Is it possible to have route prefix with template? I need to specify route/route prefix on my base controller so every controller/action would allow prefixing url with language slug.
www.mydomain.com/en/Search
www.mydomain.com/da/Sogning
www.mydomain.com/Hledat
These three routes would lead to the same action.
I would like something like this
[RoutePrefix("{language?}")]
public abstract class BaseController : Controller
Wouldn't that be better on the Route template?
[Route("{language?}/{action=index}/{id?}")]
Related
I'm new to .net core and I don't understand how the default generated Controller which has the attribute
[Route("api/[controller]")]
can handle action of "api/values"
how did it translate "[controller]" to handle "values"?
The [controller] token in the route will be replaced by the name of the controller without the controller suffix at runtime.
If you add a new controller
[Route("api/[controller]")]
public class RockController : Controller
{}
Then the [controller] will here be replaced by rock and the route will then be api/rock.
You can read more about token replacements here
If I want my url like:
http://domain/product/detail/category1/category2/.../categoryN
How to set the RouteConfig for this, the category level was not fixed.
I would like the URL for a request to be /AmazingRequest (or even /AmazingService) instead of /json/reply/AmazingRequest.
I've tried the Route attribute, but it seems to have no effect. Is it possible within ServiceStack, or would I have to resort to URL rewriting?
This is what I've tried. It compiles, but the attribute has no effect.
public class MyServiceEndpoints : IService
{
[Route("/AmazingService")]
public AmazingResponse Post(AmazingRequest request)
{
return new Amazing(request).GetResponse();
}
}
I realize I would need to tell ServiceStack that it is a json request, but I'm fine with adding the Accept and Content-Type headers or maybe even a ?format=json to the query string.
P.S. I'm using the BSD version of ServiceStack
In ServiceStack Routes are defined on the Request DTO as it's part of your Service Contract, e.g:
[Route("/AmazingService")]
public class AmazingRequest { ... }
The pre-defined Route you're using is because ServiceStack doesn't think there's any custom route defined for your Service and just uses the default one.
The alternative way for declaring your Routes is to use the Fluent Registration API in your AppHost, e.g:
public void Configure(Container container)
{
Routes
.Add<AmazingRequest>("/AmazingService");
}
But the benefit of defining them on the Request DTO's is that your .NET Service Clients will also have access to them and will be able to use your custom routes instead of falling back to the pre-defined routes.
Using the first example in the ServiceStack Auto Query documentation in a project structured similar to the EmailContacts sample project (i.e. separate projects for the ServiceModel and ServiceInterface), how would one register the custom route "/movies" defined by the Route attribute?
[Route("/movies")]
public class FindMovies : QueryBase<Movie>
{
public string[] Ratings { get; set; }
}
Normally, custom routes such as these can be register by passing the ServiceInterface assembly when instantiating AppHostBase:
public AppHost() : base("Email Contact Services", typeof(ContactsServices).Assembly) {}
However, the FindMovies request DTO does not have an associated service and therefore won't be included. No routes are registered.
If I pass typeof(FindMovies).Assembly instead of or in addition to typeof(ContactsServices).Assembly, then the pre-defined route will be registered (i.e. shows up in the metadata, postman, etc.) but the custom route is still not registered (i.e. does not show up in the metadata, postman, etc.).
What is the best way to register the custom route using attributes when there is no service and the ServiceModel and ServiceInterface are in separate projects?
These issues should be resolved in v4.0.24+ that's now available on MyGet.
There's a new AutoQueryFeature.LoadFromAssemblies property to specify an additional list of assemblies to scan for IQuery Request DTO's. This automatically looks in the assemblies where your other Request DTO's are defined so in most cases nothing needs to be done as it will automatically be able to find your query services.
The routes for Query DTO's should now appear on the metadata pages as well as Swagger and Postman metadata API's.
I want to display a view after facebook authentication in my application but I'm getting the json response instead the html view, according to the documentation the view resolution is the following:
The resolution order ServiceStack's uses to resolve the appropriate Markdown template to use for rendering HTML output is:
If the Web Service specifies a template (via a customized IHttpResult.TemplateName response) - then a View with that name.
A view with the same name as the Response DTO, looking first in /Views then in /Views/Shared
A view with the same name as the Request DTO, looking first in /Views then in /Views/Shared
these are my DTOs
public class FacebookRequest{}
public class FacebookResponse{}
this is my route configuration
Routes.Add<FacebookRequest>("/User/facebook");
my view has the folloing code:
#inherits ViewPage<MyProject.Services.Dto.FacebookResponse>
this is a facebook response
Service method:
[ClientCanSwapTemplates]
public FacebookResponse Get(FacebookRequest userRequest)
{
return new FacebookResponse();
}
As far as I understand if I have a view located in the "views" directory with the same responseDTO it should wire the view with the response from the service.
Adding comment as answer
SS uses the exact name of the response DTO class and looks for a view file with that exact name on the filesystem, unless you provide a DefaultView attribute. So, if your view (in your example) wasn't Views/FacebookResponse.cshtml exactly, it won't work. Using the inherits viewpage statement doesn't help SS resolve the view. It's looking for the exact file name in a specific location. I'm not 100% on this - but I seem to recall that it was a case sensitive match too.