I try to use the properties CATEL who generic type.
And I have XmlException in Model attribute.
[Serializable]
public class TDS : SavableModelBase<TDS>
{
public TestType<bool> Tds
{
get { return GetValue<TestType<bool>>(TdsProperty); }
set { SetValue(TdsProperty, value); }
}
public static readonly PropertyData TdsProperty = RegisterProperty("Tds", typeof(TestType<bool>));
public TDS(TestType<bool> tds)
{
Tds = tds;
}
}
ViewModel when i use catel prop
public class MainWindowViewModel : ViewModelBase
{
[Model]
public TDS Xxx //when assigning XMLException The '`' character, hexadecimal value 0x60, cannot be included in a name.
{
get { return GetValue<TDS>(XxxProperty); }
set { SetValue(XxxProperty, value); }
}
public static readonly PropertyData XxxProperty = RegisterProperty("Xxx", typeof(TDS));
}
class modelBase in main struct, where catel prop
[Serializable]
public class TestType<T> : ModelBase
{
public TestType(ushort val)
{
Val = val;
}
public ushort Val
{
get { return GetValue<ushort>(ValProperty); }
set { SetValue(ValProperty, value); }
}
public static readonly PropertyData ValProperty = RegisterProperty("Val", typeof(ushort));
}
I think that the problem, in a generic catel prop
Help me!!!
Related
I am using automapper to map expressions between classes that implement IEnumerable. The base classes look like this:
public abstract class EntityDtoBase<T> : DtoBase<T> where T : EntityDtoBase<T>
{
public virtual int Id { get; set; }
}
public abstract class PersistenceDtoBase<T> : DtoBase<T> where T : PersistenceDtoBase<T>
{
public virtual int Id { get; set; }
}
public abstract class DtoBase<T> : IEnumerable<T> where T : DtoBase<T>
{
private readonly IList<T> _items;
public int Count => _items.Count;
protected DtoBase()
{
this._items = new List<T>();
}
public void Add(T item)
{
_items.Add(item);
}
/* other methods like AddRange... */
IEnumerator IEnumerable.GetEnumerator()
{
return _items.GetEnumerator();
}
public IEnumerator<T> GetEnumerator()
{
return _items.GetEnumerator();
}
}
After migrating to Automapper 10, expression mapping between classes enheriting from EntityDtoBase and PersistenceDtoBase throws a System.EntryPointNotFoundException : Entry point was not found. The configuration I am using in my project is similar to the one used in this unit test:
public class UserEntityDto : EntityDtoBase<UserEntityDto> { }
public class UserPersistenceDto : PersistenceDtoBase<UserPersistenceDto> { }
public class UserProfile : Profile
{
public UserProfile() { CreateMap<UserEntityDto, UserPersistenceDto>().ReverseMap(); }
}
public class UnitTest
{
private readonly IMapper _mapper;
public UnitTest()
{
var sp = CreateServices();
_mapper = sp.GetRequiredService<IMapper>();
}
private static IServiceProvider CreateServices()
{
return new ServiceCollection()
.AddAutoMapper(cfg =>
{
cfg.AddExpressionMapping();
cfg.AddCollectionMappers();
cfg.ForAllMaps((map, exp) => exp.MaxDepth(1));
cfg.AllowNullCollections = true;
cfg.ShouldMapProperty = p => p.GetMethod.IsPublic || p.GetMethod.IsAssembly;
}, typeof(UnitTest).Assembly)
.BuildServiceProvider(false);
}
[Fact]
public void Should_Map_Expression()
{
Expression<Func<UserEntityDto, bool>> searchExpression = u => u.Id == 1;
var searchExpressionMapped = _mapper.Map<Expression<Func<UserPersistenceDto, bool>>>(searchExpression);
Assert.NotNull(searchExpressionMapped);
}
You can find the complete unit test project here. The test succeeds using Automapper 9 and fails using Automapper 10.
I have a class which I want to serialize with YamlDotNet:
public class AwesomeClass : PropertyChangedBase
{
private bool _element1;
private bool _enabled;
public bool Element1
{
get { return _element1; }
set
{
_element1 = value;
NotifyOfPropertyChange(() => Element1);
}
}
public bool Enabled
{
get { return _enabled; }
set
{
_enabled = value;
NotifyOfPropertyChange(() => Enabled);
}
}
}
My problem is, in the base class is an element named: IsNotifying
Is there a way to exclude this element from serialization, without the change of the base class?
You could override the property in the derived class and apply the YamlIgnore attribute there. While the sample below works, I suspect for more complicated class hierarchies you would really need to ensure no behavior changes.
public class AwesomeClass : PropertyChangedBase
{
[YamlIgnore]
public new bool IsNotifying
{
get { return base.IsNotifying; }
set { base.IsNotifying = value; }
}
[YamlIgnore]
public override bool Blah
{
get { return base.Blah; }
set { base.Blah = value; }
}
}
public class PropertyChangedBase
{
public bool IsNotifying
{
get;
set;
}
public virtual bool Blah
{
get;
set;
}
}
I had a similar problem (needed to filter properties of a particular type from classes I couldn't change, so using the attribute was not an option) and is what I came up with:
Create a custom type inspector:
public class MyTypeInspector : TypeInspectorSkeleton
{
private readonly ITypeInspector _innerTypeDescriptor;
public MyTypeInspector(ITypeInspector innerTypeDescriptor)
{
_innerTypeDescriptor = innerTypeDescriptor;
}
public override IEnumerable<IPropertyDescriptor> GetProperties(Type type, object container)
{
var props = _innerTypeDescriptor.GetProperties(type, container);
props = props.Where(p => !(p.Type == typeof(Dictionary<string, object>) && p.Name == "extensions"));
props = props.Where(p => p.Name != "operation-id");
return props;
}
}
Create the serializer as follows:
var builder = new SerializerBuilder();
builder.WithTypeInspector(inspector => new MyTypeInspector(inspector));
var serializer = builder.Build();
I have following case:
Flex class
public class Flex {
private String key;
private String val;
public Flex () {
}
public void setKey(String key) {
this.key = key;
}
public String getKey() {
return key;
}
public void setVal(String val) {
this.val = val;
}
public String getVal() {
return val;
}
FlexManager class
public class FlexManager {
private Map<String, Flex> keyValue = new HashMap<String, Flex>();
public FlexManager () {
populateFlexFieldMap();
}
private void populateFlexFieldMap() {
if (keyValue.isEmpty()) {
List<Flex> fieldds = loadKVFromFile();
for (Flexfield : fieldds) {
keyValue.put(field.getKey(), field);
}
}
}
public void setKeyValue(Map<String, FlexField> keyValue) {
this.keyValue = keyValue;
}
public Map<String, Flex> getKeyValue() {
return keyValue;
}
}
The input with managedBean is ready.
How can I get the val value in Flex class through getKeyValue() method with EL?
My approach is this: ${managedBeanName.keyValue['key'].val}
but I get this warning in my IDE
Reference ${managedBeanName.keyValue['key'].val} not found
You don't need to type get in order to invoke a getter.
${managedBeanName.keyValue['key'].val}
I've been searching why this generic contruction doesn't compile
I get:
Cannot implicitly convert type 'WpfApplication1.CowDao' to 'WpfApplication1.Dao'
public abstract class Animal { }
public class Dog : Animal { }
public class Cow : Animal { }
public abstract class Dao<T> where T : Animal
{
public void Insert(T t);
}
public class DogDao : Dao<Dog> { }
public class CowDao : Dao<Cow> { }
public class Main
{
public Main()
{
Dao<Animal> dao = null;
if (true) dao = new DogDao();
else dao = new CowDao();
}
}
I just want to get to my goal --> making a 'neutral' instance
I think that my construction has to change, but i don't know how
I'm using .NET Framework 4
Thanks
Generics from a derived does not inherit from Generic from a base class so you may not cast one to another. Instead, write an extension method ToGenericParent that converts like that:
public static Generic<Parent> ToGenericParent(this Generic<Derived> derived)
{
return new Generic<Parent>() { Value = derived.Value };
}
Change your Inheritance for your Dao layers as
public class DogDao : Dao<Animal> { }
public class CowDao : Dao<Animal> { }
Edit:
public abstract class Dao<T> where T : Animal
{
public virtual void Insert(T t)
{
}
protected void ExecuteQuery(string quer)
{
}
}
public class DogDao : Dao<Dog>
{
public override void Insert(Dog t)
{
string insert = "INSERT INTO DOG ...";
base.ExecuteQuery(insert);
}
}
public class CowDao : Dao<Cow>
{
public override void Insert(Cow t)
{
string insert = "INSERT INTO COW ...";
base.ExecuteQuery(insert);
}
}
Here is my problem. I have a presenter class, lets call it 'Presenter' that takes an IDataSource as a constructor argument. There are different implementations of the IDataSource interface. I would like to be able to pass some argument to Ninject and based on that argument one of several IDataSource implementations should by used. I've provided some sample code below. I think that my solution is really ugly and that there must be a smarter, cleaner way to do this. How are you guys solving this type of problem?
Here is my sample code
public class Presenter
{
public Presenter(IDataSource dataSource)
{
DataSource = dataSource;
}
private IDataSource DataSource { get; set; }
public List<string> GetData()
{
return DataSource.GetAll();
}
}
public class InMemoryDataSource : IDataSource
{
public List<string> GetAll()
{
return new List<string> {"a", "b"};
}
}
public class DbDataSource : IDataSource
{
public List<string> GetAll()
{
return new List<string> { "1", "2" };
}
}
public interface IDataSource
{
List<string> GetAll();
}
public class Module : NinjectModule
{
public override void Load()
{
Bind<Presenter>().To<Presenter>().Named("Db");
Bind<Presenter>().To<Presenter>().Named("InMemory");
Bind<IDataSource>().To<InMemoryDataSource> ().WhenParentNamed("InMemory");
Bind<IDataSource>().To<DbDataSource>().WhenParentNamed("Db");
}
}
[Test]
public void Run()
{
using (var kernel = new StandardKernel(new Module()))
{
var p = kernel.Get<Presenter>(x => x.Name == "InMemory");
foreach(var s in p.GetData())
{
Console.Out.WriteLine(s);
}
}
}
This depends on what you want to do. I assume that you want to use a different db for testing than for production. In this case would create the module with the production configuration in mind and simply Rebind everything for testing:
public class Presenter
{
public Presenter(IDataSource dataSource)
{
DataSource = dataSource;
}
private IDataSource DataSource { get; set; }
public List<string> GetData()
{
return DataSource.GetAll();
}
}
public class InMemoryDataSource : IDataSource
{
public List<string> GetAll()
{
return new List<string> {"a", "b"};
}
}
public class DbDataSource : IDataSource
{
public List<string> GetAll()
{
return new List<string> { "1", "2" };
}
}
public interface IDataSource
{
List<string> GetAll();
}
public class Module : NinjectModule
{
public override void Load()
{
Bind<Presenter>().To<Presenter>();
Bind<IDataSource>().To<DbDataSource>();
}
}
[Test]
public void Run()
{
using (var kernel = new StandardKernel(new Module()))
{
kernel.Rebind<IDataSource>().To<InMemoryDataSource>();
var p = kernel.Get<Presenter>();
foreach(var s in p.GetData())
{
Console.Out.WriteLine(s);
}
}
}