Related
I'm working on a research related to frequencies.
I want to sum all the numbers in each cell and reduce them to single number only.
some cells have 2 numbers, others have 13 numbers. like these..
24.0542653897891
25.4846064424057
27
28.6055035477009
I tried several formulas to do that. the best ones have me 2 digits number, that I couldn't sum it again to get a single result.
like these Formulas:
=SUMPRODUCT(MID(SUBSTITUTE(B5,".",""),ROW(INDIRECT("1:"&LEN(B5)-1)),1)+0)
=SUMPRODUCT(1*MID(C5,ROW(INDIRECT("1:"&LEN(C5))),1))
any suggestion?
Thank you in advance.
EDIT
Based on your explanation your comments, it seems that what you want is what is called the digital root of the all the digits (excluding the decimal point). In other words, repeatedly summing the digits until you get to a single digit.
That can be calculated by a simpler formula than adding up the digits.
=1+(SUBSTITUTE(B5,".","")-1)-(INT((SUBSTITUTE(B5,".","")-1)/9)*9)
For long numbers, we can split the number in half and process each half. eg:
=1+MOD(1+MOD(LEFT(SUBSTITUTE(B5,".",""),INT(LEN(SUBSTITUTE(B5,".",""))/2))-1,9)+1+MOD(RIGHT(SUBSTITUTE(B5,".",""),LEN(SUBSTITUTE(B5,".",""))-INT(LEN(SUBSTITUTE(B5,".",""))/2))-1,9)-1,9)
However, the numbers should be stored as TEXT. When numbers are stored as numbers, what we see may not necessarily be what is stored there, and what the formula (as well as the UDF) will process.
The long formula version will correct all the errors on your worksheet EXCEPT for B104. B104 appears to have the value 5226.9332653096000 but Excel is really storing the value 5226.9333265309688. Because of Excel's precision limitations, this will get processed as 5226.93332653097. Hence there will be a disagreement.
Another method that should work would be to round all of the results in your column B to 15 digits (eg: . Combining that with using the long formula version should result in agreement for all the values you show.
Explanation
if a number is divisible by 9, its digital root will be 9, otherwise, the digital root will be n MOD 9
The general formula would be: =1+Mod(n-1,9)
In your case, since we are dealing with numbers larger than can be calculated using the MOD function, we need to both remove the dot, and also use the equivalent of mod which is n-(int(n/9)*9)
Notes:
this will work best with numbers stored as text. Since Excel may display and/or convert large numbers, or numbers with many decimal places, differently than expected, working with text strings of digits is the most stable method.
this method will not work reliably with numbers > 15 digits.
If you have numbers > 15 digits, then I suggest a VBA User Defined Function:
Option Explicit
Function digitalRoot(num As String) As Long
Dim S As String, Sum As Long, I As Long
S = num
Do While Len(S) > 1
Sum = 0
For I = 1 To Len(S)
Sum = Sum + Val(Mid(S, I, 1))
Next I
S = Trim(Str(Sum))
Loop
digitalRoot = CLng(S)
End Function
You could use a formula like:
=SUMPRODUCT(FILTERXML("<t><s>"&SUBSTITUTE(A1," ","</s><s>")&"</s></t>","//s"))
You might need an extra SUBSTITUTE for changing . to , if that's your decimal delimiter:
=SUMPRODUCT(FILTERXML("<t><s>"&SUBSTITUTE(SUBSTITUTE(A1,".",",")," ","</s><s>")&"</s></t>","//s"))
However, maybe a UDF as others proposed is also a possibility for you. Though, something tells me I might have misinterpreted your question...
I hope you are looking for something like following UDF.
Function SumToOneDigit(myNumber)
Dim temp: temp = 0
CalcLoop:
For i = 1 To Len(myNumber)
If IsNumeric(Mid(myNumber, i, 1)) Then temp = temp + Mid(myNumber, i, 1)
Next
If Len(temp) > 1 Then
myNumber = temp
temp = 0
GoTo CalcLoop
End If
SumToOneDigit = temp
End Function
UDF (User Defined Functions) are codes in VBA (visual basic for applications).
When you can not make calculations with Given Excel functions like ones in your question, you can UDFs in VBA module in Excel. See this link for UDF .. If you dont have developer tab see this link ,, Add a module in VBA in by right clicking on the workbook and paste the above code in that module. Remember, this code remains in this workbook only. So, if you want to use this UDF in some other file your will have to add module in that file and paste the code in there as well. If you are frequently using such an UDF, better to make add-in out of it like this link
In addition to using "Text to Columns" as a one-off conversion, this is relatively easy to do in VBA, by creating a user function that accepts the data as a string, splits it into an array separated by spaces, and then loops the elements to add them up.
Add the following VBA code to a new module:
Function fSumData(strData As String) As Double
On Error GoTo E_Handle
Dim aData() As String
Dim lngLoop1 As Long
aData = Split(strData, " ")
For lngLoop1 = LBound(aData) To UBound(aData)
fSumData = fSumData + CDbl(aData(lngLoop1))
Next lngLoop1
fExit:
On Error Resume Next
Exit Function
E_Handle:
MsgBox Err.Description & vbCrLf & vbCrLf & "fSumData", vbOKOnly + vbCritical, "Error: " & Err.Number
Resume fExit
End Function
Then enter this into a cell in the Excel worksheet:
=fSumData(A1)
Regards,
The UDF below will return the sum of all numbers in a cell passed to it as an argument.
Function SumCell(Cell As Range) As Double
Dim Fun As Double ' function return value
Dim Sp() As String ' helper array
Dim i As Integer ' index to helper array
Sp = Split(Cell.Cells(1).Value)
For i = 0 To UBound(Sp)
Fun = Fun + Val(Sp(i))
Next i
SumCell = Fun
End Function
Install the function in a standard code module, created with a name like Module1. Call it from the worksheet with syntax like =SumCell(A2) where A2 is the cell that contains the numbers to be summed up. Copy down as you would a built-in function.
Please take a look at the attached image. I have a long list of items and I've created a common keywords to search in that list. I'm using this formula:
=INDEX(A:A,MATCH((("*"&B2&"*")&("*"&C2&"*")&("*"&D2&"*")&("*"&E2&"*")&("*"&F2&"*")),A:A,0))
The problem that the search is going through the same sequence that I entered.
It gives error if the sequence of the words in the cell is different than the sequence in my formula which make sense.
Is there a way I can search for 3 or more words that are existing in any cell in any sequence?
I am open to using VBA if necessary.
My search results:
Here is the user defined function:
Public Function indexMX(rng As Range, pat1 As Range, pat2 As Range, pat3 As Range, pat4 As Range, pat5 As Range) As Variant
Dim r As Range, rngx As Range, s(1 To 5) As String, Kount As Long, j As Long
s(1) = pat1.Value
s(2) = pat2.Value
s(3) = pat3.Value
s(4) = pat4.Value
s(5) = pat5.Value
Set rngx = Intersect(rng, rng.Parent.UsedRange)
For Each r In rngx
v = r.Value
Kount = 0
For j = 1 To 5
If InStr(1, v, s(j)) > 0 Or s(j) = "" Then Kount = Kount + 1
Next j
If Kount = 5 Then
indexMX = v
Exit Function
End If
Next r
indexMX = "no luck"
End Function
Here is an example of its usage:
As you see, we give the UDF() the address of the column and the addresses of the five keywords and the UDF() finds the first item containing all five words.
If a keyword is blank, it is not used. (so if you want to search for only two keywords, leave the other three blank). If no matches are found the phrase no luck is returned.
User Defined Functions (UDFs) are very easy to install and use:
ALT-F11 brings up the VBE window
ALT-I
ALT-M opens a fresh module
paste the stuff in and close the VBE window
If you save the workbook, the UDF will be saved with it.
If you are using a version of Excel later then 2003, you must save
the file as .xlsm rather than .xlsx
To remove the UDF:
bring up the VBE window as above
clear the code out
close the VBE window
To use the UDF from Excel:
=myfunction(A1)
To learn more about macros in general, see:
http://www.mvps.org/dmcritchie/excel/getstarted.htm
and
http://msdn.microsoft.com/en-us/library/ee814735(v=office.14).aspx
and for specifics on UDFs, see:
http://www.cpearson.com/excel/WritingFunctionsInVBA.aspx
Macros must be enabled for this to work!
EDIT#1:
to remove case sensitivity, replace:
If InStr(1, v, s(j)) > 0 Or s(j) = "" Then Kount = Kount + 1
with:
If InStr(1, LCase(v), LCase(s(j))) > 0 Or s(j) = "" Then Kount = Kount + 1
Yes, it is possible for a single cell to return three matching words from a different cell. The answer in this example uses a formula to return 6 matches. VBA and special array functions are not used.
This is the formula:
=SUBSTITUTE(SUBSTITUTE(SUBSTITUTE(SUBSTITUTE(SUBSTITUTE(SUBSTITUTE(SUBSTITUTE(SUMPRODUCT((IFERROR(SEARCH(FIRST,TARGET),0)>0)*100000+(IFERROR(SEARCH(SECOND,TARGET),0)>0)*20000+(IFERROR(SEARCH(THIRD,TARGET),0)>0)*3000+(IFERROR(SEARCH(FOURTH,TARGET),0)>0)*400+(IFERROR(SEARCH(FIFTH,TARGET),0)>0)*50+(IFERROR(SEARCH(SIXTH,TARGET),0)>0)*6),"1",FIRST&DELIM),"2",SECOND&DELIM),"3",THIRD&DELIM),"4",FOURTH&DELIM),"5",FIFTH&DELIM),"6",SIXTH&DELIM),"0","")
Did you notice the named ranges? FIRST, SECOND, THIRD, etc are individual cells and each one holds a word. We are trying to find those words inside TARGET. If we find the words, then we will write them in this cell holding this formula and each word will be separated by DELIM
The ranges are optional. In the picture below, you'll see cell A2 contains the word "named". This is the first of the six words we're tying to find and it can be expressed as FIRST = "A2" = "named" Inside the formula you'll see that FIRST appears twice. You could replace it with "named" and the cell A2 would become blank but the functionality of the formula would not change.
Even TARGET is optional. It could be written as E1 or typed out word for word.
I don't know why anyone would do that... but it is possible.
DELIM is at cell B2, it is a double space
Now to explain how it works
SEARCH(search for what?, search where?) This is responsible for determining if a match exists or not. If you understand what the named ranges then you've already figured out the syntax is. The location of first letter that of match in TARGET is returned. In this formula it is always 1 If it is not found then the number is 0
IFERROR(value,value) tries to perform the operation. If successful then the result is displayed. If there's an error the second result is displayed. Every IFERROR in this formula is practically the same: IFERROR(SEARCH(FIRST,TARGET),0) It searches inside TARGET trying to find the FIRST word. Result if found is 1 and if not found is 0
It gets a little more complicated from here so lets recap. We're calling SEARCH 6 times. Once for each word we want to find and we're always looking in TARGET. Result will be a 1 if match is found or a 0 if not. Ironically, us humans can put it together and see the match but the formula can't determine which words have been matched without more information
SUMPRODUCT takes the sum (addition) of the product (multiplication) of two or more arrays.
multiply two arrays to get the product
a, b, c * e, f, g = ae, bf, cg
takethe sum of the product to get the SUMPRODUCT
ae + bf + cg`
This is easiest when thought of a price and quantity. If one array is the price of a group of items and the other is quantity of the same group of items, then multiplying the two arrays will create a new array where each element is the cost to buy all items of that type in the group the total, and adding all those numbers give you the total cost you'd pay for all of the items
Here we multiply two arrays:
Qty Price
12.0 0.3
70.0 0.1
20.0 0.4
Multiply them to get the product:
Qty Price Total
12.0 0.3 3.8
70.0 0.1 7.0
20.0 0.4 8.0
Take the sum of the product:
Qty Price Total
12.0 0.3 3.8
70.0 0.1 7.0
20.0 0.4 8.0
18.8 SUMPRODUCT
Lets look at part of the formula:
SUMPRODUCT((IFERROR(SEARCH(FIRST,TARGET),0)>0)*100000+IFERROR(SEARCH(SECOND,TARGET),0)>0)*20000+...
It is easy to see this segment is looking for two words. We know SUMPRODUCT want's to multiply and add arrays. If you're thinking (IFERROR(SEARCH(FIRST,TARGET),0)>0) is an array, you'd be right! It's not an array in the technical sense of the word, but it does evaluate into a single value which can thought of as a 1x1 array, or, a cell. The sharp eyed and quick witted, may have noticed there is something on this array we have mentioned. It's the inequality at the end! Many of you know that you can take numerical values and turn them into boolean by testing them with an inequality. So lets evaluate.... SEARCH for FIRST inside TARGET = 1 because FIRST = "named" which is inside TARGET waaaaaaay in the back and because it wasn't an error we get to keep the 1. Next we do the inequality 1 > 0 = TRUE One is greater than zero and evaluates to TRUE
This is what we have right now
SUMPRODUCT((TRUE*100000+IFERROR(SEARCH(SECOND,TARGET),0)>0)*20000+....
Can you identify the arrays now? We know TRUE is an array, a 1x1. You know the IFERROR bit all the way to the inequality is also an array. Lets evaluate that IFERROR .... Mathematically we should still be working from left to right but trust me, we're ok if we let it slide this once.
IFERROR(SEARCH(SECOND,TARGET),0)>0) SECOND = "array" = 1 = TRUE
Did you follow my short hand? It's ok if you didn't just back up and practice on FIRST until you understand.
Plugging in the value gives us something like this
SUMPRODUCT(TRUE*100000+TRUE*20000+...
SUMPRODUCT is the SUM(addition) of the PRODUCT(multiplication)
So we're adding the stuff we multiply
SUMPRODUCT = (TRUE * 100000) + (TRUE * 20000)
Remember how easy it was to go from 1 > 0 to TRUE. We're "getting all up into that boolean TRUE that" equals 1 Here's a fun fact, -1 is also equal to TRUE. If you've ever seen a formula with a double negative in it like this STUFF(--(MORESTUFF( that's just some Excel wizard person making sure they get a +1 instead of a -1 ... ok, so lets get back on track and evalute
SUMPRODCUT = 1 * 100000 + 1 * 20000+....
SUMPRODCUT = 100000 + 20000+....
SUMPRODCUT = 120000+.....
I know you've been asking about those numbers. One hundred thousand? What's one hundred thousand for? I've been purposefully ignoring until it became convenient to talk about it. And now it's convenient. Go look at the whoooole formula and you'll find a pattern. Those numbers are in a decreasing sequence. Anyone who's ever done bitwise logic can see where this is going.I'm running short on time so I'll cut to the chase. Assume a hypothetical situation where every word was matched. You'd end up with
SUMPRODUCT = 100000 + 20000 + 3000 + 400 + 50 + 6
SUMPRODCUT = 123456
123456 are you pulling my leg? No, I am not. We're almost done so if you're still with me then you're gonna drive it home.
We have a large group of SUBSTITUTE teachers at the front of the line and we gotta get rid of them.
We also have this to contend with :"1",FIRST&DELIM),"2",SECOND&DELIM),"3",THIRD&DELIM),"4",FOURTH&DELIM),"5",FIFTH&DELIM),"6",SIXTH&DELIM),"0","")
Thankfully for us, they are part of the same problem. We worked our way from the middle out.
SUBSTITUTE(SUBSTITUTE(text, old text, new text)
SUBSTITUTE(SUBSTITUTE("123456","1", FIRST & DELIM),"2",SECOND & DELIM)....
Remember at top DELIM was pointing to a cell holding a double space. Each DELIM can be replaced with " " or any other delimiter you want.
SUBSTITUTE(SUBSTITUTE("123456","1", "named" & " "),"2",SECOND & DELIM)...
SUBSTITUTE("named 23456","2",SECOND & DELIM)...
SUBSTITUTE("named 23456","2","array"& " ")...
("named array 3456")... and so on.
Any questions?
Ok, class is dismissed!
I want you to have some fun. I need something specific.
First i must explain what i do. I use a simple codification for product prices at retail store, because i dont want people know the real price for themselves. So i change the original numbers to another subtracting the number 9 for each number.
Normally I manually write down all the prices with this codification for every product.
So.. for example number 10 would be 89. (9-1 = 8) and (9-0 = 9)
Other examples:
$128 = 871
$75 = 24
$236 = 763
$9 = 0
Finally i put 2 number nines (9) at the beginning of the codified price also, to confuse people who might think that number could be the price.
So the examples i used before are like this:
99871 (means $128)
9924 (means $75)
99763 (means $236)
990 (means $9)
Remember that i need 2 (two) nines before the real price. The real prices never start with 0 so, the nines at the beginning exist only to confuse people.
Ok. So, now that you understand, here comes the 2nd part.
I have an excel whith hundreds of my products added, with prices, description, etc. And i decided it is time to use a printer and start to print this information from excel. I have a software to do that, but first i need to have the codified prices in the excel also.
The fun part begins when i want to convert the real prices that are already written in my excel document into a new column AUTOMATICALLY. So that way i don´t have to type again all the prices in codified form for the old and new items i add in the future.
Can someone help me with this? Is it even possible?
I tried with =A1-9999 but, it works well with 2 character number only. Because if the real price is 5, i will get 3 nines: 9994(code). And if the price is 234 i will get only 1 nine 9765(code). And it is a condition i need to have the TWO nines at first.
Thank you very much in advanced!
Though you have requested for formula , I am suggesting VBA program which seems to me very convenient.
You have to open VBE and insert a module and copy the program. Change the code lines wherever indicated to suit your requirements for sheets etc.
Sub NumberCode()
Dim c As Range
Dim LR As Integer
Dim numProbs As Long
Dim sht As Worksheet
Dim s As Integer
Dim v As Long
Dim v1 As Long
Set sht = Worksheets("Sheet1") ' change as per yr requirement
numProbs = 0
LR = sht.Cells(Rows.Count, "A").End(xlUp).Row
For Each c In sht.Range("A1:A" & LR).Cells
s = Len(c)
v = c.Value
v1 = 99
For s = 1 To Len(c)
v1 = v1 & (9 - Mid(c, s, 1))
Next
c.Offset(0, 1).Value = v1
v1 = 99
numProbs = numProbs + 1
Next
MsgBox "Number coding finished"
End Sub
Sample sheet of results is appended below.
I will be using helper cells but you could dump it all into one cell if you want since you are only dealing with 4 characters.
For the purpose of this example, I am assuming your original price list starts in B11.
=IFERROR(9-MID($B11,COLUMN(A1),1),"")
Place that in D11 and copy to the right three more times so you have it from D11 to G11. That formula strips off 1 character from your price and subtracts that character from 9. When you go the next column it repeats itself. If you do not have that many characters, it will return "".
In C11 you will build your number based on the adjacent 4 columns using this formula:
="99"&D11&E11&F11&G11
It places 99 in front then adds the numbers from the adjacent 4 columns.
Select cells C11 to G11 and copy and paste downward beside your data column as far as you need to go.
An alternate more concise method would be:
=REPT(9,LEN(B11)+2)-B11
Perhaps I'm missing something, though simply:
=REPT(9,2+LEN(A1))-A1
seems good to me.
Regards
I want to do an INDEX-MATCH-like lookup between two documents, except my MATCH's index array doesn't stay in one column.
In Vague-English: I want a value from a known column that matches another value that may be found in any column.
Refer to the image below. Let's call everything to the left of the bold vertical line on column H doc1, and the right side will be doc2.
Doc2 has a column "Find This", which will be the INDEX's array. It is compared with "ID1" from doc1 (Note that the values in "Find This" will not be in the same order as column ID1, but it's easier to undertsand this way).
The "[Result]" column in doc2 will be the value from doc1's "Want This" column from the row that matches "FIND THIS" ...However, sometimes the value from "FIND THIS" is not in the "ID1" column, and is instead in "ID2","ID3", etc.
So, I'm trying to generate Col K from Col J. This would be like pressing Ctrl+F and searching for a value in Col J, then taking the value from Col D in that row and copying it to Col K.
I made identical values from a column the same color in the other doc to make it easier to visualize where they are coming from.
Note also that in column F of doc1, the same value from doc2's "Find This" can be found after some other text.
Also note that the column headers are only there as examples, the ID columns are not actually numbered.
I would simply hard-code the correct column to search from, but I'm not in control of doc1, and I'm worried that future versions may have new "ID" columns, with other's being removed.
I'd prefer this to be a solution in the form of a formula, but VB will do.
To generate column K based on given values of column J then you could use the following:
=INDEX(doc1!$D$2:$D$14,SUMPRODUCT((doc1!$B$2:$H$14=J2)*ROW(doc1!$B$2:$H$14))-1)
Copy that formula down as far as you need to go.
It basically only returns the row of the where a matching column J is found. we then find that row in the index of your D range to get your value in K.
Proof of concept:
UPDATE:
If you are working with non unique entities n column J. That is the value on its own can be found in multiple rows and columns. Consider using the following to return the Last row where there J value is found:
=INDEX(doc1!$D$2:$D$14,AGGREGATE(14,6,(doc1!$B$2:$H$14=J2)*ROW(doc1!$B$2:$H$14),1)-1)
UPDATE 2:
And to return the first row where what you are looking in column J is found use:
=INDEX($D$2:$D$14,AGGREGATE(15,6,1/($B$2:$H$14=J2)*ROW($B$2:$H$14)-1,1))
Thanks to Scott Craner for the hint on the minimum formula.
To determine if you have UNIQUE data from column J in your range B2:H14 you can enter this array formula. In order to enter an array formula you need to press CTRL+SHFT+ENTER at the same time and not just ENTER. You will know you have done it right when you see {} around your formula in the formula bar. You cannot at the {} manually.
=IF(MAX(COUNTIF($B$2:$H$14,J2:J14))>1,"DUPLICATES","UNIQUE")
UPDATE 3
AGGREGATE - A relatively new function to me but goes back to Excel 2010. Aggregate is 19 functions rolled into 1. It would be nice if they all worked the same way but they do not. I think it is functions numbered 14 and up that will perform the same way an array formula or a CSE formula if you prefer. The nice thing is you do not need to use CSE when entering or editing them. SUMPRODUCT is another example of a regular formula that performs array formula calculations.
The meat of this explanation I believe is what is happening inside of the AGGREGATE brackets. If you click on the link you will get an idea of what the first two arguments are. The first defines which function you are using, and the second tell AGGREGATE how to deal with Errors, hidden rows, and some other nested functions. That is the relatively easy part. What I believe you want to know is what is happening with this:
(doc1!$B$2:$H$14=J2)*ROW(doc1!$B$2:$H$14)
For illustrative purpose lets reduce this formula to something a little smaller in scale that does the same thing. I'll avoid starting in A1 as that can make life a little easier when counting since it the 1st row and first column. So by placing the example range outside of it you can see some more special considerations potentially.
What I want to know is what row each of the items list in Column C occurs in column B
| B | C
3 | DOG | PLATYPUS
4 | CAT | DOG
5 | PLATYPUS |
The full formula for our mini example would be:
{=($B$3:$B$5=C2)*ROW($B$3:$B$5)}
And we are going to look at the following as an array
=INDEX($B$3:$B$5,AGGREGATE(14,6,($B$3:$B$5=C2)*ROW($B$3:$B$5),1)-2)
So the first brackets is going to be a Boolean array as you noted. Every cell that is TRUE will TRUE until its forced into a math calculation. When that happens, True becomes 1 and False becomes 0.I that formula was entered as a CSE formula and place in D2, it would break down as follows:
FALSE X 3
FALSE X 4
TRUE X 5
The 3, 4 and 5 come from ROW() returning the value of the row number that it is dealing with at the time of the array math operation. Little trick, we could have had ROW(1:3). Just need to make sure the size of the array matches! This is not matrix math is just straight across multiplication. And since the Boolean is now experiencing a math operation we are now looking at:
0 X 3 = 0
0 X 4 = 0
1 X 5 = 5
So the array of {0,0,5} gets handed back to the aggregate for more processing. The important thing to note here is that it contains ONLY 0 and the individual row numbers where we had a match. So with the first aggregate formula, formula 14 was chosen which is the LARGE function. And we also told it to ignore errors, which in this particular case does not matter. So after providing the array to the aggregate function, there was a ,1) to finish off the aggregate function. The 1 tells the aggregate function that we want the 1st larges number when the array is sorted from smallest to largest. If that number was 2 it would be the 2nd largest number and so on. So the last row or the only row that something is found on is returned. So in our small example it would be 5.
But wait that 5 was buried inside another function called Index. and in our small example that INDEX formula would be:
=INDEX($B$3:$B$5,AGGREGATE(...)-2)
Well we know that the range is only 3 rows long, so asking for the 5th row, would have excel smacking you up side the head with an error because your index number is out of range. So in comes the header row correction of -1 in the original formula or -2 for the small example and what we really see for the small example is:
=INDEX($B$3:$B$5,5-2)
=INDEX($B$3:$B$5,3)
and here is a weird bit of info, That last one does not become PLATYPUS...it becomes the cell reference to =B5 which pulls PLATYPUS. But that little nuance is a story for another time.
Now in the comments Scott essentially told me to invert for the error to get the first row. And this is important step for the aggregate and it had me running in circles for awhile. So the full equation for the first row option in our mini example is
=INDEX($B$3:$B$5,AGGREGATE(15,6,1/($B$3:$B$5=C2)*ROW($B$3:$B$5),1)-2)
And what Scott Craner was actually suggesting which Skips one math step is:
=INDEX($B$3:$B$5,AGGREGATE(15,6,ROW($B$3:$B$5)/($B$3:$B$5=C2),1)-2)
However since I only realized this after writing this all up the explanation will continue with the first of these two equations
So the important thing to note here is the change from function 14 to function 15 which is SMALL. Think of it a finding the minimum. And this time that 6 plays a huge factor along with the 1/. So our array in the middle this time equates to:
1/FALSE X 3
1/FALSE X 4
1/TRUE X 5
Which then becomes:
1/0 X 3
1/0 X 4
1/1 X 5
Which then has excel slapping you up side the head again because you are trying to divide by 0:
#div/0 X 3
#div/0 X 4
1/1 X 5
But you were smart and you protected yourself from that slap upside the head when you told AGGREGATE to ignore error when you used 6 as the second argument/reference! Therefore what is above becomes:
{5}
Since we are performing a SMALL, and we passed ,1) as the closing part of the AGGREGATE, we have essentially said give me the minimum row number or the 1st smallest number of the resulting array when sorted in ascending order.
The rest plays out the same as it did for the LARGE AGGREGATE method. The pitfall I fell into originally is I did not use the 1/ to force an error. As a result, every time I tried getting the SMALL of the array I was getting 0 from all the false results.
SUMPRODUCT works in a very similar fashion, but only works when your result array in the middle only returns 1 non zero answer. The reason being is the last step of the SUMPRODUCT function is to all the individual elements of the resulting array. So if you only have 1 non zero, you get that non zero number. If you had two rows that matched for instance 12 and 31, then the SUMPRODUCT method would return 43 which is not any of the row numbers you wanted, where as aggregate large would have told you 31 and aggregate small would have told you 12.
Something like this maybe, starting in K2 and copied down:
=IFERROR(INDEX(D:D,MAX(IFERROR(MATCH(J2,B:B,0),-1),IFERROR(MATCH(J2,E:E,0),-1),IFERROR(MATCH(J2,G:G,0),-1),IFERROR(MATCH(J2,H:H,0),-1))),"")
If you want to keep the positions of the columns for the Match variable, consider creating generic range names for each column you want to check, like "Col1", "Col2", "Col3". Create a few more range names than you think you will need and reference them to =$B:$B, =$E:$E etc. Plug all range names into Match functions inside the Max() statement as above.
When columns are added or removed from the table, adjust the range name definitions to the columns you want to check.
For example, if you set up the formula with five Matches inside the Max(), and the table changes so you only want to check three columns, point three of the range names to the same column. The Max() will only return one result and one lookup, even if the same column is matched several times.
I came up with a vba solution if I understood correctly:
Sub DisplayActiveRange()
Dim sheetToSearch As Worksheet
Set sheetToSearch = Sheet2
Dim sheetToOutput As Worksheet
Set sheetToOutput = Sheet1
Dim search As Range
Dim output As Range
Dim searchCol As String
searchCol = "J"
Dim outputCol As String
outputCol = "K"
Dim valueCol As String
valueCol = "D"
Dim r As Range
Dim currentRow As Integer
currentRow = 1
Dim maxRow As Integer
maxRow = sheetToOutput.UsedRange.Rows.Count
For currentRow = 1 To maxRow
Set search = Range("J" & currentRow)
For Each r In sheetToSearch.UsedRange
If r.Value <> "" Then
If r.Value = search.Value Then
Set output = sheetToOutput.Range(outputCol & currentRow)
output.Value = sheetToSearch.Range(valueCol & currentRow).Value
currentRow = currentRow + 1
Set search = sheetToOutput.Range(searchCol & currentRow)
End If
End If
Next
Next currentRow
End Sub
There might be better ways of doing it, but this will give you what you want. We assume headers in both "source" and "destination" sheets. You will need to adapt the "Const" declarations according to how your sheets are named. Press Control & G in Excel to bring up the VBA window and copy and paste this code into "This Workbook" under the "VBA Project" group, then select "Run" from the menu:
Option Explicit
Private Const sourceSheet = "Source"
Private Const destSheet = "Destination"
Public Sub FindColumns()
Dim rowCount As Long
Dim foundValue As String
Sheets(destSheet).Select
rowCount = 1 'Assume a header row
Do While Range("J" & rowCount + 1).value <> ""
rowCount = rowCount + 1
foundValue = FncFindText(Range("J" & rowCount).value)
Sheets(destSheet).Select
Range("K" & rowCount).value = foundValue
Loop
End Sub
Private Function FncFindText(value As String) As String
Dim rowLoop As Long
Dim colLoop As Integer
Dim found As Boolean
Dim pos As Long
Sheets(sourceSheet).Select
rowLoop = 1
colLoop = 0
Do While Range(alphaCon(colLoop + 1) & rowLoop + 1).value <> "" And found = False
rowLoop = rowLoop + 1
Do While Range(alphaCon(colLoop + 1) & rowLoop).value <> "" And found = False
colLoop = colLoop + 1
pos = InStr(Range(alphaCon(colLoop) & rowLoop).value, value)
If pos > 0 Then
FncFindText = Mid(Range(alphaCon(colLoop) & rowLoop).value, pos, Len(value))
found = True
End If
Loop
colLoop = 0
Loop
End Function
Private Function alphaCon(aNumber As Integer) As String
Dim letterArray As String
Dim iterations As Integer
letterArray = "ABCDEFGHIJKLMNOPQRSTUVWXYZ"
If aNumber <= 26 Then
alphaCon = (Mid$(letterArray, aNumber, 1))
Else
If aNumber Mod 26 = 0 Then
iterations = Int(aNumber / 26)
alphaCon = (Mid$(letterArray, iterations - 1, 1)) & (Mid$(letterArray, 26, 1))
Else
'we deliberately round down using 'Int' as anything with decimal places is not a full iteration.
iterations = Int(aNumber / 26)
alphaCon = (Mid$(letterArray, iterations, 1)) & (Mid$(letterArray, (aNumber - (26 * iterations)), 1))
End If
End If
End Function
I have a worksheet with products where the people in my office can add new positions. The problem we're running into is that the products have specifications but not everybody puts them in (or inputs them wrong).
Example:
"cool product 14C"
Is there a way to convert Data Valuation option so that it warns me now in case I put "very cool product 14B" or anything that contains an already existing string of characters (say, longer than 4), like "cool produKt 14C" but also "good product 15" and so on?
I know that I can prevent 100% matches using COUNTIF and spot words that start/end in the same way using LEFT/RIGHT but I need to spot partial matches within the entries as well.
Thanks a lot!
If you want to cover typo's, word wraps, figure permutations etc. maybe a SOUNDEX algorithm would suit to your problem. Here's an implementation for Excel ...
So if you insert this as a user defined function, and create a column =SOUNDEX(A1) for each product row, upon entry of a new product name you can filter for all product rows with same SOUNDEX value. You can further automate this by letting user enter the new name into a dialog form first, do the validation, present them a Combo Box dropdown with possible duplicates, etc. etc. etc.
edit:
small function to find parts of strings terminated by blanks in a range (in answer to your comment)
Function FindSplit(Arg As Range, LookRange As Range) As String
Dim LookFor() As String, LookCell As Range
Dim Idx As Long
LookFor = Split(Arg)
FindSplit = ""
For Idx = 0 To UBound(LookFor)
For Each LookCell In LookRange.Cells
If InStr(1, LookCell, LookFor(Idx)) <> 0 Then
If FindSplit <> "" Then FindSplit = FindSplit & ", "
FindSplit = FindSplit & LookFor(Idx) & ":" & LookCell.Row
End If
Next LookCell
Next Idx
If FindSplit = "" Then FindSplit = "Cool entry!"
End Function
This is a bit crude ... but what it does is the following
split a single cell argument in pieces and put it into an array --> split()
process each piece --> For Idx = ...
search another range for strings that contain the piece --> For Each ...
add piece and row number of cell where it was found into a result string
You can enter/copy this as a formula next to each cell input and know immediately if you've done a cool input or not.
Value of cell D8 is [asd:3, wer:4]
Note the use of absolute addressing in the start of lookup range; this way you can copy the formula well down.
edit 17-Mar-2015
further to comment Joanna 17-Mar-2015, if the search argument is part of the range you're scanning, e.g. =FINDSPLIT(C5; C1:C12) you want to make sure that the If Instr(...) doesn't hit if LookCell and LookFor(Idx) are really the same cell as this would create a false positive. So you would rewrite the statement to
...
...
If InStr(1, LookCell, LookFor(Idx)) <> 0 And _
Not (LookCell.Row = Arg.Row And LookCell.Column = Arg.Column) _
Then
hint
Do not use a complete column (e.g. $C:$C) as the second argument as the function tends to become very slow without further precautions