I'm trying to download Oracle Java JDK 8 directly from the official website.
To understand, I mean Java Development Kit (JDK), not the Java Runtime Environment (JRE), which can be downloaded automatically here.
NOTE: I'm not asking about outdated java scripts that no longer working and/or openjdk or something like that. Please, if you want to quote from other posts from Stack Overflow or other site - please, provide valid information.
I'm working on a software updater that works on windows, but also on Linux (Ubuntu, MacOS X, Fedora, Bedrock, Arch etc.). As building the cli script, I saw that on Linux is easier to keep the software up-to-date using the repos whereas in windows you need to login-and-download.
I searched on internet about software updater for software/scripts to update java, like:
chocolatey ;
Powershell Java-Update ;
GitHub Java-Update
and found incomplete list, only for jre or outdated software versions.
But, after searching deeper, I found this link that automatically downloads Oracle JDK 8 without login in a chat fragment from a website.
#Hello Just pass the bundle id through their webapp api https://javadl.oracle.com/webapps/download/AutoDL?BundleId=242044_3d5a2bb8f8d4428bbe94aed7ec7ae784
How that guy did that? And how to keep the oracle jdk 8 to the latest version using git ; python ; windows-powershell ; powershell-core etc.?
And can someone explain me that direct download link?
I'm using IBM Notes 9 Social Edition (Mac) however it does not contain this jar on the client. Nor is it packaged with java. Is the Notes API not supported on a Mac environment?
I don't know why it's not found on your machine - perhaps it's only installed with the Domino Designer client nowadays. But you can get NCSO.jar from your Domino server or from a Domino Designer installation on a Windows machine. There's no reason why it wouldn't work on a Mac.
IBM Notes 9 Social Edition (Mac) does not ship with NCSO.jar, but you can retrieve it from other sources (as #Richard Schwartz metions). It does work in the Mac environment but you need to be sure to use the JDK 1.6 that it gets hooked up to when IBM Notes is installed. e.g.:
/System/Library/Java/JavaVirtualMachines/1.6.0.jdk
Also, you need to ensure you use the -d32 flag to run it in 32-bit mode, as it defaults to 64-bit mode. You cannot use any new JDK version as the 32-bit mode is no longer supported.
Furthermore, you may need to update the DYLD_LIBRARY_PATH environment variable to point to your notes dydll library files in the Notes installation eg.:
DYLD_LIBRARY_PATH="/Applications/IBM Notes.app/Contents/MacOS"
We are migrating our Java EE / JBoss web application currently running on 32-bit linux box & 32-bit JVM to 64-bit linux box & 64-bit JVM.
We analyzed & changed the JVM heap, permgen, stack etc., sizes appropriately. Is that enough or should we consider any other parameters/ make any other changes as a part of the 64bit migration?
We are currently using "jboss-eap-4.3" / "jboss-4.0.5.GA". Do we need to install / upgrade the JBoss server?
Also, can you point me if any other mandatory change that I am missing on 32-bit to 64-bit migration?
Should I check if all the jar files that we use in our application are compatible to 64-bit jvm?
Define tests which cover your use cases, and run these against both installations
Define a load test scenario, and run it against both installations as well
Management should approve both suites/procedures.
There should be no need to check .jars for 64-bit compatibility, unless you use JNI. Anyway problems should be revealed by the tests mentioned before.
Use the newest stable JBoss version. Otherwise you could run into problems while trying to get support for an older version.
Keep your old installation for a certain time to be able to switch back.
I'm trying to decide whether I could switch to JavaFX for the user interface of my Java application. Most of my users would be using the Oracle JRE, which has JavaFX integrated these days. However, some are using OpenJDK (on linux). This (old) question suggests that OpenJDK deals very badly with JavaFX. According to this question, the alternative OpenJFX will only be fully integrated into OpenJDK in version 9. So my question is twofold:
Is the JavaFX support in OpenJDK still so bad?
If so, are there any Linux distributions that already offer an OpenJFX package so users wouldn't have to build it themselves?
JavaFX is part of OpenJDK
The JavaFX project itself is open source and is part of the OpenJDK project.
However, the OpenJDK project includes many projects, including incubating projects and other projects, such as OpenJFX, whose source and implementation are not shipped as part of some JDK/JRE distributions (e.g. Oracle JDK 11+ implementations and many open-source JDK Linux package installations do not include JavaFX runtimes).
Modern JavaFX distributions are modules
JavaFX is not part of most JDK 11+ downloads, it is usually downloaded by developers as modules or a separate SDK.
Specifically for JavaFX 11+, as detailed on the https://openjfx.io site:
JavaFX runtime is available as a platform-specific SDK, or as a number of jmods, or as a set of artifacts in Maven Central.
This means that JavaFX can be used from any modern JDK running on a supported platform, by including the appropriate JavaFX modules (available from openjfx or Maven Central) on the runtime module path.
All JavaFX modules available from openjfx are open source implementations that contain no closed source code.
For distribution of JavaFX-based applications to end-users, it is advised to package a run-time image distribution based on the JDK and JavaFX modules + required dependent library code and application code. A full discussion of this packaging is out of scope for this answer, but one can create a distribution based purely on open-source JDK+JavaFX+library+application code if desired. See the openjfx.io documentation on run-time images for some more (though not comprehensive) information on this.
Update Sep 2021
Also, see the related question:
JavaFx in oracle JDK 8 is same as openjfx 8 versions or not? what is the relationship between javafx in oracle jdk 8 and openjfx8?
Which covers information regarding Java 8 and also some later versions.
Update Dec 2019
For current information on how to use Open Source JavaFX, visit https://openjfx.io. This includes instructions on using JavaFX as a modular library accessed from an existing JDK (such as an Open JDK installation).
The open source code repository for JavaFX is at https://github.com/openjdk/jfx.
At the source location linked, you can find license files for open JavaFX (currently this license matches the license for OpenJDK: GPL+classpath exception).
The wiki for the project is located at: https://wiki.openjdk.java.net/display/OpenJFX/Main
If you want a quick start to using open JavaFX, the Bellsoft's Liberica JDK distributions provide pre-built OpenJDK binaries that include OpenJFX for a variety of platforms.
For distribution as self-contained applications, Java 14 is scheduled to implement JEP 343: Packaging Tool, which "Supports native packaging formats to give end users a natural installation experience. These formats include msi and exe on Windows, pkg and dmg on macOS, and deb and rpm on Linux.", for deployment of OpenJFX based applications with native installers and no additional platform dependencies (such as a pre-installed JDK).
Older information that may become outdated over time
Building JavaFX from the OpenJDK repository
You can build an open version of OpenJDK (including JavaFX) completely from source which has no dependencies on the Oracle JDK or closed source code.
Update: Using a JavaFX distribution pre-built from OpenJDK sources
As noted in comments to this question and in another answer, the Debian Linux distributions offer a JavaFX binary distibution based upon OpenJDK:
https://packages.qa.debian.org/o/openjfx.html
Install via:
sudo apt-get install openjfx
(currently this only works for Java 8 as far as I know).
Differences between Open JDK and Oracle JDK with respect to JavaFX
The following information was provided for Java 8. As of Java 9, VP6 encoding is deprecated for JavaFX and the Oracle WebStart/Browser embedded application deployment technology is also deprecated. So future versions of JavaFX, even if they are distributed by Oracle, will likely not include any technology which is not open source.
Oracle JDK includes some software that is not usable from the OpenJDK. The components that relate to JavaFX:
The ON2 VP6 video codec, which is owned by Google and Google has not open sourced.
The Oracle WebStart/Browser Embedded application deployment technology.
This means that an open version of JavaFX cannot play VP6 FLV files. This is not a big loss as it is difficult to find VP6 encoders or media encoded in VP6.
Other more common video formats, such as H.264 will playback fine with an open version of JavaFX (as long as you have the appropriate codecs pre-installed on the target machine).
The lack of WebStart/Browser Embedded deployment technology is really something to do with OpenJDK itself rather than JavaFX specifically. This technology can be used to deploy non-JavaFX applications.
It would be great if the Open Source community developed a deployment technology for Java (and other software) which completely replaced WebStart and Browser Embedded deployment methods, allowing a nice light-weight, low impact user experience for application distribution. I believe there have been some projects started to serve such a goal, but they have not yet reached a high maturity and adoption level.
Personally, I feel that WebStart/Browser Embedded deployments are legacy technology and there are currently better ways to deploy many JavaFX applications (such as self-contained applications).
Update Dec, 2019:
An open source version of WebStart for JDK 11+ has been developed and is available at https://openwebstart.com.
Who needs to create Linux OpenJDK Distributions which include JavaFX
It is up to the people which create packages for Linux distributions based upon OpenJDK (e.g. Redhat, Ubuntu etc) to create RPMs for the JDK and JRE that include JavaFX. Those software distributors, then need to place the generated packages in their standard distribution code repositories (e.g. fedora/red hat network yum repositories). Currently this is not being done, but I would be quite surprised if Java 8 Linux packages did not include JavaFX when Java 8 is released in March 2014.
Update, Dec 2019:
Now that JavaFX has been separated from most binary JDK and JRE distributions (including Oracle's distribution) and is, instead, available as either a stand-alone SDK, set of jmods or as a library dependencies available from the central Maven repository (as outlined as https://openjfx.io), there is less of a need for standard Linux OpenJDK distributions to include JavaFX.
If you want a pre-built JDK which includes JavaFX, consider the Liberica JDK distributions, which are provided for a variety of platforms.
Advice on Deployment for Substantial Applications
I advise using Java's self-contained application deployment mode.
A description of this deployment mode is:
Application is installed on the local drive and runs as a standalone
program using a private copy of Java and JavaFX runtimes. The
application can be launched in the same way as other native
applications for that operating system, for example using a desktop
shortcut or menu entry.
You can build a self-contained application either from the Oracle JDK distribution or from an OpenJDK build which includes JavaFX. It currently easier to do so with an Oracle JDK.
As a version of Java is bundled with your application, you don't have to care about what version of Java may have been pre-installed on the machine, what capabilities it has and whether or not it is compatible with your program. Instead, you can test your application against an exact Java runtime version, and distribute that with your application. The user experience for deploying your application will be the same as installing a native application on their machine (e.g. a windows .exe or .msi installed, an OS X .dmg, a linux .rpm or .deb).
Note: The self-contained application feature was only available for Java 8 and 9, and not for Java 10-13. Java 14, via JEP 343: Packaging Tool, is scheduled to again provide support for this feature from OpenJDK distributions.
Update, April 2018: Information on Oracle's current policy towards future developments
The Future of JavaFX and Other Java Client Roadmap Updates by Donald Smith, Sr. Director of Product Management, Oracle.
Java Client Roadmap Update - March 2018 an Oracle White Paper.
For me this worked.
$ sudo apt-get install openjfx
As a quick solution you can copy the JavaFX runtime JAR file and those referenced from Oracle JRE(JDK) or any self-contained application that uses JavaFX(e.g. JavaFX Scene Builder 2.0):
cp <JRE_WITH_JAVAFX_HOME>/lib/ext/jfxrt.jar <JRE_HOME>/lib/ext/
cp <JRE_WITH_JAVAFX_HOME>/lib/javafx.properties <JRE_HOME>/lib/
cp <JRE_WITH_JAVAFX_HOME>/lib/amd64/libprism_* <JRE_HOME>/lib/amd64/
cp <JRE_WITH_JAVAFX_HOME>/lib/amd64/libglass.so <JRE_HOME>/lib/amd64/
cp <JRE_WITH_JAVAFX_HOME>/lib/amd64/libjavafx_* <JRE_HOME>/lib/amd64/
just make sure you have the gtk 2.18 or higher
Also answering this question:
Where can I get pre-built JavaFX libraries for OpenJDK (Windows)
On Linux its not really a problem, but on Windows its not that easy, especially if you want to distribute the JRE.
You can actually use OpenJFX with OpenJDK 8 on windows, you just have to assemble it yourself:
Download the OpenJDK from here: https://github.com/AdoptOpenJDK/openjdk8-releases/releases/tag/jdk8u172-b11
Download OpenJFX from here: https://github.com/SkyLandTW/OpenJFX-binary-windows/releases/tag/v8u172-b11
copy all the files from the OpenFX zip on top of the JDK, voila, you have an OpenJDK with JavaFX.
Update:
Fortunately from Azul there is now a OpenJDK+OpenJFX build which can be downloaded at their community page: https://www.azul.com/downloads/zulu-community/?&version=java-8-lts&os=windows&package=jdk-fx
Try obuildfactory.
There is need to modify these scripts (contains error and don't exactly do the "thing" required), i will upload mine scripts forked from obuildfactory in next few days. and so i will also update my answer accordingly.
Until then enjoy, sir :)
I needed to run a .jar in Windows which required Java FX. I also didn't need the JDK part.
Note: I didn't bother changing the PATH/JAVA_HOME variables because it wasn't needed in my case, for a more complete walkthrough see: How to install OpenJDK 11 on Windows?
Download OpenJDK and Java FX (jmods) (version 17.0.2 for this example)
https://jdk.java.net/17/
https://gluonhq.com/products/javafx/
Unzip the downloaded files. Copy/move the .jmod files from the Java FX directory to the OpenJDK dir (jmods subdirectory).
Create a JRE with jlink, use this web app to get the exact command line options:
https://justinmahar.github.io/easyjre/
PowerShell snippet:
$Version = '17.0.2'
$DownDir = 'path\to\dir\with\.zip'
$JdkDir = "jdk-${Version}"
$JavaFxDir = "javafx-jmods-${Version}"
$NewDir = "jre-${Version}+javafx"
$ProgramFilesDir = "$env:ProgramFiles\OpenJDK\${NewDir}"
Set-Location -Path $DownDir
# Unzip archives
Expand-Archive -Path "openjfx-${Version}_windows-x64_bin-jmods.zip" -Destination .
Expand-Archive -Path "openjdk-${Version}_windows-x64_bin.zip" -Destination .
# Create a custom runtime image using jlink, excluding all modules that start with 'jdk.'
Copy-Item -Path "${JavaFxDir}\*.jmod" -Destination "${JdkDir}\jmods"
$Mods = Get-Item -Path "$JdkDir\jmods\*.jmod" | ? { !($_.Name -like 'jdk.*') }
$Mods = $Mods.Name -replace '.jmod$' -join ','
& "${JdkDir}\bin\jlink.exe" --output $NewDir --compress=2 --no-header-files --no-man-pages --module-path "${JdkDir}\jmods" --add-modules $Mods
# (Optional) Delete unzipped directories
Remove-Item -Path $JdkDir,$JavaFxDir -Recurse
# Test if the .jar works
$jar = Get-Item "\path\to\.jar"
& "${NewDir}\bin\javaw.exe" -jar $jar
# (Optional) Copy the new directory to Program Files (requires admin privileges), zip it to distribute to other computers and delete it
Copy-Item -Path $NewDir -Destination $ProgramFilesDir -Recurse
Compress-Archive -Path $NewDir -DestinationPath "openjdk-${Version}_jre+javafx_windows-x64_bin.zip"
Remove-Item -Path $NewDir -Recurse
# (Optional) Create shortcut in Desktop
$Lnk = "$env:USERPROFILE\Desktop\Shortcut.lnk"
$WshShell = New-Object -ComObject WScript.Shell
$Shortcut = $WshShell.CreateShortcut($Lnk)
$Shortcut.TargetPath = "${ProgramFilesDir}\bin\javaw.exe"
$Shortcut.WorkingDirectory = $jar.DirectoryName
$Shortcut.Arguments = '-jar "' + $jar.FullName + '"'
$Shortcut.Save()
According to Oracle integration of OpenJDK & javaFX will be on Q1-2014 ( see roadmap : http://www.oracle.com/technetwork/java/javafx/overview/roadmap-1446331.html ). So, for the 1st question the answer is that you have to wait until then. For the 2nd question there is no other way. So, for now go with java swing or start javaFX and wait
I used Amazon Coretto JDK. This had all FX Components I needed.
I tried to install MonoDevelop on Suse 11.0 Enterprise, using the 1-click install on the MonoDevelop download page, but quickly wound up in a tangle of missing dependencies. I then tried using the Suse software repositories to get MonoDevelop, and waded through several of the dependencies for awhile trying to get the necessary packages to fulfill the dependencies, but some of the packages in the Suse repositories actually appear to be missing the needed RPM files. Are these repositories no longer being actively maintained?
I am aware that there is a CD on the Mono site (called the Mono LiveCD) that appears to contain a complete installation of the development environment, as well as a DVD for OpenSuse 11.2 (on the OpenSuse site) that might actually have all of the Mono software already installed. But the target environment for the utility I am writing is Suse 11.0 Enterprise Server. Does that matter?
What is the shortest distance between two points here?
that might actually have all of the Mono software already installed.
It has all of the Mono software installed ( of course it depends on what do you mean 'all') Last time when i tried it, the installation included Mono itself, monodevelop, MoMa and some software, written in Mono ( gome-do, for example ). I did not perform any additional steps for migrating my solution from a windows machine. the one thing worth to mention, monodevelop crashed several times, but i think it was memory-related ( an image had access only to 512 mb of RAM ).
But the target environment for the
utility I am writing is Suse 11.0
Enterprise Server. Does that matter?
In theory, it does not. You will have to check Mono versions of course, but i don't think you will face any problems during migration process. As far as i know, Suse 11.0 comes with Mono 2.0 pre-installed. With a latest life-cd you are going to develop using mono 2.6. There were some major changes ( partial LINQ to SQL suport ) you will have to compare changelog's of course.
If you're trying to install Mono on Suse Linux Enterprise Server, you need to download the Mono Extension Pack (available here). In SLES 11 it was separated out into a separate product in order to decouple the support life cycle from that of the general distribution. This allows them to release more often.
The add-on is available for x86, x86_64, and IBM System Z.