I know that Spark can be operated using Scala, Python and Java. Also, that RDDs are used to store data.
But please explain, what's the architecture of Spark and how does it work internally.
Spark revolves around the concept of a resilient distributed dataset (RDD), which is a fault-tolerant collection of elements that can be operated on in parallel. RDDs support two types of operations: transformations, which create a new dataset from an existing one, and actions, which return a value to the driver program after running a computation on the dataset.
Spark translates the RDD transformations into something called DAG (Directed Acyclic Graph) and starts the execution,
At high level, when any action is called on the RDD, Spark creates the DAG and submits to the DAG scheduler.
The DAG scheduler divides operators into stages of tasks. A stage is comprised of tasks based on partitions of the input data. The DAG scheduler pipelines operators together. E.g. many map operators can be scheduled in a single stage. The final result of a DAG scheduler is a set of stages.
The stages are passed on to the Task Scheduler. The task scheduler launches tasks via cluster manager (Spark Standalone/Yarn/Mesos). The task scheduler doesn't know about dependencies of the stages.
The Worker/Slave executes the tasks.
Let's come to how Spark builds the DAG.
At high level, there are two transformations that can be applied onto the RDDs, namely narrow transformation and wide transformation. Wide transformations basically result in stage boundaries.
Narrow transformation - doesn't require the data to be shuffled across the partitions. For example, map, filter, etc.
Wide transformation - requires the data to be shuffled, for example, reduceByKey, etc.
Let's take an example of counting how many log messages appear at each level of severity.
Following is the log file that starts with the severity level:
INFO I'm Info message
WARN I'm a Warn message
INFO I'm another Info message
and create the following Scala code to extract the same:
val input = sc.textFile("log.txt")
val splitedLines = input.map(line => line.split(" "))
.map(words => (words(0), 1))
.reduceByKey{(a,b) => a + b}
This sequence of commands implicitly defines a DAG of RDD objects (RDD lineage) that will be used later when an action is called. Each RDD maintains a pointer to one or more parents along with the metadata about what type of relationship it has with the parent. For example, when we call val b = a.map() on a RDD, the RDD b keeps a reference to its parent a, that's a lineage.
To display the lineage of an RDD, Spark provides a debug method toDebugString() method. For example, executing toDebugString() on splitedLines RDD, will output the following:
(2) ShuffledRDD[6] at reduceByKey at <console>:25 []
+-(2) MapPartitionsRDD[5] at map at <console>:24 []
| MapPartitionsRDD[4] at map at <console>:23 []
| log.txt MapPartitionsRDD[1] at textFile at <console>:21 []
| log.txt HadoopRDD[0] at textFile at <console>:21 []
The first line (from bottom) shows the input RDD. We created this RDD by calling sc.textFile(). See below more diagrammatic view of the DAG graph created from the given RDD.
Once the DAG is built, Spark scheduler creates a physical execution plan. As mentioned above, the DAG scheduler splits the graph into multiple stages, the stages are created based on the transformations. The narrow transformations will be grouped (pipe-lined) together into a single stage. So for our example, Spark will create a two-stage execution as follows:
The DAG scheduler then submits the stages into the task scheduler. The number of tasks submitted depends on the number of partitions present in the textFile. Fox example consider we have 4 partitions in this example, then there will be 4 sets of tasks created and submitted in parallel provided if there are enough slaves/cores. The below diagram illustrates this in bit more detail:
For more detailed information I suggest you to go through the following YouTube videos where the Spark creators give in depth details about the DAG and execution plan and lifetime.
Advanced Apache Spark- Sameer Farooqui (Databricks)
A Deeper Understanding of Spark Internals - Aaron Davidson (Databricks)
Introduction to AmpLab Spark Internals
The diagram below shows how Apache Spark internally working:
Here are some JARGONS from Apache Spark i will be using.
Job:- A piece of code which reads some input from HDFS or local, performs some computation on the data and writes some output data.
Stages:-Jobs are divided into stages. Stages are classified as a Map or reduce stages(Its easier to understand if you have worked on Hadoop and want to correlate). Stages are divided based on computational boundaries, all computations(operators) cannot be Updated in a single Stage. It happens over many stages.
Tasks:- Each stage has some tasks, one task per partition. One task is executed on one partition of data on one executor(machine).
DAG:- DAG stands for Directed Acyclic Graph, in the present context its a DAG of operators.
Executor:- The process responsible for executing a task.
Driver:- The program/process responsible for running the Job over the Spark Engine
Master:- The machine on which the Driver program runs
Slave:- The machine on which the Executor program runs
All jobs in spark comprise a series of operators and run on a set of data. All the operators in a job are used to construct a DAG (Directed Acyclic Graph). The DAG is optimized by rearranging and combining operators where possible. For instance let’s assume that you have to submit a Spark job which contains a map operation followed by a filter operation. Spark DAG optimizer would rearrange the order of these operators, as filtering would reduce the number of records to undergo map operation.
Spark has a small code base and the system is divided in various layers. Each layer has some responsibilities. The layers are independent of each other.
The first layer is the interpreter, Spark uses a Scala interpreter, with some modifications.
As you enter your code in spark console(creating RDD's and applying operators), Spark creates a operator graph.
When the user runs an action(like collect), the Graph is submitted to a DAG Scheduler. The DAG scheduler divides operator graph into (map and reduce) stages.
A stage is comprised of tasks based on partitions of the input data. The DAG scheduler pipelines operators together to optimize the graph. For e.g. Many map operators can be scheduled in a single stage. This optimization is key to Sparks performance. The final result of a DAG scheduler is a set of stages.
The stages are passed on to the Task Scheduler. The task scheduler launches tasks via cluster manager.( Spark Standalone/Yarn/Mesos). The task scheduler doesn't know about dependencies among stages.
The Worker executes the tasks on the Slave. A new JVM is started per JOB. The worker knows only about the code that is passed to it.
Spark caches the data to be processed, allowing it to me 100 times faster than hadoop. Spark is highly configurable, and is capable of utilizing the existing components already existing in the Hadoop Eco-System. This has allowed spark to grow exponentially, and in a little time many organisations are already using it in production.
Related
I have a Spark Standalone Cluster (which consists of two Workers with 2 cores each). I run an SQLQuery which joins 2 dataframes and shows the result. I have some questions regarding the above simle example.
val df1 = sc.read.text(fn1).toDF()
val df2 = sc.read.text(fn2).toDF()
df1.createOrReplaceTempView("v1")
df2.createOrReplaceTempView("v2")
val df_join = sc.sql("SELECT * FROM v1,v2 WHERE v1.value=v2.value AND v2.value<1500").show()
DAG Scheduler - Number of Tasks
From what i've understood so far when i spark-submit the application, a SparkContext is spawn for the handling of the Job(where job is the printing of result rows). SparkContext creates a Task Scheduler instance which then creates a DAGScheduler. Through a simple event mechanism, the DAGScheduler handles the job for execution(handleJobSubmitted function from the code). SparkSQL query has been transformed into a physical execution plan(through Catalyst Optimizer), and then to an RDD-Graph(with toRdd function). DagScheduler receives the RDD-Graph and recursively creates all the stages.
I do not understand how it finds the Number of Tasks(before the execution of any stage) in the last stage,keeping in mind that the result stage is the one that performs the join(and prints the results). The number of data(and the rdds and the number of their partitions, which define the number of tasks) we have is unknown until the parent stages have ended their execution.
Parallel Execution of Stages
Each one of the two first stages is independent of the other, as it loads data from different files. I have read many posts that say that Stages that do not have dependencies between them MAY be executed in parallel from the cluster. What is the condition that implies that independent stages's tasks are executed in parallel?
Task Dependencies
Finally, i've read that Task Scheduler does not know about Stage Dependencies. If i keep in mind that each Stage in Spark is a TakSet( aka a set of non dependent tasks, each task with same functionality packed up with different partition of data), then TaskScheduler does not know as well the dependencies between tasks of different Stages. As a result, how and when a task knows the data on which it'll execute a function?
If for example, the task knows apriori where to look for its input data, then it could be launched as soon as they become available.
We're performing some tests to evaluate the behavior of transformations and actions in Spark with Spark SQL. In our tests, first we conceive a simple dataflow with 2 transformations and 1 action:
LOAD (result: df_1) > SELECT ALL FROM df_1 (result: df_2) > COUNT(df_2)
The execution time for this first dataflow was 10 seconds. Next, we added another action to our dataflow:
LOAD (result: df_1) > SELECT ALL FROM df_1 (result: df_2) > COUNT(df_2) > COUNT(df_2)
Analyzing the second version of the dataflow, since all transformation are lazy and re-executed for each action (according to the documentation), when executing the second count, it should require the execution of the two previous transformations (LOAD and SELECT ALL). Thus, we expected that when executing this second version of our dataflow, the time would be around 20 seconds. However, the execution time was 11 seconds. Apparently, the results of the transformations required by the first count were cached by Spark for the second count.
Please, do you guys know what is happening?
Take a look at your jobs, you may see skipped stages which is a good thing. Spark recognizes that it still has the shuffle output from the previous job and will reuse it rather than starting from the source data and re-shuffle the full dataset.
It is the Spark DAG scheduler which recolonizes that there is future use of data after it get it from Action.A Spark program implicitly creates a logical directed acyclic graph (DAG) of operations.When the driver runs, it converts this logical graph into a physical execution plan.
Actions force translation of the DAG to an execution plan
When you call an action on an RDD it must be computed.In your Case you are just doing an action and after that doing another action on top of that. This requires computing its parent RDDs as well. Spark’s scheduler submits a job to compute all needed RDDs. That job will have one or more stages, which are parallel waves of computation composed of tasks. Each stage will correspond to one or more RDDs in the DAG. A single stage can correspond to multiple RDDs due to pipelining.
Spark Visualization
DAG
I have a doubt that, how do stages execute in a spark application. Is there any consistency in execution of stages that can be defined by programmer or will it derived by spark engine?
Check the entities(stages, partitions) in this pic:
pic credits
Does stages in a job(spark application ?) run parallel in spark?
Yes, they can be executed in parallel if there is no sequential dependency.
Here Stage 1 and Stage 2 partitions can be executed in parallel but not Stage 0 partitions, because of dependency partitions in Stage 1 & 2 has to be processed.
Is there any consistency in execution of stages that can be defined by
programmer or will it derived by spark engine?
Stage boundary is defined by when data shuffling happens among partitions. (check pink lines in pic)
How do stages execute in a Spark job
Stages of a job can run in parallel if there is no dependencies among them.
In Spark, stages are split by boundries. You have a shuffle stage, which is a boundary stage where transformations are split at, i.e. reduceByKey, and you have a result stage, which are stages that are bound to yield a result without causing a shuffle, i.e. a map operation:
(Picture provided by Cloudera)
Since groupByKey is a shuffle stage, you see the split in pink boxes which marks a boundary.
Internally, a stage is further divided into tasks. e.g in the picture above, the first row which does textFile -> map -> filter, can be split into three tasks, one for each transformation.
When one transformations output is another transformations input, we need the serial execution. But, if stages are unrelated, i.e hadoopFile -> groupByKey -> map, they can run in parallel. Once they declare a dependency between them from that stage on they will continue execution serially.
I have been using Spark + Python to finish some works, it's great, but I have a question in my mind:
Where is the spark job of transformation and action done?
Is transformation job done in Spark Master (or Driver) while action job is done in Workers (Executors), or both of them are done in Workers (Executors)
Workers (aka slaves) are running Spark instances where executors live
to execute tasks.
Transformations are performed at the worker, when the action method is called the computed data is brought back to the driver.
An application in Spark is executed in three steps:
1.Create RDD graph, i.e. DAG (directed acyclic graph) of RDDs to represent entire computation.
2.Create stage graph, i.e. a DAG of stages that is a logical execution plan based on the RDD graph. Stages are created by breaking the RDD graph at shuffle boundaries.
3.Based on the plan, schedule and execute tasks on workers.
Transformations run at executors.
Actions run at executors and driver. Most of the work is still happening in the executors but the final steps like reducing outputs is executed in the driver.
When any action is called on the RDD, Spark creates the DAG and submits to the DAG scheduler.
The DAG scheduler divides operators into stages of tasks. A stage is comprised of tasks based on partitions of the input data. The DAG scheduler pipelines operators together.
The Stages are passed on to the Task Scheduler.The task scheduler launches tasks via cluster manager.(Spark Standalone/Yarn/Mesos). The task scheduler doesn't know about dependencies of the stages.
The tasks(transformation) executes on the Workers(Executors)
and when action(take/collect) is called it brings back the data at the
Driver.
The Spark research paper has prescribed a new distributed programming model over classic Hadoop MapReduce, claiming the simplification and vast performance boost in many cases specially on Machine Learning. However, the material to uncover the internal mechanics on Resilient Distributed Datasets with Directed Acyclic Graph seems lacking in this paper.
Should it be better learned by investigating the source code?
Even i have been looking in the web to learn about how spark computes the DAG from the RDD and subsequently executes the task.
At high level, when any action is called on the RDD, Spark creates the DAG and submits it to the DAG scheduler.
The DAG scheduler divides operators into stages of tasks. A stage is comprised of tasks based on partitions of the input data. The DAG scheduler pipelines operators together. For e.g. Many map operators can be scheduled in a single stage. The final result of a DAG scheduler is a set of stages.
The Stages are passed on to the Task Scheduler.The task scheduler launches tasks via cluster manager (Spark Standalone/Yarn/Mesos). The task scheduler doesn't know about dependencies of the stages.
The Worker executes the tasks on the Slave.
Let's come to how Spark builds the DAG.
At high level, there are two transformations that can be applied onto the RDDs, namely narrow transformation and wide transformation. Wide transformations basically result in stage boundaries.
Narrow transformation - doesn't require the data to be shuffled across the partitions. for example, Map, filter etc..
wide transformation - requires the data to be shuffled for example, reduceByKey etc..
Let's take an example of counting how many log messages appear at each level of severity,
Following is the log file that starts with the severity level,
INFO I'm Info message
WARN I'm a Warn message
INFO I'm another Info message
and create the following scala code to extract the same,
val input = sc.textFile("log.txt")
val splitedLines = input.map(line => line.split(" "))
.map(words => (words(0), 1))
.reduceByKey{(a,b) => a + b}
This sequence of commands implicitly defines a DAG of RDD objects (RDD lineage) that will be used later when an action is called. Each RDD maintains a pointer to one or more parents along with the metadata about what type of relationship it has with the parent. For example, when we call val b = a.map() on a RDD, the RDD b keeps a reference to its parent a, that's a lineage.
To display the lineage of an RDD, Spark provides a debug method toDebugString(). For example executing toDebugString() on the splitedLines RDD, will output the following:
(2) ShuffledRDD[6] at reduceByKey at <console>:25 []
+-(2) MapPartitionsRDD[5] at map at <console>:24 []
| MapPartitionsRDD[4] at map at <console>:23 []
| log.txt MapPartitionsRDD[1] at textFile at <console>:21 []
| log.txt HadoopRDD[0] at textFile at <console>:21 []
The first line (from the bottom) shows the input RDD. We created this RDD by calling sc.textFile(). Below is the more diagrammatic view of the DAG graph created from the given RDD.
Once the DAG is build, the Spark scheduler creates a physical execution plan. As mentioned above, the DAG scheduler splits the graph into multiple stages, the stages are created based on the transformations. The narrow transformations will be grouped (pipe-lined) together into a single stage. So for our example, Spark will create two stage execution as follows:
The DAG scheduler will then submit the stages into the task scheduler. The number of tasks submitted depends on the number of partitions present in the textFile. Fox example consider we have 4 partitions in this example, then there will be 4 set of tasks created and submitted in parallel provided there are enough slaves/cores. Below diagram illustrates this in more detail:
For more detailed information i suggest you to go through the following youtube videos where the Spark creators give in depth details about the DAG and execution plan and lifetime.
Advanced Apache Spark- Sameer Farooqui (Databricks)
A Deeper Understanding of Spark Internals - Aaron Davidson (Databricks)
Introduction to AmpLab Spark Internals
Beginning Spark 1.4 visualization of data has been added through the following three components where it also provide a clear graphical representation of DAG.
Timeline view of Spark events
Execution DAG
Visualization of Spark Streaming statistics
Refer to link for more information.