I want to get the first character of a std::str. The method char_at() is currently unstable, as is String::slice_chars.
I have come up with the following, but it seems excessive to get a single character and not use the rest of the vector:
let text = "hello world!";
let char_vec: Vec<char> = text.chars().collect();
let ch = char_vec[0];
UTF-8 does not define what "character" is so it depends on what you want. In this case, chars are Unicode scalar values, and so the first char of a &str is going to be between one and four bytes.
If you want just the first char, then don't collect into a Vec<char>, just use the iterator:
let text = "hello world!";
let ch = text.chars().next().unwrap();
Alternatively, you can use the iterator's nth method:
let ch = text.chars().nth(0).unwrap();
Bear in mind that elements preceding the index passed to nth will be consumed from the iterator.
I wrote a function that returns the head of a &str and the rest:
fn car_cdr(s: &str) -> (&str, &str) {
for i in 1..5 {
let r = s.get(0..i);
match r {
Some(x) => return (x, &s[i..]),
None => (),
}
}
(&s[0..0], s)
}
Use it like this:
let (first_char, remainder) = car_cdr("test");
println!("first char: {}\nremainder: {}", first_char, remainder);
The output looks like:
first char: t
remainder: est
It works fine with chars that are more than 1 byte.
Get the first single character out of a string w/o using the rest of that string:
let text = "hello world!";
let ch = text.chars().take(1).last().unwrap();
It would be nice to have something similar to Haskell's head function and tail function for such cases.
I wrote this function to act like head and tail together (doesn't match exact implementation)
pub fn head_tail<T: Iterator, O: FromIterator<<T>::Item>>(iter: &mut T) -> (Option<<T>::Item>, O) {
(iter.next(), iter.collect::<O>())
}
Usage:
// works with Vec<i32>
let mut val = vec![1, 2, 3].into_iter();
println!("{:?}", head_tail::<_, Vec<i32>>(&mut val));
// works with chars in two ways
let mut val = "thanks! bedroom builds YT".chars();
println!("{:?}", head_tail::<_, String>(&mut val));
// calling the function with Vec<char>
let mut val = "thanks! bedroom builds YT".chars();
println!("{:?}", head_tail::<_, Vec<char>>(&mut val));
NOTE: The head_tail function doesn't panic! if the iterator is empty. If this matched Haskell's head/tail output, this would have thrown an exception if the iterator was empty. It might also be good to use iterable trait to be more compatible to other types.
If you only want to test for it, you can use starts_with():
"rust".starts_with('r')
"rust".starts_with(|c| c == 'r')
I think it is pretty straight forward
let text = "hello world!";
let c: char = text.chars().next().unwrap();
next() takes the next item from the iterator
To “unwrap” something in Rust is to say, “Give me the result of the computation, and if there was an error, panic and stop the program.”
The accepted answer is a bit ugly!
let text = "hello world!";
let ch = &text[0..1]; // this returns "h"
Related
Is there a way to parse an integer from a str in rust, like my_str.parse(), but yielding an iterator to the point after the parsed integer? Something like this:
let my_str = "1234x";
let mut iter = my_str.chars();
assert_eq!(iter.parse_and_advance().unwrap(), 1234);
assert_eq!(iter.next(), Some('x'));
You don't need iterators at all. You can first use str::find to find the first non-numeric value, then use str::split_at to split the string there so you can parse the first half and convert the second half into an iterator:
let str = "1234x";
let non_letter = str.find(|c: char| c != '-' && !c.is_numeric());
let (num, rest) = str.split_at(non_letter.unwrap_or(str.len()));
let num: i32 = num.parse().unwrap();
let mut rest = rest.chars();
assert_eq!(num, 1234);
assert_eq!(rest.next(), Some('x'));
Playground link
Note that, as stated in the comments, there's a little more nuance than this to extracting the initial number, but depending on your usecase it won't be an issue.
I have an application where I am receiving a string with some repetitive characters. I am receiving input as a String. How to remove the characters from specific index?
main.rs
fn main() {
let s:String = "{\"name\":\"xx/yyyy/machine/zzz/test_int4\",\"status\":\"online\",\"timestamp\":\"2021-06-11 18:20:42.231770800 UTC\",\"value\":7}8668982856274}".to_string();
println!("{}", s);
}
how can I get result
"{\"name\":\"xx/yyyy/machine/zzz/test_int4\",\"status\":\"online\",\"timestamp\":\"2021-06-11 18:20:42.231770800 UTC\",\"value\":7}"
instead of
"{\"name\":\"xx/yyyy/machine/zzz/test_int4\",\"status\":\"online\",\"timestamp\":\"2021-06-11 18:20:42.231770800 UTC\",\"value\":7}}8668982856274}"
String indexing works only with bytes, thus you need to find an index for the appropriate byte slice like this:
let mut s = "{\"name\":\"xx/yyyy/machine/zzz/test_int4\",\"status\":\"online\",\"timestamp\":\"2021-06-11 18:20:42.231770800 UTC\",\"value\":7}8668982856274}";
let closing_bracket_idx = s
.as_bytes()
.iter()
.position(|&x| x == b'}')
.map(|i| i + 1)
.unwrap_or_else(|| s.len());
let v: serde_json::Value = serde_json::from_str(&s[..closing_bracket_idx]).unwrap();
println!("{:?}", v);
However, keep in mind, this approach doesn't really work in general for more complex cases, for example } in a json string value, or nested objects, or a type other than an object at the upmost level (e.g. [1, {2: 3}, 4]). More neat way is using parser capabilities to ignore of the trailing, as an example for serde_json:
let v = serde_json::Deserializer::from_str(s)
.into_iter::<serde_json::Value>()
.next()
.expect("empty input")
.expect("invalid json value");
println!("{:?}", v);
I'm wondering how I can remove the first and last character of a string in Rust.
Example:
Input:
"Hello World"
Output:
"ello Worl"
You can use the .chars() iterator and ignore the first and last characters:
fn rem_first_and_last(value: &str) -> &str {
let mut chars = value.chars();
chars.next();
chars.next_back();
chars.as_str()
}
It returns an empty string for zero- or one-sized strings and it will handle multi-byte unicode characters correctly. See it working on the playground.
…or the trivial solution
also works with Unicode characters:
let mut s = "Hello World".to_string();
s.pop(); // remove last
if s.len() > 0 {
s.remove(0); // remove first
}
I did this by using string slices.
fn main() {
let string: &str = "Hello World";
let first_last_off: &str = &string[1..string.len() - 1];
println!("{}", first_last_off);
}
I took all the characters in the string until the end of the string - 1.
You can also use split_at().
let msg = "Hello, world!";
let msg = msg.split_at(msg.len() - 1);
let msg = msg.0.split_at(1);
println!("{}", msg.1);
ello, world
split_at() returns the following: (&str, &str).
This solution seems rather inelegant:
fn parse_range(&self, string_value: &str) -> Vec<u8> {
let values: Vec<u8> = string_value
.splitn(2, "-")
.map(|part| part.parse().ok().unwrap())
.collect();
{ values[0]..(values[1] + 1) }.collect()
}
Since splitn(2, "-") returns exactly two results for any valid string_value, it would be better to assign the tuple directly to two variables first and last rather than a seemingly arbitrary-length Vec. I can't seem to do this with a tuple.
There are two instances of collect(), and I wonder if it can be reduced to one (or even zero).
Trivial implementation
fn parse_range(string_value: &str) -> Vec<u8> {
let pos = string_value.find(|c| c == '-').expect("No valid string");
let (first, second) = string_value.split_at(pos);
let first: u8 = first.parse().expect("Not a number");
let second: u8 = second[1..].parse().expect("Not a number");
{ first..second + 1 }.collect()
}
Playground
I would recommend returning a Result<Vec<u8>, Error> instead of panicking with expect/unwrap.
Nightly implementation
My next thought was about the second collect. Here is a code example which uses nightly code, but you won't need any collect at all.
#![feature(conservative_impl_trait, inclusive_range_syntax)]
fn parse_range(string_value: &str) -> impl Iterator<Item = u8> {
let pos = string_value.find(|c| c == '-').expect("No valid string");
let (first, second) = string_value.split_at(pos);
let first: u8 = first.parse().expect("Not a number");
let second: u8 = second[1..].parse().expect("Not a number");
first..=second
}
fn main() {
println!("{:?}", parse_range("3-7").collect::<Vec<u8>>());
}
Instead of calling collect the first time, just advance the iterator:
let mut values = string_value
.splitn(2, "-")
.map(|part| part.parse().unwrap());
let start = values.next().unwrap();
let end = values.next().unwrap();
Do not call .ok().unwrap() — that converts the Result with useful error information to an Option, which has no information. Just call unwrap directly on the Result.
As already mentioned, if you want to return a Vec, you'll want to call collect to create it. If you want to return an iterator, you can. It's not bad even in stable Rust:
fn parse_range(string_value: &str) -> std::ops::Range<u8> {
let mut values = string_value
.splitn(2, "-")
.map(|part| part.parse().unwrap());
let start = values.next().unwrap();
let end = values.next().unwrap();
start..end + 1
}
fn main() {
assert!(parse_range("1-5").eq(1..6));
}
Sadly, inclusive ranges are not yet stable, so you'll need to continue to use +1 or switch to nightly.
Since splitn(2, "-") returns exactly two results for any valid string_value, it would be better to assign the tuple directly to two variables first and last rather than a seemingly arbitrary-length Vec. I can't seem to do this with a tuple.
This is not possible with Rust's type system. You are asking for dependent types, a way for runtime values to interact with the type system. You'd want splitn to return a (&str, &str) for a value of 2 and a (&str, &str, &str) for a value of 3. That gets even more complicated when the argument is a variable, especially when it's set at run time.
The closest workaround would be to have a runtime check that there are no more values:
assert!(values.next().is_none());
Such a check doesn't feel valuable to me.
See also:
What is the correct way to return an Iterator (or any other trait)?
How do I include the end value in a range?
From the documentation, it's not clear. In Java you could use the split method like so:
"some string 123 ffd".split("123");
Use split()
let mut split = "some string 123 ffd".split("123");
This gives an iterator, which you can loop over, or collect() into a vector.
for s in split {
println!("{}", s)
}
let vec = split.collect::<Vec<&str>>();
// OR
let vec: Vec<&str> = split.collect();
There are three simple ways:
By separator:
s.split("separator") | s.split('/') | s.split(char::is_numeric)
By whitespace:
s.split_whitespace()
By newlines:
s.lines()
By regex: (using regex crate)
Regex::new(r"\s").unwrap().split("one two three")
The result of each kind is an iterator:
let text = "foo\r\nbar\n\nbaz\n";
let mut lines = text.lines();
assert_eq!(Some("foo"), lines.next());
assert_eq!(Some("bar"), lines.next());
assert_eq!(Some(""), lines.next());
assert_eq!(Some("baz"), lines.next());
assert_eq!(None, lines.next());
There is a special method split for struct String:
fn split<'a, P>(&'a self, pat: P) -> Split<'a, P> where P: Pattern<'a>
Split by char:
let v: Vec<&str> = "Mary had a little lamb".split(' ').collect();
assert_eq!(v, ["Mary", "had", "a", "little", "lamb"]);
Split by string:
let v: Vec<&str> = "lion::tiger::leopard".split("::").collect();
assert_eq!(v, ["lion", "tiger", "leopard"]);
Split by closure:
let v: Vec<&str> = "abc1def2ghi".split(|c: char| c.is_numeric()).collect();
assert_eq!(v, ["abc", "def", "ghi"]);
split returns an Iterator, which you can convert into a Vec using collect: split_line.collect::<Vec<_>>(). Going through an iterator instead of returning a Vec directly has several advantages:
split is lazy. This means that it won't really split the line until you need it. That way it won't waste time splitting the whole string if you only need the first few values: split_line.take(2).collect::<Vec<_>>(), or even if you need only the first value that can be converted to an integer: split_line.filter_map(|x| x.parse::<i32>().ok()).next(). This last example won't waste time attempting to process the "23.0" but will stop processing immediately once it finds the "1".
split makes no assumption on the way you want to store the result. You can use a Vec, but you can also use anything that implements FromIterator<&str>, for example a LinkedList or a VecDeque, or any custom type that implements FromIterator<&str>.
There's also split_whitespace()
fn main() {
let words: Vec<&str> = " foo bar\t\nbaz ".split_whitespace().collect();
println!("{:?}", words);
// ["foo", "bar", "baz"]
}
The OP's question was how to split with a multi-character string and here is a way to get the results of part1 and part2 as Strings instead in a vector.
Here splitted with the non-ASCII character string "☄☃🤔" in place of "123":
let s = "☄☃🤔"; // also works with non-ASCII characters
let mut part1 = "some string ☄☃🤔 ffd".to_string();
let _t;
let part2;
if let Some(idx) = part1.find(s) {
part2 = part1.split_off(idx + s.len());
_t = part1.split_off(idx);
}
else {
part2 = "".to_string();
}
gets: part1 = "some string "
part2 = " ffd"
If "☄☃🤔" not is found part1 contains the untouched original String and part2 is empty.
Here is a nice example in Rosetta Code -
Split a character string based on change of character - of how you can turn a short solution using split_off:
fn main() {
let mut part1 = "gHHH5YY++///\\".to_string();
if let Some(mut last) = part1.chars().next() {
let mut pos = 0;
while let Some(c) = part1.chars().find(|&c| {if c != last {true} else {pos += c.len_utf8(); false}}) {
let part2 = part1.split_off(pos);
print!("{}, ", part1);
part1 = part2;
last = c;
pos = 0;
}
}
println!("{}", part1);
}
into that
Task
Split a (character) string into comma (plus a blank) delimited strings based on a change of character (left to right).
If you are looking for the Python-flavoured split where you tuple-unpack the two ends of the split string, you can do
if let Some((a, b)) = line.split_once(' ') {
// ...
}