I am building a token based authentication (Node.js using passport/JWT with an angular client).
After the user enter his credentials he gets an access token, which he sends in every request inside the header (header: bearer TOKEN).
I don't want to prompt a login request everytime his access token expires (about everyday I guess),
I've heard about the Refresh Tokens. The refresh token never expires (or rarely expires) and able to renew tokens indefinitely.When the access token is about to expire, the client can send a renew request to get a new access token by sending his refresh token.
I don't understand few things, I might be missing something:
How a long-living/never expiring refresh tokens don't ruin the security of having short-living
access tokens.
Cookies can be stole and be used until they expire. Tokens are short living so they more secured,
but if I provide a long-living refresh token I lose the advantage of using tokens.
NOTE: I am aware that the refresh tokens are sent at the initial login, so cann't be spoofed in every request, but if they are spoofed at the initial request they are vulnerable.
The refresh token is presented on a different path than the access token: the access token is only ever presented to the Resource Server, the refresh token is only ever presented to the Authorization Server. The access token can be self-contained so that it does not need costly calls to the Authorization Server to check its validity, but to mitigate loss and to increase accuracy (it cannot be revoked in case something goes wrong) it is short-lived. The refresh token is long lived and gets validated on each call to the Authorization Server and as such it can be revoked. The combination of the two makes the system secure.
I use the following approach:
Tables/indexes:
User table (just has the user ids and all the user related meta-data)
JWT table (three fields : user_id, access_token, refresh_token)
Authentication Flow
1.When a previously unauthenticated user signs in, issue a JWT which contains an access token, and a refresh token. Update the refresh token in the JWT table, together with the user_id, and the access token.
2.Make sure that the JWT has an expiration time that is something small/comfortable for your users. Usually less than an hour.
4.When a client makes a request with a JWT
a. Check expiry of the access token. If the token has not expired -> continue without hitting any db tables.
b. If the access token has expired, lookup the user_id in the JWT table, and check if the refresh token and access tokens match, whatever the client has provided,
If yes, issue a new JWT with the response and update the new refresh token,access token into the JWT table.
if no, return 401. The client is forced to ask the user to then sign in.
END.
To summarize,
1.DB calls are required only to check if the refresh token is valid.
2.This system allows for a user to sign in from any number of devices, with any number of JWT's
3.All JWT's related to a user can be invalidated, by wiping the refresh tokens related to that user from the JWT table, this can be done, for eg: when a user changes his/her password. This, in effect, narrows down the window of compromise to the expiration time of the access token/JWT.
I believe this is the intention behind JWT's. The percentage of DB calls/user depends on your expiration time, the duration a user is usually on your website, etc.
Related
Main purpose is security: Shortened access token is important, because if someone stoles an expired token, then the attacker cannot use it, because it is expired.
We can obtain new access token with refresh token without the client needs to login again. Refresh tokens live longer.
I still don't get why refresh tokens was invented, because it can be stolen the same way as access token, right? If someone stoles refresh token, then the attacker gets access token as well.
Refresh tokens are being sent on the network way less than access tokens, so if your network is being sniffed, they will find the refresh token every 30mins (for example) in one request, so the window for you to be exposed is very small (you need to be sniffing in the right moment and for a long time)
Refresh tokens can be revoked, so if a user's token is stolen, the user can revoke its refresh token, but with a stateless access token with a long expiration time, it's not possible to close a session
If you want to store your access tokens, so they are revokable and get rid of refresh tokens, then you are not using a stateless JWT token, so you have to hit your database for each request you receive to check if the token is still valid or not.
I've been doing a lot of reading on this subject and I can see that there are many different opinions and approaches to authenticating using JWT.
My understanding is as follows:
In its simplest form, a JWT authentication mechanism should:
Verify username and password.
Create a signed JWT access token containing information (depending on the app's needs) on the user.
Send that token in the response.
The client then stores the token (which from my understanding there is some debate whether a secure cookie or localStorage is more secure), and sends it with each request's headers.
The server can then authorize the user using middleware verifying the JWT. No state, all information in contained within the JWT.
Assuming the JWT has no expiration (or perhaps a very long expiration date, maybe a couple of months), it sounds good because I can provide the user a persistent logged in state for a long time. The concern is, to my understanding, if the JWT was to be stolen, it is essentially an unlimited access card and a huge security breach.
So that's where the refresh token enters, the server issues both refresh and access tokens (refresh token with a long/unlimited expiration and the access token short).
The server database holds some kind of table of valid refresh tokens (so that if one is stolen it can be invalidated easily) and when issuing a new access token, validates the refresh token.
This also adds the need to add some sort of countdown mechanism on the front end where a refresh request is to be sent to the server prior to the access token expiration date so that the user won't be logged out.
And my question:
Why? If we go through all the trouble of creating a db table for refresh tokens, why not just make a table of valid access tokens and invalidate them if needed? How is that less secure than using refresh tokens?
Thank you
Access tokens aren't primarily used to provide extra security, but to provide efficiency and decoupling.
An access token can have a very short lifetime - maybe even less than a minute - but be used to authenticate multiple requests to different services within that time. Those services don't need to have any access to the authentication database, because they can trust the access token until its expiry date; that makes them faster and simpler.
For instance, if you're using a dynamic page with lots of AJAX requests, that might run in very quick succession. Those AJAX calls might be implemented as serverless functions (e.g. AWS Lambda), or as standalone scripts in different programming languages on different servers, or you might just want to make them as efficient as possible, and avoid any database access. The only information that needs to be shared between them is a public key to verify the signature on the JWTs they receive.
From a security a point of view, this is a trade-off: on the one hand, an access token for a user whose access has been revoked can still be used until it expires; on the other hand, the long-lived refresh token is transmitted much less than a traditional session token, so there are fewer chances for it to be intercepted.
To address your concrete concern:
This also adds the need to add some sort of countdown mechanism on the front end where a refresh request is to be sent to the server prior to the access token expiration date so that the user won't be logged out.
No "countdown" is needed. The code that has access to both tokens simply looks at its current access token before using it; if it has expired, or is about to expire, it requests a new one using the refresh token. It then gets a new access token, and probably a renewed refresh token - the expiry date on the refresh token represents how long the user can be idle before they are automatically logged out.
We don't need to make a table of access tokens and it is dangerous to secure.
We have to save only refresh token and add one field for valid/invalid in the table. And send access token and refresh token to the client side.
The clients send access token with each request's headers.
The server can authorize the user using middleware verifying the JWT.
After some time, the access token will be expired(access token's expired time is shorter than the refresh token's expired time).
The client sends refresh token to server.
Then the client will get new access token using refresh token(refresh token should be recreated, in other words, we can use only one-time refresh token, we have to update table of refresh token with new refresh token).
The client can get new access token and refresh token.
I hope it will be help you.
Good evening, I ran into a problem that I need to make authorization more secure and without re-logging. I read on the Internet that you need to use two tokens (access and refresh), but how to properly do authorization with them. You can advise a resource where competent authorization with two tokens is made.
My Tech Stack:
MongoDB
ExpressJS
ReactJS
NodeJS
If you request authentication with offline_access scope, you'll geta refresh token in addition to an access token. Save this refresh token to the database and whenever you need to make another call on behalf of the user you can
Make the call using your existing access token. If you don't get a 401, then you're good.
If you did get a 401, your token is probably expired and then you can call the token end point on the authorization server with the refresh token and grant_type=refresh_token to get a new access token and try your call again.
Might make the most sense to always request a new access token using your refresh token before you make another call.
To my knowledge you only deal with access tokens for authorization. The refresh token is only there to refresh an expired access token. The refresh token is exchanged for a new access token - without needing to present authentication credentials again. The call also (typically) takes a fraction of the time than re-authenticating.
as soon as the user log-in, give it two tokens refresh and access, store the refresh token in the database, give access token a expire time (5-10 min approx or less depending on your requirement).
for each request user will use the access token and for each request backend should check for the expired access token.
if the access token is expired, user will get a new access token by sending the stored refresh token to the backend(using a dedicated endpoint), backend will than check whether the refresh token is present in the database or not, if yes a new access token with new expire time will be sent in the response.
the cycle will continue until the user logs-out, in that case the refresh token will be deleted from the database and after some time access token will also get expire.
I am implementing SSO for our systems in order to centralize the user authentication and authorization, in which we will have a SSO-server (User and Session Manager) where the user logs in using his/her credentials and then will be able to access all other associated systems.
The implementation of SSO:
First the user will get the session (access token + refresh token)
and they will be stored in the client side.
If he redirects
to the other systems a (single use token) will be generate by SSO
server for that system
And up on the system loading the (single use
token) will be exchanged with a pair of access-token and refresh
token and they will be stored in the client side of that particular
system
And on each server request the session (access token +
refresh token) will be sent through request header so that the
system's server could request this user's authorization from SSO
server.
Access token has less expiry time than refresh token and it's not stored in SSO server and only it's signature is checked for authorization but the refresh token is stored so that we could revoke it later if needed.
(due to the huge amount authorization requests that we will have later on I did not want to stored the access token.)
The problem is that if a user wants to logout, all his/her access tokens should be expired but they are not stored in database and only in client side for each system and I can only revoke the refresh token so the token remains valid until it's expiry time passes and till then it can be used and it means the user is still login.
I use JWT for the token generation and verificaiton.
This is my first question in here I hope I have explained the problem properly.
And I will be waiting for your kind responses.
Preferably use a cookie to store your tokens. When the user has logged out. Simply clear the cookie and return. Now the user does not have the access token and won't be authenticated.
Note: Make sure to make a secure cookie.
This is not a coding question, but a conceptual question for the correct handling and processing of a refresh token.
I have a single page app which issues a jwt token when logging in. The token works just fine. Now, I want to set the expiration to a low value, and use a refresh token to refresh the bearer token.
The question is, what claims should be stored in the refresh token? And what steps are supposed to be done to validate the refresh token before issuing a new token?
For example, right now my refresh token is a jwt which stores an expiration, so the client knows when the refresh token expires, and a username claim so that I know what user the refresh token is associated with.
So then when the refresh token is recieved:
Check that it is not expired.
Check that it has not been revoked.
Use the UserName in the refresh token to issue a new short-lived bearer token.
Is this the correct workflow for this? I just want to make sure I am not missing any security checks.
If your application is a single page application, you should not use long lived refresh tokens as you have no way of securely storing them.
OAuth2 defines a number of grant flows for different types of clients (which I've described here). Refresh tokens are only meant for confidential clients (like web applications living on a secured server).
Your refresh token is just as vulnerable to theft as your access token, since both are bearer tokens stored on the client.
Some OAuth libraries allow SPA or other non-confidential clients to get a new access token by talking to the token endpoint of the authorization server using a session token in a cookie. As long as the cookie is valid, the user can get a new access token. After that, the user will need to re-authenticate. Of course cookies can be marked secure and http only, making them harder to steal.
If you issue the JWT tokens from the same service endpoint that consumes the access tokens, you could have the client include a nonce in the token request that you hash and include as a claim in the token. The client can send the JWT in the Authorization header and the nonce in a custom header. Your token verification would hash the nonce again and compare it to the claim in the JWT. That way, if your token is stolen is harder to use without the nonce value. Of course, in a targeted attack, your nonce could also be stolen.