Related
I have a bash shell-script with a function which exports an environment variable.
For sake of argument lets use the following example:
#!/bin/bash
function my_function()
{
export my_env_var=$1
}
Since the whole purpose is to export the variable to the main shell I source it.
When the main shell is bash this works fine:
<bash-shell>
> source ~/tmp/my_test.sh
> my_function test
> echo $my_env_var
test
But other customers use csh and there things start to fail if I use the same command with the same script, since csh does not know functions :-(
<csh-shell>
% source ~/tmp/my_test.sh
Badly placed ()'s
I already tried to wrap it in a wrapper-script:
#!/bin/sh
bash -c 'source ~/tmp/my_test.sh; my_function test`
echo my_env_var = $my_env_var
But my_env_var is not exported in this way:
<csh-shell>
% source ~/tmp/my_test2.sh
my_env_var: Undefined variable.
Where it is known in the bash shell (as can be seen by changing the 2nd script to:
#!/bin/sh
bash -c 'source ~/tmp/my_test.sh; my_function test; echo my_env_var in bash = $my_env_var`
echo my_env_var = $my_env_var
<csh-shell>
% source ~/tmp/my_test2.sh
my_env_var in bash = test
my_env_var: Undefined variable.
What am I missing / doing wrong so the script exports the variable when it is called from bash and when it is called from csh?
The Bourne shell and csh are not compatible; many commands are different, and csh misses many features (it doesn't have functions at all). Plus, sooner or later you're going to have someone who uses fish, which is different yet still. The only way to make a non-trivial script work for both is to write it twice.
That said, if you want to set some environment variables then the general strategy is to create a script which outputs the required commands; this can be in any language (shell, Python, C); for example:
#!/bin/sh
# ... do work here ...
var="foo"
# Getting the shell in a cross-platform way isn't too easy. This was only tested
# on Linux. Can add a "-c" or "-f" flag if you need cross-platform support.
shell=$(ps -ho comm $(ps -ho ppid $$))
case "$shell" in
(csh|tcsh) echo "setenv VAR $var" ;;
(fish) echo "set -Ux VAR $var" ;;
(*) echo "export VAR=$var"
esac
And when you run it, it outputs the appropriate commands:
% ./work
export VAR=foo
% tcsh
> ./work
setenv VAR foo
> fish
martin#x270 ~> ./work
set -Ux VAR foo
And to actually set it, eval the output like so:
% eval $(./work)
% echo $VAR
foo
% tcsh
> eval `./work`
> echo $VAR
foo
> fish
martin#x270 ~> eval (./work)
martin#x270 ~> echo $VAR
foo
The downside of this is that informational messages, warnings, etc. will also get eval'd; to solve this make sure to always output these to stderr:
echo >&2 "warning: foo"
If you don't want to run eval you can also use something slightly more complicated which prints VAR=foo and then create a Bourne and csh wrapper script to parse those lines, but "output the variables you want to set, instead of directly setting them" is the general approach to take to make something work in multiple incompatible shells.
I want to execute a long running command in Bash, and both capture its exit status, and tee its output.
So I do this:
command | tee out.txt
ST=$?
The problem is that the variable ST captures the exit status of tee and not of command. How can I solve this?
Note that command is long running and redirecting the output to a file to view it later is not a good solution for me.
There is an internal Bash variable called $PIPESTATUS; it’s an array that holds the exit status of each command in your last foreground pipeline of commands.
<command> | tee out.txt ; test ${PIPESTATUS[0]} -eq 0
Or another alternative which also works with other shells (like zsh) would be to enable pipefail:
set -o pipefail
...
The first option does not work with zsh due to a little bit different syntax.
Dumb solution: Connecting them through a named pipe (mkfifo). Then the command can be run second.
mkfifo pipe
tee out.txt < pipe &
command > pipe
echo $?
using bash's set -o pipefail is helpful
pipefail: the return value of a pipeline is the status of
the last command to exit with a non-zero status,
or zero if no command exited with a non-zero status
There's an array that gives you the exit status of each command in a pipe.
$ cat x| sed 's///'
cat: x: No such file or directory
$ echo $?
0
$ cat x| sed 's///'
cat: x: No such file or directory
$ echo ${PIPESTATUS[*]}
1 0
$ touch x
$ cat x| sed 's'
sed: 1: "s": substitute pattern can not be delimited by newline or backslash
$ echo ${PIPESTATUS[*]}
0 1
This solution works without using bash specific features or temporary files. Bonus: in the end the exit status is actually an exit status and not some string in a file.
Situation:
someprog | filter
you want the exit status from someprog and the output from filter.
Here is my solution:
((((someprog; echo $? >&3) | filter >&4) 3>&1) | (read xs; exit $xs)) 4>&1
echo $?
See my answer for the same question on unix.stackexchange.com for a detailed explanation and an alternative without subshells and some caveats.
By combining PIPESTATUS[0] and the result of executing the exit command in a subshell, you can directly access the return value of your initial command:
command | tee ; ( exit ${PIPESTATUS[0]} )
Here's an example:
# the "false" shell built-in command returns 1
false | tee ; ( exit ${PIPESTATUS[0]} )
echo "return value: $?"
will give you:
return value: 1
So I wanted to contribute an answer like lesmana's, but I think mine is perhaps a little simpler and slightly more advantageous pure-Bourne-shell solution:
# You want to pipe command1 through command2:
exec 4>&1
exitstatus=`{ { command1; printf $? 1>&3; } | command2 1>&4; } 3>&1`
# $exitstatus now has command1's exit status.
I think this is best explained from the inside out - command1 will execute and print its regular output on stdout (file descriptor 1), then once it's done, printf will execute and print icommand1's exit code on its stdout, but that stdout is redirected to file descriptor 3.
While command1 is running, its stdout is being piped to command2 (printf's output never makes it to command2 because we send it to file descriptor 3 instead of 1, which is what the pipe reads). Then we redirect command2's output to file descriptor 4, so that it also stays out of file descriptor 1 - because we want file descriptor 1 free for a little bit later, because we will bring the printf output on file descriptor 3 back down into file descriptor 1 - because that's what the command substitution (the backticks), will capture and that's what will get placed into the variable.
The final bit of magic is that first exec 4>&1 we did as a separate command - it opens file descriptor 4 as a copy of the external shell's stdout. Command substitution will capture whatever is written on standard out from the perspective of the commands inside it - but since command2's output is going to file descriptor 4 as far as the command substitution is concerned, the command substitution doesn't capture it - however once it gets "out" of the command substitution it is effectively still going to the script's overall file descriptor 1.
(The exec 4>&1 has to be a separate command because many common shells don't like it when you try to write to a file descriptor inside a command substitution, that is opened in the "external" command that is using the substitution. So this is the simplest portable way to do it.)
You can look at it in a less technical and more playful way, as if the outputs of the commands are leapfrogging each other: command1 pipes to command2, then the printf's output jumps over command 2 so that command2 doesn't catch it, and then command 2's output jumps over and out of the command substitution just as printf lands just in time to get captured by the substitution so that it ends up in the variable, and command2's output goes on its merry way being written to the standard output, just as in a normal pipe.
Also, as I understand it, $? will still contain the return code of the second command in the pipe, because variable assignments, command substitutions, and compound commands are all effectively transparent to the return code of the command inside them, so the return status of command2 should get propagated out - this, and not having to define an additional function, is why I think this might be a somewhat better solution than the one proposed by lesmana.
Per the caveats lesmana mentions, it's possible that command1 will at some point end up using file descriptors 3 or 4, so to be more robust, you would do:
exec 4>&1
exitstatus=`{ { command1 3>&-; printf $? 1>&3; } 4>&- | command2 1>&4; } 3>&1`
exec 4>&-
Note that I use compound commands in my example, but subshells (using ( ) instead of { } will also work, though may perhaps be less efficient.)
Commands inherit file descriptors from the process that launches them, so the entire second line will inherit file descriptor four, and the compound command followed by 3>&1 will inherit the file descriptor three. So the 4>&- makes sure that the inner compound command will not inherit file descriptor four, and the 3>&- will not inherit file descriptor three, so command1 gets a 'cleaner', more standard environment. You could also move the inner 4>&- next to the 3>&-, but I figure why not just limit its scope as much as possible.
I'm not sure how often things use file descriptor three and four directly - I think most of the time programs use syscalls that return not-used-at-the-moment file descriptors, but sometimes code writes to file descriptor 3 directly, I guess (I could imagine a program checking a file descriptor to see if it's open, and using it if it is, or behaving differently accordingly if it's not). So the latter is probably best to keep in mind and use for general-purpose cases.
(command | tee out.txt; exit ${PIPESTATUS[0]})
Unlike #cODAR's answer this returns the original exit code of the first command and not only 0 for success and 127 for failure. But as #Chaoran pointed out you can just call ${PIPESTATUS[0]}. It is important however that all is put into brackets.
In Ubuntu and Debian, you can apt-get install moreutils. This contains a utility called mispipe that returns the exit status of the first command in the pipe.
Outside of bash, you can do:
bash -o pipefail -c "command1 | tee output"
This is useful for example in ninja scripts where the shell is expected to be /bin/sh.
The simplest way to do this in plain bash is to use process substitution instead of a pipeline. There are several differences, but they probably don't matter very much for your use case:
When running a pipeline, bash waits until all processes complete.
Sending Ctrl-C to bash makes it kill all the processes of a pipeline, not just the main one.
The pipefail option and the PIPESTATUS variable are irrelevant to process substitution.
Possibly more
With process substitution, bash just starts the process and forgets about it, it's not even visible in jobs.
Mentioned differences aside, consumer < <(producer) and producer | consumer are essentially equivalent.
If you want to flip which one is the "main" process, you just flip the commands and the direction of the substitution to producer > >(consumer). In your case:
command > >(tee out.txt)
Example:
$ { echo "hello world"; false; } > >(tee out.txt)
hello world
$ echo $?
1
$ cat out.txt
hello world
$ echo "hello world" > >(tee out.txt)
hello world
$ echo $?
0
$ cat out.txt
hello world
As I said, there are differences from the pipe expression. The process may never stop running, unless it is sensitive to the pipe closing. In particular, it may keep writing things to your stdout, which may be confusing.
PIPESTATUS[#] must be copied to an array immediately after the pipe command returns.
Any reads of PIPESTATUS[#] will erase the contents.
Copy it to another array if you plan on checking the status of all pipe commands.
"$?" is the same value as the last element of "${PIPESTATUS[#]}",
and reading it seems to destroy "${PIPESTATUS[#]}", but I haven't absolutely verified this.
declare -a PSA
cmd1 | cmd2 | cmd3
PSA=( "${PIPESTATUS[#]}" )
This will not work if the pipe is in a sub-shell. For a solution to that problem,
see bash pipestatus in backticked command?
Base on #brian-s-wilson 's answer; this bash helper function:
pipestatus() {
local S=("${PIPESTATUS[#]}")
if test -n "$*"
then test "$*" = "${S[*]}"
else ! [[ "${S[#]}" =~ [^0\ ] ]]
fi
}
used thus:
1: get_bad_things must succeed, but it should produce no output; but we want to see output that it does produce
get_bad_things | grep '^'
pipeinfo 0 1 || return
2: all pipeline must succeed
thing | something -q | thingy
pipeinfo || return
Pure shell solution:
% rm -f error.flag; echo hello world \
| (cat || echo "First command failed: $?" >> error.flag) \
| (cat || echo "Second command failed: $?" >> error.flag) \
| (cat || echo "Third command failed: $?" >> error.flag) \
; test -s error.flag && (echo Some command failed: ; cat error.flag)
hello world
And now with the second cat replaced by false:
% rm -f error.flag; echo hello world \
| (cat || echo "First command failed: $?" >> error.flag) \
| (false || echo "Second command failed: $?" >> error.flag) \
| (cat || echo "Third command failed: $?" >> error.flag) \
; test -s error.flag && (echo Some command failed: ; cat error.flag)
Some command failed:
Second command failed: 1
First command failed: 141
Please note the first cat fails as well, because it's stdout gets closed on it. The order of the failed commands in the log is correct in this example, but don't rely on it.
This method allows for capturing stdout and stderr for the individual commands so you can then dump that as well into a log file if an error occurs, or just delete it if no error (like the output of dd).
It may sometimes be simpler and clearer to use an external command, rather than digging into the details of bash. pipeline, from the minimal process scripting language execline, exits with the return code of the second command*, just like a sh pipeline does, but unlike sh, it allows reversing the direction of the pipe, so that we can capture the return code of the producer process (the below is all on the sh command line, but with execline installed):
$ # using the full execline grammar with the execlineb parser:
$ execlineb -c 'pipeline { echo "hello world" } tee out.txt'
hello world
$ cat out.txt
hello world
$ # for these simple examples, one can forego the parser and just use "" as a separator
$ # traditional order
$ pipeline echo "hello world" "" tee out.txt
hello world
$ # "write" order (second command writes rather than reads)
$ pipeline -w tee out.txt "" echo "hello world"
hello world
$ # pipeline execs into the second command, so that's the RC we get
$ pipeline -w tee out.txt "" false; echo $?
1
$ pipeline -w tee out.txt "" true; echo $?
0
$ # output and exit status
$ pipeline -w tee out.txt "" sh -c "echo 'hello world'; exit 42"; echo "RC: $?"
hello world
RC: 42
$ cat out.txt
hello world
Using pipeline has the same differences to native bash pipelines as the bash process substitution used in answer #43972501.
* Actually pipeline doesn't exit at all unless there is an error. It executes into the second command, so it's the second command that does the returning.
Why not use stderr? Like so:
(
# Our long-running process that exits abnormally
( for i in {1..100} ; do echo ploop ; sleep 0.5 ; done ; exit 5 )
echo $? 1>&2 # We pass the exit status of our long-running process to stderr (fd 2).
) | tee ploop.out
So ploop.out receives the stdout. stderr receives the exit status of the long running process. This has the benefit of being completely POSIX-compatible.
(Well, with the exception of the range expression in the example long-running process, but that's not really relevant.)
Here's what this looks like:
...
ploop
ploop
ploop
ploop
ploop
ploop
ploop
ploop
ploop
ploop
5
Note that the return code 5 does not get output to the file ploop.out.
Suppose you have the following command stored in a variable:
COMMAND='echo hello'
What's the difference between
$ eval "$COMMAND"
hello
$ bash -c "$COMMAND"
hello
$ $COMMAND
hello
? Why is the last version almost never used if it is shorter and (as far as I can see) does exactly the same thing?
The third form is not at all like the other two -- but to understand why, we need to go into the order of operations when bash in interpreting a command, and look at which of those are followed when each method is in use.
Bash Parsing Stages
Quote Processing
Splitting Into Commands
Special Operator Parsing
Expansions
Word Splitting
Globbing
Execution
Using eval "$string"
eval "$string" follows all the above steps starting from #1. Thus:
Literal quotes within the string become syntactic quotes
Special operators such as >() are processed
Expansions such as $foo are honored
Results of those expansions are split on characters into whitespace into separate words
Those words are expanded as globs if they parse as same and have available matches, and finally the command is executed.
Using sh -c "$string"
...performs the same as eval does, but in a new shell launched as a separate process; thus, changes to variable state, current directory, etc. will expire when this new process exits. (Note, too, that that new shell may be a different interpreter supporting a different language; ie. sh -c "foo" will not support the same syntax that bash, ksh, zsh, etc. do).
Using $string
...starts at step 5, "Word Splitting".
What does this mean?
Quotes are not honored.
printf '%s\n' "two words" will thus parse as printf %s\n "two words", as opposed to the usual/expected behavior of printf %s\n two words (with the quotes being consumed by the shell).
Splitting into multiple commands (on ;s, &s, or similar) does not take place.
Thus:
s='echo foo && echo bar'
$s
...will emit the following output:
foo && echo bar
...instead of the following, which would otherwise be expected:
foo
bar
Special operators and expansions are not honored.
No $(foo), no $foo, no <(foo), etc.
Redirections are not honored.
>foo or 2>&1 is just another word created by string-splitting, rather than a shell directive.
$ bash -c "$COMMAND"
This version starts up a new bash interpreter, runs the command, and then exits, returning control to the original shell. You don't need to be running bash at all in the first place to do this, you can start a bash interpreter from tcsh, for example. You might also do this from a bash script to start with a fresh environment or to keep from polluting your current environment.
EDIT:
As #CharlesDuffy points out starting a new bash shell in this way will clear shell variables but environment variables will be inherited by the spawned shell process.
Using eval causes the shell to parse your command twice. In the example you gave, executing $COMMAND directly or doing an eval are equivalent, but have a look at the answer here to get a more thorough idea of what eval is good (or bad) for.
There are at least times when they are different. Consider the following:
$ cmd="echo \$var"
$ var=hello
$ $cmd
$var
$ eval $cmd
hello
$ bash -c "$cmd"
$ var=world bash -c "$cmd"
world
which shows the different points at which variable expansion is performed. It's even more clear if we do set -x first
$ set -x
$ $cmd
+ echo '$var'
$var
$ eval $cmd
+ eval echo '$var'
++ echo hello
hello
$ bash -c "$cmd"
+ bash -c 'echo $var'
$ var=world bash -c "$cmd"
+ var=world
+ bash -c 'echo $var'
world
We can see here much of what Charles Duffy talks about in his excellent answer. For example, attempting to execute the variable directly prints $var because parameter expansion and those earlier steps had already been done, and so we don't get the value of var, as we do with eval.
The bash -c option only inherits exported variables from the parent shell, and since I didn't export var it's not available to the new shell.
I would like to store a command to use at a later time in a variable (not the output of the command, but the command itself).
I have a simple script as follows:
command="ls";
echo "Command: $command"; #Output is: Command: ls
b=`$command`;
echo $b; #Output is: public_html REV test... (command worked successfully)
However, when I try something a bit more complicated, it fails. For example, if I make
command="ls | grep -c '^'";
The output is:
Command: ls | grep -c '^'
ls: cannot access |: No such file or directory
ls: cannot access grep: No such file or directory
ls: cannot access '^': No such file or directory
How could I store such a command (with pipes/multiple commands) in a variable for later use?
Use eval:
x="ls | wc"
eval "$x"
y=$(eval "$x")
echo "$y"
Do not use eval! It has a major risk of introducing arbitrary code execution.
BashFAQ-50 - I'm trying to put a command in a variable, but the complex cases always fail.
Put it in an array and expand all the words with double-quotes "${arr[#]}" to not let the IFS split the words due to Word Splitting.
cmdArgs=()
cmdArgs=('date' '+%H:%M:%S')
and see the contents of the array inside. The declare -p allows you see the contents of the array inside with each command parameter in separate indices. If one such argument contains spaces, quoting inside while adding to the array will prevent it from getting split due to Word-Splitting.
declare -p cmdArgs
declare -a cmdArgs='([0]="date" [1]="+%H:%M:%S")'
and execute the commands as
"${cmdArgs[#]}"
23:15:18
(or) altogether use a bash function to run the command,
cmd() {
date '+%H:%M:%S'
}
and call the function as just
cmd
POSIX sh has no arrays, so the closest you can come is to build up a list of elements in the positional parameters. Here's a POSIX sh way to run a mail program
# POSIX sh
# Usage: sendto subject address [address ...]
sendto() {
subject=$1
shift
first=1
for addr; do
if [ "$first" = 1 ]; then set --; first=0; fi
set -- "$#" --recipient="$addr"
done
if [ "$first" = 1 ]; then
echo "usage: sendto subject address [address ...]"
return 1
fi
MailTool --subject="$subject" "$#"
}
Note that this approach can only handle simple commands with no redirections. It can't handle redirections, pipelines, for/while loops, if statements, etc
Another common use case is when running curl with multiple header fields and payload. You can always define args like below and invoke curl on the expanded array content
curlArgs=('-H' "keyheader: value" '-H' "2ndkeyheader: 2ndvalue")
curl "${curlArgs[#]}"
Another example,
payload='{}'
hostURL='http://google.com'
authToken='someToken'
authHeader='Authorization:Bearer "'"$authToken"'"'
now that variables are defined, use an array to store your command args
curlCMD=(-X POST "$hostURL" --data "$payload" -H "Content-Type:application/json" -H "$authHeader")
and now do a proper quoted expansion
curl "${curlCMD[#]}"
var=$(echo "asdf")
echo $var
# => asdf
Using this method, the command is immediately evaluated and its return value is stored.
stored_date=$(date)
echo $stored_date
# => Thu Jan 15 10:57:16 EST 2015
# (wait a few seconds)
echo $stored_date
# => Thu Jan 15 10:57:16 EST 2015
The same with backtick
stored_date=`date`
echo $stored_date
# => Thu Jan 15 11:02:19 EST 2015
# (wait a few seconds)
echo $stored_date
# => Thu Jan 15 11:02:19 EST 2015
Using eval in the $(...) will not make it evaluated later:
stored_date=$(eval "date")
echo $stored_date
# => Thu Jan 15 11:05:30 EST 2015
# (wait a few seconds)
echo $stored_date
# => Thu Jan 15 11:05:30 EST 2015
Using eval, it is evaluated when eval is used:
stored_date="date" # < storing the command itself
echo $(eval "$stored_date")
# => Thu Jan 15 11:07:05 EST 2015
# (wait a few seconds)
echo $(eval "$stored_date")
# => Thu Jan 15 11:07:16 EST 2015
# ^^ Time changed
In the above example, if you need to run a command with arguments, put them in the string you are storing:
stored_date="date -u"
# ...
For Bash scripts this is rarely relevant, but one last note. Be careful with eval. Eval only strings you control, never strings coming from an untrusted user or built from untrusted user input.
For bash, store your command like this:
command="ls | grep -c '^'"
Run your command like this:
echo $command | bash
Not sure why so many answers make it complicated!
use alias [command] 'string to execute'
example:
alias dir='ls -l'
./dir
[pretty list of files]
I tried various different methods:
printexec() {
printf -- "\033[1;37m$\033[0m"
printf -- " %q" "$#"
printf -- "\n"
eval -- "$#"
eval -- "$*"
"$#"
"$*"
}
Output:
$ printexec echo -e "foo\n" bar
$ echo -e foo\\n bar
foon bar
foon bar
foo
bar
bash: echo -e foo\n bar: command not found
As you can see, only the third one, "$#" gave the correct result.
I faced this problem with the following command:
awk '{printf "%s[%s]\n", $1, $3}' "input.txt"
I need to build this command dynamically:
The target file name input.txt is dynamic and may contain space.
The awk script inside {} braces printf "%s[%s]\n", $1, $3 is dynamic.
Challenge:
Avoid extensive quote escaping logic if there are many " inside the awk script.
Avoid parameter expansion for every $ field variable.
The solutions bellow with eval command and associative arrays do not work. Due to bash variable expansions and quoting.
Solution:
Build bash variable dynamically, avoid bash expansions, use printf template.
# dynamic variables, values change at runtime.
input="input file 1.txt"
awk_script='printf "%s[%s]\n" ,$1 ,$3'
# static command template, preventing double-quote escapes and avoid variable expansions.
awk_command=$(printf "awk '{%s}' \"%s\"\n" "$awk_script" "$input")
echo "awk_command=$awk_command"
awk_command=awk '{printf "%s[%s]\n" ,$1 ,$3}' "input file 1.txt"
Executing variable command:
bash -c "$awk_command"
Alternative that also works
bash << $awk_command
As you don't specify any scripting language, I would recommand tcl, the Tool Command Language for this kind of purpose.
Then in the first line, add the appropriate shebang:
#!/usr/local/bin/tclsh
with appropriate location you can retrieve with which tclsh.
In tcl scripts, you can call operating system commands with exec.
#!/bin/bash
#Note: this script works only when u use Bash. So, don't remove the first line.
TUNECOUNT=$(ifconfig |grep -c -o tune0) #Some command with "Grep".
echo $TUNECOUNT #This will return 0
#if you don't have tune0 interface.
#Or count of installed tune0 interfaces.
First of all, there are functions for this. But if you prefer variables then your task can be done like this:
$ cmd=ls
$ $cmd # works
file file2 test
$ cmd='ls | grep file'
$ $cmd # not works
ls: cannot access '|': No such file or directory
ls: cannot access 'grep': No such file or directory
file
$ bash -c $cmd # works
file file2 test
$ bash -c "$cmd" # also works
file
file2
$ bash <<< $cmd
file
file2
$ bash <<< "$cmd"
file
file2
Or via a temporary file
$ tmp=$(mktemp)
$ echo "$cmd" > "$tmp"
$ chmod +x "$tmp"
$ "$tmp"
file
file2
$ rm "$tmp"
Be careful registering an order with the: X=$(Command)
This one is still executed. Even before being called. To check and confirm this, you can do:
echo test;
X=$(for ((c=0; c<=5; c++)); do
sleep 2;
done);
echo note the 5 seconds elapsed
It is not necessary to store commands in variables even as you need to use it later. Just execute it as per normal. If you store in variables, you would need some kind of eval statement or invoke some unnecessary shell process to "execute your variable".
Two questions: how can I write a shell variable from this script into its child script?
Are there any easier ways to do this?
If you can't follow what I'm doing, I'm:
1) starting with a list of directories whose names will be stored as values taken by $i
2) cd'ing to every value of $i and ls'ing its contents
3) echoing its contents into a new script with the name of the directory via cat
4) using echo and cat to write a new script that contains the ls'd values of $i and sends them all to a blogging email address called $i#tumblr.com
#/bin/sh
read -d '' commands <<EOF
#list of directories goes here
dir1
dir2
dir3
etc...
EOF
for i in $commands
do
cd $SPECIALPATH/$i
echo ("#/bin/sh \n read -d '' directives <<EOF \n") | cat >> $i.sh
ls | cat >> $i.sh
echo ("EOF \n for q in $directives \n do \n uuencode $q $q | sendmail $i \n done \n") | cat >> $i.sh
# NB -- I am asking the script to write the shell variable $i into the new
# script, called $i.sh, as the email address specified, in the middle of an
# echo statement... I am well aware that it doesn't work as is
chmod +x $i.sh
./$i.sh
done
You are abusing felines a lot - you should simply redirect, rather than pipe to cat which appends.
You can avoid the intermediary $i.sh file by bundling all the output that goes to the file with a single I/O redirection that pipes direct into a shell - no need for the intermediate file to clean up (you didn't show that happening) or the chmod operation.
I would have done this using braces:
{
echo "..."
ls
echo "..."
} | sh
However, when I looked at the script in that form, I realized that wasn't necessary. I've left the initial part of your script unchanged, but the loop is vastly simpler like this:
#/bin/sh
read -d '' commands <<EOF
#list of directories goes here
dir1
dir2
dir3
etc...
EOF
for i in $commands
do
(
cd $SPECIALPATH/$i
ls |
while read q
do uuencode $q $q | sendmail $i
done
)
done
I'm assuming the sendmail command works - it isn't the way I'd try sending email. I'd probably use mailx or something similar, and I'd avoid using uuencode too (I'd use a base-64 encoding, left to my own devices):
do uuencode $q $q | mailx -s "File $q" $i#tumblr.com
The script also uses parentheses around the cd command. It means that the cd command and what follows is run in a sub-shell, so the parent script does not change directory. In this case, with an absolute pathname for $SPECIALDIR, it would not matter much. But as a general rule, it often makes life easier if you isolate directory changes like that.
I'd probably simplify it still further for general reuse (though I'd need to add something to ensure that SPECIALPATH is set appropriately):
#/bin/sh
for i in "$#"
do
(
cd $SPECIALPATH/$i
ls |
while read q
do uuencode $q $q | sendmail $i
done
)
done
I can then invoke it with:
script-name $(<list-of-dirs)
That means that without editing the script, it can be reused for any list of directories.
Intermediate step 1:
for i in $commands
do
(
cd $SPECIALPATH/$i
{
echo "read -d '' directives <<EOF"
ls
echo "EOF"
echo "for q in $directives"
echo "do"
echo " uuencode $q $q | sendmail $i"
echo "done"
} |
sh
)
done
Personally, I find it easier to read the generated script if the code that generates makes the generated script clear - using multiple echo commands. This includes indenting the code.
Intermediate Step 2:
for i in $commands
do
(
cd $SPECIALPATH/$i
{
ls |
echo "while read q"
echo "do"
echo " uuencode $q $q | sendmail $i"
echo "done"
} |
sh
)
done
I don't need to read the data into a variable in order to step through each item in the list once - simply read each line in turn. The while read mechanism is often useful for splitting up a line into multiple variables too: while read var1 var2 var3 junk will read the first field into $var1, the second into $var2, the third into $var3, and if there's anything left over, it goes into $junk. If you've generated the data accurately, there won't be any junk; but sometimes you have to deal with other people's data.
If the generated script is meant to be temporary, I would not use files. Besides, chmoding them to executable sounds unsafe. When I needed to parallel my scripting, I used a bash script to form a set of commands (in an array, split the array in two, then implode the array) to a single \n-separated string and then pass that to a new bash instance.
Basically, in bash:
for orig in "$#"
do
commands="$commands echo \"echoeing stuff here for arguments $orig\" \n"
done
echo -e $commands |bash
And a small tip: if the script doesn't need supervising, throw in a & after the piped bash to make your first script quit and do the rest of the work forked background.
If you export a variable
export VAR1=FOO
it'll be present in any child processes.
If you take a look at the init scripts, /etc/init..d/* you'll notice that many source another file full of "external" definitions. You could set up a file like that and have your child script source these files.