I have a situation where i have a table with multiple department entries. I will run a DISTINCT query on department names and have to create tabs in jsf page for each of the departments.When i add a new department in the table , then it should dynamically create a tab for that department.
How to achieve this?
Your help is much appreciated..Thanks
I presume your menu is based on view objects. If that's the case, then new menu tab will be available on the next time the user logs in (in case you use security) , or if you close and re-open the browser.
If you want a different behaviour, you need to code your way out: offer a 'refresh' button from where you may do a call 'Execute' action to refresh the menu on demand.
An option to get the new menu visible immediately ( though not recommended from performance perspective) would be to set the attribute CacheResult=false on the pageDef's iterator pointing towards your view object.
Related
I wish to create a view showing a number of fields from notes documents with replication or save conflicts. So far I have managed to create a basic view with a column for the document ID (Contract ID) then the next column states "Replication or Save Conflicts" but I don't seem to able to either get rid of the replocation or save conflcits column or add new columns to show additional fields from the document. Is there a way I can do this? I want to be able to show the view in XPages. Here is the View selection formula I am using;
SELECT #IsAvailable($Conflict)
Conflicts are not displayed good in views. here are a few alternative tips to deal with conflicts that might give you an idea or two :-)
Create a categorized column with the value of the field $ConflictItems in the view you have, then you will see which item is causing the conflict and can take action to prevent it.
When you open a conflict you can use the action menu "View Parent" to compare the parent and the conflict
Ytra ScanEZ is a great tool for finding and resolving conflicts. it is also possible to create a script that will compare the documents and present a diff list.
You can create an XPage to display your conflicts (and parents). The web is more dynamic as it allow you to layout your data in the way you want and is not restricted to the way view in Notes works. This kind of xpage can be displayed in Notes client or Web browser
Use XPages power. Get all documents from the view with your selection formula. But don't try to show any column value and get fields directly from back-end document you get from view entry entry.getDocument().
Sure, it has some performance impact, but for (hopefully) small amount of replication conflict it's nothing serious.
My scenario:
The xpage ( document content ) has a complex structure. I have a 1st button which opens this xpage, having in the postNewDocument:
Contr.replaceItemValue("txt_codformularmain","01") // I use this field as a flag.
Now, there is another button which compose the same xpage ... but in this case, I do want the xpage to be different, in other words to have some additional / showed fields.
I could add another code at the postNewDocument, like this:
Contr.replaceItemValue("txt_codformularmain2","01")
Later on, in some views I will filter the listed documents by this 2 fields: some views will be listing the documents where txt_codformularmain=01, other views for txt_codformularmain2=01, and so on.
All the fields are on the same form element. ( I could create easily 2 different xpages, with 2 document contents, but in the form Properties at onOpen and onWebAccess settings, I can add only one xpage )
But, I think it isn't the best approach for this. Because in both cases, postNewDocument takes place, and both fields are having the value 01.
In classic lotus notes programming, I had used only one field ( flag ) and for every different button, inside the button's code I just changed the field value: 01, 02, and so on, before the newDocument had been composed.
Should I use another/ a better approach?
I might go for creating a new form with the fields needed there, and creating a new XPage binded to that form...
dominoDocument.isNewNote() will tell you if it's a new document or not. You can compute visibility based on that.
If it's based on a field value, then again set the visibility based on what the value should be for the panel to be visible - instead of getComponent().getValue() use dominoDocument.getItemValueString() assuming it's a Text field for best practice. In the onblur event of the control that's bound to the field you're checking against, trigger a partial refresh. You will need to amend the default partial refresh settings if there is validation on the page.
Once you're comfortable with that technique, start thinking about using a dataContext to hold whether or not an area should be visible, and referencing that dataContext variable in the rendered property. The benefits of this are not only performance, but youo can give a better variable name to the dataContext to make it clearer when supporting the application what the logic is behind it being visible. For someone supporting the Notes Client app, for example, it's unclear without hunting what state "01" or "02" means. Descriptors like "newDoc", "published", etc have an advantage there.
Another method of optimisation would be to use a Dynamic Content control.
But it sounds like your XPage is going to be complex enough without adding more complexity at this stage.
I have scripts that react off of, for example, a client Recalc client event. For example, on my form I have a subtab that users may add or remove items from. Based on actions on this subtab (housing a child record of the parent) I would like a field on the parent to update (say to show a total from the children records).
As I was saying, these events seem to work fine if in edit mode but they do not work correctly in view mode. (even in view mode these child records have a "Delete" option at the end of each row in the subtab. This was provided by netsuite by default.
I wondered if anyone had any tips to best allow this parent field to update real time while in updating the subtab rows with the form in view mode.
Thanks.
You can make a custom field on the parent (header) whose value is determined by saved search. For instance, make a saved search that totals the line values by transaction. Be sure to make it filter by transaction in the Available Filters tab. Make the search public so everyone can use it.
Create the custom field that sources the total from the saved search. Make sure to uncheck the "Store Value" checkbox, as you don't want to store the data, you want to reference the search results. You do this on the Validation and Defaulting tab. You'll see a field for Saved Search there. Choose the search you created above.
As you remove/add/change lines on the transaction, the field updates accordingly. In essence, you don't need a single line of code to make this work - it's all in how you create the search and the custom field that references it.
I have a similar situation posted here.
The NetSuite team answered me by email, and it happens you can't really achieve this on the view mode: some API methods are not available. Their suggestion to my case (and I think it applies to yours too) was really to force a refresh on the whole page.
Of course, you can always achieve this accessing the DOM elements directly, but this isn't a best practice, as your code can stop working if these elements change on a version update.
I had the same problem, I'm not able to restrict on view or remove edit button. But, there was one alternative solution with workflows, you can deploy workflow on child record edit mode restrictions, then if the user clicks edit on view then the record will not be available to edit. This concern will apply to custom record as well.
This should be a simple thing, but as I am quickly finding out with CRM 2011, simple things almost never are...
Anyway, I have a custom activity type, a "Trip". A Trip represents a single visit by a service technician to a client's site. Trips are always created in connection with a Case (Incident) and never with any other entity type, so the entity exists as a custom activity that does not "Display In Activity Menus". That allows me to drop a subgrid of Trips into the primary Case view, making it the only place these things can be created.
The problem is that when I try to create a new Trip from the Case form (by clicking the subgrid and choosing "Add New Trip" from the ribbon), the "Regarding" field isn't populated with the Case that I was on when I clicked "Add". Any of the "built-in" activity types will default their corresponding field with no problem, so it would seem to me that I can do the same here. The field's supposed to be read-only once this defaulting works, but just so I can set up the reference when creating new Trips, I've made it editable, and of course when you pop up the lookup, you can assign this Trip to anything (which is why I want the field read-only in the first place).
I need the form to default the parent Case when the Trip form loads. It has to be there when it's first created, because if it isn't there on the first save, then some plugin code that sets other default values (namely data relating to other Trips that may or may not exist for the same Case) won't work properly.
I read about relationship field mapping, where you can default the values of various fields based on fields of the parent entity, but the relationship between the Incident and my Trip is not listed as mappable from either side and I can't figure out how to make it mappable. I also know it's possible to set default values using JavaScript, but if there's a less "custom" way to set this particular behavior up I would love to know how.
As an epitaph based on Mike's comment, it does indeed seem that Microsoft doesn't want this done. But, it's still possible to do it. The basic steps are:
Download the Ribbon Workbench solution and import it into CRM.
Create a new solution containing the entity or entities you want to be able to customize.
Create a JavaScript file containing functions that will open the form you want and pass the information you need as a parameter. There are two ways to specify the parameters; you can define custom parameters on the form, or you can use Microsoft's undocumented parameters for the Regarding field:
function OpenNewTripFromCase()
{
var entityId = Xrm.Page.data.entity.getId();
var entityTypeCode= Xrm.Page.context.getQueryStringParameters().etc;
var entityDisplayName = Xrm.Page.getAttribute("title").getValue();
var params = {};
params["pId"] = entityId;
params["pType"] = entityTypeCode;
params["pName"] = entityDisplayName;
Xrm.Utility.openEntityForm("cst_trip", null, params);
}
Import this JavaScript file as a Web Resource, and add it to the Solution so it will be available to Ribbon Workbench.
Open up Ribbon Workbench and open the solution you created with your entity and resources. Click the Solution Elements tab, and find the "Commands" item. Right-click and select "Add New". Now expand the list, find and click on your new command. In the Properties pane, change the name of the command to be more descriptive (it's recommended you only change the third "Command#" term), then click the magnifying glass button to the right of the Actions field.
In the window that pops up, click "Add", then choose "JavaScript Function Action". A new item will be added to the action list. Click it, then in the properties pane to the right, find the library containing your function, then type in the function name. I didn't get any sort of IntelliSense here, so be careful typing in the function name. Add parameters if you need to (you shouldn't need to with the code above), then click OK
Now click the custom activity entity in the Entities list of Ribbon Workbench, then in the dropdown to the upper right of the ribbon layout, select the SubGrid ribbon. Create a button in this Ribbon, give it the icon and text you want, and in the Properties pane, set the Command to the command you just created.
Publish the customized Solution, and you should, if you did everything correctly, have a new button that will do the same thing as the "Add New" button when you've selected a sub-grid, but will additionally populate the Regarding field.
In my SharePoint List, I have an "Employee" column that is a User type field. I would like to add some custom Business Logic to the processing of this field.
Currently, when the user adds a row, I check to see if the user is an Employee or a Manager and then change the behavior on this column accordingly. I do this by statically rendering the field in my custom "ListForm Rendering Template", just before my custom ListFieldIterator. I simply use a standard SharePoint FormField (and FormLabel) control. In the markup of the FormField control, I specify the FieldName (Employee) and an event handler for the Load event. In this Load event, I will check to see if the current user is an Employee or Manager (using two different SharePoint groups). If the user is an Employee I set the value of the field to the current user (this part works perfectly). I also want to change the field so it can't be modified. I thought I might be able to just change the ControlMode on the field (in the code of the OnLoad Event Handler) to Display, but for some reason this has no effect. The field still renders with the full, people picker editor. Am I not changing the fields control mode soon enough? Or is this simply not the correct approach? The other logic I want to put in is if the user is a Manager, I would like to allow that user to select the person from a list (SharePoint group) of Employees. It may be easier to just use the people picker and limit the selectable users to that group. (I think I can do this with the SelectionGroup property.) Although, it would be better if I could just provide a dropdownlist of users, which I could possibly do with a hidden dropdownlist that I would show and event handlers that I could use (handle event selectedindexchanged) to pull the value selected and populate the (now hidden) Employee (user) field. Does this approach make sense? Assuming all that will work, the real difficulty I am having is with changing the ControlMode (rendering) on the field (when the user is an employee) to a label or some kind of read only control, which is how that field renders when viewing the row, which is why I think if I can just trick the control into thinking it is in Display mode then it should work perfectly!
I am still learning SharePoint, but I am very proficient in ASP .Net. This is why I would like to keep my customizations in this Custom Rendering Template, using code behind and leverage my existing skill set as much as properly.
Any thoughts, opinions or advice? Does anyone know why I can't get the column to switch the "Control Mode"?
I do not think that I fully understand your scenario. Some code samples could help.
But anyway it sounds like you want some heavy customizations of the user field. In that case you might want to have a look at creating a custom field with all its advantages and disadvantages. Have a look at MSDN: http://msdn.microsoft.com/en-us/library/gg132914.aspx
Another option might be - in case you do not want to re-use this column in many list definitions - that you can get away with your custom rendering template and create a custom create/edit form where you implement the specific edit behaviour for the field (plain ASP.NET with some SharePoint controls). Here is a nice walk-through on how to grab a custom edit form from SharePoint designer: http://community.bamboosolutions.com/blogs/sharepoint-2010/archive/2011/05/12/sharepoint-2010-cookbook-how-to-create-a-customized-list-edit-form-for-development-in-visual-studio-2010.aspx
I hope this helps. Kr., Bernd.