In PHP, it's easy to include a file in another one to avoid redundancy of the code using the include keyword. Is there a similar solution in Node.JS using Handlebars.JS?
From your question it sounds like you are looking for handlebars partials. For an example check out https://github.com/donpark/hbs/tree/master/examples/partial.
In short, you'd have something which looked like:
index.hbs:
<!DOCTYPE HTML>
<html>
<head>
<meta http-equiv="Content-Type" content="text/html; charset=UTF-8" />
<title>Your Website</title>
</head>
<body>
{{> header}}
</body>
</html>
where {{> header}} is referencing the header.hbs partial.
Related
I am having difficulty on how to properly display this like the real ones. Right, so
here's my piece of code. You can try this on your respective IDE's to view the page
because basically I cannot drag and drop here the image. I'm using html CSS, vs code. its just basically the interface of google with header, main, serach bar at the middle and those buttons and navs at the bottom of it.
I'm having difficulty on trying to make this like a real google ui. :(( Just a beginner.
<!DOCTYPE html>
<html lang="en">
<head>
<meta charset="UTF-8">
<meta http-equiv="X-UA-Compatible" content="IE=edge">
<meta name="viewport" content="width=device-width, initial-scale=1.0">
<title>Google Login</title>
<link rel="shortcut icon" href="google-logo-png-29534-32x32.ico" type="image/x-
icon">
</head>
<body>
<div id="header">
Gmail
Images
<img src="pad.png">
<img src="cs-logo.png">
</header>
<main>
<input type="search">
<img src="google-voice-search-icon.png">
<img src="googlelogo_color_272x92dp.png">
<button>Google Search</button>
<button>I'm feeling lucky</button>
</main>
<p>Google offered in: Filipino <a href="#">Cebuano</p>
</div>
</body>
</html>
The property src="" in the img tag will take the image from the local path or an URL to an image.
If you want, for example, the doodle's image you have two options:
Download the image from the Google web and then overwrite the img tag with something like this: <img src="/path/to/the/image.png"
Get the URL to the image in web(in this case: https://www.google.com/images/branding/googlelogo/1x/googlelogo_color_272x92dp.png) and then overwrite the img tag with something like this: <img src="https://www.google.com/images/branding/googlelogo/1x/googlelogo_color_272x92dp.png"
I hope this could help.
I develop ASP.Net Core 2.1 RazorPages web application. I want parametrize the the value of asp-page tag helper.
So I use following code in cshtml file. There is a del_link local variable defined in begining of file. This variable is late used as parameter for second asp-page tag helper.
#page
#{
string del_link = "/UnloadDelete";
}
<!DOCTYPE html>
<html>
<head>
<meta charset="utf-8" />
<meta name="viewport" content="width=device-width, initial-scale=1.0" />
</head>
<body>
<div>
<a asp-page="/UnloadEdit">Details</a>
<a asp-page=#del_link>Delete</a>
</div>
</body>
</html>
ASP.Net Razor generate following HTML code.
<!DOCTYPE html>
<html>
<head>
<meta charset="utf-8" />
<meta name="viewport" content="width=device-width, initial-scale=1.0" />
</head>
<body>
<div>
Details
Delete
</div>
</body>
</html>
As you can see in HTML code, asp-page="/UnloadEdit" is properly rendered to HTML code, but asp-page=#del not, it is rendered to <a href="">. How I can use local variable for asp-page tag helper in Razor Pages?
Thanks in advance.
You must pass a page name to the asp-page attribute. So what you are trying to do is not supported. If #del_link renders a relative URL, you can pass that to the href attribute instead. There may be other suitable solutions, depending on why you feel the need to use #del_link at all.
Using ufront and erazor I ran into the following problem very quickly.
The hello-world example provides the following layout:
<!DOCTYPE html>
<html lang="en">
<head>
<title>#title</title>
<meta charset="utf-8" />
<link rel="stylesheet" href="//maxcdn.bootstrapcdn.com/bootstrap/3.3.1/css/bootstrap.min.css" />
</head>
<body>
<div class="container">
#viewContent
</div>
</body>
<script src="//code.jquery.com/jquery-1.11.1.min.js"></script>
<script src="//maxcdn.bootstrapcdn.com/bootstrap/3.3.1/js/bootstrap.min.js"</script>
</html>
For certain pages I want to add more headers or scripts after Jquery has been loaded.
One way to do so (for the scripts for example), would be to pass the scripts as an array of strings, and construct them on the layout file :
...
<script src="//maxcdn.bootstrapcdn.com/bootstrap/3.3.1/js/bootstrap.min.js"</script>
#for(script in scripts) {
<script src='#script.path'></script>
}
</html>
....
The problem with this approach is that I can't keep meaningful headers + body + scripts on the same template file witch would be great, also needs extra care to pass the scripts and headers as context.
Some template engines like Razor or Laravel allow to do that using 'sections'.
Is it possible to do something similar with erazor? If not what would be a good alternative?
If I set the following in my app.js file, why can't I access it using app.settings.title rather than settings.title in my rendered view? It seems I cannot prefix it with the app object.
...
app.set('title','TestApplication');
...
Why must I do this,
<!DOCTYPE html>
<html lang='en'>
<head>
<title><%= settings.title %></title>
</head>
<body>
</body>
</html>
rather than this?
<!DOCTYPE html>
<html lang='en'>
<head>
<title><%= app.settings.title %></title>
</head>
<body>
</body>
</html>
There is probably a simply answer to this question, but I am new to Javascript and am trying to learn Expressjs and Nodejs.
Thanks
Because variable is extracted before getting to view.
Because express provides some abstraction at the view level. It would be redundant and potentially insecure to expose app to your view, and so it's abstracted away so that you can just directly access settings.
In Jade JS, it's very easy to extend a layout. Supposed one have layout.jade, and for the index.jade, just do:
extend layout
block content // content comes here
Then it's pretty sufficient.
I searched the official guide but didn't found how to do. The most similar seems to be something like:
{>partials}
But still that's not extending a layout. How to achieve similar thing in DustJS?
Thanks a lot.
I found the solution... turns out I didn't read the dust documents careful enough.
Layout File:
<html>
<head>
<title>{+title}Location of Title{/title}</title>
<meta name="viewport" content="width=device-width, initial-scale=1.0">
<script src="//ajax.googleapis.com/ajax/libs/jquery/1.9.1/jquery.js"></script>
<script src="//ajax.googleapis.com/ajax/libs/jqueryui/1.10.3/jquery-ui.js"></script>
<link href="//netdna.bootstrapcdn.com/twitter-bootstrap/2.3.2/css/bootstrap-combined.css" rel="stylesheet">
<script src="//netdna.bootstrapcdn.com/twitter-bootstrap/2.3.2/js/bootstrap.js"></script>
</head>
<body>
<header>
<h1 id="page-title" class="very-middle">{+title}Title Comes Here{/title}</h1>
</header>
<div id="content">
{+content}
Content Comes Here
{/content}
</div>
</body>
</html>
Content File:
{>layout/}
{<content}
{!
Content simply comes here
}
{/content}
So the point is the use of {+placeHolder}, {>toExtend} and {