So I followed this tutorial: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=gyyj57O0FVI
and I made exactly the same code in javafx8.
public class CountdownController implements Initializable{
#FXML
private Label labTime;
#Override
public void initialize(URL location, ResourceBundle resources) {
new Thread(){
public void run(){
while(true){
Calendar calendar = new GregorianCalendar();
int hour = calendar.get(Calendar.HOUR);
int minute = calendar.get(Calendar.MINUTE);
int second = calendar.get(Calendar.SECOND);
String time = hour + ":" + minute + ":" + second;
labTime.setText(time);
}
}
}.start();
}
After I close the Window, application/thread is still running in the system. My guess its because the infinite loop, but shouldnt the thread be terminated with application closing?
Second thing is that when I try to set the text for Label I get the error:
Exception in thread "Thread-4" java.lang.IllegalStateException: Not on FX application thread; currentThread = Thread-4
at com.sun.javafx.tk.Toolkit.checkFxUserThread(Toolkit.java:204)
at com.sun.javafx.tk.quantum.QuantumToolkit.checkFxUserThread(QuantumToolkit.java:364)
at javafx.scene.Parent$2.onProposedChange(Parent.java:364)
at com.sun.javafx.collections.VetoableListDecorator.setAll(VetoableListDecorator.java:113)
at com.sun.javafx.collections.VetoableListDecorator.setAll(VetoableListDecorator.java:108)
at com.sun.javafx.scene.control.skin.LabeledSkinBase.updateChildren(LabeledSkinBase.java:575)
at com.sun.javafx.scene.control.skin.LabeledSkinBase.handleControlPropertyChanged(LabeledSkinBase.java:204)
at com.sun.javafx.scene.control.skin.LabelSkin.handleControlPropertyChanged(LabelSkin.java:49)
at com.sun.javafx.scene.control.skin.BehaviorSkinBase.lambda$registerChangeListener$60(BehaviorSkinBase.java:197)
at com.sun.javafx.scene.control.skin.BehaviorSkinBase$$Lambda$144/1099655841.call(Unknown Source)
at com.sun.javafx.scene.control.MultiplePropertyChangeListenerHandler$1.changed(MultiplePropertyChangeListenerHandler.java:55)
at javafx.beans.value.WeakChangeListener.changed(WeakChangeListener.java:89)
at com.sun.javafx.binding.ExpressionHelper$SingleChange.fireValueChangedEvent(ExpressionHelper.java:182)
at com.sun.javafx.binding.ExpressionHelper.fireValueChangedEvent(ExpressionHelper.java:81)
at javafx.beans.property.StringPropertyBase.fireValueChangedEvent(StringPropertyBase.java:103)
at javafx.beans.property.StringPropertyBase.markInvalid(StringPropertyBase.java:110)
at javafx.beans.property.StringPropertyBase.set(StringPropertyBase.java:143)
at javafx.beans.property.StringPropertyBase.set(StringPropertyBase.java:49)
at javafx.beans.property.StringProperty.setValue(StringProperty.java:65)
at javafx.scene.control.Labeled.setText(Labeled.java:146)
at application.CountdownController$1.run(CountdownController.java:29)
...yes, I am going to read more about threads, but I would like to know the answer to these questions.
Part I
A thread, when created, runs independent of other threads. You have a new thread which has an infinite loop, which implies, it will keep running forever, even after the stage has been closed.
Normally, using a infinite loop is not advised, because breaking out of it is very difficult.
You are advised to use :
TimerTask
ScheduledExecutorService
You can then call either one of them (based on whatever you are using)
TimerTask.cancel()
ScheduledExecutorService.shutdownNow()
when your stage is closed. You can use something like :
stage.setOnCloseRequest(closeEvent -> {
timertask.cancel();
});
JavaFX API's (thanks to James_D comment's)
These do not need to be explicitly canceled as ScheduledService uses daemon threads and AnimationTimer runs on the JavaFX thread.
ScheduledService
AnimationTimer
Part II
Your second part of the question has been answered time and again in the forum.
You need to be on the JavaFX Application thread to use scene graph elements.
Since you have created a new thread and trying to update label, which is a JavaFX node, it throws the exception. For more information, please visit:
JavaFX error when trying to remove shape
Why am I getting java.lang.IllegalStateException "Not on FX application thread" on JavaFX?
Javafx Not on fx application thread when using timer
With ScheduledExecutorService as far as I am concerned You cant easly set it as deamon and I don't want to play with stage.setOnCloseRequest(closeEvent -> {});
With AnimationTimer I cant do something like Thread.sleep(100) beetween iteration like you suggested because "AnimationTimer runs on the JavaFX thread."
ScheduledService is just quite difficult for me to understand right now...
so, as I was reading and reading about it I came to conclusion that maybe this simple option will be the best:
public class CountdownController implements Initializable{
#FXML
private Label labTime;
#FXML
private Button buttSTOP;
#Override
public void initialize(URL location, ResourceBundle resources) {
Timer timer = new Timer(true); //set it as a deamon
timer.schedule(new MyTimer(), 0, 1000);
}
public class MyTimer extends TimerTask{
#Override
public void run() {
Calendar calendar = new GregorianCalendar();
int hour = calendar.get(Calendar.HOUR);
int minute = calendar.get(Calendar.MINUTE);
int second = calendar.get(Calendar.SECOND);
String time = hour + ":" + minute + ":" + second;
Platform.runLater(() -> {
labTime.setText(time);
});
}
}
Thanks James_D and ItachiUchiha. It works, let me know if I'am something missing!
EDIT:
I also include code for Counting down the time, as it was my initial aim, maybe someone will find it usefull as well:
public class CountdownController implements Initializable{
#FXML
private Label labTime;
#FXML
private Button buttSTOP;
private Timer timer = new Timer(true); //set it as a deamon
private int iHours = 0,
iMinutes = 1,
iSeconds = 10;
public void initCountdownController(int iHours, int iMinutes, int iSeconds){
this.iHours = iHours;
this.iMinutes = iMinutes;
this.iSeconds = iSeconds;
}
#Override
public void initialize(URL location, ResourceBundle resources) {
buttSTOP.setOnAction(e -> {
buttSTOPAction(e);
});
timer.schedule(new MyTimer(), 0, 1000);
}
private void buttSTOPAction(ActionEvent e) {
timer.cancel();
}
public class MyTimer extends TimerTask{
#Override
public void run() {
String time = iHours + ":" + iMinutes + ":" + iSeconds;
Platform.runLater(() -> {
labTime.setText(time);
});
if(iSeconds < 1)
if(iMinutes < 1)
if(iHours < 1)
this.cancel();
else{
iHours--;
iMinutes = 59;
iSeconds = 59;
}
else{
iMinutes--;
iSeconds = 59;
}
else
iSeconds--;
}
}
Related
Warning: This is my first time using threads and my first time trying out an animation. Please bear with me.
I want to rotate an ImageView. I set up a thread for it:
public class ThreadAnimation extends Thread
{
private ImageView iv;
private RotateTransition rt;
public ThreadAnimation(ImageView iv)
{
this.iv = iv;
}
#Override
public void run()
{
while (true)
{
RotateTransition r = new RotateTransition();
r.setToAngle(360);
r.setCycleCount(1);
r.setDuration(Duration.millis(300));
r.setNode(iv);
r.play();
try
{
sleep(100);
} catch (InterruptedException e)
{
return;
}
}
}
}
I call this inside my controller class, upon pressing a Button.
animation.setOnAction(new EventHandler<ActionEvent>()
{
#Override
public void handle (ActionEvent abschicken)
{
ThreadAnimation thread = null; //ANIMATION PIZZA
if (thread == null)
{
thread = new ThreadAnimation(olivenview);
thread.start();
}
}
});
My ImageView olivenview will rotate just like I wanted it to. However it takes quite a long time until it seems to stop (I can see it because the button triggering it still looks triggered for a while) and when I go ahead to press it a second time afterwards, I get a nonstop error stream with a lot of null pointer exceptions. I am very clueless, can anyone help me out? Is this due to my Thread Setup or does the problem lie somewhere else (in code that I didn't post here)?
I believe you do not need threads for this. Notice the .play() method returns immediately and the animation will run in the background.
That being said, try this.
...
//Create your rotation
final RotateTransition r = new RotateTransition();
r.setToAngle(360);
r.setCycleCount(1);
r.setDuration(Duration.millis(300));
r.setNode(iv);
//When the button is pressed play the rotation. Try experimenting with .playFromStart() instead of .play()
button.setOnAction(new EventHandler<ActionEvent>() {
#Override
public void handle(ActionEvent action) {
r.play();
}
});
...
On an other note I recommend switching to java 8 so that you can use lambda expressions instead of the anonymous class!
This question already has answers here:
JavaFX periodic background task
(6 answers)
Closed 5 years ago.
I want to achieve something like this: user press the login button and then label shows:
"Connecting."
0.5 sec time interval
"Connecting.."
0.5 sec time interval
"Connecting..."
etc
Just a visual effect that indicates something is actually going on "under the hood".
All I managed to get wasn't quite what I was expecting. I click the button, wait 1.5 sec and then I got "Connecting...", missing 2 previous steps.
First, my Status class
public class Status {
private static StringProperty status = new SimpleStringProperty();
public static void setStatus(String newStatus) {
status.setValue(newStatus);
}
public static String getStatus() {
return status.getValue();
}
public static StringProperty get() {
return status;
}
}
and my LoginView class
public class LoginView extends Application {
private Button loginButton = new Button("Log in");
private Label statusLabel;
private void createLabels() {
statusLabel = new Label(Status.getStatus());
statusLabel.textProperty().bind(Status.get());
}
}
private void createButtons() {
loginButton.setOnAction(e -> {
try {
Status.setStatus("Connecting.");
Thread.sleep(500);
Status.setStatus("Connecting..");
Thread.sleep(500);
Status.setStatus("Connecting...");
Thread.sleep(500);
} catch (InterruptedException e1) {
e1.printStackTrace();
}
});
}
Run a Task from a different thread. Task allows you to update it's message property on the JavaFX application thread that should be used to update the GUI and must not be blocked by long-running tasks, since it's responsible for rendering:
Task<Void> task = new Task<Void>() {
#Override
protected Void call() throws InterruptedException {
updateMessage("Connecting.");
Thread.sleep(500);
updateMessage("Connecting..");
Thread.sleep(500);
updateMessage("Connecting...");
Thread.sleep(500);
return null;
}
};
// bind status to task's message
Status.get().bind(task.messageProperty());
// run task on different thread
new Thread(task).start();
You should do animations with the Timeline API. Have a look here:
https://docs.oracle.com/javase/8/javafx/api/javafx/animation/Timeline.html
Basically you just define KeyFrames at 0.5 seconds distance and set the value of the text to add a another dot. You can also make it repeat indefinitely until the connection is established to get cyclic animation.
Another way is to make a SequentialTransition which will have two PauseTransitions of 0.5 seconds.
BTW in your code you pause the main UI thread and that is why you can’t see the animation.
I read much about the JavaFX GUI Model, Plattform->RunLater and Threads, but I still do not figure out how to get this right. I had a JavaFX GUI which on a button click executed a process and updated a Progress Bar and Label. This was running well with Threading and Platform, but I had to Change this to an Observer Model.
I invoke a Progress Tracker in a Singleton Model, which gets updated by the class executing the process and is Observable. I implemented an Observer as well which should update the two UI Elements.
GUI Controller with Button Event
private void createKeyPressed(ActionEvent event) {
// Make Progressbar visible
pbKeyProgress.visibleProperty().set(true);
if (!Check.keyFileExistant() || cbKeyOverwrite.selectedProperty().get()) {
ProgressTracker.getTracker().addObserver(new ProgressObserver(pbKeyProgress, lblKeyProgress));
Creator.createKey(cbKeyLength.getValue());
} else {
}
}
Progress Observer
public class ProgressObserver implements Observer {
private final ProgressBar progressBar;
private final Label statusLabel;
public ProgressObserver(ProgressBar progressBar, Label statusLabel) {
this.progressBar = progressBar;
this.statusLabel = statusLabel;
}
#Override
public void update(Observable o, Object o1) {
Platform.runLater(() -> {
System.out.println("Tracker set to "+ProgressTracker.getProgress() + " " + ProgressTracker.getStatus());
progressBar.setProgress(ProgressTracker.getProgress());
statusLabel.setText(ProgressTracker.getStatus());
});
}
}
Progress Tracker
public synchronized void setTracker(int currentStep, String currentStatus) {
checkInstance();
instance.step = currentStep;
instance.status = currentStatus;
instance.notifyObservers();
System.out.println(instance.countObservers());
}
Creator
public static void createKey(String length) {
Task<Void> task;
task = new Task<Void>() {
#Override
public Void call() throws Exception {
initTracker(0,"Start");
doStuff();
ProgressTracker.getTracker().setTracker(1,"First");
doStuff();
ProgressTracker.getTracker().setTracker(2,"Second");
// and so on
return null;
}
};
new Thread(task)
.start();
}
The Print within the ProgressTracker gets executed. However, if I add a print within the update of the Observer nothing will be printed. If I check within the Progresstracker, the Observer Count is 1.
Why does the Observer not get notified or execute anything, even if the Notify is called? Did I get the Threading and Execution Modell wrong?
The Progress Bar and the Label will also stay on their initial values.
Don't reinvent the wheel. The JavaFX Properties Pattern is a ready-made implementation of the Observable pattern: there is no need to implement it yourself. Additionally, Task already defines methods for updating various properties, which can be called from any thread but will schedule the actual updates on the FX Application Thread. See updateProgress() and updateMessage(), for example.
So you can do, for example:
public static Task<Void> createKey(String length) {
Task<Void> task;
task = new Task<Void>() {
final int totalSteps = ... ;
#Override
public Void call() throws Exception {
updateProgress(0, totalSteps);
updateMessage("Start");
doStuff();
updateProgress(1, totalSteps);
updateMessage("First");
doStuff();
updateProgress(2, totalSteps);
updateMessage("Second");
// and so on
return null;
}
};
new Thread(task)
.start();
return task ;
}
and
private void createKeyPressed(ActionEvent event) {
// Make Progressbar visible
pbKeyProgress.visibleProperty().set(true);
if (!Check.keyFileExistant() || cbKeyOverwrite.selectedProperty().get()) {
Task<Void> task = Creator.createKey(cbKeyLength.getValue());
pbKeyProgress.progressProperty().bind(task.progressProperty());
lblKeyProgress.textProperty().bind(task.messageProperty());
} else {
}
}
I'm new guy here :)
I have a small problem which concerns binding in JavaFX. I have created Task which is working as a clock and returns value which has to be set in a special label (label_Time). This label presents how many seconds left for player's answer in quiz.
The problem is how to automatically change value in label using the timer task? I tried to link value from timer Task (seconds) to label_Time value in such a way...
label_Time.textProperty().bind(timer.getSeconds());
...but it doesn't work. Is it any way to do this thing?
Thanks in advance for your answer! :)
Initialize method in Controller class:
public void initialize(URL url, ResourceBundle rb) {
Timer2 timer = new Timer2();
label_Time.textProperty().bind(timer.getSeconds());
new Thread(timer).start();
}
Task class "Timer2":
public class Timer2 extends Task{
private static final int SLEEP_TIME = 1000;
private static int sec;
private StringProperty seconds;
public Timer2(){
Timer2.sec = 180;
this.seconds = new SimpleStringProperty("180");
}
#Override protected StringProperty call() throws Exception {
int iterations;
for (iterations = 0; iterations < 1000; iterations++) {
if (isCancelled()) {
updateMessage("Cancelled");
break;
}
System.out.println("TIK! " + sec);
seconds.setValue(String.valueOf(sec));
System.out.println("TAK! " + seconds.getValue());
// From the counter we subtract one second
sec--;
//Block the thread for a short time, but be sure
//to check the InterruptedException for cancellation
try {
Thread.sleep(10);
} catch (InterruptedException interrupted) {
if (isCancelled()) {
updateMessage("Cancelled");
break;
}
}
}
return seconds;
}
public StringProperty getSeconds(){
return this.seconds;
}
}
Why your app does not work
What is happening is that you run the task on it's own thread, set the seconds property in the task, then the binding triggers an immediate update of the label text while still on the task thread.
This violates a rule for JavaFX thread processing:
An application must attach nodes to a Scene, and modify nodes that are already attached to a Scene, on the JavaFX Application Thread.
This is the reason that your originally posted program does not work.
How to fix it
To modify your original program so that it will work, wrap the modification of the property in the task inside a Platform.runLater construct:
Platform.runLater(new Runnable() {
#Override public void run() {
System.out.println("TIK! " + sec);
seconds.setValue(String.valueOf(sec));
System.out.println("TAK! " + seconds.getValue());
}
});
This ensures that when you write out to the property, you are already on the JavaFX application thread, so that when the subsequent change fires for the bound label text, that change will also occur on the JavaFX application thread.
On Property Naming Conventions
It is true that the program does not correspond to JavaFX bean conventions as Matthew points out. Conforming to those conventions is both useful in making the program more readily understandable and also for making use of things like the PropertyValueFactory which reflect on property method names to allow table and list cells to automatically update their values as the underlying property is updated. However, for your example, not following JavaFX bean conventions does not explain why the program does not work.
Alternate Solution
Here is an alternate solution to your countdown binding problem which uses the JavaFX animation framework rather than the concurrency framework. I prefer this because it keeps everything on the JavaFX application thread and you don't need to worry about concurrency issues which are difficult to understand and debug.
import javafx.animation.*;
import javafx.application.Application;
import javafx.beans.*;
import javafx.beans.binding.Bindings;
import javafx.beans.property.*;
import javafx.event.*;
import javafx.geometry.Pos;
import javafx.scene.*;
import javafx.scene.control.*;
import javafx.scene.layout.VBox;
import javafx.stage.Stage;
import javafx.util.Duration;
public class CountdownTimer extends Application {
#Override public void start(final Stage stage) throws Exception {
final CountDown countdown = new CountDown(10);
final CountDownLabel countdownLabel = new CountDownLabel(countdown);
final Button countdownButton = new Button(" Start ");
countdownButton.setOnAction(new EventHandler<ActionEvent>() {
#Override public void handle(ActionEvent t) {
countdownButton.setText("Restart");
countdown.start();
}
});
VBox layout = new VBox(10);
layout.getChildren().addAll(countdownLabel, countdownButton);
layout.setAlignment(Pos.BASELINE_RIGHT);
layout.setStyle("-fx-background-color: cornsilk; -fx-padding: 20; -fx-font-size: 20;");
stage.setScene(new Scene(layout));
stage.show();
}
public static void main(String[] args) throws Exception {
launch(args);
}
}
class CountDownLabel extends Label {
public CountDownLabel(final CountDown countdown) {
textProperty().bind(Bindings.format("%3d", countdown.timeLeftProperty()));
}
}
class CountDown {
private final ReadOnlyIntegerWrapper timeLeft;
private final ReadOnlyDoubleWrapper timeLeftDouble;
private final Timeline timeline;
public ReadOnlyIntegerProperty timeLeftProperty() {
return timeLeft.getReadOnlyProperty();
}
public CountDown(final int time) {
timeLeft = new ReadOnlyIntegerWrapper(time);
timeLeftDouble = new ReadOnlyDoubleWrapper(time);
timeline = new Timeline(
new KeyFrame(
Duration.ZERO,
new KeyValue(timeLeftDouble, time)
),
new KeyFrame(
Duration.seconds(time),
new KeyValue(timeLeftDouble, 0)
)
);
timeLeftDouble.addListener(new InvalidationListener() {
#Override public void invalidated(Observable o) {
timeLeft.set((int) Math.ceil(timeLeftDouble.get()));
}
});
}
public void start() {
timeline.playFromStart();
}
}
Update for additional questions on Task execution strategy
Is it possible to run more than one Task which includes a Platform.runLater(new Runnable()) method ?
Yes, you can use multiple tasks. Each task can be of the same type or a different type.
You can create a single thread and run each task on the thread sequentially, or you can create multiple threads and run the tasks in parallel.
For managing multiple tasks, you can create an overseer Task. Sometimes it is appropriate to use a Service for managing the multiple tasks and the Executors framework for managing multiple threads.
There is an example of a Task, Service, Executors co-ordination approach: Creating multiple parallel tasks by a single service In each task.
In each task you can place no runlater call, a single runlater call or multiple runlater calls.
So there is a great deal of flexibility available.
Or maybe I should create one general task which will be only take data from other Tasks and updating a UI?
Yes you can use a co-ordinating task approach like this if complexity warrants it. There is an example of such an approach in in Render 300 charts off screen and save them to files.
Your "Timer2" class doesn't conform to the JavaFX bean conventions:
public String getSeconds();
public void setSeconds(String seconds);
public StringProperty secondsProperty();
I'm new to threading; in fact I'm not even trying to multi- thread the Windows Forms app I'm working on, but all of my searches on this issue lead me to the topic of multithreading. When debugging in Visual Studio 2010 Express, it seems to "jump around" to use the term I've seen others use to describe the same problem. When I let it run, sometimes it runs as expected, other times it just seems to keep running, getting hung up.
In trying to hone my question, I think I need to figure out:
If the timer class calls a method on a different thread, and there isn't an obvious danger of unpredictable instance values/ state corruption in the executing code (there aren't any conditional checks of instance variables etc), why would that method called by the timer appear to behave unpredictably? To me it seems that the code should run synchronously, and if a different thread is used for part of the process, so be it. I can't see where there is opportunity for thread corruption.
When the program starts, it prompts for the timer to be set to run a data download process. After the procedure runs, the timer is set again to a default time, at the end of the procedure. Consistently, the initial timer setting works, and fires as expected, running the data download process... it's that data download method, somewhere within it it goes awry. The last line of code is what sets the timer again, but I can't tell if it's getting hit while debugging it. (jumping around)..
I've added relevant code below... and I stepped into every procedure in my code from the beginning... they all show current thread id 10. This is up to an including the timer firing off, and stopping at a breakpoint at the very next line to execute, which is the data download process. The current thread at that point: 14. I've built the solution before running it/ trying to debug btw. Any ideas?
public partial class frmTradingAppMain : Form
{
private TradingAppDataRunManager drm;
private void frmTradingAppMain_Shown(object sender, EventArgs e)
{
drm = new TradingAppDataRunManager();
drm.StatusChanged += new DataRunManager.DRMStatusChangeHandler(UpdateFormData);
drm.InitializeOrScheduleDataRun();
}
private void UpdateFormData()
{
this.Invoke(new DataRunManager.DRMStatusChangeHandler(UpdateFormDataImpl));
}
private void UpdateFormDataImpl()
{
lblDataDwnLoadManagerStatus.Text = Convert.ToString(drm.Status);
if (drm.Status == DataRunManager.DRMStatus.Inactive)
{
lblNextScheduledDataDownloadDate.Text = "Date not set.";
lblNextScheduledDataDownloadTime.Text = "Time not set.";
}
else
{
lblNextScheduledDataDownloadDate.Text = drm.DateTimeOfNextScheduledDataRun.ToShortDateString();
lblNextScheduledDataDownloadTime.Text = drm.DateTimeOfNextScheduledDataRun.ToShortTimeString();
}
}
}
public abstract class DataRunManager
{
protected DataRunTimer dataRuntimer;
public delegate void DRMStatusChangeHandler();
public event DRMStatusChangeHandler StatusChanged;
public DRMStatusChangeHandler statusChanged;
public void InitializeOrScheduleDataRun()
{
if (DataRunIsAvailable() && UserWouldLikeToPerformDataRun())
RunMainDataProcedure(null);
else
ScheduleDataRun();
}
public void RunMainDataProcedure(object state)
{
start = DateTime.Now;
Status = DRMStatus.Running;
StatusChanged();
GetDataCollections();
foreach (DataCollection dcl in dataCollectionList)
{
dcl.RunDataCollection();
dcl.WriteCollectionToDatabase();
}
PerformDBServerSideProcs();
stop = DateTime.Now;
WriteDataRunStartStopTimesToDB(start, stop);
SetDataRunTimer(DateTimeOfNextAvailableDR());
}
public void ScheduleDataRun()
{
FrmSetTimer frmSetTimer = new FrmSetTimer(DateTimeOfNextAvailableDataRun);
DateTime currentScheduledTimeOfNextDataRun = DateTimeOfNextScheduledDataRun;
DRMStatus currentStatus= Status;
try
{
frmSetTimer.ShowDialog();
DateTimeOfNextScheduledDataRun = (DateTime)frmSetTimer.Tag;
SetDataRunTimer(DateTimeOfNextScheduledDataRun);
}
catch
{
Status = currentStatus;
DateTimeOfNextScheduledDataRun = currentScheduledTimeOfNextDataRun;
}
}
}
public class DataRunTimer
{
System.Threading.Timer timer;
public DataRunTimer(){}
public void SetNextDataRunTime(TimerCallback timerCallback, DateTime timeToSet)
{
if (timer == null)
timer = new System.Threading.Timer(timerCallback);
TimeSpan delayTime = new TimeSpan(timeToSet.Day - DateTime.Now.Day, timeToSet.Hour - DateTime.Now.Hour, timeToSet.Minute - DateTime.Now.Minute,
timeToSet.Second - DateTime.Now.Second);
TimeSpan intervalTime = new TimeSpan(0, 0, 10);
timer.Change(delayTime, intervalTime);
}
public void DataRunTimerCancel()
{
if (timer != null)
timer.Dispose();
}
}