I have 3 columns with the following name:
name1, name2 and value.
I want to obtain in another sheet two tables having two compulsory condition (min and max calculated using name1 and name2):
the name of the first table to be taken from the column with name2 and this table has two partition.
the first partition named max, is calculating the max for 30_-20, 40_-20, 50_-20, 30_22, 40_22, 50_22, 30_60, 40_60, 50_60 and second partition named min, is calculating the min for 30_-20, 40_-20, 50_-20, 30_22, 40_22, 50_22, 30_60, 40_60, 50_60.
What I want to say can be viewed in the following picture.
I need this for my job, and I don't know anything about macros. I think it will be necessary to learn macros.
Given a layout on a single worksheet similar to your sample image.
The standard formula(s) for G3, I3, M3 and O3 are:
=MAX(INDEX($C$2:$C$999*($A$2:$A$999=H3)*($B$2:$B$999=H$1), , ))
=MIN(INDEX($C$2:$C$999+(($A$2:$A$999<>H3)+($B$2:$B$999<>H$1))*1E+99, , ))
=MAX(INDEX($C$2:$C$999*($A$2:$A$999=N3)*($B$2:$B$999=N$1), , ))
=MIN(INDEX($C$2:$C$999+(($A$2:$A$999<>N3)+($B$2:$B$999<>N$1))*1E+99, , ))
Fill down as necessary. It is usually easier to reference a cell containing a value (e.g. 30_-20) than repeatedly hardcoding the value into a variety of similar formulas. I've used H3:H5 and N3:N5 for the column A values.
How it Works:
See MINIF, MAXIF and MODEIF with Standard Formulas.
Related
I have a table on Excel with data as the following:
Meaning, I have different JPH based on the %SMALL unit and the number of active stations.
I need to create a matrix like the following (with %SMALL on horizontal and STATIONS on vertical axes):
And the formula for each cell should:
Take the input of Stations (column "B")
Check, for that specific Stations number, the amount of data on the other table (like make a filter on STATIONS for the specific number)
Perform an VLOOKUP for checking the JPH based on the %SMALL value on row 2
Interpolate for the exact JPH value, if not found on table
For now, I was able to create the last part (the VLOOKUP and the interpolation), with the following:
=IFERROR(VLOOKUP(C2;'EARLY-STATIONS'!$F:$H;3;FALSE);AVERAGE(OFFSET(INDEX('EARLY-STATIONS'!$H:$H;MATCH(C2;'EARLY-STATIONS'!$F:$F;1));0;0;2;1)))
The problem I'm facing is than with this, the calculation is not checking the number of stations, so the Iteration is not accurate.
Unfortunately I cannot use VBA macros to solve this.
Any clue?
This is an attempt because more clarity is needed in terms of all possible scenarios to consider, based on different input data and how to understand the "extrapolation" process. This approach understands as extrapolation the average of two values (lower and greater), but the idea can be customized to any other way to calculate it. Per tags listed in the question I assume there is no Excel version constraint. This is O365 solution:
=LET(sm, A2:A10, st, B2:B10, jph, C2:C10, smx, F1:J1, sty, E2:E4, NULL, "",
GETLk, LAMBDA(x,y,mode, FILTER(jph, (st=y)
* (sm = INDEX(sm, XMATCH(x, sm, mode))), NULL)),
GET, LAMBDA(x,y, LET(f, FILTER(jph, (jph=GETLk(x,y, 1))
+ (jph=GETLk(x,y, -1)), NULL), IF(#f=NULL, NULL, AVERAGE(f)))),
HREDUCE, LAMBDA(yi, DROP(REDUCE("", smx, LAMBDA(ac,x,
HSTACK(ac, GET(x, yi)))),,1)),
DROP(REDUCE("", sty, LAMBDA(ac,y, VSTACK(ac, HREDUCE(y)))),1))
The above formula spills the entire result, I don't think for this case you can use a LOOKUP-like function.
Here is the output:
The highlighted cells where the average is calculated.
Explanation
The main idea is to use DROP/REDUCE/HSTACK/VSTACK pattern to generate the grid. Check my answer to the following question: how to transform a table in Excel from vertical to horizontal but with different length on how to apply it.
We use two user LAMBDA functions to abstract some calculations:
GETLk(x,y,mode), filters jph name based on %SMALL and Stations columns values, based on input values x (x-axis value from the grid), y (y-axis value form the grid) respectively. The third input argument mode, is for doing the approximate search in XMATCH (1-next largest, -1 next smallest). In case the value exist in the input table, XMATCH returns the same value in both cases.
GET(x,y) has the logic to find the value or if the value doesn't exist to calculate the average. It uses the previous LAMBDA function GETLk. We filter for jph values that match the input values (x,y), but we use an OR condition in the FILTER (+), to select both lower or greater values. If the value exist, returns just one value otherwise two values are returned by FILTER (f). Finally if f is not empty we return the average, otherwise the value we setup as NULL.
HREDUCE: Concatenate the result by columns for a given row of the grid. Check the referred question for more information about it.
I'm trying to compare two columns ("Shows") from different tables and showing which one has the greater number ("Rating") associated with it in another table.
Ignore the operation column above as part of the solution that I'm trying to get, it's just to illustrate for you what I'm trying to compare.
Important note: If the names are duplicated. Compare the matching pair in their corresponding order. (1st with 1st, 2nd with 2nd, 3rd with 3rd etc..) illustrated in the table below:
Thanks
You can try the following in cell F3 for an array solution that spills the entire result at once:
=LET(sA, A3:A6, rA, B3:B6, sB, C3:C6, rB, D3:D6, CNTS, LAMBDA(x,
LET(seq, SEQUENCE(ROWS(x)), MAP(seq, LAMBDA(s,ROWS(FILTER(x,(x=INDEX(x,s))
*(seq<=s))))))), cntsA, CNTS(sA), cntsB, CNTS(sB), eval, MAP(sA, rA, cntsA,
LAMBDA(s,r,c,IF(r > FILTER(rB, (sB=s) * (cntsB=c)), "Table 1", "Table 2"))),
HSTACK(sA, eval))
Here is the output:
Explanation
The main idea is to count repeated show values. We use a user LAMBDA function CNTS, to avoid repetition of the same formula twice. Once we have the counts (cntsA, contsB), we use MAP to iterate over Table 1 elements with the counts and look for specific show and counts to compare with Table 2 columns. The FILTER function will return always a single value (based on sample data). Finally, we prepare the output as expected using HSTACK.
Try-
=IF(INDEX(FILTER($B$3:$B$6,$A$3:$A$6=G3),COUNTIFS($G$3:$G3,G3))>INDEX(FILTER($E$3:$E$6,$D$3:$D$6=G3),COUNTIFS($G$3:$G3,G3)),"Table-1","Table-2")
I am writing a series of queries to my workbook's data model to retrieve the number of documents by Category_Name which are greater than a certain numbers of days old (e.g. >=650).
Currently this formula (entered in celll C3) returns the correct number for a single Days Old value (=3).
=CUBEVALUE("ThisWorkbookDataModel",
"[Measures].[Count of Docs]",
"[EDD_Report].[Category_Name].&["&$B2&"]",
"[EDD_Report_10-01-18].[Days Old].[34]")
How do I return the number of documents for Days Old values >=650?
The worksheet looks like:
A B C
1 Date PL Count of Docs
2 10/1/2018 ALD 3
3 ...
UPDATE: As suggested in #ama 's answer below, the expression in step B did not work.
However, I created a subset of the Days Old values using
=CUBESET("ThisWorkbookDataModel",
"{[EDD_Report_10-01-18].[Days Old].[all].[650]:[EDD_Report_10-01-18].[Days Old].[All].[3647]}")
The cell containing this cubeset is referenced as the third Member_expression of the original CUBEVALUE formula. The limitation is now that the values for the beginning and end must be members of the Days Old set.
This is limiting, in that, I was hoping for a more general test for >=650 and there is no way to guarantee that specific values of Days Old will be in the query.
First time I hear about CUBE, so you got me curious and I did some digging. Definitely not an expert, but here is what I found:
MDX language should allow you to provide value ranges in the form of {[Table].[Field].[All].[LowerBound]:[Table].[Field].[All].[UpperBound]}.
A. Get the total number of entries:
D3 =CUBEVALUE("ThisWorkbookDataModel",
"[Measures].[Count of Docs]",
"[EDD_Report].[Category_Name].&["&$B2&"]"),
"{[EDD_Report_10-01-18].[Days Old].[All]")
B. Get the number of entries less than 650:
E3 =CUBEVALUE("ThisWorkbookDataModel",
"[Measures].[Count of Docs]",
"[EDD_Report].[Category_Name].&["&$B2&"]"),
"{[EDD_Report_10-01-18].[Days Old].[All].[0]:[EDD_Report_10-01-18].[Days Old].[All].[649]}")
Note I found something about using .[All].[650].lag(1)} but I think for it to work properly your data might need to be sorted?
C. Substract
C3 =D3-E3
Alternatively, go for the quick and dirty:
=CUBEVALUE("ThisWorkbookDataModel",
"[Measures].[Count of Docs]",
"[EDD_Report].[Category_Name].&["&$B2&"]"),
"{[EDD_Report_10-01-18].[Days Old].[All].[650]:[EDD_Report_10-01-18].[Days Old].[All].[99999]}")
Hope this helps and do let me know, I am still curious!
I have a scale, based on which I decide the value of the coefficient for the multiplication. The scale looks as following:
Which means that:
for Category1: when value>=1.000.000 then coef is 1, when value>=500.000 then coef is 0.8 and etc.
Same logic applies for Category2;
Then I have input data in the following format:
Company !MainCat|Sales Amount|
Company1|T1 | 6.500.000|
Company2|T2 | 70.000|
I need to find corresponding coefficient, ratio of the coeffitient and the value (=ratio*MaxCoef). Currently, I am finding coef the following way:
- for company1:
=IF(C8>=$D2;$D$1;IF(C8>=$E2;$E$1;IF(C8>=$F2;$F$1;IF(C8>=$G2;$G$1;IF(C8>=$H2;$H$1;IF(C8>=$I2;$I$1))))))
That is literally hardcoded and doesn't look good. Maybe there is a better way of doing ? Any suggestions?
Formula view:
You can COUNTIF(range, [criteria] < value) * 0.2 as your add 0.2 per coef stage.
To you data do: =COUNTIF(D2:H2, "<"&C8) * 0.2, count how many stages the value passes * the value per stage.
Your count if range needs to be until H2 as I2 is 0, so inferior to value and gets counted.
To combine the COUNTIF() with a dynamic search for the right category based on MainCat you can MATCH() the MainCat with Code which will give the row where the Code is located and utilize INDIRECT() to apply it as range.
=COUNTIF(INDIRECT("D"&MATCH(B8,B:B,0)&":H"&MATCH(B8,B:B,0)),"<"&C8)*0.2
MATCH(B8,B:B,0) - will match the value on B8 (lets say T1) and return the row 2.
INDIRECT("D"&MATCH(B8,B:B,0)&":H"&MATCH(B8,B:B,0) = INDIRECT("D"&2&":H"&2) - will turn the text into an actual range to be use by the COUNTIF().
Create a table ‚Mapping’ that contains two columns, ‚Category’ and ‚Coefficient‘, then use INDEX-MATCH on it as described in https://www.deskbright.com/excel/using-index-match/.
=INDEX(Mapping[Category]; MATCH([Coefficient]; Mapping[Coefficient]; -1))
This example assumes that you put this formula into a table that has a column named ‚Coefficient‘ with the input value to your multiple IFs.
The trick is that as a match_type argument, provide either -1 or 1, according to your needs.
You can do this in VBA. Write your own function which ends in something like that
=MyOwnScale(C8; B8; A2:I3)
The first parameter of your VBA-function is the value, the second the category and the third is the range with the thresholds. So you can move your cascading IF-loops in VBA-Code and you (and your users) see only a clean function call in the cell.
This question relates to the Schematiq add-in for Microsoft Excel.
Using =tbl.Lookup(table, columnsToSearch, valuesToFind, resultColumn, [defaultValue]) the values in the valuesToFind column have a consistent 3 characters to the left and then varying characters after (e.g. 908-123456 or 908-321654 - i.e. 908 is always consistent)
How can I tell the function to lookup the value based on the first 3 characters only? The expected answer should be the sum of the results of the above, i.e. 500 + 300 = 800
tbl.Lookup() works by looking for an exact match - this helps ensure it's fast but in this case it means you need an extra step to calculate a column of lookup values, something like this:
A2: =tbl.CalculateColumn(A1, "code", "x => LEFT(x, 3)", "startOfCode")
This will give you a new column that you can use for the columnsToSearch argument, however tbl.Lookup() also looks for just one match - it doesn't know how to combine values together if there is more than one matching row in the table, so I think you also need one more step to group your table by the first 3 chars of the code, like this:
A3: =tbl.Group(A2, "startOfCode", "amount")
Because tbl.Group() adds values together by default, this will give you a table with a row for each distinct value of startOfCode and the subtotal of amount for each of those values. Finally, you can do the lookup exactly as you requested, which for your input table will return 800:
A4: =tbl.Lookup(A3, "startOfCode", "908", "amount")