I have a C code in vi from which I want to replace the text "\n" with something else. Use of %s:\n:(anything else) isn't working. Is there any way to bypass this?
For example,a line in the code is: printf("Hello world\n");
In vi, I need to replace "\n" in the printf line with a full stop. Use of substitue command (%s:\n:.) will not work for "\n"
Please let me know what is the command to replace 'text' which also has some implicit meaning in vi (here \n is newline is vi as well).
Thanks in advance!
You need to escape the backslash in \n, like this:
%s:\\n:.
Related
I'm using ZSH and wondering if there's a config I can add to my .zshrc file that can separate the command line and path line.
Before:
localhost /workplace/sudo/myservice/src/myservice % [cursor here]
Expecting:
localhost /workplace/sudo/myservice/src/myservice %
[cursor here]
I know Oh My Zsh can do that but just wondering which exact config was implemented to achieve this?
Just insert a literal line break.
Before:
PS1='%m %~ %# '
After:
PS1='%m %~ %#
'
Done.
Alternatively, you can use a $'' string, which lets you use print escape characters, such as \n for newline:
PS1=$'%m %~ %#\n '
I want to create a new file using vi editor from command line and add a string to it multiple times say 100. Using vi -S command.script file.txt is supposed to do the trick where a new file file.txt will be created and the commands given in command.script file can write to this file. My command.script contains
:%100a hello world
:wq
But its's not working, what I am doing wrong?
If you interactively execute :%100a hello world in a Vim session, you'll get E488: Trailing characters. Looking up :help :a:
:{range}a[ppend][!] Insert several lines of text below the specified
line. If the {range} is missing, the text will be
inserted after the current line. [...]
These two commands will keep on asking for lines, until you type a line
containing only a ".".
tells you that the text has to be put in following lines (and concluded by a line with only a . character).
Or did you mean to use the normal mode a command? (That one takes a [count] to multiply; your %100 range is wrong, too!)
You can also use the low-level function append(), repeating the string with repeat().
summary
$append
hello world
[...]
hello world
.
execute "$normal! 100ahello world\<CR>"
" Easier with o instead of a:
$normal! 100ohello world
call append('$', repeat(['hello world'], 100))
non-Vim alternatives
But honestly, if that is your real use case (and not just a simplified toy example), you don't need Vim at all for this. Here's one example for the Bash shell:
$ for i in $(seq 100); do echo "hello world" >> file.txt; done
I'm running a script for vim EX mode I've tried every escape character and word identifier I can find.
it needs to find the string "/etc/walker" and replace it with "/etc/runner"
% s/\</etc/walker\>/\</etc/runner\>/g
wq
same issue with a script to append at the end of the file. It doesn't do anything. I'm trying to append "/etc/walker"
$
a
\</etc/walker\>
.
wq
what I've tried on regex editors seems to work there but not in EX
Thanks for your help
Try this:
:s#/etc/walker#/etc/runner#
Notice the use of # as a delimiter, that way you don't have to add back slashes.
You could also use:
:s#/etc/walker#/etc/runner#
For appending at the end of the line:
:s#$#/etc/walker#
In EX mode just remove the : at the beginning.
I would like to register this:
a
b
So I typed : then let #c='a^Mb' and I tried also with \r and \n instead of ^M
When I type "cp vim do not consider this as a return to line but as chars.
Update:
I am running vim 7.4.52 on 3.16.0-38-generic #52~14.04.1-Ubuntu
:let #c="a\n\nb"
Seems to be working fine for me on vim7.4 on FreeBSD. (Double quotes instead of single quotes)
If it's not working, you might want to specify which platform and version of vim?
In my vim, I can use :%!sed "s/^/ /", got the wrong output when I use :%!sed 's/^/ /' .
sed: -e expression #1, char 0: no previous regular expression
Is there differences between single quote and double quote in vim command mode?
In my sed, single quote is the same as double quote.
$ echo "wha012" | sed 's/w/haha/'
hahaha012
$ echo "wha012" | sed "s/w/haha/"
hahaha012
my system is xp+vim 7.3 for windows.
In my system:
[1] "c://cygwin/bin/ash.exe"
[2] "c://cygwin/bin/bash.exe"
[3] "c://cygwin/bin/dash.exe"
[4] "c://cygwin/bin/sh.exe"
if i set set shell=\"c:\cygwin\bin\sh.exe"\ -f in _vimrc,i get the new wrong messages:
sed command can not found.
Funny, when I try :%!sed "/^/ /" I get the same error message as when I use single quotes:
sed: 1: "/^/ /": invalid command code /
(This line replaces the content of my file.) I expect to get an error message there because, as #Birei pointed out, you left out the sed s command. This works as expected, with either single or double quotes:
:%!sed "s/^/ /"
#Birei is also right that you can use vim to do things like this, but I assume you have simplified the example from what you were really trying to do.
To answer the original question, Vim uses single quotes for literal strings. The only special character in a literal string is ' itself. Strings delimited with double quotes use \ to denote special character, such as `"\<Esc>".
:echo 'a''b' == "a'b"
:help expr-string
:help literal-string
my system is xp+vim 7.3 for windows
By default Vim uses cmd.exe to run :! commands on Windows, which behaves differently with regard to quoting from the POSIX shell that your s/w/haha/ examples suggest you've been testing with. Try something like
:set shell=\"C:\path\to\sh.exe\"\ -f
to tell it to use your POSIX shell instead. Or if you're using cygwin then try the cygwin version of vim instead of the Windows native one.
The difference is in the sed command, that lets interpolate variables when you execute it directly from the shell, like:
sed "s/$pattern/$replacement/"
but your problem is that you have to use a substitution command that begins with letter s, like:
:%!sed "s/^/ /"
Also you can have same behaviour inside vim without an external command, like:
:%s/^/ /