websocket-server replacement in BrowserQuest - node.js

I am trying to get Mozilla's BrowserQuest up and running and have run into a problem. It depends on the websocket-server node package, and unfortunately that has been deprecated and removed from the npm library.
I have added the ws and node-websocket-server packages, however neither of them seem to be an easy replacement for the existing calls to websocket-server.
One prior SO post I saw said to replace websocket-server with node-websocket-server in the package.json file, however there are existing direct calls to websocket-server in the BrowserQuest codebase.
I also tried updating the server/js/ws.js file directly as follows (added node- to the websocket-server fields):
var cls = require("./lib/class"),
url = require('url'),
wsserver = require("node-websocket-server"),
miksagoConnection = require('node-websocket-server/lib/ws/connection'),
worlizeRequest = require('websocket').request,
http = require('http'),
Utils = require('./utils'),
_ = require('underscore'),
BISON = require('bison'),
WS = {},
useBison = false;
which leads to the following error:
/homenode/browserquest/BrowserQuest/server/js/map.js:15
path.exists(filepath, function(exists) {
^
TypeError: undefined is not a function
at module.exports.cls.Class.extend.init (/home/node/browserquest/BrowserQuest/server/js/map.js:15:11)
at Class (/home/node/browserquest/BrowserQuest/server/js/lib/class.js:50:23)
at module.exports.cls.Class.extend.run (/home/node/browserquest/BrowserQuest/server/js/worldserver.js:151:20)
at /homenode/browserquest/BrowserQuest/server/js/main.js:79:15
at Function._.each._.forEach (/home/node/browserquest/BrowserQuest/node_modules/underscore/underscore.js:153:9)
at main (/home/node/browserquest/BrowserQuest/server/js/main.js:77:7)
at /home/node/browserquest/BrowserQuest/server/js/main.js:134:13
at /home/node/browserquest/BrowserQuest/server/js/main.js:117:13
at fs.js:334:14
at FSReqWrap.oncomplete (fs.js:95:15)

This is updated! I also got it to work today!!
https://github.com/nenuadrian/BrowserQuest

Related

nodemon starting `node server.js` TypeError: marked is not a function

I'm creating a blog, using this 'Web Dev Simplified' tutorial:
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=1NrHkjlWVhM
I've copied the code from git hub https://github.com/WebDevSimplified/Markdown-Blog, installed the node modules and linked it to my mongodb database online.
Node Modules include;
express, mongoose, ejs, --save-dev nodemon, slugify, method-override, dompurify, jsdom.
The database was working and I could save articles, until I added the last part about sanitizing HTML and converting markdown to HTML, this is when the 'TypeError: marked is not a function' comes up, and the save button ceases to work.
Seems a once understood function is now not understood because of a more recent node module dependency, either the dompurify library or jsdom. I'm really out of my depth here! please help!
From Marked Documentation:
https://marked.js.org/#demo
Node JS
import { marked } from 'marked';
// or const { marked } = require('marked');
const html = marked.parse('# Marked in Node.js\n\nRendered by **marked**.');
Your Code:
if (this.markdown) {
this.sanitizedHtml = dompurify.sanitize(marked(this.markdown))
}
try this:
if (this.markdown) {
this.sanitizedHtml = dompurify.sanitize(marked.parse(this.markdown))
}
its work for me
In my case:
const { marked } = require('marked');
instead of
const marked = require('marked')
...
this.sanitizedHTML = dompurify.sanitize(marked.parse(this.markdown))
Per node example documentation at https://marked.js.org/#demo

Can't use crypto in NPM dependency in Electron app

I'm building an Electron app (with Ionic) to digitally sign PDFs with p12 certificates using node-signpdf (https://www.npmjs.com/package/node-signpdf). I've had problems which I solved by using require ('electron').remote for example for fs.
I've also installed the same node version in my OS (MacOS Catalina) as the same one that electron is using (Node v12.4.0).
The problem is that one of the NPM dependencies uses crypto and it shows as undefined with the next error:
HomePage.html:39 ERROR TypeError: _crypto.randomBytes is not a function
at Object.ctx.seedFileSync (prng.js:340)
at _reseedSync (prng.js:210)
at Object.ctx.generateSync (prng.js:163)
at Object.ctx.generate (prng.js:80)
at Object.ctx.getBytes (random.js:92)
at _modPow (rsa.js:431)
at Object.push../node_modules/node-forge/lib/rsa.js.pki.rsa.encrypt (rsa.js:501)
at Object.key.sign (rsa.js:1245)
at addSignerInfos (pkcs7.js:534)
at Object.sign (pkcs7.js:377)
What I can see is that node-signpdf uses node-forge as a dependency, and node-forge loads crypto inside prng.js this way:
var _crypto = null;
if(forge.util.isNodejs && !forge.options.usePureJavaScript &&
!process.versions['node-webkit']) {
_crypto = require('crypto');
}
I've tried changing that part of the code to use crypto-js or browserfy-crypto (this last one doesn't even build and hasn't been updated in years), but I keep getting the error shown above.
EDIT 1:
This is how I'm implementing the signature in my service:
public signFile(pathToFile: string, pathToCert: string): void {
const fs = (<any>window).require('fs');
let certBuffer = fs.readFileSync(pathToCert);
let fileBuffer = fs.readFileSync(pathToFile);
fileBuffer = plainAddPlaceholder({
pdfBuffer: fileBuffer,
reason: 'I have reviewed it.',
signatureLength: 1612,
});
const signedPdf = signer.sign(fileBuffer, certBuffer, {passphrase: 'qwertyui'});
}
The code adds the placeholder to add the signature, the problem comes in signer.sign
EDIT 2:
When I run the app if I type in console: require ('crypto') I see the methods, so it looks like it's loaded in the global scope, the problem seems to be in the NPM dependency of node-forge.
EDIT 3:
I've changed require('crypto') to window.require('crypto') and started working. But I think I'll have to make postinstall script to modify it.
Is there a better way?
-
How can I make this crypto thing work? I ran out of ideas. Maybe you can spare some?
Thanks for your time!

What does require('..') mean?

I am new to node.js and have been trying to test some code using yarn. At the moment I am using the following code:
const assert = require('assert')
const username = process.env.HDFS_USERNAME || 'webuser'
const endpoint1 = process.env.HDFS_NAMENODE_1 || 'namenode1.lan'
const endpoint2 = process.env.HDFS_NAMENODE_2 || 'namenode2.lan'
const homeDir = `/user/${username}`
const basePath = process.env.HDFS_BASE_PATH || homeDir
const nodeOneBase = `http://${endpoint1}:9870`
const nodeTwoBase = `http://${endpoint2}:9870`
const webhdfs = require('..')
const should = require('should')
const nock = require('nock')
describe('WebHDFSClient', function () {
const oneNodeClient = new (require('..')).WebHDFSClient({
namenode_host: endpoint1
});
})
that I've got from this repo:
https://github.com/ryancole/node-webhdfs/blob/master/test/webhdfs.js
and when I try to run yarn test I get the following error:
Cannot find module '..'
Require stack:
- myrepo/test/lib/hdfs.js
- myrepo/test/tests.js
- myrepo/node_modules/mocha/lib/mocha.js
- myrepo/node_modules/mocha/index.js
- myrepo/node_modules/mocha/bin/_mocha
Error: Cannot find module '..'
As you can see, require('..') is used couple of times in the code and I can not figure out what it means. I've found posts on require('../') which I think is not exactly the same as this one.
The inbuilt node.js require function uses a quite complex package resolution algorithm. So there are lots of things that may influence it.
A. Defaulting to index.js
node.js implicitly requires a file named index.js if no file name is specified.
So require("..") translates to require("../index.js")
B. The main package property.
If you require is inside a module and points to the root of the module it will read the main property from the packages package.json and require the file specified there.
So given this package definition (package.json)
{
"main": "./fileA.js"
}
The call to require("..") will be translated to require("../fileA.js")
Resources
Good explanatory blog entry
Official Docs

Error: Cannot find module 'togeojson'

I am attempting to use this module in node.js and am running into an "Error: Cannot find module 'togeojson'" error when I attempt to use the documented example code:
// using togeojson in nodejs
var tj = require('togeojson'),
fs = require('fs'),
// node doesn't have xml parsing or a dom. use xmldom
DOMParser = require('xmldom').DOMParser;
var kml = new DOMParser().parseFromString(fs.readFileSync('foo.kml', 'utf8'));
var converted = tj.kml(kml);
var convertedWithStyles = tj.kml(kml, { styles: true });
I ran npm init in the same directory that my app.js file (where the above code resides) is stored and I used the --save flag when installing the #mapbox/togeojson package to my application.
I am running node version 8.11.2 and npm v 6.1.0.
How do I go about debugging an issue like this in node/npm?
It is #mapbox/togeojson package, not togeojson, so it should be required like:
var tj = require('#mapbox/togeojson');

Using Yeoman programmatically inside nodejs project

I want to use an yeoman generator inside a NodeJS project
I installed yeoman-generatorand generator-git (the generator that I want use) as locally dependency, and, at this moment my code is like this:
var env = require('yeoman-generator')();
var path = require('path');
var gitGenerator = require('generator-git');
var workingDirectory = path.join(process.cwd(), 'install_here/');
generator = env.create(gitGenerator);
obviously the last line doesn't work and doesn't generate the scaffold.
The question: How to?
Importantly, I want to stay in local dependency level!
#simon-boudrias's solution does work, but after I changed the process.chdir(), this.templatePath() and this.destinationPath() returns same path.
I could have use this.sourcePath() to tweak the template path, but having to change this to each yeoman generator is not so useful. After digging to yo-cli, I found the following works without affecting the path.
var env = require('yeoman-environment').createEnv();
env.lookup(function() {
env.run('generator-name');
});
env.create() only instantiate a generator - it doesn't run it.
To run it, you could call generator.run(). But that's not ideal.
The best way IMO would be this way:
var path = require('path');
var env = require('yeoman-generator')();
var gitGenerator = require('generator-git');
// Optionnal: look every generator in your system. That'll allow composition if needed:
// env.lookup();
env.registerStub(gitGenerator, 'git:app');
env.run('git:app');
If necessary, make sure to process.chdir() in the right directory before launching your generator.
Relevant documentation on the Yeoman Environment class can be found here: http://yeoman.io/environment/Environment.html
Also see: http://yeoman.io/authoring/integrating-yeoman.html
The yeoman-test module is also very useful if you want to pass predefined answers to your prompts. This worked for me.
var yeomanTest = require('yeoman-test');
var answers = require('from/some/file.json');
var context = yeomanTest.run(path.resolve('path/to/generator'));
context.settings.tmpdir = false; // don't run in tempdir
context.withGenerators([
'paths/to/subgenerators',
'more/of/them'
])
.withOptions({ // execute with options
'skip-install': true,
'skip-sdk': true
})
.withPrompts(answers) // answer prompts
.on('end', function () {
// do some stuff here
});

Resources