Ok, I'm a noob so go easy on me.
I have created an app in WPF using c#.
Of the many functions I have made one is a textbox that shows a countdown from 1:0:0 to 0.
This has a start/reset, play/pause, +30sec, -30 sec buttons attached.
They all work perfectly. However, I need the output showing from that particular textbox to show in a secondary window I have created in either another or duplicated textbox.
Is this even possible?
Thanks
public void CountDownTimer()
{
_timer = new DispatcherTimer(new TimeSpan(0, 0, 1), DispatcherPriority.Normal, delegate
{
// _time = TimeSpan.FromMinutes(60);
ShowTimer.Text = _time.ToString("c");
if (_time == TimeSpan.Zero) _timer.Stop();
_time = _time.Add(TimeSpan.FromSeconds(-1));
}, Application.Current.Dispatcher);
}
//STARTS TIMER FROM 1HOUR ALSO RESETS
private void StartButton_Click(object sender, RoutedEventArgs e)
{
_time = TimeSpan.FromMinutes(60);
_timer.Start();
}
//PAUSES AND COMMENCES TIMER NOTE: THIS DOES NOT RESET THE TIMER
private void PauseButton_Click(object sender, RoutedEventArgs e)
{
if (_timer.IsEnabled)
{
_timer.Stop();
}
else _timer.Start();
}
I know you're aware that there's bad practice here, so I won't chew you out for that. :D
The easiest way to achieve what you want is to have the secondary window as a member of the first window, then change your DispatchTimer's callback to
_timer = new DispatcherTimer(new TimeSpan(0, 0, 1), DispatcherPriority.Normal, delegate
{
// _time = TimeSpan.FromMinutes(60);
ShowTimer.Text = _time.ToString("c");
if (_time == TimeSpan.Zero) _timer.Stop();
_time = _time.Add(TimeSpan.FromSeconds(-1));
secondaryWindow.TextBoxTimer = _time;
}, Application.Current.Dispatcher);
It depends on where and how you instantiate your secondary window, and if the first window has reference to it. You might also consider raising an event when the timer changes, and subscribing the secondary window to that event with a handler that updates the textbox. Better yet, don't use controls like TextBox as a variable, but bind them to a property in another class. That's a step towards MVVM.
Related
Within the Acumatica 19.201.0070 framework I have created a custom processing page that utilizes PXFilteredProcessing with the old style processing UI public override bool IsProcessing => false; I have defined a cancel button (below) that will clear the graph and set some values of the processing filter.
public PXCancel<NPMasterSubGeneratorFilter> Cancel;
[PXCancelButton()]
protected virtual IEnumerable cancel(PXAdapter adapter)
{
NPMasterSubGeneratorFilter row = Filter.Current;
if (row != null)
{
this.Clear();
Filter.SetValueExt<NPMasterSubGeneratorFilter.segmentID>(Filter.Current, row.SegmentID);
if (!(row.NewSegment ?? false)) Filter.SetValueExt<NPMasterSubGeneratorFilter.segmentValue>(Filter.Current, row.SegmentValue);
}
return adapter.Get();
}
This works perfectly fine except for a single use case, after processing results are shown if the user then presses the cancel button the corresponding action is never hit. ( My fellow office devs state that core Acumatica processing pages seem to operate the same. )
Setting of the processing delegate is within the filter RowSelected event.
GeneratedSubs.SetProcessDelegate(list => CreateSubaccounts(list, row));
I have implemented a few iterations of my processing method but the current is below.
protected virtual void CreateSubaccounts(List<NPGeneratedSub> subs, NPMasterSubGeneratorFilter filter)
{
if (filter.NewSegment ?? false)
{
try
{
SegmentMaint segGraph = PXGraph.CreateInstance<SegmentMaint>();
segGraph.Segment.Update(segGraph.Segment.Search<Segment.dimensionID, Segment.segmentID>(AADimension.Subaccount, filter.SegmentID.Value));
SegmentValue value = segGraph.Values.Insert(new SegmentValue() { Value = filter.SegmentValue, Descr = filter.Description });
segGraph.Actions.PressSave();
}
catch
{
throw new PXOperationCompletedSingleErrorException(NonProfitPlusMessages.SegmentValueCannotCreate);
}
}
SubAccountMaint subGraph = PXGraph.CreateInstance<SubAccountMaint>();
NPSubAccountMaintExtension subGraphExt = subGraph.GetExtension<NPSubAccountMaintExtension>();
subGraphExt.save.ConfirmSaving = false;
Sub newSub;
bool errored = false;
foreach (NPGeneratedSub sub in subs)
{
PXProcessing<NPGeneratedSub>.SetCurrentItem(sub);
try
{
newSub = subGraph.SubRecords.Insert(new Sub() { SubCD = sub.SubCD, Description = sub.Description });
subGraph.Save.Press();
subGraph.Clear();
PXProcessing<NPGeneratedSub>.SetProcessed();
}
catch (Exception e)
{
PXProcessing<NPGeneratedSub>.SetError(e);
errored = true;
}
}
if (errored)
{
throw new PXOperationCompletedWithErrorException();
}
}
What needs to be adjusted to allow the buttons action to be triggered on press after processing results have been returned?
After stepping through the javascript I discovered that it wasn't sending a request to the server when you click the cancel button on this screen after processing. The reason is because SuppressActions is getting set to true on the Cancel PXToolBarButton. I compared what I was seeing on this screen to what was happening on screens that work correctly and realized that Acumatica is supposed to set SuppressActions to true on the Schedule drop down PXToolBarButton but for some reason, on this screen, it is incorrectly setting it to true on whatever button is after the Schedule drop down button.
I looked through the code in PX.Web.UI and it looks like they set SuppressActions to true when a drop down button is disabled and PXProcessing adds a FieldSelecting event to the Schedule button which disables the button after you click process. However, I didn't notice any obvious issues as to why the code would be setting it on the wrong PXToolBarButton so someone will likely need to debug the code and see what's going on (we are unable to debug code in PX.Web.UI.dll).
I tried commenting out the other grids in the aspx file that aren't related to the PXProcessing view and this resolved the issue. So my guess would be that having multiple grids on the PXProcessing screen somehow causes a bug where it sets SuppressActions on the wrong PXToolBarButton. However, since the multiple grids are a business requirement, removing them is not a solution. Instead, I would suggest moving all buttons that are after the schedule button to be before the schedule button. To do this, just declare the PXActions before the PXFilteredProcessing view in the graph.
Please try this
Override IsDirty property
Use PXAction instead of PXCancel
Add PXUIField attribute with enable rights
action name should start from lowercase letter
delegate name should start from uppercase letter
see code below
public override bool IsDirty => false;
public override bool IsProcessing
{
get { return false;}
set { }
}
public PXAction<NPMasterSubGeneratorFilter> cancel;
[PXUIField(MapEnableRights = PXCacheRights.Select)]
[PXCancelButton]
protected virtual IEnumerable Cancel(PXAdapter adapter)
{
NPMasterSubGeneratorFilter row = Filter.Current;
if (row != null)
{
this.Clear();
Filter.SetValueExt<NPMasterSubGeneratorFilter.segmentID>(Filter.Current, row.SegmentID);
if (!(row.NewSegment ?? false)) Filter.SetValueExt<NPMasterSubGeneratorFilter.segmentValue>(Filter.Current, row.SegmentValue);
}
return adapter.Get();
}
I spend a lot of time working with Windows Forms controls but from a background worker thread - I suppose this is good practice really since you don't want your form to be locking up when people click buttons. To be honest, with just about everything GUI related action I normally do in a background worker thread, so the interface is nice an responsive to the user (Wish more people would do that!).
So my question is... every time I have to interact with controls I have to "Invoke" them, with something like:
if (control.InvokeRequired)
{
//
}
Standard practice right? However, this leads me to some terribly messy code, because just about every control type I have, I need a MethodInvoker delegate or something. It's adding thousands of lines of code to my protects, and its terribly time consuming.
I currently have hundreds of "property setting" methods like:
private void Safe_SetLableText(Label control, string text)
{
if (control.InvokeRequired)
{
control.Invoke((MethodInvoker)delegate
{
control.Text = text;
});
}
else
{
control.Text = text;
}
}
So, is there some other technique, or way to do this, or some way to being able to always alter a property of a control, no matter what the control is and no matter what thread im in?
something like: (pseudocode)
BackgroundWorker.RunWorkerAsync();
private void thing_to_do()
{
// We are in a background thread now
DoSomeDatabaseWorkThatTakesALongTime();
InvokeAnyControls();
// Do some stuff...
controlX.Text = "123"
controlY.Height = 300;
controlZ.text = ControlA.text;
RestoreAnyControls();
}
You could wrap your InvokeRequired code with a delegate, like so:
public static void Invoke2<TControl>(this TControl c, Action<TControl> code) where TControl : Control {
if( c.InvokeRequired ) c.Invoke( delegate() { code(c); } );
else code(c);
}
Then use it like so:
private void Safe_SetLableText(Label control, string text) {
control.Invoke2( c => c.Text = text );
}
Of course you might want better names than Invoke2, but I hope the idea sits will with you. Note that the lambda-expression syntax is a C# 3.0 feature, but the Action<T> delegate is part of .NET 2.0, so this will compile against the .NET Framework 2.0 so long as you're VS2008 or later.
I'm posting an answer to my own question because I think it will add value to the community.
1) I wanted to "simplify" my code, and one if the most important finds was that that the:
control.InvokeRequired
really isnt needed... its pretty much a given. Importantly, you CAN rely on the fact that the control will need to be invoked if you are in a background (or non-UI) thread.
2) The invocation travels "UP" the control tree, so if you have:
Form > Control > Control inside Control > etc > etc
You only need to invoke "Form" (top most), and then you can alter the properties of the child elements.
So here is my clean and simple solution to working with background workers (or non-UI threads). I have just tested this now and it works great.
public partial class Form1: Form
{
public Form1()
{
BackgroundWorker bgw = new BackgroundWorker();
bgw.DoWork += new DoWorkEventHandler(this.bgDoWork);
bgw.RunWorkerCompleted += new RunWorkerCompletedEventHandler(this.bgComplete);
bgw.RunWorkerAsync();
}
private void bgComplete(object sender, EventArgs e)
{
// You are not in the UI thread now, so you can Invoke without error
this.Invoke((MethodInvoker)delegate
{
// Now you can change any property an any control within this form.
// Remember "this" refers to Form1.
this.label1.Text = "test123";
this.label2.Text = "test456";
this.label3.Text = this.label4.Text;
// You can set progress bars too, not just label text
}
}
private void bgDoWork(object sender, DoWorkEventArgs e)
{
// Do something that takes a long time
}
}
As you are already using the Background worker why don't you 'misuse' OnProgressChanged?
private void thing_to_do()
{
// We are in a background thread now
DoSomeDatabaseWorkThatTakesALongTime();
BackgroundWorker.ReportProgress(1, "state");
DoSomeMoreDatabaseWorkThatTakesALongTime();
BackgroundWorker.ReportProgress(2, YourObjectHere);
}
void OnProgressChanged(ProgressChangedEventArgs progressArgs)
{
switch(progressArgs.ProgressPercentage)
{
case 1:
// Do some stuff...
controlX.Text = "123"
controlY.Height = 300;
controlZ.text = ControlA.text;
break;
case 2:
// other stuff
YourObject obj = (YourObject) progressArgs.UserState;
// wahtever...
break;
default:
break;
}
}
I have 2 Telerik's rad grids. First one is master and second one is detail. I can delete rows from both grids independently by pressing "Delete" button on toolbar above each grid. I also have "Refresh" buttons in toolbar of both grids.
The problem is with detail grid. When I delete item(s) the grid doesn't refresh. Calling Rebind method doesn't help. The only thing that helps is to press "Refresh" button in toolbar of master grid and select the row in master grid by mouse that was previously selected. After that I can see refreshed detail grid.
So, I don't need to press "Refresh" button in toolbar of master grid and select the row in master grid by mouse. I can refresh the master grid programmatically and only want to reselect the item that was originally selected also programmatically. I've tried this:
item.Selected = true;
But, it only visually selects the item in master grid and doesn't refresh the detail grid.
So, how to select the item in master grid programmatically in order to get the same effect as selecting it by mouse?
Thank you in advance.
I've just realised that your probably using different DataSource for both grids, but pointing to the same database, right? My example below uses the same datasource for both grids. However I made on a detail view versus a normal view by making some columns not visible. Maybe this strategy could fix your issue?
My first thought was to try implement the SelectionChanged event, or if not that, the SelectionChanging event. Put a refresh in there you see. But I didn't end up doing it that way.
I wrote a small program as below. It saves the edits to disk with any row change as long as its not a remove (I had trouble saving remove edits when the button was clicked it gave a null pointer exception on the remove command). It also saves changes just before closing the program (so that any delete rows are also saved then). I did find that the deleteOne and deleteTwo buttons (that delete from the first or second grid, respectively) do in fact cause the deletion to occur in both grids. So a possibility is you could use the radGridView1.Rows.Remove(row) or RemoveAt(i) command if that works in your situation?
Another possibility is that if refresh isn't working you could set the DataSource to null and then set it to the data source again, after deleting the row. This is a bit drastic but if it's the only thing that works? I'm talking about the data source for both grids.
My code is below:
using System;
using System.Collections.Generic;
using System.ComponentModel;
using System.Data;
using System.Drawing;
using System.Text;
using System.Windows.Forms;
using Telerik.WinControls;
using Telerik.WinControls.Data;
using Telerik.WinControls.UI;
namespace RadControlsWinFormsApp1
{
public partial class RadForm1 : Telerik.WinControls.UI.RadForm
{
public RadForm1()
{
InitializeComponent();
}
private void RadForm1_Load(object sender, EventArgs e)
{
// TODO: This line of code loads data into the 'testdbDataSet.Customers' table. You can move, or remove it, as needed.
this.customersTableAdapter.Fill(this.testdbDataSet.Customers);
radGridView1.Columns["Address"].IsVisible = false;
}
private void radGridView1_RowsChanged(object sender, Telerik.WinControls.UI.GridViewCollectionChangedEventArgs e)
{
// if removing don't update, because if my delete button is pressed this
// will otherwise cause all sorts of problems and freezes the grid
if (e.Action != NotifyCollectionChangedAction.Remove)
{
try
{
customersTableAdapter.Update(testdbDataSet);
}
catch (DBConcurrencyException ex)
{
// unable to save right now, don't worry about it
}
}
radGridView2.Refresh();
}
private void butDeleteOne_Click(object sender, EventArgs e)
{
bool haveRemoved = false;
for (int i = 0; i < radGridView1.Rows.Count && !haveRemoved; ++i)
{
GridViewRowInfo row = radGridView1.Rows[i];
if (row.IsSelected)
{
haveRemoved = true;
radGridView1.Rows.RemoveAt(i);
}
}
}
private void butDeleteTwo_Click(object sender, EventArgs e)
{
bool haveRemoved = false;
for (int i = 0; i < radGridView2.Rows.Count && !haveRemoved; ++i)
{
GridViewRowInfo row = radGridView2.Rows[i];
if (row.IsSelected)
{
haveRemoved = true;
radGridView2.Rows.RemoveAt(i);
}
}
}
private void radGridView2_RowsChanged(object sender, GridViewCollectionChangedEventArgs e)
{
// if removing don't update, because if my delete button is pressed this
// will otherwise cause all sorts of problems and freezes the grid
if (e.Action != NotifyCollectionChangedAction.Remove)
{
try
{
customersTableAdapter.Update(testdbDataSet);
}
catch (DBConcurrencyException ex)
{
// unable to save right now, don't worry about it
}
}
radGridView1.Refresh();
}
private void RadForm1_FormClosing(object sender, FormClosingEventArgs e)
{
// ensure all data is saved back into database on close
customersTableAdapter.Update(testdbDataSet);
}
//private void radGridView1_CellEndEdit(object sender, Telerik.WinControls.UI.GridViewCellEventArgs e)
//{
//}
}
}
I have 20 TextBoxes in a form. And I have a Common KeyPress Event for all of that Textboxes.
So I try to declare the keypress event like the following manner... is it possible?
for (int Cnl = 1; Cnl < 21; Cnl++)
{
((RichTextBox)Cnl).KeyPress += new KeyPressEventHandler(this.Comn_KeyPress);
}
Correct idea; but casting an int to a RichTextBox will never work. Try this:
foreach (var control in this.Controls)
{
var text = control as RichTextBox;
if (text != null)
text.KeyPress += new KeyPressEventHandler(this.Comn_KeyPress);
}
For a WPF application you can register global event handlers using the methods on the EventManager static class:
// Register the following class handlers for the TextBox XxFocus events.
EventManager.RegisterClassHandler(typeof(TextBox), TextBox.GotKeyboardFocusEvent,
new RoutedEventHandler(HandleTextBoxFocus));
Then add whatever logic you need on the event handler, for ex.:
private void HandleTextBoxFocus(Object sender, RoutedEventArgs e)
{
(sender as TextBox).SelectAll();
}
I developed an outlook add in (custom task pane), with web browser in the user control.
All the things working well beside the backspace or the delete button when I am writing something in text box in the web browser, I can't use those keys, am I missing something?
I am a few years late to the party but I managed to fix this. The easiest way to fix this is to ensure proper focus is given to the input fields, so you will need to be able to run your own javascript on whatever page is being loaded.
The javascript I run on the page is as follows (using jQuery):
$(document).on("click", function (e) {
// first let the add-in give focus to our CustomTaskPane
window.external.focus();
// then in our web browser give focus to whatever element was clicked on
$(e.target).focus();
});
the window.external variable contains code run from the plugin (c# or VB I assume) which is exposed so we can interact from web page back to the add-in.
In the add-in code for the custom taskpane set the context of window.external:
// event when webBrowser is finished loading document
private void webBrowser1_DocumentCompleted(object sender, WebBrowserDocumentCompletedEventArgs e)
{
// sets context of window.external to functions defined on this context
webBrowser1.ObjectForScripting = this;
}
And a public method for focusing:
// can be called by the web browser as window.external.focus()
public void focus()
{
this.Focus();
}
This worked for me, and I hope it helps others. Although do note that this probably doesn't work if the user keyboard navigates using tab, but you can either extend this code for that use case, or safely assume that the average outlook user will have his hand glued to the mouse.
Ok I solved the problem ,
The problem is that the custom task pane in not always gets fucos from the outlook.
So, I raised an event every time that there is "onclick" for all the pane, and then forced the pane to be in focus.
spent a lot of time trying to get this working in Outlook v16.0.13801.20288 the above did not work for me. I ended up with this working code.
Create a user control and add your webbrowser control to it then customize the .cs as below
private void CreateTaskPane() {
MyWinFormUserControl webBrowser = new MyWinFormUserControl();
webBrowser.webBrowser3.Url = new Uri("https://google.com");
webBrowser.webBrowser3.Width = 500;
webBrowser.webBrowser3.Dock = DockStyle.Fill;
webBrowser.webBrowser3.Visible = true;
webBrowser.Width = 500;
webBrowser.Dock = DockStyle.Fill;
webBrowser.Visible = true;
this.CRMTaskPaneControl = CustomTaskPanes.Add(webBrowser, "My App");
//Components.WebViewContainerWPFUserControl webView = (Components.WebViewContainerWPFUserControl)_eh.Child;
//webView.webview.Source = new Uri("https://localhost:3000");
this.CRMTaskPaneControl.Width = 500;
System.Windows.Forms.Application.DoEvents();
this.CRMTaskPaneControl.Control.Focus();
this.CRMTaskPane.Visible = true;
}
public partial class MyWinFormUserControl : UserControl
{
public WebBrowser webBrowser3;
public System.Windows.Forms.WebBrowser webBrowser1;
public MyWinFormUserControl()
{
InitializeComponent();
}
private void InitializeComponent()
{
this.webBrowser3 = new System.Windows.Forms.WebBrowser();
this.SuspendLayout();
//
// webBrowser3
//
this.webBrowser3.Dock = System.Windows.Forms.DockStyle.Fill;
this.webBrowser3.Location = new System.Drawing.Point(0, 0);
this.webBrowser3.MinimumSize = new System.Drawing.Size(20, 20);
this.webBrowser3.Name = "webBrowser3";
this.webBrowser3.Size = new System.Drawing.Size(500, 749);
this.webBrowser3.TabIndex = 0;
this.webBrowser3.DocumentCompleted += new System.Windows.Forms.WebBrowserDocumentCompletedEventHandler(this.webBrowser3_DocumentCompleted);
//
// MyWinFormUserControl
//
this.Controls.Add(this.webBrowser3);
this.Name = "MyWinFormUserControl";
this.Size = new System.Drawing.Size(500, 749);
this.Load += new System.EventHandler(this.MyWinFormUserControl_Load);
this.ResumeLayout(false);
}
void webBrowser3_DocumentCompleted(object sender, System.Windows.Forms.WebBrowserDocumentCompletedEventArgs e)
{
HtmlDocument doc;
doc = webBrowser3.Document;
doc.Click += doc_Click;
}
void doc_Click(object sender, HtmlElementEventArgs e)
{
this.Focus(); // force user control to have the focus
HtmlElement elem = webBrowser3.Document.GetElementFromPoint(e.ClientMousePosition);
elem.Focus(); // then let the clicked control to have focus
}
private void MyWinFormUserControl_Load(object sender, EventArgs e)
{
//Control loaded
}
Turns out this is an easy issue to fix.
Just write
class MyBrowser : WebBrowser {}
Then use MyBrowser instead of the .NET one.