I am using a JMS Outbound Gateway to send messages to a request queue and receive messages from a separate response queue. I would like to add functionality so that a call is made to a specific bean's method once a message has been successfully sent to the request queue.
I am using spring-integration 4.0.4 APIs and spring-integration-java-dsl 1.0.0 APIs for this and, I have so far been able to achieve the above functionality as follows:
#Configuration
#EnableIntegration
public class IntegrationConfig {
...
#Bean
public IntegrationFlow requestFlow() {
return IntegrationFlows
.from("request.ch")
.routeToRecipients(r ->
r.ignoreSendFailures(false)
.recipient("request.ch.1", "true")
.recipient("request.ch.2", "true"))
.get();
}
#Bean
public IntegrationFlow sendReceiveFlow() {
return IntegrationFlows
.from("request.ch.1")
.handle(Jms.outboundGateway(cachingConnectionFactory)
.receiveTimeout(45000)
.requestDestination("REQUEST_QUEUE")
.replyDestination("RESPONSE_QUEUE")
.correlationKey("JMSCorrelationID"), e -> e.requiresReply(true))
.channel("response.ch").get();
}
#Bean
public IntegrationFlow postSendFlow() {
return IntegrationFlows
.from("request.ch.2")
.handle("requestSentService", "fireRequestSuccessfullySentEvent")
.get();
}
...
}
Now, although the above configuration works, I have noticed that the only apparent reason request.ch.1 is called before request.ch.2 seems to be because of the channel names' alphabetical order and not because of the order in which they where added to the RecipientListRouter itself. Is this correct? Or am I missing something here?
* EDIT below shows solution using Aggregator between JMS Outbound/Inbound Adapters approach (without Messaging Gateway) *
Integration Config:
#Configuration
#EnableIntegration
public class IntegrationConfig {
...
#Bean
public IntegrationFlow reqFlow() {
return IntegrationFlows
.from("request.ch")
.enrichHeaders(e -> e.headerChannelsToString())
.enrichHeaders(e -> e.headerExpression(IntegrationMessageHeaderAccessor.CORRELATION_ID, "headers['" + MessageHeaders.REPLY_CHANNEL + "']"))
.routeToRecipients(r -> {
r.ignoreSendFailures(false);
r.recipient("jms.req.ch", "true");
r.recipient("jms.agg.ch", "true");
})
.get();
}
#Bean
public IntegrationFlow jmsReqFlow() {
return IntegrationFlows
.from("jms.req.ch")
.handle(Jms.outboundAdapter(cachingConnectionFactory)
.destination("TEST_REQUEST_CH")).get();
}
#Bean
public IntegrationFlow jmsPostReqFlow() {
return IntegrationFlows
.from("jms.req.ch")
.handle("postSendService", "postSendProcess")
.get();
}
#Bean
public IntegrationFlow jmsResFlow() {
return IntegrationFlows
.from(Jms.inboundAdapter(cachingConnectionFactory).destination(
"TEST_RESPONSE_CH"),
c -> c.poller(Pollers.fixedRate(1000).maxMessagesPerPoll(10)))
.channel("jms.agg.ch").get();
}
#Bean
public IntegrationFlow jmsAggFlow() {
return IntegrationFlows
.from("jms.agg.ch")
.aggregate(a -> {
a.outputProcessor(g -> {
List<Message<?>> l = new ArrayList<Message<?>>(g.getMessages());
Message<?> firstMessage = l.get(0);
Message<?> lastMessage = (l.size() > 1) ? l.get(l.size() - 1) : firstMessage;
Message<?> messageOut = MessageBuilder.fromMessage(lastMessage)
.setHeader(MessageHeaders.REPLY_CHANNEL, (String) firstMessage.getHeaders().getReplyChannel())
.build();
return messageOut;
});
a.releaseStrategy(g -> g.size() == 2);
a.groupTimeout(45000);
a.sendPartialResultOnExpiry(false);
a.discardChannel("jms.agg.timeout.ch");
}, null)
.channel("response.ch")
.get();
}
}
#Bean
public IntegrationFlow jmsAggTimeoutFlow() {
return IntegrationFlows
.from("jms.agg.timeout.ch")
.handle(Message.class, (m, h) -> new ErrorMessage(new MessageTimeoutException(m), h))
.channel("error.ch")
.get();
}
}
Cheers,
PM
H-m... Looks like. It is really a bug in the DslRecipientListRouter logic: https://github.com/spring-projects/spring-integration-java-dsl/issues/9
Will be fixed soon and released over a couple of days.
Thank you for pointing that out!
BTW. your logic isn't correct a bit: Even when we fix that RecipientListRouter, the second recipinet will receive the same request message only after JmsOutboundGateway will have received the reply, not just after request has been sent to the request-queue.
It is blocked request-reply process. And there is no a hook to get a point between reqeust and reply in the JmsOutboundGateway.
Is that OK for you?
Related
using Boot 2.2.2 and Integration 5.2.2 - when an XML message is sourced from a File and fails unmarshalling (i.e. it is not XML) the message proceeds as expect to errorChannel. However, when the message comes from JMS, through the same route of channels and fails unmarshalling, it is not routed to errorChannel and the message is rolled-back to JMS. After which I am stuck in an endless loop of SAXParseException for the same message.
I had following this example from Proper ultimate way to migrate JMS event listening to Spring Integration with Spring Boot
. Is there some implied transaction control that I am not considering? How do I have Spring Integration forward the message to errorChannel and commit the 'get' from the incoming queue?
Synopsis of code is as follows;
#Bean
public IntegrationFlow fileReader() {
return IntegrationFlows
.from(
Files
.inboundAdapter( ... )
...
.get(), e -> e.poller(Pollers.fixedDelay(1000))
)
.transform(new FileToStringTransformer())
.channel("backUpChannel")
.get();
}
#Bean
public IntegrationFlow getMessageFromJms(ConnectionFactory connectionFactory, #Value("${queues.myQueue}") String myQueue) {
return IntegrationFlows.from(
Jms
.messageDrivenChannelAdapter(connectionFactory)
.destination(myQueue)
)
.channel("backUpChannel")
.get();
}
#Bean
public IntegrationFlow doBackUp() {
return IntegrationFlows
.from("backUpChannel")
.<String>handle((payload, headers) -> {
String uuid = headers.get(MessageHeaders.ID).toString();
File backUpFile = new File("c:/backup/" + uuid + ".txt");
byte[] payloadContent = payload.getBytes();
try {
java.nio.file.Files.write(backUpFile.toPath(), payloadContent);
} catch (IOException e) {
e.printStackTrace();
}
return payload;
})
.channel("XXX")
.get();
}
#Bean
public Jaxb2Marshaller unmarshaller() {
Jaxb2Marshaller unmarshaller = new Jaxb2Marshaller();
unmarshaller.setClassesToBeBound(MyClass.class);
return unmarshaller;
}
#Bean
public IntegrationFlow handleParseXml() {
return IntegrationFlows
.from("XXX")
.transform(new UnmarshallingTransformer(unmarshaller()))
.channel("YYY")
.get();
}
You need to add .errorChannel(...) to the message-driven channel adapter.
I have 2 server side services and I would like route messages to them using message headers, where remote clients put service identification into field type.
Is the code snippet, from server side config, the correct way? It throws cast exception indicating that route() see only payload, but not the message headers. Also all example in the Spring Integration manual shows only payload based decisioning.
#Bean
public IntegrationFlow serverFlow( // common flow for all my services, currently 2
TcpNetServerConnectionFactory serverConnectionFactory,
HeartbeatServer heartbeatServer,
FeedServer feedServer) {
return IntegrationFlows
.from(Tcp.inboundGateway(serverConnectionFactory))
.<Message<?>, String>route((m) -> m.getHeaders().get("type", String.class),
(routeSpec) -> routeSpec
.subFlowMapping("hearbeat", subflow -> subflow.handle(heartbeatServer::processRequest))
.subFlowMapping("feed", subflow -> subflow.handle(feedServer::consumeFeed)))
.get();
}
Client side config:
#Bean
public IntegrationFlow heartbeatClientFlow(
TcpNetClientConnectionFactory clientConnectionFactory,
HeartbeatClient heartbeatClient) {
return IntegrationFlows.from(heartbeatClient::send, e -> e.poller(Pollers.fixedDelay(Duration.ofSeconds(5))))
.enrichHeaders(c -> c.header("type", "heartbeat"))
.log()
.handle(outboundGateway(clientConnectionFactory))
.handle(heartbeatClient::receive)
.get();
}
#Bean
public IntegrationFlow feedClientFlow(
TcpNetClientConnectionFactory clientConnectionFactory) {
return IntegrationFlows.from(FeedClient.MessageGateway.class)
.enrichHeaders(c -> c.header("type", "feed"))
.log()
.handle(outboundGateway(clientConnectionFactory))
.get();
}
And as usual here is the full demo project code, ClientConfig and ServerConfig.
There is no standard way to send headers over raw TCP. You need to encode them into the payload somehow (and extract them on the server side).
The framework provides a mechanism to do this for you, but it requires extra configuration.
See the documentation.
Specifically...
The MapJsonSerializer uses a Jackson ObjectMapper to convert between a Map and JSON. You can use this serializer in conjunction with a MessageConvertingTcpMessageMapper and a MapMessageConverter to transfer selected headers and the payload in JSON.
I'll try to find some time to create an example of how to use it.
But, of course, you can roll your own encoding/decoding.
EDIT
Here's an example configuration to use JSON to convey message headers over TCP...
#SpringBootApplication
public class TcpWithHeadersApplication {
public static void main(String[] args) {
SpringApplication.run(TcpWithHeadersApplication.class, args);
}
// Client side
public interface TcpExchanger {
public String exchange(String data, #Header("type") String type);
}
#Bean
public IntegrationFlow client(#Value("${tcp.port:1234}") int port) {
return IntegrationFlows.from(TcpExchanger.class)
.handle(Tcp.outboundGateway(Tcp.netClient("localhost", port)
.deserializer(jsonMapping())
.serializer(jsonMapping())
.mapper(mapper())))
.get();
}
// Server side
#Bean
public IntegrationFlow server(#Value("${tcp.port:1234}") int port) {
return IntegrationFlows.from(Tcp.inboundGateway(Tcp.netServer(port)
.deserializer(jsonMapping())
.serializer(jsonMapping())
.mapper(mapper())))
.log(Level.INFO, "exampleLogger", "'Received type header:' + headers['type']")
.route("headers['type']", r -> r
.subFlowMapping("upper",
subFlow -> subFlow.transform(String.class, p -> p.toUpperCase()))
.subFlowMapping("lower",
subFlow -> subFlow.transform(String.class, p -> p.toLowerCase())))
.get();
}
// Common
#Bean
public MessageConvertingTcpMessageMapper mapper() {
MapMessageConverter converter = new MapMessageConverter();
converter.setHeaderNames("type");
return new MessageConvertingTcpMessageMapper(converter);
}
#Bean
public MapJsonSerializer jsonMapping() {
return new MapJsonSerializer();
}
// Console
#Bean
#DependsOn("client")
public ApplicationRunner runner(TcpExchanger exchanger,
ConfigurableApplicationContext context) {
return args -> {
System.out.println("Enter some text; if it starts with a lower case character,\n"
+ "it will be uppercased by the server; otherwise it will be lowercased;\n"
+ "enter 'quit' to end");
Scanner scanner = new Scanner(System.in);
String request = scanner.nextLine();
while (!"quit".equals(request.toLowerCase())) {
if (StringUtils.hasText(request)) {
String result = exchanger.exchange(request,
Character.isLowerCase(request.charAt(0)) ? "upper" : "lower");
System.out.println(result);
}
request = scanner.nextLine();
}
scanner.close();
context.close();
};
}
}
I have a requirement where i need to make a rest call when it fails i have to retry 3 times and depending on the status code received i need perform different action, i couldn't find a proper spring integration dsl example. How to configure the error handler and retry
#Bean
public IntegrationFlow performCreate() {
return IntegrationFlows.from("createFlow")
.handle(Http.outboundGateway("http://localhost:8080/create")
.httpMethod(HttpMethod.GET)
.expectedResponseType(String.class)
.requestFactory(simpleClientHttpRequestFactory())
.errorHandler(??)
)
.log(LoggingHandler.Level.DEBUG, "response", m -> m.getPayload())
.log(LoggingHandler.Level.DEBUG, "response", m -> m.getHeaders())
.get();
}
private SimpleClientHttpRequestFactory simpleClientHttpRequestFactory() {
SimpleClientHttpRequestFactory simpleClientHttpRequestFactory = new SimpleClientHttpRequestFactory();
simpleClientHttpRequestFactory.setReadTimeout(5000);
simpleClientHttpRequestFactory.setConnectTimeout(5000);
return simpleClientHttpRequestFactory;
}
The Java DSL .handle() has a second argument - Consumer<GenericEndpointSpec<?>> and that one can be configured with the:
/**
* Configure a list of {#link Advice} objects to be applied, in nested order, to the
* endpoint's handler. The advice objects are applied only to the handler.
* #param advice the advice chain.
* #return the endpoint spec.
*/
public S advice(Advice... advice) {
One of those advises is in the Spring Integration box - RequestHandlerRetryAdvice: https://docs.spring.io/spring-integration/docs/5.0.4.RELEASE/reference/html/messaging-endpoints-chapter.html#retry-advice
https://docs.spring.io/spring-integration/docs/5.0.4.RELEASE/reference/html/java-dsl.html#java-dsl-endpoints
.handle(Http.outboundGateway("http://localhost:8080/create")
.httpMethod(HttpMethod.GET)
.expectedResponseType(String.class)
.requestFactory(simpleClientHttpRequestFactory()),
e -> e.advice(retryAdvice())
...
#Bean
public RequestHandlerRetryAdvice retryAdvice() {
RequestHandlerRetryAdvice requestHandlerRetryAdvice = new RequestHandlerRetryAdvice();
requestHandlerRetryAdvice.setRecoveryCallback(errorMessageSendingRecoverer());
return requestHandlerRetryAdvice;
}
#Bean
public ErrorMessageSendingRecoverer errorMessageSendingRecoverer() {
return new ErrorMessageSendingRecoverer(recoveryChannel())
}
#Bean
public MessageChannel recoveryChannel() {
return new DirectChannel();
}
#Bean
public IntegrationFlow handleRecovery() {
return IntegrationFlows.from("recoveryChannel")
.log(LoggingHandler.Level.ERROR, "error",
m -> m.getPayload())
.get();
}
I am using Spring Integration DSL and have a simple Gateway:
#MessagingGateway(name = "eventGateway", defaultRequestChannel = "inputChannel")
public interface EventProcessorGateway {
#Gateway(requestChannel="inputChannel")
public void processEvent(Message message)
}
My spring integration flow is defined as:
#Bean MessageChannel inputChannel() { return new DirectChannel(); }
#Bean MessageChannel errorChannel() { return new DirectChannel(); }
#Bean MessageChannel retryGatewayChannel() { return new DirectChannel(); }
#Bean MessageChannel jsonChannel() { return new DirectChannel(); }
#Bean
public IntegrationFlow postEvents() {
return IntegrationFlows.from(inputChannel())
.route("headers.contentType", m -> m.channelMapping(MediaType.APPLICATION_JSON_VALUE, "json")
)
.get();
}
#Bean
public IntegrationFlow retryGateway() {
return IntegrationFlows.from("json")
.gateway(retryGatewayChannel(), e -> e.advice(retryAdvice()))
.get();
}
#Bean
public IntegrationFlow transformJsonEvents() {
return IntegrationFlows
.from(retryGatewayChannel())
.transform(new JsonTransformer())
.handle(new JsonHandler())
.get();
}
The JsonTransformer is a simple AbstractTransformer that transforms the JSON data and passes it to the JsonHandler.
class JsonHandler extends AbstractMessageHandler {
public void handleMessageInternal(Message message) throws Exception {
// do stuff, return nothing if success else throw Exception
}
}
I call my gateway from code as such:
try {
Message<List<EventRecord>> message = MessageBuilder.createMessage(eventList, new MessageHeaders(['contentType': contentType]))
eventProcessorGateway.processEvent(message)
logSuccess(eventList)
} catch (Exception e) {
logError(eventList)
}
I want the entire call and processing to be synchronous, and any errors that occur to be caught so I can handle them appropriately. The call to the gateway works, the message gets sent to through the Transformer and to the Handler, processed and if an Exception occurs it bubbles back and is caught and logError() is called. However if the call is successful, the call to logSuccess() never occurs. It is like execution stops/hangs after the Handler processes the message and never returns. I do not need to actually get any response, I am more concerned if something fails to process. Do I need to send something back to the initial EventProcessorGateway?
Your issue is here:
return IntegrationFlows.from("json")
.gateway(retryGatewayChannel(), e -> e.advice(retryAdvice()))
.get();
where that .gateway() is request/reply because it is a part of the main flow.
It is something similar to the <gateway> within <chain>.
So, even if your main flow is one-way, using .gateway() inside that requires from your sub-flow some reply, but this one:
.handle(new JsonHandler())
.get();
doesn't do that.
Because it is one-way MessageHandler.
From other side, even if you'd make the last one as request-reply (AbstractReplyProducingMessageHandler), it won't help you because you don't know what to do with that reply after the mid-flow gateway. Just because your main flow is the one-way.
You must re-think your desing a bit more and try to get rid of that mid-flow gateway. I see that you try to make some logic with retryAdvice().
But how about to move it to the .handle(new JsonHandler()) instead of that wrong .gateway()?
I am trying to implement the following using Spring Integration with DSL and lambda:
Given a message, send it to N consumers (via publish-subscribe). Wait for limited time and return all results that have arrived form consumers (<= N) during that interval.
Here is an example configuration I have so far:
#Configuration
#EnableIntegration
#IntegrationComponentScan
#ComponentScan
public class ExampleConfiguration {
#Bean(name = PollerMetadata.DEFAULT_POLLER)
public PollerMetadata poller() {
return Pollers.fixedRate(1000).maxMessagesPerPoll(1).get();
}
#Bean
public MessageChannel publishSubscribeChannel() {
return MessageChannels.publishSubscribe(splitterExecutorService()).applySequence(true).get();
}
#Bean
public ThreadPoolTaskExecutor splitterExecutorService() {
final ThreadPoolTaskExecutor executorService = new ThreadPoolTaskExecutor();
executorService.setCorePoolSize(3);
executorService.setMaxPoolSize(10);
return executorService;
}
#Bean
public DirectChannel errorChannel() {
return new DirectChannel();
}
#Bean
public DirectChannel requestChannel() {
return new DirectChannel();
}
#Bean
public DirectChannel channel1() {
return new DirectChannel();
}
#Bean
public DirectChannel channel2() {
return new DirectChannel();
}
#Bean
public DirectChannel collectorChannel() {
return new DirectChannel();
}
#Bean
public TransformerChannel1 transformerChannel1() {
return new TransformerChannel1();
}
#Bean
public TransformerChannel2 transformerChannel2() {
return new TransformerChannel2();
}
#Bean
public IntegrationFlow errorFlow() {
return IntegrationFlows.from(errorChannel())
.handle(m -> System.err.println("[" + Thread.currentThread().getName() + "] " + m.getPayload()))
.get();
}
#Bean
public IntegrationFlow channel1Flow() {
return IntegrationFlows.from(publishSubscribeChannel())
.transform("1: "::concat)
.transform(transformerChannel1())
.channel(collectorChannel())
.get();
}
#Bean
public IntegrationFlow channel2Flow() {
return IntegrationFlows.from(publishSubscribeChannel())
.transform("2: "::concat)
.transform(transformerChannel2())
.channel(collectorChannel())
.get();
}
#Bean
public IntegrationFlow splitterFlow() {
return IntegrationFlows.from(requestChannel())
.channel(publishSubscribeChannel())
.get();
}
#Bean
public IntegrationFlow collectorFlow() {
return IntegrationFlows.from(collectorChannel())
.resequence(r -> r.releasePartialSequences(true),
null)
.aggregate(a ->
a.sendPartialResultOnExpiry(true)
.groupTimeout(500)
, null)
.get();
}
}
TransformerChannel1 and TransformerChannel2 are sample consumers and have been implemented with just a sleep to emulate delay.
The message flow is:
splitterFlow -> channel1Flow \
-> channel2Flow / -> collectorFlow
Everything seem to work as expected, but I see warnings like:
Reply message received but the receiving thread has already received a reply
which is to be expected, given that partial result was returned.
Questions:
Overall, is this a good approach?
What is the right way to gracefully service or discard those delayed messages?
How to deal with exceptions? Ideally I'd like to send them to errorChannel, but am not sure where to specify this.
Yes, the solution looks good. I guess it fits for the Scatter-Gather pattern. The implementation is provided since version 4.1.
From other side there is on more option for the aggregator since that version, too - expire-groups-upon-timeout, which is true for the aggregator by default. With this option as false you will be able to achieve your requirement to discard all those late messages. Unfortunately DSL doesn't support it yet. Hence it won't help even if you upgrade your project to use Spring Integration 4.1.
Another option for those "Reply message received but the receiving thread has already received a reply" is on the spring.integraton.messagingTemplate.throwExceptionOnLateReply = true option using spring.integration.properties file within the META-INF of one of jar.
Anyway I think that Scatter-Gather is the best solution for you use-case.
You can find here how to configure it from JavaConfig.
UPDATE
What about exceptions and error channel?
Since you get deal already with the throwExceptionOnLateReply I guess you send a message to the requestChannel via #MessagingGateway. The last one has errorChannel option. From other side the PublishSubscribeChannel has errorHandler option, for which you can use MessagePublishingErrorHandler with your errorChannel as a default one.
BTW, don't forget that Framework provides errorChannel bean and the endpoint on it for the LoggingHandler. So, think, please, if you really need to override that stuff. The default errorChannel is PublishSubscribeChannel, hence you can simply add your own subscribers to it.