I'm doing an extended project as one of my qualifications in my current College and I chose to write a python Strategy/RPG game. As a result, I ended up with the highest level of Python knowledge (Surpassing my Computing Teacher who only ever uses the basics... and used Tkinter only once a few years ago. Every one else who has decided to make a program, are either coding in Lua, Java, C++, HTML/CSS/Java-Script or, those who are coding in python, they are only using the basics learned from our teacher.)
I say "Highest level of Python knowledge" but really it isn't that high... I only know a little beyond the basics.
As a result, a forum post is the best place I can turn to for help.
So in my game I defined this function:
#"Given_String" is the question that one would want to ask. (With the answer being an integer between 1 and "Choice_Range" (inclusive)
def Value_Error(Given_String,Error_Message,Choice_Range):
while True:
try:
Temp=int(input(Given_String))
if Temp<1 or Temp>Choice_Range:
print(Error_Message)
else:
break
except ValueError:
print(Error_Message)
return Temp
I then wanted to add tkinter to my code, because the game would have to be in a separate window, and not in the console. As a result, I had to change this code so that it displays the "Given_Message" and the "Error_Message" in a tkinter window, and uses the value that has been typed into an entry box when defining "Temp".
I wrote this code to make this work: (Or at least most of it)
#This code is stored in a different file for neatness and hence I had to import "sys" to avoid circular imports.
#This code is made to be flexible so that I can later re-use it when necessary.
#This code starts with the function all the way at the bottom. The rest are made to add flexibility and to structure the algorithm.
#This code hasn't been fully run (Because of the Error crashing the Python Shell) so it can contain other Run-time Errors that I'm not aware of yet.
import sys
def Generate_Window(Window_Name,X_Parameter=5,Y_Parameter=50):
Temp=sys.modules['tkinter'].Tk()
Temp.title(Window_Name)
Temp.geometry(str(X_Parameter)+"x"+str(Y_Parameter))
return Temp
def Generate_Button(Master,Text="Submit"):
Temp=sys.modules["tkinter"].Button(Master,text=Text)
return Temp
def Generate_Entry(Master):
Temp=sys.modules["tkinter"].Entry(Master)
return Temp
def Generate_Label(Master,Given_String):
Temp=sys.modules["tkinter"].Label(Master,text=Given_String)
return Temp
def Com_Get_Entry(Given_Window,Given_Entry):
Temp=Given_Entry.get()
Given_Window.destroy()
return Temp
def Com_Confirm(Given_Window):
Given_Window.destroy()
def Generate_Entry_Box(Given_String):
Entry_Window=Generate_Window("Entry",X_Parameter=300)
Entry_Label=Generate_Label(Entry_Window,Given_String)
Entry_Entry=Generate_Entry(Entry_Window)
Entry_Button=Generate_Button(Entry_Window)
Entry_Button.configure(command=lambda:Com_Get_Entry(Entry_Window,Entry_Entry))
Entry_Label.grid(row=0,columnspan=2)
Entry_Entry.grid(row=1,column=0)
Entry_Button.grid(row=1,column=1)
def Generate_Alert_Message(Given_String):
Alert_Window=Generate_Window("Alert",X_Parameter=300)
Alert_Label=Generate_Label(Alert_Window,Given_String)
Alert_Button=Generate_Button(Alert_Window,Text="OK")
Alert_Button.configure(command=lambda:Com_Confirm(Alert_Window))
Alert_Label.grid(row=0,columnspan=2)
Alert_Button.grid(row=1,column=1)
def Get_Interger_Input_In_Range(Given_String,Error_Message,Choice_Range):
while True:
try:
Returned_Value=int(Generate_Entry_Box(Given_String))
if Returned_Value<1 or Returned_Value>Choice_Range:
Generate_Alert_Message(Error_Message)
else:
break
except ValueError:
Generate_Alert_Message(Error_Message)
return Temp
I already included in my code all that I was struggling with and that I could find an answer to.
I.E: On-click, do a certain action with given parameters.
One thing I could not find, is how to return the entered value to the original (Get_Interger_Input_In_Range()) function after the button has been clicked.
What I mean is something like this:
def Function1(GivenParameter1,GivenParameter2):
Temp=Function2(GivenParameter1)
Temp+=GiverParameter2 #random action
return Temp
def Function2(GivenParameter):
Button=Button(Master,command=Function3).grid()
Entry=Entry(Master).grid()
def Function3():
Temp=Entry.get()
return Temp
In Function1 I want Temp to equal the entered value from Function2.
Is there any way to do this without using classes? (I'm not too familiar with classes yet)
Is there any way to do this at all?
I haven't seen anyone give the answer I was looking for...
Because even if they said to use classes... I still didn't know how to return it (Explanation just below)
#The following code was written quickly for purposes of explaining what I mean. It doesn't actually work... (It seems that the button command is being called automatically...)
from tkinter import *
class Return_Value_In_Entry():
def __init__(self):
self.Master=Tk()
self.Entry=Entry(self.Master)
self.Button=Button(self.Master,text="Submit",command=self.Return())
def Return(self):
self.TempVar=self.Entry.get()
return self.TempVar
The way I see it, the Return() function would return the value to the button and not the function/assignment that called the class ... Which is the same problem I'm having with my code.
If you read this all then I really appreciate it. I hope someone can answer my question and tell me (if it's impossible otherwise) how to use classes to solve my "Little" yet large problem.
I fixed your example code (I think). The main problem is that this:
command=self.Return()
does not do what you think it does. It just assigns return value from Return() to command. This is incorrect. It should be
command=self.Return
This assigns function Return to command. Subsequently, when ever button is pressed, self.Return() is executed.
The full example is here:
from tkinter import *
class Return_Value_In_Entry():
def __init__(self):
self.Master=Tk()
self.Entry=Entry(self.Master)
self.Entry.pack()
self.Button=Button(self.Master,text="Submit",command=self.Return)
self.Button.pack()
self.Master.mainloop()
def Return(self):
self.TempVar=self.Entry.get()
print(self.TempVar)
Return_Value_In_Entry()
Now, whenever you press the Button, the value from the Entry widget is saved into self.TempVar and printed out, just to check if its working. Hope this helps.
Gif showing how the example program works:
Related
I have written some code in python for a live time in tkinter.
Whenever I run the code it comes up with some numbers on the tkinter window like 14342816time. Is there a way to fix this?
import tkinter
import datetime
window = tkinter.Tk()
def time():
datetime.datetime.now().time()
datetime.time(17, 3,)
print(datetime.datetime.now().time())
tkinter.Label(window, text = time).pack()
window.mainloop()
After some fixes to your code, I came up with the following, which should at least get you started toward what you want:
import datetime
import tkinter
def get_time():
return datetime.datetime.now().time()
root = tkinter.Tk()
tkinter.Label(root, text = get_time()).pack()
root.mainloop()
The imports are needed so that your program knows about the contents of the datetime and tkinter modules - you may be importing them already, however, I can't tell that for certain from what you posted. You need to create a window into which you put your label, which wasn't happening; following convention, I called that parent (and only) window "root". Then I put the Label into root. I changed the name of your time() function to get_time(), since it's best to avoid confusing fellow programmers (and maybe yourself) with a function that shares its name with another (the time() function in time). I removed two lines in get_time() that don't actually accomplish anything. Finally, I changed the print you had to a return, so that the value can be used by the code calling the function.
There are other improvements possible here. If you're content with the time as it is, you could eliminate the get_time function and just use datetime.datetime.now().time() instead of calling get_time(). However, I suspect you might want to do something to clean up that time before it is displayed, so I left it there. You might want to research the datetime and time modules some more, to see how to clean things up.
I'm aware of the SO post How do I override file.write() in Python 3? but after looking it over and trying whats suggested I'm still stuck.
I want to override the file.write method in Python 3 so that I can "REDACT" certain words (Usernames, Passwords...etc).
I found a great example of overriding the print and general stdout and stderr http://code.activestate.com/recipes/119404/
The issue is that it doesn't work for file.write. How can I override the file.write?
My code for redacting when printing is:
def write(self, text):
for word in self.redacted_list:
text = text.replace(word, "REDACTED")
self.origOut.write(text)
return text
thanks
From the self.origOut.write(text) I assume you are trying to write an in-between-class that pretends to be a file but provides a different .write() method.
I don't see any problems in the code you posted (assuming it's a method of a class you use). Possibly you wrote a class but forgot to create instances of it?
Did you try to write something like this?:
class IAmNoARealFile:
def __init__(self, real_file):
self.origOut = real_file
def __getattr__(self, attr_name): # provide everything a file has
return getattr(self.origOut, attr_name)
def write(self, ...):
...
with open('test.txt', 'w') as f:
f = IAmNotARealFile(f) # did you forget this?
f.write('some text SECRET blah SECRET') # calls IAMNotARealFile.write with your extra code
with open('test.txt') as f:
f = IAmNotARealFile(f)
print(f.read()) # this "falls through" to the actual file object
you will also probably want to return self.origOut.write() in your own .write(), if you don't have a specific reason not to.
Note that if you rewrite open() to directly return IAMNotARealFile:
def open(*args, **kwargs):
return IAMNotARealFile(open(*args, **kwargs))
you will have to manually supply (some) "magic methods" because
This method may still be bypassed when looking up special methods as the result of implicit invocation via language syntax or built-in functions. See Special method lookup.
--docs for .__getattribute__(), but it also applies to .__getattr__()
Why?
Bypassing the __getattribute__() machinery in this fashion provides significant scope for speed optimisations within the interpreter, at the cost of some flexibility in the handling of special methods (the special method must be set on the class object itself in order to be consistently invoked by the interpreter).
-- On special ("magic") method lookup [code style and emphasis mine]
Hi I want to make a button which is going to be a function to make a variable going to be an input, but the problem how I'm going to make the function when pressed to add a variable. I'm using python 3.6
This is just a sample code I think you are trying to find this solution if not can you clarify the question.
def button():
a = 4
print("Hello I am pressed")
return a
buttonVariable = button()
The problem I am encountering is that I appear to be stuck in an infinite loop, (If I am not, please correct me). I am using tkinter for python 3.6 (64 bit) on windows 10.
In the module I am having an issue with I have 3 entry widgets and 2 buttons. Both buttons call the "destroy()" function in order to kill the parent window.
Below is a heavily abstracted version of my module, the purpose of the module is to take inputs from the entry widget and write them to a file.
def Create():
parent = Tk()
parent.MakeItlookNice
entry1 = Entry(parent)
entry1.insert(INSERT, "Please enter your desired username here")
entry2 = Entry(parent)
entry2.insert(INSERT, "Please enter your desired password here")
entry3 = Entry(parent)
entry3.insert(INSERT, "What is your mother's maiden name")
Submit = tk.Button(parent,
text ="Click here to submit your stuff",
command = lambda: [parent.destroy(),
submit.function()])
Cancel = tk.Button(parent,
text ="Click here to cancel your request",
command = lambda: parent.destroy())
parent.mainloop()
This function is contained within the module "RegisterNewUser". The "Menu" module is the module that called this function. As far as I am aware once parent.destroy() is called there is no more code to execute since it is all contained within parent.mainloop(), therefore the function is finished and the "Menu" module should continue executing.
What should happen:
I want the Submit button to destroy the window, execute the function and then return to the "Menu" module.
I want the cancel button to destroy the window and return to the "Menu" module.
What actually happens:
The window closes, like it is supposed to
But the code inside the "Menu" module does not start executing again
When I go to close the python shell, it warns me that the program is still running
Ultimately my question is, what code is still running and why hasn't it stopped?
Thank you for reading this and if you require more detail please let me know.
EDIT: I have done research on this topic before posting this question. I have read the documentation on both the tk.destroy() function and the tk.mainloop() function, I have also opened up the Tkinter module in IDLE to try and understand what happens at a deeper level but after all this, I was still unable to figure out a solution. This is my first question on stack overflow, please forgive me if I have done anything wrong.
Hmmm, so you say multiple windows? an easier way to achieve a complex UI as such is using a concept called frames. Tkinter allows you to completely change you screen and layout if you switch to a new frames. This might require you to reprogram alot of code. for an example see Switch between two frames in tkinter
Also, Some guy built a really nice Bitcoin monitoring app using tkinter and frames on youtube
I think you would probably benefit from using Toplevel() here.
I have taken the code you provided and added it to a class used to create the main window and to manage the pop up window.
I noticed a few things with you code.
Its obvoious you are importing tkinter twice like this:
import tkinter as tk
from tkinter import *
I can tell from how you have written your entry fields vs your buttons. Do not do this. Instead just used one or the other. I recommend just using import tkinter as tk.
You are using a function to create a new tkinter instance and judging by your question you all ready have a tkinter instance created for your menu. Instead of creating new Tk() instances you can use Toplevel() instead to open a new window that can inherit everything from the main window and should be easier to manage.
You do not really need to use lambda in this situation. I have also removed the lambda function and replaced with a simple command that will work here.
Take a look at the below code and let me know if you have any questions.
import tkinter as tk
class MyApp(tk.Frame):
def __init__(self, master, *args, **kwargs):
tk.Frame.__init__(self, master, *args, **kwargs)
self.master = master
self.master.title("Main MENU")
tk.Button(self.master, text="Open top level", command = self.create).pack()
def create(self):
self.top = tk.Toplevel(self.master)
entry1 = tk.Entry(self.top, width = 35)
entry1.pack()
entry1.insert(0, "Please enter your desired username here")
entry2 = tk.Entry(self.top, width = 35)
entry2.pack()
entry2.insert(0, "Please enter your desired password here")
entry3 = tk.Entry(self.top, width = 35)
entry3.pack()
entry3.insert(0, "What is your mother's maiden name")
tk.Button(self.top, text ="Click here to submit your stuff",
command = self.Submit).pack()
tk.Button(self.top, text ="Click here to cancel your request",
command = self.top.destroy).pack()
def Submit(self):
print("Do something here to submit data")
self.top.destroy()
if __name__ == "__main__":
root = tk.Tk()
app1 = MyApp(root)
tk.mainloop()
You can use toplevel() and its library function wait_window() just prior to (or instead of) your mainloop() and your problem will be solved
wait_window() mentioned above worked for me in the code below replacing popup.mainloop() with it, the mainloop() kept my code in an infinite loop upon the popup even after okay button was hit
I am trying to use jedi to complete python code inside a PyQt application, using QCompleter and QStringListModel to store the possible completion.
Here's a simple working demo:
#!/usr/bin/env python3
from PyQt5.QtCore import *
from PyQt5.QtWidgets import *
import jedi
import sys
class JediEdit(QLineEdit):
def __init__(self, parent=None):
super().__init__(parent)
self._model = QStringListModel()
self._compl = QCompleter()
self._compl.setModel(self._model)
self.setCompleter(self._compl)
self.textEdited.connect(self.update_model)
def update_model(self, cur_text):
script = jedi.Script(cur_text)
compl = script.completions()
strings = list(cur_text + c.complete for c in compl)
self._model.setStringList(strings)
if __name__ == '__main__':
app = QApplication(sys.argv)
line = JediEdit()
line.show()
sys.exit(app.exec_())
If you run the application and write a code which is not completing anything (e.g. or foo =), the completion will actually show all the possible tokens that can go in that position.
So, if I run and write a space in the field, lots of things pops up, from abs to __version__.
I would like to prevent this: is it possible to query jedi.Script to understand if the token is being completed or if a completely new token is starting?
EDIT: another little question: say that I am running an interpreter which is detached from jedi current state. How can I provide local and global variables to jedi.Script so that it will take into account those, instead of its own completions?
Autocompletion
Jedi's autocompletion will always show all possible tokens in a place. That's the whole point in autocompletion.
If you don't want that behavior just scan the last few characters for whitespace and certain other characters like = or :, it would be a very simple regex command. (You could also try to look up Jedi's internals and use the way how Jedi knows about this context. However I'm not going to tell you, because it's not a public API and IMHO regex calls suffice.)
In the future something like that might be possible. (See https://github.com/davidhalter/jedi/issues/253).
Now that I think about it, there might be another way that you could experiment with this: You can try to play with Completion.name and Completion.complete. The latter only gives you what could come after the current token, while the name would be the full thing. So you can compare and if they are equal than you might not want to display anything.
Have fun playing with the API :-)
Interpreter
If you're running an interpreter, you can use jedi.Interpreter to combine code with actual Python objects. It's pretty flexible. But please note that the current Interpreter (0.8.1) is very buggy. Please use the master branch from Github (0.9.0).