebinding a variable that referred to a mutable value will also cause the change not to be reflected in other references to the original value. For instance, you replaced the append() calls in the second part of the code with Y = Y + [2] and Z = Z + [3], the original X list would not be changed, since those assignment statements rebind Y and Z rather than modifying the original values in place.
The "augmented assignment" operators like +=, -=, and *= are a bit tricky. They will first try to do an in-place modification if the value on the left side supports it (and many mutable types do). If the value doesn't support in-place modification of that kind (for instance, because it's an immutable object, or because the specific operator is not allowed), it will fall back on using the regular + operator to create a new value instead (if that fails too it will raise an exception).
func1(PROPOSAL) will return NONE and it won't affect the global PROPOSAL variable because you don't assign that return value to PROPOSAL.
func2() just calls func1() and then prints the PROPOSAL variable that wasn't changed it that scope just in func1(PROPOSAL)
Why when I create a class with a list, the list and its contents become global
class A:
my_list = []
string = ""
def add(self, data):
self.string += "a"
self.my_list.append(data)
def print_list(self):
print(self.string)
print(self.my_list)
a = A()
b = A()
a.add("test")
a.print_list()
b.print_list()
Both a and b will print the list that was created by a.add
# results of a.print_list
xa
['test']
# results of b.print_list
x
['test']
So my question is, is this normal for python3, or a bug.
Doesnt seem right to me that only the list is modified globally.
This is the explaining:
Objects have individuality, and multiple names (in multiple scopes) can be bound to the same object. This is known as aliasing in other languages. This is usually not appreciated on a first glance at Python, and can be safely ignored when dealing with immutable basic types (numbers, strings, tuples). However, aliasing has a possibly surprising effect on the semantics of Python code involving mutable objects such as lists, dictionaries, and most other types. This is usually used to the benefit of the program, since aliases behave like pointers in some respects. For example, passing an object is cheap since only a pointer is passed by the implementation; and if a function modifies an object passed as an argument, the caller will see the change — this eliminates the need for two different argument passing mechanisms as in Pascal.
From oficial Python 3 docs
And this is the solution:
(...) use an instance variable instead (...)
Like this:
class Dog:
def __init__(self, name):
self.name = name
self.tricks = [] # creates a new empty list for each dog
def add_trick(self, trick):
self.tricks.append(trick)
Result of above code:
>>> d = Dog('Fido')
>>> e = Dog('Buddy')
>>> d.add_trick('roll over')
>>> e.add_trick('play dead')
>>> d.tricks ['roll over']
>>> e.tricks ['play dead']
In your example, you should move your my_list = [] declaration to the init function...
class A:
string = ""
def __init__(self):
self.my_list = []
def add(self, data):
self.string += "a"
self.my_list.append(data)
def print_list(self):
print(self.string)
print(self.my_list)
a = A()
b = A()
a.add("test")
a.print_list()
b.print_list()
Hope this help.
Regards
Strings are immutable so
self.string += "a"
creates a new object and binds it to self.string
This is clearly mutating the list in place
self.my_list.append(data)
Perhaps more interesting is that
self.my_list += [data]
also mutates the list
The general rule is that __iadd__ does behave differently for mutable vs immutable objects