I have been exclusively using cypher queries of this client for Neo4j because there is no out of the box way of doing many things. One of those id to get nodes. There is no way to retrieve them without knowing their id, which is very low level. Any idea on how to run a
$client->findOne('property','value');
?
It should be straightforward but it isn't from the documentation.
Make Indexes on the properties you want to search, from a newly created $personNode
$personIndex = new \Everyman\Neo4j\NodeIndex($client, 'person');
$personIndex->add($personNode, 'name', $personNode->name);
Then later to search, the new PHP object $personIndex will reference the same, populated index as above.
$personIndex = new \Everyman\Neo4j\NodeIndex($client, 'person');
$match = $personIndex->findOne('name', 'edoceo');
Related
In case we had the model:
class Publication(models.Model):
title = models.CharField(max_length=30)
class Article(models.Model):
publications = models.ManyToManyField(Publication)
According to: https://docs.djangoproject.com/en/4.0/topics/db/examples/many_to_many/, to create an object we must have both objects saved before we can create the relation:
p1 = Publication(title='The Python Journal')
p1.save()
a1 = Article(headline='Django lets you build web apps easily')
a1.save()
a1.publications.add(p1)
Now, if we called delete in either of those objects the object would be removed from the DB along with the relation between both objects. Up until this point I understand.
But is there any way of doing that, if an Article is removed, then, all the Publications that are not related to any Article will be deleted from the DB too? Or the only way to achieve that is to query first all the Articles and then iterate through them like:
to_delete = []
qset = a1.publications.all()
for publication in qset:
if publication.article_set.count() == 1:
to_delete(publication.id)
a1.delete()
Publications.filter(id__in=to_delete).delete()
But this has lots of problems, specially a concurrency one, since it might be that a publication gets used by another article between the call to .count() and publication.delete().
Is there any way of doing this automatically, like doing a "conditional" on_delete=models.CASCADE when creating the model or something?
Thanks!
I tried with #Ersain answer:
a1.publications.annotate(article_count=Count('article_set')).filter(article_count=1).delete()
Couldn't make it work. First of all, I couldn't find the article_set variable in the relationship.
django.core.exceptions.FieldError: Cannot resolve keyword 'article_set' into field. Choices are: article, id, title
And then, running the count filter on the QuerySet after filtering by article returned ALL the tags from the article, instead of just the ones with article_count=1. So finally this is the code that I managed to make it work with:
Publication.objects.annotate(article_count=Count('article')).filter(article_count=1).filter(article=a1).delete()
Definetly I'm not an expert, not sure if this is the best approach nor if it is really time expensive, so I'm open to suggestions. But as of now it's the only solution I found to perform this operation atomically.
You can remove the related objects using this query:
a1.publications.annotate(article_count=Count('article_set')).filter(article_count=1).delete()
annotate creates a temporary field for the queryset (alias field) which aggregates a number of related Article objects for each instance in the queryset of Publication objects, using Count function. Count is a built-in aggregation function in any SQL, which returns the number of rows from a query (a number of related instances in this case). Then, we filter out those results where article_count equals 1 and remove them.
I have created a non-persistent attribute in my WoActivity table named VDS_COMPLETE. it is a bool that get changed by a checkbox in one of my application.
I am trying to make a automatisation script in Python to change the status of every task a work order that have been check when I save the WorkOrder.
I don't know why it isn't working but I'm pretty sure I'm close to the answer...
Do you have an idea why it isn't working? I know that I have code in comments, I have done a few experimentations...
from psdi.mbo import MboConstants
from psdi.server import MXServer
mxServer = MXServer.getMXServer()
userInfo = mxServer.getUserInfo(user)
mboSet = mxServer.getMboSet("WORKORDER")
#where1 = "wonum = :wonum"
#mboSet .setWhere(where1)
#mboSet.reset()
workorderSet = mboSet.getMbo(0).getMboSet("WOACTIVITY", "STATUS NOT IN ('FERME' , 'ANNULE' , 'COMPLETE' , 'ATTDOC')")
#where2 = "STATUS NOT IN ('FERME' , 'ANNULE' , 'COMPLETE' , 'ATTDOC')"
#workorderSet.setWhere(where2)
if workorderSet.count() > 0:
for x in range(0,workorderSet.count()):
if workorderSet.getString("VDS_COMPLETE") == 1:
workorder = workorderSet.getMbo(x)
workorder.changeStatus("COMPLETE",MXServer.getMXServer().getDate(), u"Script d'automatisation", MboConstants.NOACCESSCHECK)
workorderSet.save()
workorderSet.close()
It looks like your two biggest mistakes here are 1. trying to get your boolean field (VDS_COMPLETE) off the set (meaning off of the collection of records, like the whole table) instead of off of the MBO (meaning an actual record, one entry in the table) and 2. getting your set of data fresh from the database (via that MXServer call) which means using the previously saved data instead of getting your data set from the screen where the pending changes have actually been made (and remember that non-persistent fields do not get saved to the database).
There are some other problems with this script too, like your use of "count()" in your for loop (or even more than once at all) which is an expensive operation, and the way you are currently (though this may be a result of your debugging) not filtering the work order set before grabbing the first work order (meaning you get a random work order from the table) and then doing a dynamic relationship off of that record (instead of using a normal relationship or skipping the relationship altogether and using just a "where" clause), even though that relationship likely already exists.
Here is a Stack Overflow describing in more detail about relationships and "where" clauses in Maximo: Describe relationship in maximo 7.5
This question also has some more information about getting data from the screen versus new from the database: Adding a new row to another table using java in Maximo
Sorry for being newbie for NodeJs and table query, my question's,
How I could create a query using Nodejs pakcage "azure-storage-node", which selects the sum/addition of two coloumns 'start' and 'period' , if the addition is greater than a threshold it will take the whole raw, my tries which didn't work is something like this,
var query = new azure.TableQuery();
total = query.select(['start']) + query.select(['period']);
query.where('total > ?' , 50000);
or may be something like this,
var query = new azure.TableQuery()
.where('start + period gt 50000');
but it throws an error of '+'.
Thanks
What you're trying to accomplish is not possible with Azure Tables at least as of today as Azure Tables has limited querying support and support for computed columns (if I may say so) is not there.
There are two possible solutions:
Have an attribute called total in your entities that will contain the value i.e. start + period. You calculate this value when you're inserting or updating the entity and store it at that time.
Do this filtering on the client side. For this you will need to download all related entities and then apply this filtering on the client side on the data that you fetched.
I am building a REST API which connects to a NEO4J instance. I am using the koa-neo4j library as the basis (https://github.com/assister-ai/koa-neo4j-starter-kit). I am a beginner at all these technologies but thanks to some help from this forum I have the basic functionality working. For example the below code allows me to create a new node with the label "metric" and set the name and dateAdded propertis.
URL:
/metric?metricName=Test&dateAdded=2/21/2017
index.js
app.defineAPI({
method: 'POST',
route: '/api/v1/imm/metric',
cypherQueryFile: './src/api/v1/imm/metric/createMetric.cyp'
});
createMetric.cyp"
CREATE (n:metric {
name: $metricName,
dateAdded: $dateAdded
})
return ID(n) as id
However, I am struggling to know how I can approach more complicated examples. How can I handle situations when I don't know how many properties will be added when creating a new node beforehand or when I want to create multiple nodes in a single post statement. Ideally I would like to be able to pass something like JSON as part of the POST which would contain all of the nodes, labels and properties that I want to create. Is something like this possible? I tried using the below Cypher query and passing a JSON string in the POST body but it didn't work.
UNWIND $props AS properties
CREATE (n:metric)
SET n = properties
RETURN n
Would I be better off switching tothe Neo4j Rest API instead of the BOLT protocol and the KOA-NEO4J framework. From my research I thought it was better to use BOLT but I want to have a Rest API as the middle layer between my front and back end so I am willing to change over if this will be easier in the longer term.
Thanks for the help!
Your Cypher syntax is bad in a couple of ways.
UNWIND only accepts a collection as its argument, not a string.
SET n = properties is only legal if properties is a map, not a string.
This query should work for creating a single node (assuming that $props is a map containing all the properties you want to store with the newly created node):
CREATE (n:metric $props)
RETURN n
If you want to create multiple nodes, then this query (essentially the same as yours) should work (but only if $prop_collection is a collection of maps):
UNWIND $prop_collection AS props
CREATE (n:metric)
SET n = props
RETURN n
I too have faced difficulties when trying to pass complex types as arguments to neo4j, this has to do with type conversions between js and cypher over bolt and there is not much one could do except for filing an issue in the official neo4j JavaScript driver repo. koa-neo4j uses the official driver under the hood.
One way to go about such scenarios in koa-neo4j is using JavaScript to manipulate the arguments before sending to Cypher:
https://github.com/assister-ai/koa-neo4j#preprocess-lifecycle
Also possible to further manipulate the results of a Cypher query using postProcess lifecycle hook:
https://github.com/assister-ai/koa-neo4j#postprocess-lifecycle
Is it possible to insert a new document into a Couchbase bucket without specifying the document's ID? I would like use Couchbase's Java SDK create a document and have Couchbase determine the document's UUID with Groovy code similar to the following:
import com.couchbase.client.java.CouchbaseCluster
import com.couchbase.client.java.Cluster
import com.couchbase.client.java.Bucket
import com.couchbase.client.java.document.JsonDocument
// Connect to localhost
CouchbaseCluster myCluster = CouchbaseCluster.create()
// Connect to a specific bucket
Bucket myBucket = myCluster.openBucket("default")
// Build the document
JsonObject person = JsonObject.empty()
.put("firstname", "Stephen")
.put("lastname", "Curry")
.put("twitterHandle", "#StephenCurry30")
.put("title", "First Unanimous NBA MVP)
// Create the document
JsonDocument stored = myBucket.upsert(JsonDocument.create(person));
No, Couchbase documents have to have a key, that's the whole point of a key-value store, after all. However, if you don't care what the key is, for example, because you retrieve documents through queries rather than by key, you can just use a uuid or any other unique value when creating the document.
It seems there is no way to have Couchbase generate the document IDs for me. At the suggestion of another developer, I am using UUID.randomUUID() to generate the document IDs in my application. The approach is working well for me so far.
Reference: https://forums.couchbase.com/t/create-a-couchbase-document-without-specifying-an-id/8243/4
As you already found out, generating a UUID is one approach.
If you want to generate a more meaningful ID, for instance a "foo" prefix followed by a sequence number, you can make use of atomic counters in Couchbase.
The atomic counter is a document that contains a long, on which the SDK relies to guarantee a unique, incremented value each time you call bucket.counter("counterKey", 1, 2). This code would take the value of the counter document "counterKey", increment it by 1 atomically and return the incremented value. If the counter doesn't exist, it is created with the initial value 2, which is the value returned.
This is not automatic, but a Couchbase way of creating sequences / IDs.