Specifically, I'd like to use the Gmail API to access my own mail only. Is there a way to do this without OAuth and just an API key and/or client id and secret?
Using an API key like:
require('googleapis').gmail('v1').users.messages.list({ auth: '<KEY>', userId: '<EMAIL>') });
yields the following error:
{ errors:
[ { domain: 'global',
reason: 'required',
message: 'Login Required',
locationType: 'header',
location: 'Authorization' } ],
code: 401,
message: 'Login Required' }
I suppose that message means they want a valid OAuth "Authorization" header. I would do that but I suppose that's not possible without presenting a webpage.
The strict answer to "Is there a way to do this without OAuth and just an API key and/or client id and secret?" is no.
However, you can achieve what you are looking for using OAuth. You simply need to store a Refresh Token, which you can then use any time to request an Auth Token to access your gmail.
In order to get the refresh token, you can either write a simple web app to do a one time auth, or follow the steps here How do I authorise an app (web or installed) without user intervention? (canonical ?) which allows you to do the whole auth flow using the Oauth Playground.
The question is rather old, but the problem is not. For now Google API has an option to create service accounts. I think it suits for everybody who wants "just connect application to its own google workspace" and not to do some actions on users behalf. Google documentation writes about it:
Typically, an application uses a service account when the application uses Google APIs to work with its own data rather than a user's data. For example, an application that uses Google Cloud Datastore for data persistence would use a service account to authenticate its calls to the Google Cloud Datastore API.
Here is the example in Java (there was no JS, but the meaning is clear):
import com.google.api.client.googleapis.auth.oauth2.GoogleCredential;
import com.google.api.services.sqladmin.SQLAdminScopes;
GoogleCredential credential = GoogleCredential.fromStream(new FileInputStream("MyProject-1234.json"))
.createScoped(Collections.singleton(SQLAdminScopes.SQLSERVICE_ADMIN));
SQLAdmin sqladmin =
new SQLAdmin.Builder(httpTransport, JSON_FACTORY, credential).build();
SQLAdmin.Instances.List instances =
sqladmin.instances().list("exciting-example-123").execute();
Related
I have an Azure AD B2C tenant setup with an Angular app on the front-end using Authorization Code Flow with PKCE and a back-end api. Everything is working fine. I now have a need to allow the user to access certain pages on the front-end anonymously. I would prefer to still protect the apis these pages will call using the same access token.
I have followed the article here to set up Client Credentials flow. I am able to get an access token successfully using Postman and use it to call my back-end apis fine. However, when I try to do the same from the Angular app, I get the following error:
{"error":"invalid_request","error_description":"AADB2C99067: Public Client XXXXX-XXXXXX is not supported for Client Credentials Grant Flow\r\nCorrelation ID: 2b3346ef-1828-4900-b890-06cdb8e0bb52\r\nTimestamp: 2022-07-28 04:12:21Z\r\n"}
Below is the code snippet I am using in Angular to retrieve the access token.
const urlencoded = new URLSearchParams();
urlencoded.set('grant_type', 'client_credentials');
urlencoded.set('client_id', '<clientid>');
urlencoded.set('client_secret', '<clientsecret>');
urlencoded.set('scope', '<scope>');
const httpOptions = {
headers: new HttpHeaders({ 'Content-Type': 'application/x-www-form-urlencoded' }),
};
const url = 'https://<b2ctenant>.b2clogin.com/<b2ctenant>.onmicrosoft.com/<customPolicy>/oauth2/v2.0/token';
return this.httpClient.post(url, urlencoded, httpOptions);
Any ideas what could be missing?
Thanks!
Though azureadb2c supports client_credential flow.One may not use them with SPA apps.
This scenario is not supported by MSAL.js. Client credential flow/ grant type will not work in SPAs(Angular) because browsers cannot securely keep client secrets.
As they may end up in the browser, visible to everyone and to attackers that load them.
Note:As the application's own credentials itself are being used, they must be kept safe - never publish that credential in your source
code
If you are using it for web app , please make sure to select the platform as web or change the reply url type to be web.
"replyUrlsWithType": [
{
"url": "https......",
"type": "Web"
},
]
Please refer :
Configure authentication in a sample Angular SPA by using Azure
Active Directory B2C | Microsoft Docs
OAuth 2.0 client credentials flow on the Microsoft identity platform- Microsoft Entra | Microsoft Docs
I am building a mern application.
the backend built using express exposes an api which users can create data and access the data they have created.
I want to allow users to sign in with google and get authorization to create and access the resources on this api which i control (not on google apis).
I keep coming across oauth 2 / open id connect articles stating that an Id token is for use by a client and a access token provided by a resource server should be used to get access to an api.
e.g. https://auth0.com/blog/why-should-use-accesstokens-to-secure-an-api/
the reason stated for this is that the aud property on the id token wont be correct if used on the api.
I realise that some sources say: that if the spa and api are served from same server and have same client id and therefore audience I can use and id token to authenticate to the api, but I am looking to understand what I can do when this is not the case?
I feel using oauth2 for authorization is overkill for my app and I cant find any information about how to use open id connect to authenticate to my api.
Surely when you sign in to Auth0 authourization server using google it is just requesting an open id connect id token from google?
I am wondering if using Authorization Code Grant flow to receive an id token on the api server would allow me to authenticate a user to my api?
in this case would the api server be the client as far as open id connect is concerned and therefore the aud value would be correct?
I can generate an url to visit the google oauth server using the node googleapis library like so:
const { google } = require("googleapis");
const oauth2Client = new google.auth.OAuth2(
'clientid','clientsecret',
"http://localhost:3000/oauthcallback",//this is where the react app is served from
);
const calendar = google.calendar({ version: "v3", auth: oauth2Client });
const scopes = ["openid"];
const url = oauth2Client.generateAuthUrl({
// 'online' (default) or 'offline' (gets refresh_token)
access_type: "offline",
// If you only need one scope you can pass it as a string
scope: scopes,
});
async function getUrl(req, res) {
console.log(url)
res.status(200).json({
url,
});
}
and use the following flow.
You are not supposed to access any API's using the ID-Token. First of all the life-time of the ID-token is very short, typically like 5 minutes.
You should always use the access-token to access API's and you can using the refresh token get new access-tokens. The ID-token you can only get one time and you use that to create the local user and local cookie session.
If you are using a SPA application, you should also consider using the BFF pattern, to avoid using any tokens in the SPA-Application
see The BFF Pattern (Backend for Frontend): An Introduction
I agree with one of the commenters that you should follow the principle of separation of concern and keep the authorization server as a separate service. Otherwise it will be a pin to debug and troubleshoot when it does not work.
I am using Azure mobile app services with Xamarin Forms.
In my app, I use web social media authentication (Facebook, Twitter, Google) configured in the azure portal.
I am taking the sid gotten from CurrentClient.Id to match it with users in my Easy Tables. However, for some users, after logging in with the same account and same provider, no match is found in my database because the sid is different! I am 100% sure that it is the same account used to login before, yet I get a different sid. How is that possible? Shouldn't it remain the same with every login or what's the whole point of it then?
You are using Azure App Service Authentication for this. There is a stable ID that is available within the JWT that you pass to the service. You can easily get it from the /.auth/me endpoint (see https://learn.microsoft.com/en-us/azure/app-service/app-service-authentication-how-to#validate-tokens-from-providers )
When you GET /.auth/me with the X-ZUMO-AUTH header set to the authenticationToken returned from the login, the user.userId field will be populated with a stable ID. So, the next question is "how do I add this / compare this within the Node.js backend?" Fortunately, the HOW-TO FAQ for Node.js explicitly answers this. Short version is, use context.user.getIdentity() (an async method) to get the identity, then do something with it:
function queryContextFromUserId(context) {
return context.user.getIdentity().then((data) => {
context.query.where({ id: data.userId });
return context.execute();
});
}
function addUserIdToContext(context) {
return context.user.getIdentity().then((data) => {
context.itme.id = data.userId;
return context.execute();
});
}
table.read(queryContextFromUserId);
table.insert(addYserIdToContext);
table.update(queryContextFromUserId);
table.delete(queryContextFromUserId);
The real question here is "what is in the data block?" It's an object that contains "whatever the /.auth/me endpoint with the X-ZUMO-AUTH header produces", and that is provider dependent.
The mechanism to figure this out.
Debug your client application - when the login completes, inspect the client object for the CurrentUser and get the current token
Use Fiddler, Insomnia, or Postman to GET .../.auth/me with an X-ZUMO-AUTH header set to the current token
Repeat for each auth method you have to ensure you have the formats of each one.
You can now use these in your backend.
I've seen that when using ADAL.js, you cannot get group membership claims due to some URL limitation.
https://github.com/AzureAD/azure-activedirectory-library-for-js/issues/239
I am using oauth-bearer authentication from the frontend, that is, the frontend triggers a login via the AD login page.
The client then pass the access token to the backend.
What I want to do:
I want to filter some data in my backend endpoints depending on group membership.
e.g. if you are a member of group "London" in AD, you should only see things related to London in our DB queries.
Super simple using e.g. Okta or Auth0, not so much with Azure AD.
I also want to accomplish the same thing on the frontend, that is, show and hide menu items depending on group membership.
(All access is still checked on backend also)
The documentation is sparse and not very helpful.
"You should use Graph API".
How?, how do I talk to graph api using the token I get from the frontend?
This is the setup I have for my Node+Express endpoints:
app.use(
"/contacts",
passport.authenticate("oauth-bearer", { session: true }),
contacts
);
How, where and when should I call the graph API here?
Our system is super small so I don't mind using session state.
Can I fetch this information when the user logs in?
How should that flow be? client logs in, once logged in, call the backend and request the groups?
When you get the access token from Azure AD after the user logged in, you can find the group membership of the user by doing a GET request to https://graph.microsoft.com/v1.0/me/memberOf with the access token like this:
function getGroupsOfUser(accessToken, callback) {
request
.get('https://graph.microsoft.com/v1.0/me/memberOf')
.set('Authorization', 'Bearer ' + accessToken)
.end((err, res) => {
callback(err, res);
});
}
This sample assumes you are using the NPM package superagent.
And the required permissions to call this API are listed here.
I am working on some client side web app like a chrome extension that needs access to outlook mail and calendar. I followed the instruction on https://dev.outlook.com/RestGettingStarted and successfully got access and refresh tokens to retrieve data.
However, I cannot find any way of implementing "logout". The basic idea is to let user sign out and login with a different outlook account. In order to do that, I removed cached tokens, requested access tokens in interactive mode. The login window did pop out, but it took any valid email address, didn't let me input password and finally returned tokens for previous account. So I was not able to really use a different account until the old token expired.
Can anyone please tell me if it is possible to send a request to revoke the tokens so people can use a different account? Thanks!
=========================================================
Update:
Actually it is the fault of chrome.identity api. I used chrome.identity.LaunchWebAuthFlow to init the auth flow. It caches user's identity but no way to remove it. So we cannot really "logout" if using this api.
I used two logouts via launchWebAuthFlow - first I called the logout link to my app, then secondly, I called the logout link to Google.
var options = {
'interactive': false,
'url': 'https://localhost:44344/Account/Logout'
}
chrome.identity.launchWebAuthFlow(options, function(redirectUri) {});
options = {
'interactive': false,
'url': 'https://accounts.google.com/logout'
}
chrome.identity.launchWebAuthFlow(options, function(redirectUri) {});