I have a form with a General Information tab. There are fields in the header and General Info tab that are bound to the same view (and thus should be a part of the same record in the Cache/Database). However, when I insert, it creates 2 records in the same table. One contains only the values for the fields in the header, the other contains only the values for the fields in the tab. I need those to be bound to the same record. What am I missing?
I got around this by declaring a second view, binding that view to the main view through the key, and assigning the tab to use the second view as its data source.
I got the idea from the EmployeeMaint BLC, where the General Info tab is distinguished from the header view using these 2 views:
public PXSelectJoin<EPEmployee, LeftJoin<GL.Branch, On<GL.Branch.bAccountID, Equal<EPEmployee.parentBAccountID>>>, Where<EPEmployee.parentBAccountID, IsNull, Or<MatchWithBranch<GL.Branch.branchID>>>> Employee;
public PXSelect<EPEmployee, Where<EPEmployee.bAccountID, Equal<Current<EPEmployee.bAccountID>>>> CurrentEmployee;
Consider that the header in the EP203000 page uses the Employee view, while the General Info tab uses the CurrentEmployee view.
...however, even though I got this code straight out of their system, I've been personally advised by Acumatica's support team NOT to declare 2 views that use the same primary DAC. Any other suggestions are welcome.
Related
I have a custom table in SQL Server called AnimalBreed and maintenance page.
I wish to add User Defined Field support via the KvExt approach instead of
traditional practices involving either CSAnswers or a CacheExtension of the
DAC and underlying "Usr" fields.
Is this possible?
Can it be done for line-level (child) DACs, such as
existing INLocation and INLocationKvExt?
Thanks!
UPDATE:
It appears the feature needs at least:
ensure your table has the NoteID column as uniqueidentifier datatype and the DAC has the corresponding field: Guid? NoteID and [PXNote()] attribute.
In the ASPX, if not ListView, add the following to the PXDataSource tag:
EnableAttributes="true"
By making these changes, I can Manage User Defined Fields, choose Attributes to include, and I can store values to the KvExt table.
I am using Version = 19.205.0023
Sales Order page observation: if I add two UDFs on SO Order Entry page, one is combobox and one is checkbox, setting their values saves just fine, but then updating the combobox and save leads to loss of the checkbox (from true to false), unless you uncheck and recheck prior to the save. Is this a bug?
Maybe technically possible but definitely not recommended to use undocumented feature like KvExt.
If you need to deploy User Defined Fields on a page which already contains them. Configure them manually and then add them in a customization package in the user defined fields section for deployment as described here:
https://help-2019r2.acumatica.com/Help?ScreenId=ShowWiki&pageid=e01f29d3-b6b1-40f4-a2d1-45c9d01bdde3
Example:
I have a case in my customisation project, were I have a PXSelector that I want it to solely act as a lookup, and would not like the users to input any data via the selector and create new records.
I could not find a way to limit this from the attribute itself, therefore I tried to limit it from the events that the control fires. The idea was that in the FieldUpdating Event I would verify whether the value inserted by the user can be found in the selector's key column, if not I would revert it back to the old value. The problem was that cancelling the event had no effect on the selector and since I did not know what the previous value was, I could not revert it back manually.
It sounds like you are trying to use a filter. You need a PXFilter view which then could be used to display data in a grid for example.
You can search the source for "PXFilter to find good examples. One I found is APVendorBalanceEnq which uses public PXFilter<APHistoryFilter> Filter
PXFilter views are not committed to the database. Typically you would create a new DAC for the filter based on your needs but you can use existing DACs that are bound to tables without the fear of the data making it to the database. With the filter you simply use the field values rather than load records into the view.
In my application, i would like to replace a viewpanel with a repeat control.
However, part of the functionality is there is a UI aspect that allows users to select certain fields (that correspond to the view), and only display the documents that match. The view is doing a filter that allows users to select aspects of the view to create a search (the code is under search of the view) that allows the view panel to be updated with the results of the search.
one of the things that is curious is that the viewpanel has a value of "#{javascript:view2}" vice an actual view name.
The viewpanel defines the search view and the ...
I'd like to be able to apply that same functionality to the repeat control. I don't see those attributes on the repeat control... Any pointers? Its been a while since i've worked with xpages... long enough that I've forgotten a lot already....
TIA !
Read this blog post I did a while back, it should explain what you need.
The view panel doesn't filter anything, it just displays rows from a datasource, same as a repeat control. Indeed you can add components to a ViewPanel's column, pulling from the current row by adding a var property to the dominoView datasource.
The view is bound to #{javascript:view2} (which would be better done by binding to #{view2} - there's no need to call SSJS here). view2 is a dominoView datasource somewhere on your page. The datasource is a wrapper that has properties to capture the settings for filtering and searching that you want to do. At runtime, they are calculated and changes the ViewEntries in the datasource.
Finally there's is the underlying Domino View object available also to LotusScript. This holds and will always hold all entries. The dominoView datasource queries that using the filtering and searching properties and retrieves a ViewEntryCollection or a ViewNavigator.
So whether you use a View Panel, Repeat Control, Data View or whatever else, those are just components to visually represent a collection of ViewEntries or Documents. All can be bound to a dominoView datasource. Where repeat controls and Data Views give you extra power is you can bind them to any kind of collection, not just a dominoView datasource (e.g. DocumentCollection, ViewEntryCollection, multi-value field, Java collection, etc).
I often find that doing the searches in Java and then passing the results to the repeat as a List work better and allow more options. I can get all the information I need in Java and load that into a Map or Tree. This gives me the ability to do custom sorting in the Java class and also to combine data from other views/databases easily. Since the data is now in memory it gets reloaded fast. The only thing you have to watch for is the size of the data. If you have a view with many entries (10K?) you might not want to load everything into memory...
Howard
I'm not sure if you've found a solution yet, but consider using jQuery dataTables. Oliver Busse wrote a very detailed blog post about integrating dataTables into XPages.
To get the specific formatting, I used a repeat control to include the "td", "tr" and "thead" attributes Oliver listed in his blog post.
Using Firebug I found that the iNotes List View object has a function called "getSelectedData()" delivering something like an array of selected view entries (each one consisting of the item specific row data, like the "ext" element described here by Paul Withers). Thus, using one of List View's internal events (like "onContextMenu"), I can retrive selected data and put them somewhere else. Which is just great!
But, as I'm never content with what I have, now I'm looking for a way to address the List View's object from the outside (e.g. using a button) to access a selected data collection in a similar or even the same way. But no matter what I try, I can't seem to get to the proper object from outside of the List View itself. Using
dojo.byId("#{id:listView1}")
is giving me an object but without any of those specific methods that I need. Neither Google, nor openNtf or the ExtLib book itself has any info on that.
Any hint?
Greets,
Lothar
I guess I solved it. I've been close yesterday, but using dojo.byId instead of dijit.byId prevented it from working:
var grid = dijit.byId("#{id:listView1}");
var sel = grid.getSelectedData();
Result is a named array of row data where each row entry contains all the relevant view entry data for that row.
Works like a charm!
- Lothar
How do you create a lookup column to a Document Library that uses the 'Name' of the document as the lookup value?
I found a blog post that recommends adding another custom field like "FileName" and then using a item reciever to populate the custom field with the value from the Name field but that seems cheesy.
Link to the blog in case people are interested:
http://blogs.msdn.com/pranab/archive/2008/01/08/sharepoint-2007-moss-wss-issue-with-lookup-column-to-doc-lib-name-field.aspx
I've got a bunch of custom document content types that I dont want to clutter with a work around that should really work anyway.
I created a one step workflow to set the title from the name, fired on modify and created. Seems to work and took seconds to create.
One way you can do this (although not the easiest way) is by creating a custom field type that extends the SPFieldLookup class. SharePoint's field editor for Lookup fields purposefully hides any columns types that aren't supported by Lookup fields, but you can create a field editor for your custom field type that shows them.
However, I have created a Lookup column that points to a Name column in a Document Library before, and it probably doesn't work like you'd expect. While the value stored in the lookup column is valid, it doesn't show up right in List view or on the View Properties form.
The solution you posted may actually be the best way to handle this. Lookup fields require some kludges if you want to handle more complex scenarios, but that's because they're not meant to provide the same functionality as a foreign key relationship in a database.
Coding in any form always scares me. So Here's what I did: I simply renamed the Stupid "Title" Field to something else, say "Keywords", since you cant do anything with that field: cant even make it mandatory.
Then I created another Single line field called "Title" and used this field for the Lookups
Well there is a simple solution to that and in might work in some case.
In the nutshell if you make the Title field Mandatory, this will force the user to enter a title. In that manner we can use title field as a lookup field.
Now How to do that?
One you are done create a document library go to the library setting. Select Advance Setting and Select Yes for the option "Allow management of content types?".
Then go back to the Library setting and Under content types select the "Document" Content type. THen Select Title Column and then Select "Required (Must contain information)" and say OK.
Now try uploading a document to this document library. You will see Title field in the form.
Hope this helps
Cheers
Vaqar
You have to add the field as XML with the ShowField as 'FileLeafRef'
var XmlFieldDefinition = "<Field DisplayName='myLookupColumn' Type='LookupMulti' StaticName='myLookupColumn' Name='myLookupColumn' Required='FALSE' List='THE LOOKUP ID HERE' WebId='THE WEB ID HERE' UnlimitedLengthInDocumentLibrary='TRUE' Mult='TRUE' Sortable='FALSE' ShowField='FileLeafRef' />"
Field fld = fieldCollection.AddFieldAsXml(XmlFieldDefinition, true, AddFieldOptions.DefaultValue);
ClientContext.Load(fld);
ClientContext.ExecuteQuery();