I'm trying to add web app endpoints from the same location, to an azure traffic manager, when I try to do this, it tells me that App Service will use load balancing to do this for me, when we apps are in the same location.
My understanding is that load balancing is for distributing requests between multiple VMs on one web app. The plan was to use out single DNS and allow traffic manager to determine which endpoint to go to using round-robin or failover. How will load balancing know to direct to one of the web apps from this single address?
Azure Web Apps already have built in load balancing between instances within the web app. So for example if you have a web app with 10 instances under the endpoint: tester.azurewebsites.net, Azure load balances appropriately across those instances.
When you bring in traffic manager, that is looking for different endpoints to facilitate between. Incoming requests will be routed based on proximity to endpoints it is managing, load and if the endpoint is available. Traffic Manager takes care of all of those complexities for you.
This allows you to have a single endpoint myapp.azurewebsites.net; which may route to myapp-west.azurewebsites.net and myapp-east.azurewebsites.net. That routing as I indicated is based on proximity, load and availability.
How it actually works is the magic sauce of Azure Traffic Manager. I use it in production and it has been working very well for me. I primarily use it for routing based on proximity, and have yet to experience a failure on a web app to test a production failover reroute.
Hope that helps!
Related
I have 2 same Web App and I have added them to application gateway's backed pool in Azure.
I have one domain for the application Gateway and I can bind only one web app to it.
Is there any way to add 2 Web App with the same domain of application gateway?
If not, then any other way to achieve high availability for Web Apps?
I want that if one Web App is not reachable, the traffic should go to other Web App. The Web Apps are not stateless and therefore ruled out the use of Traffic Manager Profile due to lack of Session Persistence.
I have gone through various questions mentioned below on the same topic, but none is related or have satisfactory solution.
- DNS: High Availability with Azure Web Apps + Traffic Manager
- Achieving High Availability using Azure Traffic Manager
- Is it possible that one domain name has multiple corresponding IP addresses?
For App Service, Application Gateway cannot be used for Load balancing Purpose. You can use Application Gateway as WAF. In your scenario, as Thomas stated, AFD would be the best option.
You can leverage the priority option which can be configured while adding App Service to the backend pool to achieve your ask.
You can assign priorities to your different backends when you want to use a primary service backend for all traffic, and provide backups in case the primary or the backup backends are unavailable.
In this case, when the probe to the Primary goes down, then the traffic will be routed to the secondary Web App.
Reference: https://learn.microsoft.com/en-in/azure/frontdoor/front-door-routing-methods
I have a SaaS web app developed with Angular 8 and Asp.net Core Web API. I have deployed web api to a azure web app and deployed angular front-end web app to another azure web app as well.
The users are from China and Australia and other countries. I want to have region load balance like Chinese users uses web app on china azure region and australian users use Australian azure region web app so that it has best performance. Azure SQL DB will be in one place (in australia).
In addition, i want to prevent attacking to web front app and web api like d-dos, web scraping and SQL injection. For web scraping, i want to add access rate limitation from one ip.
Can you please advise what service i should use? I saw the blog talking about azure application gateway, azure load balancer, azure front door and azure traffic manager. It is a bit confusing to me. I need a best practise based on my this real world scenario. Should I use one of the service or should I use multiple services?
Based on your requirement:
Since the Backend Resource is Web App, you can ignore Load balancer (Layer 4) where you can only add VMs or VMSS
Your another requirement is WAF, and it is only available in AFD and AppGW. But you can use Traffic Manager as first Tier Load balancing and have AppGW in the different regions to provide high resilience.
As you want users from specific country to reach nearest backend resource, it seems like, the best solution for you is AFD.
AFD is a global Load balancer. It has WAF capability. It can Cache the data and provide quicker responses(CDN functionality). AFD uses an intelligent probing mechanism, through which it chooses the endpoint which is closer to the client who is making the request.
Hope this helps.
Hello I have 3 different web app. Each web app has a different application with a different endpoint. I need to replicate all of these app services in multiples region. My question is. Do I need to have one Traffic manager for each replication application?
The other alternative that I had was. I could have one traffic manager in front of all applications, and Behind the traffic manager but ahead of the all application for integrating all app service in a one, I could have one API gateway. In that case, I suppose that I could have only one traffic manager instead of three.
Does somebody have one recommendation for this type of architecture?
Azure traffic manager is designed as a global service,not bound to a location. If you have 3 webapps located in different regions, use one traffic manager to route all requests will be ok. This reference architecture will be helpful: https://learn.microsoft.com/en-us/azure/architecture/reference-architectures/app-service-web-app/multi-region
I am creating a network with 2 app services, containing 2 slots each
I know the load balancers are designed to work with VM's, but I am wondering if it is possible to place a load balencer on these 2 app services to balance the load between them, Is it possible to do so??
When you Scale your Web App you add instances of your current pricing tier and Azure deploys your Web App package to each of them.
There's a Load Balancer over all your instances, so, traffic is automatically load balanced between them. You shouldn't need a Virtual Machine for this and you don't need to configure any extra Traffic Manager.
You may want to refer: scale your app in Azure App Service for more details.
but I am wondering if it is possible to place a load balencer on
these 2 app services to balance the load between them, Is it possible
to do so??
According to your description, maybe you are looking for Azure application gateway(layer 7).
Azure application gateway works at the application layer (Layer 7 in the OSI network reference stack). It acts as a reverse-proxy service, terminating the client connection and forwarding requests to back-end endpoints.
Azure application gateway support HTTP, HTTPS and Websockets.
Here is the features offered by each service:
More information about Application gateway, please refer to this article.
Maybe little late but I guess this what you are looking at
Scale Out- A scale out operation is the equivalent of creating multiple copies of your web site and adding a load balancer to distribute the demand between them. When you scale out a web site in Windows Azure Web Sites there is no need to configure load balancing separately since this is already provided by the platform.
https://azure.microsoft.com/en-us/blog/scaling-up-and-scaling-out-in-windows-azure-web-sites/
Currently I have a Service Fabric cluster with 2 stateless services hosting Asp Web APIs. While creating the cluster also appropriate Azure Load Balancers got created.
Now I would like to add Application Gateway in front of my cluster for various reasons like SSL offloading, url-routing etc.
I'd like to understand how to configure the Application Gateway correctly. I see 2 options, not sure which one is valid:
Application Gateway replaces the existing Load Balancer and points directly to SF services hosting WebApi
I keep existing LB configuration and Application Gateway points to this LB (seems like 1 LB solution too many)
Which one is correct? Any advise how to configure?
Approach 2 is what we are using, We have kept the load balancer and that is routing any request received from the Application Gateway. We found this to be easiest and simplest choice, as this involves minimum changes to be done in Application Gateway.
Your two web api's can run on every node in the VM scale set. The Azure Load Balancer is used to distribute traffic over those nodes. Targeting a single service on a single node will reduce scalability and fault tolerance.
You could use the App Gateway to translate incoming request to different ports on the Load Balancer. (E.g. direct traffic to API 1 #url ~/1/ and API 2 #url ~/2/)
Favor using load balancing rules (using all nodes) over NAT redirections (to single nodes). This way you'll have a performant, reliable system.
Solution 2 would also provide possibly to create VPN connection e.g to manage your cluster. Then no need to expose management endpoint to the public. Internal lb also brings on additional features to utilize in the future.
I would go with your first option and to implement it create / modify your ARM template so that it doesn't contain the load balancer and instead contains the application gateway.
Here is a link to the quick starts for ARM templates which you can use. There isn't an out of the box example for service fabric with a gateway but it will give you a great starting place.
link