I am having a application build using pimcore (ZendFramework) which is hosted on a Linux EC2 (Apache) instance and one more application which is hosted on Windows IIS.
Now I want both of these applications to run in the following manner:
http://example.com/app1 will redirect to pimcore
http://example.com/app2 will redirect to application hosted on IIS
I can't use subdomains for this. I was trying to use URL Rewrite (ARR) of IIS. But ZendFramework is giving the following error:
Zend_Controller_Router_Exception No route, document, custom route or redirect is matching the request
You'll need a third web server to act as a reverse proxy. This could be an Apache or a Nginx instance for example.
The reverse proxy will serve your main domain on port 80 and decide what address to contact in order to provide the appropriate content.
Related
I'm currently developing a full-stack web application + mobile app. I've pushed my API backend (node.js express) to an AWS EC2 instance.
Now I'm looking to create the frontend with React. As well as a landing page which I think will be just plain HTML (or even WordPress if possible?) to get it running asap.
Questions are:
should I upload all 3 to the same instance? if so how?
can I point my domain in a way where mydomain.com - serves the landing page, api.mydomain.com serves the backend for requests, and app.mydomain.com serves the react app.
This solution is entirely upto you here, if this is a personal project or one with a tight budget then yes you can put all applications onto the same server.
If you have a HTML only application then you could deploy that specific application to Amazon S3 with a CloudFront distribution in front to provide CDN functionality.
If you do run the applications on your server then you will need to ensure that the web server can resolve each set application individually through hostname for example Nginx uses server_name to define the web domain name for that vhost.
I would suggest if you're running all on the same box run each node application on a seperate port, then use Nginx as a proxy based on the domain name. More information on how to set this up is available here.
Finally add DNS records to target the host IP (or CNAME if you use CloudFront).
I need path based routing in iis arr where i can create target group to assign different iis servers for web farm architecture. Which is provided by AWS Application Load Balancer.
For Example:
https://aws.amazon.com/blogs/aws/new-advanced-request-routing-for-aws-application-load-balancers/
I have to provide this kind of routing on my local machine using windows server IIS ARR(Application Request Routing)
Hey I need to configure this using target group which is provided by AWS ALB there is an option to set an instance in the target group for example:
I need this to be done on my local IIS machine using some third-party software.
I need something like this for my local IIS server.
As far as I know, if you want your ARR to achieve redirecting the request to the web farm according to special rule condition like http_cookie, http_host.
You could open the url rewrite rule in the IIS manamgent console and add some condition lik below image shows:
With lots of R&D, I found the answer that while crating multiple farms we can archive this
in my scenario I want to redirect my call to a specific IP but when I am using IP address the issue is due to IP so I create Farm for each IP and redirect my call to those farm due to that my issue of IP get solved so now I don't need to configure IP address to my web config file in my project.
I have two web apps setup in Azure, and for simplicity let's call them webapp1 and webapp2. They sit behind an application gateway, which is selecting the correct web app based on the subdirectory in the URL.
Here's a basic example of how I've set it up:
www.mydomain.com -> webapp1 (the default route)
www.mydomain.com/app -> webapp2
This is working fine, except for one problem: if webapp2 redirects to the login page, for example, the domain in the URL changes to the azurewebsites.net domain. Instead of redirecting to www.mydomain.com/login, it's going to webapp2.azurewebsites.net/login.
I'm fairly new to Azure application gateway, but I know it injects the x-forwarded-* and x-original-host headers. I assumed the gateway would either alter the redirected url request to correct the domain or the config on the web app would use the x-original-host instead. Neither of these things are happening.
Is there a way to configure either the web app or the gateway to make sure the host name doesn't change on redirects? Would this scenario work better with a separate web app/VM with a classic IIS reverse proxy setup instead of the application gateway?
Currently Application Gateway would not overwrite the response from the backend. We do inject X-Original-Host and your application should use that to write the redirect URL correctly back to mydomain.
Example to configure URL rewrite on web app can be found here. An example of rewriting default *.azurewebsites.net domain to a custom domain can be found here
I am curious to understand how IIS 7.5 Reverse Proxy is implemented in Rewrite Module (v2).
I am planning to setup a website that will handle proxing between requests coming from users (internet) and my HTTP services that are deployed on the same server. I have setup a website within IIS and configured the reverse proxy logic. I've then setup another website on the same server and deployed all my WCF REST services there. I am planning to implement IIS offloading, common tasks (such as authentication, etc) on the reverse proxy website before the request gets to the actual services (like WCF routing service for SOAP). Configuration is working perfectly fine.
However I am trying to understand the implications of this setup. When IIS does reverse proxing, does it create a new HTTP request (and a new TCP port) between those two websites? And even if both sites are on the same server? Should I expect number of TCP connections opened on this server to get doubled when reverse proxy is used?
Furthermore, has anyone experienced any performance/resource issues with a similar setup?
Cheers,
OS
I have an application server installed, listening for HTTP traffic on a port which is not blocked from the world by a firewall. I wish to expose the services offered by this application only through HTTPS, preferably as a "sub directory" of the HTTPS site already hosted by the server.
Using IIS7 Url Rewriting (as part of the ARR package), I am able to setup a rule that redirects all traffic to a sub path of my existing HTTPS site. However, I am facing some trouble, when trying to make the same rule route to my server farm setup - all requests matching the rule simply get 404 reponses. Adding the very same rule to a non-SSL site, yields the expected behaviour - the application services are proxied right trough.
What might be wrong in my setup? Is ARR proxying the HTTPS requests as HTTPS traffic to the application server? The application I want to host does not have a HTTPS interfaces so, if yes: can I tell it not to do so?
Yes, I can use IIS7/ARR to route HTTPS requests to HTTP application.
The problem I experienced, was caused by the fact that the web site I wanted to use as the "container" for the proxy directory was buildt with ASP.NET MVC. The URL routing framework within ASP.NET interfered with the IIS url rewriting, and causes the 404 error.