I am trying to run the following command as part of the bash script which suppose to open ssh channel, run the program on the remote machine, save the output to the file for 10 sec, kill the process, which was writing to the file and then give the control back to bash script.
#!/bin/bash
ssh hostname '/root/bin/nodes-listener > /tmp/nodesListener.out </dev/null; sshpid=!$; sleep 10; kill -9 $sshpid 2>/dev/null &'
Unfortunately, what it seems to be doing is starting the program: nodes-listener remotely, but it never gets any further and it doesn't give control to the bash script. So, the only way to stop the execution is to do Ctrl+C.
Killing ssh doesn't help (or rather can't be executed) since the control is not with bash script as it waits for the command within the ssh session to complete, which of course never happens as it has to be killed to stop.
Here's the command line that you're running on the remote system:
/root/bin/nodes-listener > /tmp/nodesListener.out </dev/null
sshpid=!$
sleep 10
kill -9 $sshpid 2>/dev/null &
You should change it to this:
/root/bin/nodes-listener > /tmp/nodesListener.out </dev/null & <-- Ampersand goes here
sshpid=$!
sleep 10
kill -9 $sshpid 2>/dev/null
You want to start nodes-listener and then kill it after ten seconds. To do this, you need to start nodes-listener as a background process, so that the shell which is executing this command line to move on to the next command after starting nodes-listener. The & in your command line is in the wrong place, and would apply only to the kill command. You need to apply it to the nodes-listener command.
I'll also note that your sshpid=!$ line was incorrect. You want sshpid=$!. $! is the process ID of the last command started in the background.
You need to place the ampersand after the first command, then put the remaining commands onto the next line:
ssh hostname -- '/root/bin/nodes-listener > /tmp/nodesListener.out </dev/null &
sshpid=$!; sleep 10; kill $sshpid 2>/dev/null'
Btw, ssh is returning after all commands had been executed. This does mean it will close the allocated pty as well. If there are still background jobs running in that shell session, they would being killed by SIGHUP. This means, you can probably omit the explicit kill command. (Depends on whether nodes-listener handles SIGHUP and SIGTERM differently). Having this, you could simplify the code to the following:
ssh hostname -- sh -c '/root/bin/nodes-listener > /tmp/nodesListener.out </dev/null &
sleep 10'
I have resolved this by pushing the shell script to the remote machine and executing it there. It is actually less tidy and relies on space being available on the remote computer.
Since my remote machine is a small physical device, the issue of the space usage is important (even for the tiny amount of space required in this case).
/root/bin/nodes-listener > /tmp/nodesListener.out </dev/null &
sshpid=!$
sleep 20
sync
# killing nodes-listener process and giving control back to the base bash
killall -9 nodes-listener 2>/dev/null && echo "nodes-listener is killed"
Related
I am trying to use the "nohup" command to avoid killing a background process when exiting the terminal on linux MATE.
The process I want to run is a MPIrun process and I use the following command:
nohup mpirun -np 8 solverName -parallel >log 2>&1
when I leave the terminal, the processes running on the different cores are killed.
Also another thing I remarked in the log file, is that if I try to just run the following command
mpirun -np 8 solverName -parallel >log 2>&1
and then to CTRL+Z (stopping the process) the log file indicates :
Forwarding signal 20 to job
and I am unable to actually stop the mpirun command. So I guess there is something I don't understand in what I am doing
The job run in the background is still owned by your login shell (the nohup command doesn't exit until the mpirun command terminates), so it gets signalled when you disconnect. This script (I call it bk) is what I use:
#!/bin/sh
#
# #(#)$Id: bk.sh,v 1.9 2008/06/25 16:43:25 jleffler Exp $"
#
# Run process in background
# Immune from logoffs -- output to file log
(
echo "Date: `date`"
echo "Command: $*"
nice nohup "$#"
echo "Completed: `date`"
echo
) >>${LOGFILE:=log} 2>&1 &
(If you're into curiosities, note the careful use of $* and "$#". The nice runs the job at a lower priority when I'm not there. And version 1.1 was checked into version control — SCCS at the time — on 1987-08-10.)
For your process, you'd run:
$ bk mpirun -np 8 solverName -parallel
$
The prompt returns almost immediately. The key differences between what is in that code and what you do direct from the command line are:
There's a sub-process for the shell script, which terminates promptly.
The script itself runs the command in a sub-shell in background.
Between them, these mean that the process is not interfered with by your login shell; it doesn't know about the grandchild process.
Running direct on the command line, you'd write:
(nohup mpirun -np 8 solverName -parallel >log 2>&1 &)
The parentheses start a subshell; the sub-shell runs nohup in the background with I/O redirection and terminates. The continuing command is a grandchild of your login shell and is not interfered with by your login shell.
I'm not an expert in mpirun, never having used it, so there's a chance it does something I'm not expecting. My impression from the manual page is that it acts more or less like a regular process even though it can run multiple other processes, possibly on multiple nodes. That is, it runs the other processes but monitors and coordinates them and only exits when its children are complete. If that's correct, then what I've outlined is accurate enough.
To kill the process you need the following command.
first:
$ jobs -l
this gives you the PID of the process like this
[1]+ 47274 Running nohup mpirun -np 8 solverName -parallel >log 2>&1
then execute the following command to kill the process.
kill -9 {program PID i.e 47274 }
this will help you with killing the process.
note that ctrl+Z does not kill the process but it suspends it.
for the first part of the question, I recommend to try this command and see if it works or not.
nohup nohup mpirun -n 8 --your_flags ./compited_solver_name > Output.txt &
it worked for me.
tell us if it doesn't work for you.
I use this command in linux terminal to connect to a server and use it as proxy :
ssh -N -D 7070 root#ip_address
it's get the password and connect and everything is Ok but how can I put this process in background ?
I used CTRL+Z but it stop not put this process in background ...
CTRL-Z is doing exactly what it should, which is stop the process. If you then want to put it in the background, the shell command for doing that is bg:
$ ssh -N -D 7070 -l user 192.168.1.51
user#192.168.1.51's password:
^Z
[1]+ Stopped ssh -N -D 7070 -l mjfraioli 192.168.1.51
$ bg
[1]+ ssh -N -D 7070 -l user 192.168.1.51 &
That way you can enter the password interactively, and only once that is complete, stop it and put it into the background.
Try adding an ampersand to the end of your command:
ssh -N -D 7070 root#ip_address &
Explanation:
This trailing ampersand directs the shell to run the command in the background, that is, it is forked and run in a separate sub-shell, as a job, asynchronously. The shell will immediately return the return status of 0 for true and continue as normal, either processing further commands in a script or returning the cursor focus back to the user in a Linux terminal.
The shell will print out the forked process’s job number and process ID (PID) like so:
$ ./myscript.py &
[1] 1337
The stdout of the forked process will still be attached to the parent, so any output will still appear in your terminal.
After a process is forked using a single trailing ampersand &, its process ID (PID) is stored in a special variable $!. This can be used later to refer to the process:
$ echo $!
1337
Once a process is forked, it can be seen in the jobs list:
$ jobs
[1]+ Running ./myscript.py &
And it can be brought back to the command line before it finishes with the foreground command:
fg
The foreground command takes an optional argument of the job number, if you have forked multiple processes.
A single ampersand & can also delimit a list of commands to be run asynchronously.
./script.py & ./script2.py & ./script3.py &
In this example, all 3 python scripts are run at the same time, in separate sub-shells. Their stdout will still be attached to the parent shell, so if running this from a Linux terminal, you will still see the outputs.
This can also be used as a quick hack to take advantage of multiple cores with shell scripts, but be warned, it is a hack!
To detach a process completely from the shell, you may want to pipe the stdout and stderr to a file or to /dev/null. A nice way of doing this is with the nohup command.
source for above explanation: http://bashitout.com/2013/05/18/Ampersands-on-the-command-line.html
You can add option -f to make the ssh command run in background.
So the answer is ssh -f -D port username#hostname -N.
I have two scripts, in which one is calling the other, and needs to kill it after some time. A very basic, working example is given below.
main_script.sh:
#!/bin/bash
cd "${0%/*}" #make current working directory the folder of this script
./record.sh &
PID=$!
# perform some other commands
sleep 5
kill -s SIGINT $PID
#wait $PID
echo "Finished"
record.sh:
#!/bin/bash
cd "${0%/*}" #make current working directory the folder of this script
RECORD_PIDS=1
printf "WallTimeStart: %f\n\n" $(date +%s.%N) >> test.txt
top -b -p $RECORD_PIDS -d 1.00 >> test.txt
printf "WallTimeEnd: %f\n\n" $(date +%s.%N) >> test.txt
Now, if I run main_script.sh, it will not nicely close record.sh on finish: the top command will keep on running in the background (test.txt will grow until you manually kill the top process), even though the main_script is finished and the record script is killed using SIGINT.
If I ctrl+c the main_script.sh, everything shuts down properly. If I run record.sh on its own and ctrl+c it, everything shuts down properly as well.
If I uncomment wait, the script will hang and I will need to ctrl+z it.
I have already tried all kinds of things, including using 'trap' to launch some cleanup script when receiving a SIGINT, EXIT, and/or SIGTERM, but nothing worked. I also tried bring record.sh back to the foreground using fg, but that did not help too. I have been searching for nearly a day now already, with now luck unfortunately. I have made an ugly workaround which uses pidof to find the top process and kill it manually (from main_script.sh), and then I have to write the "WallTimeEnd" statement manually to it as well from the main_script.sh. Not very satisfactory to me...
Looking forward to any tips!
Cheers,
Koen
Your issue is that the SIGINT is delivered to bash rather than to top. One option would be to use a new session and send the signal to the process group instead, like:
#!/bin/bash
cd "${0%/*}" #make current working directory the folder of this script
setsid ./record.sh &
PID=$!
# perform some other commands
sleep 5
kill -s SIGINT -$PID
wait $PID
echo "Finished"
This starts the sub-script in a new process group and the -pid tells kill to signal every process in that group, which will include top.
When launching a bash script in LINUX, the script succeeds and is successful, yet the terminal hangs. I must always input CTRL+C to end the program. I am able to type in the terminal and press enter, but the script does not respond.
I can not change the script files, but can I launch it so that it disables waiting for the user? Any troubleshooting tips to disable this behaviour?
You can execute the script with & at the end, this will give the control back to the shell (executes the script as a background process).
./script.sh &
If you want to stop the script, you need to get its process id and then kill it. To get the process id, either execute ps aux | grep script where script is your script name, or execute echo $! right after you launched the script. When you have the process id, you can kill the process with kill 1234 where 1234 is the process id.
If the execution time of the script can be estimated, you can kill it automatically after a certain amount of time:
bash -c '(sleep 5m; kill $$ 2> /dev/null) & exec script' &
In this command sleep 5m is the time after the process will be killed, and script is the name of your script (or the command).
For example if the script's execution time is 30 seconds on average, then you can set the timeout to a minute or two to give it some extra time in case the execution is slower than usual. Note that this command doesn't guarantee that the script finished its execution, so use it with care.
(OSX 10.7) An application we use let us assign scripts to be called when certain activities occur within the application. I have assigned a bash script and it's being called, the problem is that what I need to do is to execute a few commands, wait 30 seconds, and then execute some more commands. If I have my bash script do a "sleep 30" the entire application freezes for that 30 seconds while waiting for my script to finish.
I tried putting the 30 second wait (and the second set of commands) into a separate script and calling "./secondScript &" but the application still sits there for 30 seconds doing nothing. I assume the application is waiting for the script and all child processes to terminate.
I've tried these variations for calling the second script from within the main script, they all have the same problem:
nohup ./secondScript &
( ( ./secondScript & ) & )
( ./secondScript & )
nohup script -q /dev/null secondScript &
I do not have the ability to change the application and tell it to launch my script and not wait for it to complete.
How can I launch a process (I would prefer the process to be in a scripting language) such that the new process is not a child of the current process?
Thanks,
Chris
p.s. I tried the "disown" command and it didn't help either. My main script looks like this:
[initial commands]
echo Launching second script
./secondScript &
echo Looking for jobs
jobs
echo Sleeping for 1 second
sleep 1
echo Calling disown
disown
echo Looking again for jobs
jobs
echo Main script complete
and what I get for output is this:
Launching second script
Looking for jobs
[1]+ Running ./secondScript &
Sleeping for 1 second
Calling disown
Looking again for jobs
Main script complete
and at this point the calling application sits there for 45 seconds, waiting for secondScript to finish.
p.p.s
If, at the top of the main script, I execute "ps" the only thing it returns is the process ID of the interactive bash session I have open in a separate terminal window.
The value of $SHELL is /bin/bash
If I execute "ps -p $$" it correctly tells me
PID TTY TIME CMD
26884 ?? 0:00.00 mainScript
If I execute "lsof -p $$" it gives me all kinds of results (I didn't paste all the columns here assuming they aren't relevant):
FD TYPE NAME
cwd DIR /private/tmp/blahblahblah
txt REG /bin/bash
txt REG /usr/lib/dyld
txt REG /private/var/db/dyld/dyld_shared_cache_x86_64
0 PIPE
1 PIPE -> 0xffff8041ea2d10
2 PIPE -> 0xffff 8017d21cb
3r DIR /private/tmp/blahblah
4r REG /Volumes/DATA/blahblah
255r REG /Volumes/DATA/blahblah
The typical way of doing this in Unix is to double fork. In bash, you can do this with
( sleep 30 & )
(..) creates a child process, and & creates a grandchild process. When the child process dies, the grandchild process is inherited by init.
If this doesn't work, then your application is not waiting for child processes.
Other things it may be waiting for include the session and open lock files:
To create a new session, Linux has a setsid. On OS X, you might be able to do it through script, which incidentally also creates a new session:
# Linux:
setsid sleep 30
# OS X:
nohup script -q -c 'sleep 30' /dev/null &
To find a list of inherited file descriptors, you can use lsof -p yourpid, which will output something like:
sleep 22479 user 0u CHR 136,32 0t0 35 /dev/pts/32
sleep 22479 user 1u CHR 136,32 0t0 35 /dev/pts/32
sleep 22479 user 2u CHR 136,32 0t0 35 /dev/pts/32
sleep 22479 user 5w REG 252,0 0 1048806 /tmp/lockfile
In this case, in addition to the standard FDs 0, 1 and 2, you also have a fd 5 open with a lock file that the parent can be waiting for.
To close fd 5, you can use exec 5>&-. If you think the lock file might be stdin/stdout/stderr themselves, you can use nohup to redirect them to something else.
Another way is to abandon the child
#!/bin/bash
yourprocess &
disown
As far as I understand, the application replaces the normal bash shell because it is still waiting for a process to finish even if init should have taken care of this child process.
It could be that the "application" intercepts the orphan handling which is normally done by init.
In that case, only a parallel process with some IPC can offer a solution (see my other answer)
I think it depends on how your parent process tries to detect if your child process has been finished.
In my case (my parent process was gnu make), I succeed by closing stdout and stderr (slightly based on the answer of that other guy) like this:
sleep 30 >&- 2>&- &
You might also close stdin
sleep 30 <&- >&- 2>&- &
or additionally disown your child process (not for Mac)
sleep 30 <&- >&- 2>&- & disown
Currently tested only in bash on kubuntu 14.04 and Mac OSX.
If all else fails:
Create a named pipe
start the "slow" script independent from the "application", make sure executes it's task in an endless loop, starting with reading from the pipe. It will become read-blocked when it tries to read..
from the application, start your other script. When it needs to invoke the "slow" script, just write some data to the pipe. The slow script will start independently so your script won't wait for the "slow" script to finish.
So, to answer the question:
bash - how can I launch a new process that is NOT a child of the original process?
Simple: don't launch it but let an independent entity launch it during boot...like init or on the fly with the command at or batch
Here I have a shell
└─bash(13882)
Where I start a process like this:
$ (urxvt -e ssh somehost&)
I get a process tree (this output snipped from pstree -p):
├─urxvt(14181)───ssh(14182)
where the process is parented beneath pid 1 (systemd in my case).
However, had I instead done this (note where the & is) :
$ (urxvt -e ssh somehost)&
then the process would be a child of the shell:
└─bash(13882)───urxvt(14181)───ssh(14182)
In both cases the shell prompt is immediately returned and I can exit
without terminating the process tree that I started above.
For the latter case the process tree is reparented beneath pid 1 when
the shell exits, so it ends up the same as the first example.
├─urxvt(14181)───ssh(14182)
Either way, the result is a process tree that outlives the shell. The
only difference is the initial parenting of that process tree.
For reference, you can also use
nohup urxvt -e ssh somehost &
urxvt -e ssh somehost & disown $!
Both give the same process tree as the second example above.
└─bash(13882)───urxvt(14181)───ssh(14182)
When the shell is terminated the process tree is, like before, reparented
to pid 1.
nohup additionally redirects the process' standard output to a file
nohup.out so, if that is a useful trait, it may be a more useful choice.
Otherwise, with the first form above, you immediately have a completely
detached process tree.