I have created an OnDemandGrid but noticed that the column sorts weren't working on any column. The arrows are there and the screen refreshes, but it won't sort the columns in asc or desc order. I have even tried specifying for each column but it still doesn't work. Anybody having/had the same issue?
UPDATE: 6.16.15 - After trying sortParam suggestion:
Comment below explains. It appears to be doing the right thing... but still won't sort.
UPDATE 6.16.15 - 4:00pm
Apparently ANY type of filtering or sort doesn't work well with Django - trying to determine how set filtering where dojo can communicate to Django Rest or vice versa - so far haven't been able to find a setting on either side that works. Not only does column sort not work - creating a search field doesn't work, nor creating a sort button.
This is after changing to the ORDERING_PARAM in DJANGO settings.py to 'SORT'... for all intensive purposes this looks like it should work.
A quick search through the Django Rest Framework documentation reveals that it defaults to expecting an ordering query parameter to indicate which field should be sorted. The dstore/Request store (inherited by Rest) allows you to indicate the query parameter name that sends sort information, via sortParam.
Additionally, it appears that DRF's OrderingFilter indicates ascending sort with no prefix, and descending sort with -. dstore/Request defaults to expecting + and - as prefixes, but these can be overridden via ascendingPrefix and descendingPrefix.
So in your case, you'll want to include sortParam: 'ordering', ascendingPrefix: '' in the properties passed when you create your Rest store instance.
In general, when you run into store-related issues like this where the grid and backend don't seem to be making ends meet, this is the process you'll have to follow - find out what the server expects, find out what the client-side store implements, and see if it can be tweaked or needs to be customized.
UPDATE 6.17.15 -
Changing server side settings to match dojo/dgrid parameters -
REST_FRAMEWORK = {
'DEFAULT_PERMISSION_CLASSES': ('rest_framework.permissions.IsAdminUser',),
'DEFAULT_PAGINATION_CLASS': 'rest_framework.pagination.LimitOffsetPagination',
# 'PAGE_SIZE': 25,
'ORDERING_PARAM': 'sort'
Related
I have a dynamo script that exports schedules out of Revit. It uses a bit of Python also, (not relevant to this question, but I thought I would just include it all).
It all works great, but I notice if certain schedules get deleted from Revit, it could change the "Index" number of the schedules I need to export. I would like to use the schedule name instead of the dynamo index number, as this will help me maintain the connection without checking if it's exporting the correct schedule. Is this possible?
From the pure Revit API point of view I can only answer that yes, this is possible. You are calling the ViewSchedule.Export method. The ViewSchedule element can indeed be retrieved from the Revit database by name using a filtered element collection.
Here is the final solution that works well. Using the "==" node and "List.FilterByBoolMask" node I was able to filter down to just what's in the String. Now I can set the string node to be an input for the dynamo player and user just needs to input the exact name of their schedule. Thank you Michael Kilkelly from ArchSmarter for this helpful video.
How to Dynamo: Filter List by Element Name
Team, I am using FHIR bluebutton for CMS data (Claims data) and
now I want to apply sorting in FHIR data
we are getting bundle of explanation of Benefit(EOB)
https://www.hl7.org/fhir/search.html#sort
I have tried passing date and status params in that _sort
but still not getting sorted data
and I am very much in confusion what to pass as a parameter
suppose I want to sort by ClaimNumber
what to pass, please help and suggest me
You will have to use a search parameter as input for the sorting. For example sorting on last updated date descending would look like this:
GET [base]/ExplanationOfBenefit?_sort=-_lastUpdated
I'm not familiar with which field of ExplanationOfBenefit would hold the ClaimNumber you mention, but if you mean the EOB identifier, the request could be this:
GET [base]/ExplanationOfBenefit?_sort=identifier
If you use the correct syntax, success will still depend on whether the server has implemented sorting on that parameter.
I have various GET http calls to my api with the following format:
/api/posts?userId=3
However, it is not filtering posts by its userId column, and just returns all posts, regardless of the posts' userId.
This syntax has worked in past projects I've had also, and is documented here. (The example they give is GET /purchase?amount=99.99).
Questions I've seen do not address the query language via defaults routes in this way, so I'm having trouble finding help. Any guesses on what could be going wrong?
UPDATE:
What does work as expected
req.query is getting set and read by policies (eg, ?userId=3 is found by req.param("userId"))
/api/posts?userId=3&populate=userId populates the userId field, (but still returns all posts for all users)
filtering by primary key (eg ?id=5) filters and returns only one record as expected
When working in the api, or in sails console, (eg Posts.find({userId: 3})) works
What does not work as expected
filtering by foreign keys (eg ?userId=6)
filtering by non-foreign keys (eg ?name=test)
filtering using where (eg &where={"userId":1})
It turns out I was adding a "where" clause to every query in a policy (eg, "where: {"status": "active"}}). Having a "where" in the query string automatically overrides the other params, and so nothing else was getting seen. (To be precise, if you have a where clause, other criteria never get seen)
For some reason, the "where" was also not working to set the search criteria for sails 0.12.13, so I ended up hacking the parseCriteria function actionUtils in sails and using the one they have for v.1 and that worked for me.
Hope that helps anyone in the future
How to make a query filter bound to a request parameter inactive if the parameter is not present?
For example: I have a query MyQuery that can be accessed through the projection MyProjection. I add a filter to that query where I say that MyDate field should be equal to {Request.QueryString:MyDate}. I want URLs like ~/MyProjection?MyDate=2016-03-08 to filter content items by the given value, but the url ~/MyProjection to just not filter by that field. But this is not what happens: a condition gets added to the query anyway and it's of the form '[minimum DateTime value] < MyDate < [maximum DateTime value]'. This is not good because it will filter out fields with NULL values. If I try to do the same with a numeric field, it's even worse because it throws exceptions when the parameter is not present.
I know I can create a new query and projection to get different options, but that seems like an overkill - also, what if I wanted to create an advanced search form, it would have to target a single projection.
Is there an "official" way to do this? Or a workaround? Or is this simply not supported in Orchard?
I'm not aware of a way to do this out of the box. However, you could pretty easily create your own filter with the behavior you want by implementing IFilterProvider.
Take a look at the Orchard.Projections module. That's where you'll find many of the default query filters (including the date field filter you referenced). Your's will likely be even simpler if you only need to handle a specific case.
For a very simple example, checkout the Orchard.Tags module (look in the projections folder). The contents of this folder will give you pretty much all the boilerplate you'll need to get started creating your own. Just plug in your own logic.
I'm trying to create a product filter with deep-linking capability. Essentially, I want the user to be able to filter my product list on multiple categories and have the URL reflect the filtering they've done.
So it would start as:
www.site.com/products/
My first level of category filtering already works. So I can use EE's regular handling of URL segments to get to my first level of filtering. For instance:
www.site.com/products/leatherthongs
Returns a filtered subset showing only a spectacular collection of leather thongs. But now I want the user to be able to filter on another category - color for instance. This is where stuff stops working.
EE's way of handling multiple categories inside templates (with ampersands or pipes) doesn't work in the URL:
www.site.com/products/leatherthongs&red
Nor does any variation that I've tried.
My next move is to create a simple raw PHP method that can capture regular querystring parameters and then inject them into the {entries} tag before rendering. Not very difficult, but quite ugly. I would love to know if there is a way to handle multiple categories in the URL natively.
Thanks for your time.
Have you considered using Low's Seg2Cat add-on? I'm not sure how complex you want to make this but it seems that you could specify something in your channel:entries loop like categories='{segment_2){if segment_3}|{segment_3_category_id}{/if}'
This exact syntax is untested but I have had success in the past with a similar solution.