I am turning around in stackoverflow without finding an answer to my question. I have used expressJS fur several days in order to make an access webpage that returns first an interstitial and then a webpage depending on several informations I can get from the requester IP and so on.
My first idea for the interstitial was to use this piece of code:
var interstitial = function(req, res, next) {
res.render('interstitial');
next();
}
router.get('/', interstitial, nextPage);
setting a timeout on the next nextPage callback function of router.get().
However it looks that I could not do that. I had an error "Error: Can't set headers after they are sent.". I suppose this is due to the fact that res.render already give a response to the request and in the philosophy of express, the next function is passing the req, res args for another reply to another function that possibly could do it. Am I right?
In that case, is there a way to give several answer, with timeout to one request? (a res.render, and after that in the next callback a rest.send...).
Or is this mandatory to force client to ask a request to give back another response? (using js on the client side for instance, or timers on client side, or maybe discussing with client script using socket.io).
Thanks
Not sure I fully understand, but you should be placing all your deterministic logic within the function of the handler you're using for your endpoint.
Kinda like so:
router.get('/', function(req, res){
var origin = request.origin;
if (origin == '11.22.33.44'){
res.send('Interstitial Page.');
}else{
res.send('Home Page');
}
});
You would replace the simple text responses with your actual pages, but the general idea is that once that endpoint is handled you can't next() it to secondary handler.
Related
I am overall clueless about how and why you set up a node.js app, and how any of the app.use functions work - the tutorials on it don't explain the why of anything.
Anyway, I have socket.io, res.locals and index.js set up like so in the app.js root file.
const sockets = require('./models/socket')(io)
app.use(function (req, res, next) {
res.locals.user_id = req.session.user_id;
next();
});
const routes = require('./routes/index');
app.use('/', routes);
I'd like to be able to access res.locals in the socket.js model, like I can in index.js found in the routes folder.
I can't guess how to go about doing this. If anybody is able to explain how and why I can or can't that would be a bonus. Thanks!
Welcome to Expressjs, there are a few fundamentals you should probably research before going any further, they'll help solve some of your confusion. I'll give a brief explanation of them but I suggest you do further research. I'll then answer your actual question at the end.
Middleware and app.use
Expressjs is built upon an idea that everything is just "middleware". Middleware is a function which runs as part of a request chain. A request chain is essentially a single client request, which then goes through a chain of a number of middleware functions until it either reaches the end of the chain, exits early by returning a response to the client, or errors.
Express middleware is a function which takes the following three arguments.
req (request) - Representing the request made by a client to your
server.
res (response) - Representing the response you will return to
the client.
next - A way of telling express that your current
middleware function is done, and it should now call the next piece of
middleware. This can either be called "empty" as next(); or with an
error next(new Error());. If it is called empty, it will trigger
the next piece of middleware, if it is called with an error then it
will call the first piece of error middleware. If next is not called at the
end of a piece of middleware, then the request is deemed finished and the
response object is sent to the user.
app.use is a way of setting middleware, this means it will run for every request (unless next() is either not called by the previous piece of middleware for some reason, or it's called with an error). This middleware will run for any HTTP request type (GET, POST, PUT, DELETE, etc).
app.use can take multiple arguments, the important ones for beginners to learn are: app.use(func) and app.use(path, func). The former sets "global" middleware which runs no matter what endpoint (url path) the client requests, the latter (with a specific path) is run only if that specific path is hit. I.e. app.use('/hello', (req, res, next) => { res.send('world'); }); will return "world" when the endpoint "/hello" is hit, but not if the client requests "/hi". Where as app.use((req, res, next) => { res.send('world'); }); would return "world" when you hit any endpoint.
There are more complex things you can do with this, but that's the basics of attaching middleware to your application. The order they are attached to the application, is the order in which they will run.
One more thing, this will blow your mind, an express application made with the standard const app = express() can also be used as middleware. This means you can create several express applications, and then mount them using app.use to a single express application. This is pretty advanced, but does allow you to do some really great things with Express.
Why can you not access res.locals in socket.io? (The real question)
Within your middleware handler, you are setting up a res.locals.use_id property. This only lives with that individual request, you can pass it around as long as the request is alive by passing it into other functions, but outside of that request it doesn't exist. res is literally the response object that tells Express how to respond to the clients request, you can set properties of it during the request but once that HTTP request has ended it's gone.
Socket.io is a way of handling web socket requests, not standard HTTP requests. Thus, in a standard express HTTP request you will not be able to hand off the connection to anything with socket.io, because the connection is a single short lived HTTP request. Likewise, you won't be able to do the same the other way.
If you wish to find the users id in a socket.io request, you'll have to do this within the socket.io request itself.
Right now, you're entering a piece of middleware for an Express.js request, you are then calling next() which runs the next piece of express middleware, at no point does it cross over into Socket.io realms. This is often confused by tutorials because Socket.io can handle requests across the same port as Express is listening on, but the two are not crossed over. So you will need to write separate middleware for both Express.js requests chains, and socket.io request chains. There are ways of writing this code once and then writing an adapter to use it across both platforms, but that's not what you've tried to do here.
I would suggest you look at doing just nodejs and express for a time before taking on socket.io as well, otherwise you're trying to learn a whole heap of technologies all at once is quite a lot to try and take on board all at once.
I would like to handle both POST and GET requests as a single request, such that all of my routings and subsequent functions only need to process a single request, rather than duplicating everything once for GET and again for POST.
So I figure the simplest way of doing this is to convert a POST to a GET early on using middleware, is there any problem with this ?
if(req.method=='POST'){
req.method = 'GET';
req.query = req.body;
delete(req.body);
}
You can have the same handler function for the both requests i.e
app.get('/', handlerFunction);
app.post('/', handlerFunction);
You can have express respond to all POST requests as 302 redirects to the same URL (these are always GET requests).
Here's some sample code:
// Redirect all post requests
app.post('^*$', function(req, res) {
// Now just issue the same request again, this time as a GET
res.redirect(302, req.url);
});
});
Side note: this will work but I wouldn't recommend this as a long term solution. If you decide you do need to handle POST requests differently from GET requests and the maintainability will become a pain. In the long run, you're better off having a clear definition for how to handle POST and GET requests rather than treating them the same.
Recommended approach is to have the same handler function for both in this case. for eg.
app.get('/path', handler);
app.post('/path', handler);
Trying to do something seemingly basic.
I'd like to create a POST request through which I'll be sending JSONs. These JSONs will be created into files, which I'd like to return to the user via download.
The use case for this is that I'm building an application which takes a form and converts it into a JSON for upload to a MongoDB database. Users can load these JSONs into the application to re-load their old records as templates.
This is how I'm approaching it as of now:
// Download JSON Previews
var jsondownload = {};
// Grabs the JSON from POST request
app.post('/api/download', function(req, res, next){
jsondownload = {};
var json = req.body;
jsondownload = json;
res.json(jsondownload);
next();
});
// Immediately downloads the JSON thereafter
app.get('/api/download', function(req, res){
res.set({"Content-Disposition":"attachment; filename='test.json'"});
res.send(jsondownload);
});
What's the right way to do this?
There is no one "right" way to do it, but a few solutions include:
Remove the GET route handler (and the jsondownload variable) completely and just respond immediately with the Content-Disposition set appropriately. This is the better of the 3 because it reduces code and keeps things simple.
Use a simple redirect in your POST route handler. Instead of responding with the JSON immediately, you would do res.redirect('/api/download').
Do more or less what currently doing, but move the logic (the res.set() and res.send()) to a separate function that gets called from both route handlers.
I need to monitor my application's uptime via New Relic. I'm using the Restify framework which is largely based on Express.
New Relic wants to make HEAD requests to my application, but I'm not sure how to set up a HEAD route correctly to satisfy New Relic. Currently, my Restify app returns a 405 error for "Method Not Allowed", which causes New Relic to have fits and send me non-stop emails about how my application is down, and I can't find any documentation from New Relic that shows how to set up a simple ping URL to satisfy them.
Is there anything I need to do other than this:
server.head('/ping', function(error, req, res) {
res.send("hello");
});
EDIT:
The parameters are mislabeled so the res.send() is actually trying to call next().send() which would be undefined. Removing the error parameter and shifting everything over fixed the code as discovered by the OP.
As per the restify documentation, you need to call return next() in your callback function:
http://mcavage.me/node-restify/#Routing
server.head('/ping', function (req, res) {
res.send('hello');
});
If you would like to respond immediately and not continue down the chain, you can pass false as a parameter in your call to next()
To learn node.js I'm creating a small app that get some rss feeds stored in mongoDB, process them and create a single feed (ordered by date) from these ones.
It parses a list of ~50 rss feeds, with ~1000 blog items, so it's quite long to parse the whole, so I put the following req.connection.setTimeout(60*1000); to get a long enough time out to fetch and parse all the feeds.
Everything runs quite fine, but the request is called twice. (I checked with wireshark, I don't think it's about favicon here).
I really don't get it.
You can test yourself here : http://mighty-springs-9162.herokuapp.com/feed/mde/20 (it should create a rss feed with the last 20 articles about "mde").
The code is here: https://github.com/xseignard/rss-unify
And if we focus on the interesting bits :
I have a route defined like this : app.get('/feed/:name/:size?', topics.getFeed);
And the topics.getFeed is like this :
function getFeed(req, res) {
// 1 minute timeout to get enough time for the request to be processed
req.connection.setTimeout(60*1000);
var name = req.params.name;
var callback = function(err, topic) {
// if the topic has been found
if (topic) {
// aggregate the corresponding feeds
rssAggregator.aggregate(topic, function(err, rssFeed) {
if (err) {
res.status(500).send({error: 'Error while creating feed'});
}
else {
res.send(rssFeed);
}
},
req);
}
else {
res.status(404).send({error: 'Topic not found'});
}};
// look for the topic in the db
findTopicByName(name, callback);
}
So nothing fancy, but still, this getFeed function is called twice.
What's wrong there? Any idea?
This annoyed me for a long time. It's most likely the Firebug extension which is sending a duplicate of each GET request in the background. Try turning off Firebug to make sure that's not the issue.
I faced the same issue while using Google Cloud Functions Framework (which uses express to handle requests) on my local machine. Each fetch request (in browser console and within web page) made resulted in two requests to the server. The issue was related to CORS (because I was using different ports), Chrome made a OPTIONS method call before the actual call. Since OPTIONS method was not necessary in my code, I used an if-statement to return an empty response.
if(req.method == "OPTIONS"){
res.set('Access-Control-Allow-Origin', '*');
res.set('Access-Control-Allow-Headers', 'Content-Type');
res.status(204).send('');
}
Spent nearly 3hrs banging my head. Thanks to user105279's answer for hinting this.
If you have favicon on your site, remove it and try again. If your problem resolved, refactor your favicon url
I'm doing more or less the same thing now, and noticed the same thing.
I'm testing my server by entering the api address in chrome like this:
http://127.0.0.1:1337/links/1
my Node.js server is then responding with a json object depending on the id.
I set up a console log in the get method and noticed that when I change the id in the address bar of chrome it sends a request (before hitting enter to actually send the request) and the server accepts another request after I actually hit enter. This happens with and without having the chrome dev console open.
IE 11 doesn't seem to work in the same way but I don't have Firefox installed right now.
Hope that helps someone even if this was a kind of old thread :)
/J
I am to fix with listen.setTimeout and axios.defaults.timeout = 36000000
Node js
var timeout = require('connect-timeout'); //express v4
//in cors putting options response code for 200 and pre flight to false
app.use(cors({ preflightContinue: false, optionsSuccessStatus: 200 }));
//to put this middleaware in final of middleawares
app.use(timeout(36000000)); //10min
app.use((req, res, next) => {
if (!req.timedout) next();
});
var listen = app.listen(3333, () => console.log('running'));
listen.setTimeout(36000000); //10min
React
import axios from 'axios';
axios.defaults.timeout = 36000000;//10min
After of 2 days trying
you might have to increase the timeout even more. I haven't seen the express source but it just sounds on timeout, it retries.
Ensure you give res.send(); The axios call expects a value from the server and hence sends back a call request after 120 seconds.
I had the same issue doing this with Express 4. I believe it has to do with how it resolves request params. The solution is to ensure your params are resolved by for example checking them in an if block:
app.get('/:conversation', (req, res) => {
let url = req.params.conversation;
//Only handle request when params have resolved
if (url) {
res.redirect(301, 'http://'+ url + '.com')
}
})
In my case, my Axios POST requests were received twice by Express, the first one without body, the second one with the correct payload. The same request sent from Postman only received once correctly. It turned out that Express was run on a different port so my requests were cross origin. This caused Chrome to sent a preflight OPTION method request to the same url (the POST url) and my app.all routing in Express processed that one too.
app.all('/api/:cmd', require('./api.js'));
Separating POST from OPTIONS solved the issue:
app.post('/api/:cmd', require('./api.js'));
app.options('/', (req, res) => res.send());
I met the same problem. Then I tried to add return, it didn't work. But it works when I add return res.redirect('/path');
I had the same problem. Then I opened the Chrome dev tools and found out that the favicon.ico was requested from my Express.js application. I needed to fix the way how I registered the middleware.
Screenshot of Chrome dev tools
I also had double requests. In my case it was the forwarding from http to https protocol. You can check if that's the case by looking comparing
req.headers['x-forwarded-proto']
It will either be 'http' or 'https'.
I could fix my issue simply by adjusting the order in which my middlewares trigger.