Access a component of a custom control - xpages

I have a custom Control which I'll call ccViewTemplate with this code in it:
<xp:repeat id="repeatData" rows="30"
value="#{viewEntry}" var="veData"
first="#{javascript:return (sessionScope.ssFirst != null)?sessionScope.ssFirst:0;}">
<xp:panel id="panelSelect">
<xp:callback facetName="viewBodyFacet" id="callback1"></xp:callback>
</xp:panel><!-- panelSelect -->
</xp:repeat>
the database view (viewEntry) is also defined in ccViewTemplate and defined based on several custom properties. ccViewTemplate is then added to another custom Control called ccFinalView. Where the custom properties are entered, and the content of the display is entered into viewBodyFacet. I have access to veData and a everything works great to this point. In the viewBodyFacet I have a link that does a redirect to open the document which also works fine. However, in the link I want to get the repeatData Property First and store it so that it returns to the correct page of the repeat. I use this code:
sessionScope.put('ssFirst',getComponent("repeatData").first);
However, the code can not find the getComponent("repeatData") because it is inside ccViewTemplate and not accessible. Is there a way to get the component repeatData from the ccViewTemplate while in ccFinalView which contains ccViewTemplate.
I have done getComponent("ccViewTemplate") and I have the handle to the custom Control, but
getComponent("ccViewTemplate").getComponent("RepeatData").first fails. So is there a way to pull a value from a component 'inside' a custom control from 'outside' the custome control?
looked a little further and found this:
var rtn = getComponent("ccViewTemplate").getPropertyMap().getProperty("repeatData");
It does not generate an error but returns nothing, if I add
var rtn = getComponent("ccViewTemplate").getPropertyMap().getProperty("repeatData").first;
I get an error getComponent() is null
Hope this makes sense.

From what I understand, this is a perfect job for a java bean. The bean can even keep a default value.
public class Controller{
public String value;
public Controller(){
value = "default_value";
}
public String getValue(){return value;}
public void setValue(String value){this.value=value}
}
In this fashion, the value will be available as soon as the object is created. pressing the button then sets the value with javascript,
ControllerBean.setValue("thisValue");
and you can read the value
ControllerBean.getValue();
This question shows how to configure the bean: How to set up a managed bean to work with Notes document
By setting this to, say the viewScope, you can then access the value anywhere you need regardless of whether or not it is in a custom control or main page. I highly recommend this approach. It just means possibly rethinking your custom control structure.
EDIT
Extra ideas include having an enum that maintains the views,
public enum Views{
VIEW_1("viewAlias", "urlParam")
private String vwAlias;
private String urlParam;
private Views(String alias, String param){
vwAlias = alias;
urlParam = param;
}
// public getters
}
And then in your controller you can get the view string:
1. By seeing if a view param is included in the URL
2. If a cookie value is set
3. Take the hard coded default
Clicking the change view action then sets the cookie value and changes the view parameter and redirects.
This is all extra ideas, but it is how I build my view controllers. I will be doing a tutorial on that soon.

Related

Is there a way to prevent creation of a data class item in C# WindowsForms UserControl

If I create a UserControl, to create and edit an instance of a data class e.g. Person in C# WindowsForms (call it PersonControl), the framework automatically adds an instance of Person in PersonControl.Designer with some default values for the properties and fills the item controls with those values. This behavior has a number of side effects which I would like to avoid.
Question: is there a defined way to prevent creation of a data class instance in UserControl.Designer?
I think you missing the DesignerSerializationVisibility attribute. If you have a custom control every public property that you add will automatically be serialized. You can use this attribute to disable the serialization for a property. I also recommend to add the Browsable attribute which will hide the property from the designer. If you want more control over serialization, like you want to serialize only when another property is set to true you can create a special named method which will then called by the designer Defining Default Values with the ShouldSerialize and Reset Methods. There was a MSDN Magazine where a lots of winform learning resource was relased there are some gems about winform internal working. If you interested in you can quickly look trhrough it. My favorite is. Create And Host Custom Designers With The .NET Framework 2.0
Sorry but i didn't mention another attribute DefaultValue You can use the attribute the following way.
public partial class PersonEditControl : UserControl
{
[DefaultValue(null)] // This attribute tells the designer if the property value matches what we specified in the attribute(null) it should not store the property value.
public PersonData? Person { get; set; }
public PersonEditControl()
{
InitializeComponent();
}
}

faces-redirect=true not working while creating and rendering view

I am currently working on a JSF 2.2 application. As per requirements, I have created custom view handler (using ViewHandlerWrapper) for my application. All the methods are just passing to default view handler except renderView which I am overriding as follows -
private viewHandler viewHandlerWrapped = null;
renderView(FacesContext facesContext, UIViewRoot viewToRender) {
String viewId = viewToRender.getViewId();
if (viewId == some condition) {
/* Do calculation to derive viewId */
}
UIViewRoot viewRoot = viewHandlerWrapped.createView(facesContext,viewId+"?faces-redirect=true");
facesContext.setViewRoot(viewRoot);
//now let system render the view
viewHandlerWrapped.renderView(facesContext,viewRoot);
}
The above is working fine and rendering & navigation is happening as expected. The only issue is faces-redirect=true is not working. The URL seems to be always one behind.
I have gone through many answers given in stackoverflow or internet. But nowhere I am able to find how to solve this.
I think I am doing something wrong e.g. ?faces-redirect=true might not be the correct way while creating view. But I am not sure what can be done to correct this.
Can someone please help me out with this?
After struggling with this for more than 4 weeks, I finally found a way to get the correct URL (instead of previous one). I am updating my answer here in case any one else falls into same problem -
"It looks like we can not use the faces-redirect=true the way I was using while creating and rendering the pages. It should be suffixed with form action. So I have changed my code as follows -
1) actions are returned on click of a button e.g.
public string doAction {
----
return "action?faces-redirect=true";
}
2) Code is updated to use implicit navigation wherever possible. With this, I didn't need to build my custom viewhandler as navigation is happening implicitly. So, I have scrapped the viewhandler.
With above two simple steps, the correct URL is being displayed on the browser now.

How can I extract the main body of an Orchard Page via a Url

What I'm looking to do is have 2 views of an orchard page.
The first will include headers and footers, the second just the main body content.
The reason is so that we can maintain the body in one place, and it will be used either as a stand alone site, or just embedded within another.
I'm thinking that it would be done by accessing the page using a different route, or appending a querystring parameter.
Any other options are welcomed.
The method I am about to describe is arguably a hack and may go against some of the intentions of the creators of Orchard, but it will get the job done.
Orchard uses the ThemeFilter with the Themed attribute to decide whether the current controller action's output will be 'themed' --- i.e., be displayed with headers and footers. The controller used by Orchard to display content items has this attribute enabled, which is why content items are displayed themed. What you are asking to do is to suppress this 'themed' mode based on the presence of a query string parameter.
ThemeFilter kicks in at a very early stage of the page request and applies itself by setting a value in the current request's http context.
ThemeFilter.cs:
public static void Apply(RequestContext context) {
// the value isn't important
context.HttpContext.Items[typeof (ThemeFilter)] = null;
}
This class does not provide a way of unApplying this value. If you are willing to modify the Orchard source code, you may add this method yourself:
public static void Unapply(RequestContext context) {
context.HttpContext.Items.Remove(typeof (ThemeFilter));
}
Then you can simply create your own action filter that checks for the existence of a query string and then call this method if appropriate, something like:
using System.Web.Mvc;
using Orchard.Mvc.Filters;
using Orchard.Themes;
namespace Demo {
public class UnthemeFilter : FilterProvider, IActionFilter {
public void OnActionExecuting(ActionExecutingContext filterContext) {
}
public void OnActionExecuted(ActionExecutedContext filterContext) {
if (filterContext.RequestContext.HttpContext.Request["unthemed"] != null) {
ThemeFilter.Unapply(filterContext.RequestContext);
}
}
}
}
Now by adding ?unthemed=true, you will be able to suppress the theming.
If you are unwilling or unable to modify the Orchard source code, it is still possible to do the same thing by directly removing the typeof (ThemeFilter) from the HTTP context in your filter. However, this breaks encapsulation and should probably be avoided in object-oriented programming.

Save all rows in an h:dataTable

I have a Facelets page with a h:dataTable. In each row of the h:dataTable, i am displaying some enabled and disabled services of a user.Here is the model object
public class ServiceList {
private long userId;
private long serviceGroupId;
private String serviceGroupName;
private long serviceId;
private String serviceName;
private String serviceUrl;
private String serviceState;
public UserServiceList() {
}
//getters and setters....
}
These are the details i am displaying in a single row of a dataTable.
serviceState in the above model object is either 'Y' or 'N'.
my problem is the application user should be able to update the servicestate of all rows of a dataTable at once and update them in the backend database.
1)what additional JSF component do i need to use inside dataTable to achive this? I am thinking of adding one more column with h:selectOneradio
2)How do i get which rows are selected and what status they have set?
I am kind of newbee to JSF.Please help.
Update:At present what i am having is two buttons namely 'Disable Service' and 'Enable Service' in the footer section of the table.
Onclick of Disable Service i am navigating to another page where i show the application user the list of enabled services to disable
And vice-versa for Enabled service button click.
So, let's say you in your Managed Bean you have a list of services you would like the user to edit:
List<Service> serviceList;
You take this List to be displayed in the data table.
<h:dataTable value="#{yourManagedBean.serviceList}" ... >
Then you can implement a commandButton that has either an action or an actionListener which points to a certain method of your managed bean, like this:
<h:commandButton action="#{yourManagedBean.saveAllAction}" ... >
And the corresponding method to save 'em all is quite straight-forward. You iterate over the managed bean field serviceList and persist every single entry (however you persist them, like calling the EntityManager when using Hibernate or any DAO class in between, you name it.)
Concerning the service status: I'd preferably use a selectBooleanCheckbox for toggling the status, since it's probably a boolean value.
Edit after comment 1:
You have the serviceStatus in your Service class. Currently it's a string, but I suppose it should be boolean to toggle active/inactive. If this property is displayed by the selectBooleanCheckbox it is automatically changed in your corresponding Java class. So calling getServiceStatus() returns true or false, depending on what is selected in the frontend. If you persist the whole Service object then, you don't have to do anything because any modifications made in the frontend HTML elements are automatically projected to the Java object behind it.

Commandlink action and #viewscoped weird behaviour

I have some code generated by netbeans wizard 'JSF pages from entity classes'.
For those who don't use netbeans I will briefly describe what the wizard does.
It creates a JSF page List.xhtml which contains a datatable with a fixed size of ten rows and two commandlinks for scrolling its content (prev 10 and next 10).
The JSF page uses a managedbean with session scope and the above mentioned commandlinks return the String 'List'.
If I change the managed bean scope to #viewscoped it is re-created every time I push a commandlink. According to me it is a weird behavior because the view actually doesn't change (it always List.xhtml ) and I would have expected a smarted view scope mechanism.
I then changed the action associated to the commandlinks with a new one which does the same things but returns void. Now the #viewscope mechanism works well but I'm not sure it is correct to use an action method with a signature like this
public void doSomething()
// instead of
public String doSomething()
My concern is that a different JSF implementation can act in an impredictable way with that kind of actions.
Thanks
Filippo
What do you return in public String doSomething()?
If you return null (or an empty String) it should not re-create the view.
If you return a navigation case then the view is re-created, regardless whether it is the same that you are currently in.

Resources