Azure Storage Multiple Image Upload - azure

How can I upload multiple images to Azure Storage from Windows Phone 8? I found a solution to upload single image, but I need to upload 3 images.
The solution that I found is below:
http://azure.microsoft.com/documentation/articles/mobile-services-windows-phone-upload-data-blob-storage/
I have an User Model, which have following properties.
public class User
{
public long Id { get; set; }
[JsonProperty(PropertyName = "username")]
public string UserName { get; set; }
[JsonProperty(PropertyName = "name")]
public string Name { get; set; }
[JsonProperty(PropertyName = "password")]
public string Password { get; set; }
[JsonProperty(PropertyName = "phone")]
public string Phone { get; set; }
[JsonProperty(PropertyName = "email")]
public string Email { get; set; }
[JsonProperty(PropertyName = "gender")]
public char Gender { get; set; }
[JsonProperty(PropertyName = "birthdate")]
public DateTime BirthDate { get; set; }
[JsonProperty(PropertyName = "location")]
public string Location { get; set; }
[JsonProperty(PropertyName = "photo")]
public System.Windows.Controls.Image Photo { get; set; }
// For Blob Storage Photo Upload
[JsonProperty(PropertyName = "containerName")]
public string ContainerName { get; set; }
[JsonProperty(PropertyName = "resourceName")]
public string ResourceName { get; set; }
[JsonProperty(PropertyName = "sasQueryString")]
public string SasQueryString { get; set; }
[JsonProperty(PropertyName = "imageUri")]
public string ImageUri { get; set; }
}
And, for register our application, user can upload a profile picture. The code for uploading a profile picture as follows:
public RegisterVersion2()
{
InitializeComponent();
SetBinding();
BuildLocalizedApplicationBar();
cameraCaptureTask = new PhotoChooserTask();
cameraCaptureTask.ShowCamera = true;
cameraCaptureTask.Completed += cameraCaptureTask_Completed;
}
void cameraCaptureTask_Completed(object sender, PhotoResult e)
{
imageStream = e.ChosenPhoto;
bmp = new System.Windows.Media.Imaging.BitmapImage();
bmp.SetSource(e.ChosenPhoto);
profilPicture.Source = bmp;
}
private void photoChoose_Click(object sender, RoutedEventArgs e)
{
cameraCaptureTask.Show();
}
async void Register(object sender, EventArgs e)
{
// Some code for getting input from user for username, email, password etc.I don't put this code here.
Model.User newUser = new Model.User
{ Email = email, UserName = username, Password = password,
BirthDate = birthday, Name = name + " " + surname, Gender = gender,
Phone = phone, ContainerName = username, ResourceName = Guid.NewGuid().ToString() + ".jpg" };
string errorString = string.Empty;
DateTime today = DateTime.Today;
if (imageStream != null)
{
await User.InsertAsync(newUser);
}
// Send the item to be inserted. When blob properties are set this
// generates an SAS in the response.
// If we have a returned SAS, then upload the blob.
if (!string.IsNullOrEmpty(newUser.SasQueryString))
{
// Get the URI generated that contains the SAS
// and extract the storage credentials.
StorageCredentials cred = new StorageCredentials(newUser.SasQueryString);
var imageUri = new Uri(newUser.ImageUri);
// Instantiate a Blob store container based on the info in the returned item.
CloudBlobContainer container = new CloudBlobContainer(
new Uri(string.Format("https://{0}/{1}",imageUri.Host, newUser.ContainerName)), cred);
// Upload the new image as a BLOB from the stream.
CloudBlockBlob blobFromSASCredential = container.GetBlockBlobReference(newUser.ResourceName);
await blobFromSASCredential.UploadFromStreamAsync(imageStream);
// When you request an SAS at the container-level instead of the blob-level,
// you are able to upload multiple streams using the same container credentials.
imageStream = null;
}
My question is about uploading multiple images. For this time, I have an Item object, which again same properties as Id, ItemName, ItemCost, ItemDescription etc. However, for this time we need to have 3 different image upload. The properties below are used for one photo, also the code for uploading image is used for one photo. How can change it?
// For Blob Storage Photo Upload
[JsonProperty(PropertyName = "containerName")]
public string ContainerName { get; set; }
[JsonProperty(PropertyName = "resourceName")]
public string ResourceName { get; set; }
[JsonProperty(PropertyName = "sasQueryString")]
public string SasQueryString { get; set; }
[JsonProperty(PropertyName = "imageUri")]
public string ImageUri { get; set; }

Related

Syncing local xamarin SQLite Database with Azure table storage Back-End

Here is my code used
TODOITEM1.cs
public class TODOITEM1
{
[JsonProperty(PropertyName = "ID")]
public int ID { get; set; }
[JsonProperty(PropertyName = "TEXT")]
public string TEXT { get; set; }
[JsonProperty(PropertyName = "COMPLETE")]
public bool COMPLETE { get; set; }
}
and here is MainPage.Xaml.cs
string DbPath = Path.Combine(System.Environment.GetFolderPath(System.Environment.SpecialFolder.Personal), "MTZDATABASE3.db");
private async void Button_Clicked(object sender, EventArgs e)
{
var store = new MobileServiceSQLiteStore("MTZDATABASE3.db");
store.DefineTable<TODOITEM1>();
string URL6 = "https://mtzstorageaccount2.table.core.windows.net/TODOITEM1";
MobileServiceClient client = new MobileServiceClient(URL6);
await client.SyncContext.InitializeAsync(store, new MobileServiceSyncHandler());
IMobileServiceSyncTable<TODOITEM1> todoTable = client.GetSyncTable<TODOITEM1>();
await todoTable.PullAsync("allTODOITEM", todoTable.CreateQuery());
and this is the error that appears Microsoft.WindowsAzure.MobileServices.MobileServiceInvalidOperationException: 'The request could not be completed. (The specified resource does not exist.)
and here is a screenshot of my table enter image description here

MVC inserting values into a ViewModel after Model to ViewModel mapping

I am working with two different databases. I am passing the Model collection (SQL Server) to a ViewModel collection. The ViewModel has extra properties which I access out of a Visual Fox Pro database. I am able to map the existing properties, but the ViewModel does not save the data after passing the values to it.
The WoCust and the Lname fields return null, but the rest of the properties which come from the original Model pass to the properties in the ViewModel fine.
When I debug at the rdr for the OleDbCommand, it shows that the ViewModel is receiving a value for both rdr[WoCust] and rdr[Lname].
How do I make it so the ViewModel saves the new values?
WOSchedule.cs...
public partial class WOSchedule
{
public long Id { get; set; }
public string WoNo { get; set; }
public Nullable<long> QuoteTypeId { get; set; }
public Nullable<int> PriorityNo { get; set; }
public bool Active { get; set; }
public Nullable<System.DateTime> WoDate { get; set; }
public Nullable<long> QuoteID { get; set; }
public Nullable<System.DateTime> WoDone { get; set; }
public Nullable<long> WOScheduleListId { get; set; }
public string StorageLocation { get; set; }
public virtual QuoteType QuoteType { get; set; }
public virtual Quote Quote { get; set; }
public virtual WOScheduleList WOScheduleList { get; set; }
}
WoWcheduleVM.cs...
public partial class WoScheduleVM
{
public long Id { get; set; }
public string WoNo { get; set; }
public Nullable<long> QuoteTypeId { get; set; }
public Nullable<int> PriorityNo { get; set; }
public bool Active { get; set; }
public DateTime? WoDate { get; set; }
public Nullable<long> QuoteID { get; set; }
public DateTime? WoDone { get; set; }
public Nullable<long> WOScheduleListId { get; set; }
public string StorageLocation { get; set; }
public string WoCust { get; set; } // extra property
public string Lname { get; set; } // extra property
public virtual QuoteType QuoteType { get; set; }
public virtual Quote Quote { get; set; }
public virtual WOScheduleList WOScheduleList { get; set; }
}
WOSchedulesController.cs
string cs = ConfigurationManager.ConnectionStrings["foxproTables"].ConnectionString;
OleDbConnection cn = new OleDbConnection(cs);
var wOSchedules = db.WOSchedules.Where(w => w.WoDone == null).Include(w => w.QuoteType);
var wOSchedulesVM = wOSchedules.Select(s => new ViewModels.WoScheduleVM()
{
Id = s.Id,
WoNo = s.WoNo,
QuoteTypeId = s.QuoteTypeId,
PriorityNo = s.PriorityNo,
Active = s.Active,
WoDate = s.WoDate,
QuoteID = s.QuoteID,
WoDone = s.WoDone,
WOScheduleListId = s.WOScheduleListId,
StorageLocation = s.StorageLocation
});
cn.Open();
foreach (var sch in wOSchedulesVM)
{
string conn = #"SELECT wo_cust, lname FROM womast INNER JOIN custmast ON womast.wo_cust = custmast.cust_id WHERE wo_no = '" + sch.WoNo + "'";
OleDbCommand cmdWO = new OleDbCommand(conn, cn);
OleDbDataReader rdr = cmdWO.ExecuteReader();
while (rdr.Read())
{
sch.WoCust = ((string)rdr["wo_cust"]).Trim();
sch.Lname = ((string)rdr["lname"]).Trim();
}
}
cn.Close();
return View(wOSchedulesVM.OrderByDescending(d => d.WoDate).ToList());
The problem is you're using foreach loop for iterating wOSchedulesVM collection, which renders the source collection immutable during iteration. The older documentation version explicitly explains that behavior:
The foreach statement is used to iterate through the collection to get
the information that you want, but can not be used to add or remove
items from the source collection to avoid unpredictable side effects. If you need to add or remove items from the source collection, use a for loop.
Therefore, you should use for loop to be able to modify property values inside that collection, as shown in example below:
using (var OleDbConnection cn = new OleDbConnection(cs))
{
cn.Open();
string cmd = #"SELECT wo_cust, lname FROM womast INNER JOIN custmast ON womast.wo_cust = custmast.cust_id WHERE wo_no = #WoNo";
// not sure if it's 'Count' property or 'Count()' method, depending on collection type
for (int i = 0; i < wOSchedulesVM.Count; i++)
{
var sch = wOSchedulesVM[i];
using (OleDbCommand cmdWO = new OleDbCommand(conn, cn))
{
cmd.Parameters.AddWithValue("#WoNo", sch.WoNo)
OleDbDataReader rdr = cmdWO.ExecuteReader();
if (rdr.HasRows)
{
while (rdr.Read())
{
sch.WoCust = (!rdr.IsDbNull(0)) ? rdr.GetString(0).Trim() : string.Empty;
sch.Lname = (!rdr.IsDbNull(1)) ? rdr.GetString(1).Trim() : string.Empty;
}
}
}
}
}
Note: This example includes 3 additional aspects, i.e. parameterized query, checking row existence with HasRows property and checking against DBNull.Value with IsDbNull().
Related issue: What is the best way to modify a list in a 'foreach' loop?

When trying to override Partition Key using Azuren Search and Azure Table Storage with .NET getting bad request

I am using Azuren Search and Azure Table Storage and with .net and i am trying to index a table and make a partition key filterable now this works fine until i try to insert something in that table where i get a BadRequest with not much of additional info.
This is my class bellow
using System;
using Microsoft.Azure.Search;
using Microsoft.Azure.Search.Models;
using Microsoft.WindowsAzure.Storage.Table;
[SerializePropertyNamesAsCamelCase]
public class Asset : TableEntity
{
public Asset(string name)
{
Name = name;
}
public Asset()
{
}
public Asset(string name, DateTimeOffset toBePublished, string pkey)
{
Name = name;
ToBePublishedDate = toBePublished;
PartitionKey = pkey;
}
[System.ComponentModel.DataAnnotations.Key]
public string Id { get; set; } = DateTimeOffset.UtcNow.ToString("O")
.Replace("+", string.Empty)
.Replace(":", string.Empty)
.Replace(".", string.Empty);
[IsFilterable, IsSortable, IsSearchable]
public new string PartitionKey { get; set; }
[IsFilterable, IsSortable, IsSearchable]
public string Name { get; set; } = "TemptAsset " + new Guid();
[IsFilterable, IsSortable]
public int? Version { get; set; } = 1;
[IsFilterable, IsSortable]
public DateTimeOffset? ToBePublishedDate { get; set; } = DateTimeOffset.UtcNow;
[IsFilterable, IsSortable]
public DateTimeOffset? ToBeRetiredDate { get; set; } = null;
[IsFilterable, IsSearchable, IsSortable]
public string Company { get; set; } = "TempCompany";
[IsFilterable, IsSortable]
public bool IsApproved { get; set; } = false;
[IsFilterable, IsSortable]
public bool IsDraft { get; set; } = true;
}
This runs and the index is created successfully see bellow
Now if i try to add an entity to that table i get a BadRequest, but do the exact same thing with commenting out the PartitionKey in my entity and this works fine.
This is how i create my index
AzureSearch.CreateAssetNameIndex(AzureSearch.CreateSearchServiceClient());
and the methods called bellow
using System;
using System.Collections.Generic;
using System.Linq;
using System.Threading;
using System.Threading.Tasks;
using AssetSynch.Models;
using Microsoft.Azure.Search;
using Microsoft.Azure.Search.Models;
public static SearchServiceClient CreateSearchServiceClient()
{
string searchServiceName = "*****";
string adminApiKey = "********";
SearchServiceClient serviceClient = new SearchServiceClient(searchServiceName,
new SearchCredentials(adminApiKey));
return serviceClient;
}
public static async void CreateAssetNameIndex(SearchServiceClient serviceClient)
{
Index definition = new Index
{
Name = "assetname",
Fields = FieldBuilder.BuildForType<Asset>()
};
await serviceClient.Indexes.CreateAsync(definition);
}
If i return the error using postman this is the exception i get
{
"innerExceptions": [
{
"requestInformation": {
"httpStatusCode": 400,
"httpStatusMessage": "Bad Request",
"serviceRequestID": "59efbc9a-0002-002c-3570-d5d55c000000",
"contentMd5": null,
"etag": null,
"requestDate": "Thu, 25 May 2017 17:05:01 GMT",
"targetLocation": 0,
"extendedErrorInformation": {
"errorCode": "PropertiesNeedValue",
"errorMessage": "The values are not specified for all properties in the entity.\nRequestId:59efbc9a-0002-002c-3570-d5d55c000000\nTime:2017-05-25T16:05:06.5197909Z",
"additionalDetails": {}
},
"isRequestServerEncrypted": false
}
}
]
}
if i remove the Partition key from my entity and re run the same code to re-create the index the same piece of code this executes successfully.
What i did noticed is that there are now 2 Partition keys on my entity one of which will remain null see image bellow and that my property does not override the original.
Is there something i am missing here?
According to your codes, I find your Asset has used new keyword to modify the base class's partition property.
But this will just hidden the base.partition not override it.
public new string PartitionKey { get; set; }
After you set the value in the Asset class, you will find it contains two partition as below:
So if the base class's partition key value is null, it will return 400 error.
So if you want to add the new entity to the table, you need set the base class(TableEntity) partition key value.
So I suggest you could change your Asset as below:
[SerializePropertyNamesAsCamelCase]
public class Asset : TableEntity
{
public Asset(string name)
{
Name = name;
base.PartitionKey = this.PartitionKey;
}
public Asset()
{
base.PartitionKey = this.PartitionKey;
}
public Asset(string name, DateTimeOffset toBePublished, string pkey)
{
Name = name;
ToBePublishedDate = toBePublished;
PartitionKey = pkey;
base.PartitionKey = this.PartitionKey;
}
[Key]
[IsFilterable]
public string Id { get; set; } = DateTimeOffset.UtcNow.ToString("O")
.Replace("+", string.Empty)
.Replace(":", string.Empty)
.Replace(".", string.Empty);
[IsFilterable, IsSortable, IsSearchable]
public new string PartitionKey { get; set; }
[IsFilterable, IsSortable, IsSearchable]
public string Name { get; set; } = "TemptAsset " + new Guid();
[IsFilterable, IsSortable]
public int? Version { get; set; } = 1;
[IsFilterable, IsSortable]
public DateTimeOffset? ToBePublishedDate { get; set; } = DateTimeOffset.UtcNow;
[IsFilterable, IsSortable]
public DateTimeOffset? ToBeRetiredDate { get; set; } = null;
[IsFilterable, IsSearchable, IsSortable]
public string Company { get; set; } = "TempCompany";
[IsFilterable, IsSortable]
public bool IsApproved { get; set; } = false;
[IsFilterable, IsSortable]
public bool IsDraft { get; set; } = true;
}
If you want to use table storage as datasource, I suggest you could refer to this article.

Azure, DocumentDB cannot save POCO object as a document

I have serious problem with MS Azure DocumentDB.
I Know it's in pre-realese only, but as I know it is said that it is possible to save Dynamic and POCO objects as a documents. When I save dynamic object it works just fine (object is added to a collection):
dynamic dynamicObject = new
{
testId = "12",
text = "aaa bbb ccc"
};
await client.CreateDocumentAsync(collectionSelfLink, dynamicObject);
However, when I try to add a POCO obejct, it doesnt works (nothing is added to a collection):
public class House
{
[JsonProperty(PropertyName = "id")]
public string HouseId { get; set; }
[JsonProperty(PropertyName = "name")]
public string Name { get; set; }
[JsonProperty(PropertyName = "address")]
public string Address { get; set; }
}
------------------
House house = new House() {HouseId = "1", Name="TestHouse", Address="asdasdasd"};
await client.CreateDocumentAsync(collectionSelfLink, house);
Everything else is the same.
EDIT: temp solution is to inherit your POCO class from Microsoft.Azure.Documents.Document class.
as per my comment, can't repro this.
here is my test project:
static void Main(string[] args)
{
House house = new House() { HouseId = "1", Name = "TestHouse", Address = "asdasdasd" };
Document doc = client.CreateDocumentAsync(col.DocumentsLink, house).Result;
Console.Write(doc.SelfLink);
Console.ReadLine();
}
public class House
{
[JsonProperty(PropertyName = "id")]
public string HouseId { get; set; }
[JsonProperty(PropertyName = "name")]
public string Name { get; set; }
[JsonProperty(PropertyName = "address")]
public string Address { get; set; }
}
results in 1 document created and doc.selfLink being printed to the Console.

SubSonic Simple Repository One-To-Many

I made a class like:
public class Video
{
public Guid VideoID { get; set; }
public VideoCategory VideoCategory { get; set; }
public int SortIndex { get; set; }
public string Title { get; set; }
public string Body { get; set; }
public string Author { get; set; }
public string Filename { get; set; }
public new void Add()
{
this.VideoID = Guid.NewGuid();
DB.Repository.Add(this);
}
}
And another like
public class VideoCategory
{
public Guid VideoCategoryID { get; set; }
public string Title { get; set; }
public new void Add()
{
this.VideoCategoryID = Guid.NewGuid();
DB.Repository.Add(this);
}
}
I then have code like:
VideoCategory VideoCategory = new VideoCategory();
VideoCategory.Title = "TestTitle";
VideoCategory.Add();
Video Video = new Video();
Video.VideoCategory = VideoCategory;
Video.SortIndex = 1;
Video.Title = "TestTitle";
Video.Body = "TestBody";
Video.Author = "TestAuthor";
Video.Filename = "TestFile.flv";
Video.Add();
It doesn't save the VideoCategory into my database, so obviously i'm missing something. What else is needed to done to save a one-to-many relationship?
You could probably just do the following, you'll probably want to tidy it up but it will ensure your foreign key value gets populated:
public class Video
{
protected VideoCategory videoCategory;
public Guid ID { get; set; }
public VideoCategory VideoCategory
{
get { return videoCategory; }
set
{
videoCategory = value;
VideoCategoryId = value.ID;
}
}
public Guid VideoCategoryId { get; set; }
public int SortIndex { get; set; }
public string Title { get; set; }
public string Body { get; set; }
public string Author { get; set; }
public string Filename { get; set; }
}
public class VideoCategory
{
public Guid ID { get; set; }
public string Title { get; set; }
}
SimpleRepository repo = new SimpleRepository(SimpleRepositoryOptions.RunMigrations);
VideoCategory videoCategory = new VideoCategory();
videoCategory.ID = Guid.NewGuid();
videoCategory.Title = "TestTitle";
repo.Add<VideoCategory>(videoCategory);
Video video = new Video();
video.ID = Guid.NewGuid();
video.VideoCategory = videoCategory;
video.SortIndex = 1;
video.Title = "TestTitle";
video.Body = "TestBody";
video.Author = "TestAuthor";
video.Filename = "TestFile.flv";
repo.Add<Video>(video);
You're not missing anything. Simplerepository doesn't support one to many out of the box.
Heres a useful link that shows how to mangage foreign keys yourself in SimpleRepository -
subsonic-3-simplerepository
Have not tried it myself, but looks like it would actually work.
Fluent Nhibernate will do this foriegn key management for you automatically, but it's a LOT more complex.
PS If this was helpful, please vote it up.

Resources