Is it possible to compare two String.Index values in Swift? I'm trying to process a string character by character, and several times I need to check if I am at the end of the string. I've tried just doing
while (currentIndex < string.endIndex) {
//do things...
currentIndex = currentIndex.successor()
}
Which complained about type conversions. Then, I tried defining and overload for < as such:
#infix func <(lhs: String.Index, rhs: String.Index) -> Bool {
var ret = true //what goes here?
return ret
}
Which gets rid of compilation errors, but I have no clue what to do in order to compare lhs and rhs properly. Is this the way I should go about using String.Index, or is there a better way to compare them?
The simplest option is the distance() function:
var string = "Hello World"
var currentIndex = string.startIndex
while (distance(currentIndex, string.endIndex) >= 0) {
println("currentIndex: \(currentIndex)")
currentIndex = currentIndex.successor()
}
Beware distance() has O(N) performance, so avoid it for large strings. However, the entire String class doesn't currently handle large strings anyway — you should probably switch to CFString if performance is critical.
Using an operator overload is a bad idea, but just as a learning exercise this is how you'd do it:
var string = "Hello World"
var currentIndex = string.startIndex
#infix func <(lhs: String.Index, rhs: String.Index) -> Bool {
return distance(lhs, rhs) > 0
}
while (currentIndex < string.endIndex) {
currentIndex = currentIndex.successor()
}
String indexes support = and !=. String indexes are an opaque type, not integers and can not be compared like integers.
Use: if (currentIndex != string.endIndex)
var currentIndex = string.startIndex
while (currentIndex != string.endIndex) {
println("currentIndex: \(currentIndex)")
currentIndex = currentIndex.successor()
}
I believe this REPL/Playground example should illuminate what you (and others) need to know about working with the String.Index concept.
// This will be our working example
let exampleString = "this is a string"
// And here we'll call successor a few times to get an index partway through the example
var someIndexInTheMiddle = exampleString.startIndex
for _ in 1...5 {
someIndexInTheMiddle = someIndexInTheMiddle.successor()
}
// And here we will iterate that string and detect when our current index is relative in one of three different possible ways to the character selected previously
println("\n\nsomeIndexInTheMiddle = \(exampleString[someIndexInTheMiddle])")
for var index: String.Index = exampleString.startIndex; index != exampleString.endIndex; index = index.successor() {
println(" - \(exampleString[index])")
if index != exampleString.startIndex && index.predecessor() == someIndexInTheMiddle {
println("current character comes after someIndexInTheMiddle")
} else if index == someIndexInTheMiddle {
println("current character is the one indicated by someIndexInTheMiddle")
} else if index != exampleString.endIndex && index.successor() == someIndexInTheMiddle {
println("Current character comes before someIndexinTheMiddle")
}
}
Hopefully that provides the necessary information.
Whatever way you decide to iterator over a String, you will immediately want to capture the iteration in a function that can be repeatedly invoked while using a closure applied to each string character. As in:
extension String {
func each (f: (Character) -> Void) {
for var index = self.startIndex;
index < self.endIndex;
index = index.successor() {
f (string[index])
}
}
}
Apple already provides these for C-Strings and will for general strings as soon as they get character access solidified.
Related
I have a method that detects urls in a string and returns me both the urls and the ranges where they can be found. Everything works perfectly until there are emojis on the string. For example:
"I'm gonna do this callenge as soon as I can swing again 😂😂😂\n http://youtu.be/SW_d3fGz1hk"
Because of the emojis, the url extracted from the text is http://youtu.be/SW_d3fGz1 instead of http://youtu.be/SW_d3fGz1hk. I figured that the easiest solution was to just replace the emojis on the string with whitespace characters (cause I need the range to be correct for some text styling stuff). Problem is, this is extremely hard to accomplish with Swift (most likely my abilities with the Swift String API is lacking).
I've been trying to do it like this but it seems that I cannot create a string from an array of unicode points:
var emojilessStringWithSubstitution: String {
let emojiRanges = [0x1F601...0x1F64F, 0x2702...0x27B0]
let emojiSet = Set(emojiRanges.flatten())
let codePoints: [UnicodeScalar] = self.unicodeScalars.map {
if emojiSet.contains(Int($0.value)) {
return UnicodeScalar(32)
}
return $0
}
return String(codePoints)
}
Am I approaching this problem the wrong way? Is replacing emojis the best solution here? If so, how can I do it?
Swift 5
Don't use this hardcoded way to detect emojis. In Swift 5 you can do it easily
let inputText = "Some 🖐string 😂😂😂 with 👹👹 👹 emoji 🖐"
let textWithoutEmoij = inputText.unicodeScalars
.filter { !$0.properties.isEmojiPresentation }
.reduce("") { $0 + String($1) }
print(textWithoutEmoij) // Some string with emoji
You can use pattern matching (for emoji patterns) to filter out emoji characters from your String.
extension String {
var emojilessStringWithSubstitution: String {
let emojiPatterns = [UnicodeScalar(0x1F601)...UnicodeScalar(0x1F64F),
UnicodeScalar(0x2702)...UnicodeScalar(0x27B0)]
return self.unicodeScalars
.filter { ucScalar in !(emojiPatterns.contains{ $0 ~= ucScalar }) }
.reduce("") { $0 + String($1) }
}
}
/* example usage */
let str = "I'm gonna do this callenge as soon as I can swing again 😂😂😂\n http://youtu.be/SW_d3fGz1hk"
print(str.emojilessStringWithSubstitution)
/* I'm gonna do this callenge as soon as I can swing again
http://youtu.be/SW_d3fGz1hk */
Note that the above only makes use of the emoji intervals as presented in your question, and is in no way representative for all emojis, but the method is general and can swiftly be extended by including additional emoji intervals to the emojiPatterns array.
I realize reading your question again that you'd prefer substituting emojis with whitespace characters, rather than removing them (which the above filtering solution does). We can achieve this by replacing the .filter operation above with a conditional return .map operation instead, much like in your question
extension String {
var emojilessStringWithSubstitution: String {
let emojiPatterns = [UnicodeScalar(0x1F600)...UnicodeScalar(0x1F64F),
UnicodeScalar(0x1F300)...UnicodeScalar(0x1F5FF),
UnicodeScalar(0x1F680)...UnicodeScalar(0x1F6FF),
UnicodeScalar(0x2600)...UnicodeScalar(0x26FF),
UnicodeScalar(0x2700)...UnicodeScalar(0x27BF),
UnicodeScalar(0xFE00)...UnicodeScalar(0xFE0F)]
return self.unicodeScalars
.map { ucScalar in
emojiPatterns.contains{ $0 ~= ucScalar } ? UnicodeScalar(32) : ucScalar }
.reduce("") { $0 + String($1) }
}
}
I the above, the existing emoji intervals has been extended, as per your comment to this post (listing these intervals), such that the emoji check is now possibly exhaustive.
Swift 4:
extension String {
func stringByRemovingEmoji() -> String {
return String(self.filter { !$0.isEmoji() })
}
}
extension Character {
fileprivate func isEmoji() -> Bool {
return Character(UnicodeScalar(UInt32(0x1d000))!) <= self && self <= Character(UnicodeScalar(UInt32(0x1f77f))!)
|| Character(UnicodeScalar(UInt32(0x2100))!) <= self && self <= Character(UnicodeScalar(UInt32(0x26ff))!)
}
}
Emojis are classified as symbols by Unicode. Character sets are typically used in searching operations. So we will use Character sets a property that is symbols.
var emojiString = "Hey there 🖐, welcome"
emojiString = emojiString.components(separatedBy: CharacterSet.symbols).joined()
print(emojiString)
Output is
Hey there , welcome
Now observe the emoji is replaced by a white space so there is two white space and we replace it by the following way
emojiString.replacingOccurrences(of: " ", with: " ")
The above method replace parameter of: "two white space" to with: "single white space"
Getting all emoji is more complicated than you would think. For more info on how to figure out which characters are emoji, check out this stackoverflow post or this article.
Building on that information, I would propose to use the extension on Character to more easily let us understand which characters are emoji. Then add a String extension to easily replace found emoji with another character.
extension Character {
var isSimpleEmoji: Bool {
guard let firstProperties = unicodeScalars.first?.properties else {
return false
}
return unicodeScalars.count == 1 &&
(firstProperties.isEmojiPresentation ||
firstProperties.generalCategory == .otherSymbol)
}
var isCombinedIntoEmoji: Bool {
return unicodeScalars.count > 1 &&
unicodeScalars.contains {
$0.properties.isJoinControl ||
$0.properties.isVariationSelector
}
}
var isEmoji: Bool {
return isSimpleEmoji || isCombinedIntoEmoji
}
}
extension String {
func replaceEmoji(with character: Character) -> String {
return String(map { $0.isEmoji ? character : $0 })
}
}
Using it would simply become:
"Some string 😂😂😂 with emoji".replaceEmoji(with: " ")
I found that the solutions given above did not work for certain characters such as 🏋️🏻♂️ and 🧰.
To find the emoji ranges, using regex I converted the full list of emoji characters to a file with just hex values. Then I converted them to decimal format and sorted them. Finally, I wrote a script to find the ranges.
Here is the final Swift extension for isEmoji().
extension Character {
func isEmoji() -> Bool {
let emojiRanges = [
(8205, 11093),
(12336, 12953),
(65039, 65039),
(126980, 129685)
]
let codePoint = self.unicodeScalars[self.unicodeScalars.startIndex].value
for emojiRange in emojiRanges {
if codePoint >= emojiRange.0 && codePoint <= emojiRange.1 {
return true
}
}
return false
}
}
For reference, here are the python scripts I wrote to parse the hex strings to integers and then find the ranges.
convert-hex-to-decimal.py
decimals = []
with open('hex.txt') as hexfile:
for line in hexfile:
num = int(line, 16)
if num < 256:
continue
decimals.append(num)
decimals = list(set(decimals))
decimals.sort()
with open('decimal.txt', 'w') as decimalfile:
for decimal in decimals:
decimalfile.write(str(decimal) + "\n")
make-ranges.py
first_line = True
range_start = 0
prev = 0
with open('decimal.txt') as hexfile:
for line in hexfile:
if first_line:
prev = int(line)
range_start = prev
first_line = False
continue
curr = int(line)
if prev + 1000 < curr: # 100 is abitrary to reduce number of ranges
print("(" + str(range_start) + ", " + str(prev) + ")")
range_start = curr
prev = curr
Don't hard-code the range of emojis, use this instead.
func 去除表情符号(字符串:String) -> String {
let 转换为Unicode = 字符串.unicodeScalars//https://developer.apple.com/documentation/swift/string
let 去除表情后的结果 = 转换为Unicode.filter { (item) -> Bool in
let 判断是否表情 = item.properties.isEmoji
return !判断是否表情//是表情就不保留
}
return String(去除表情后的结果)
}
I am trying to use a predicate to search an array of dictionary objects for a string value (from a searchController). I am not getting any partial string matches. I need to search through many key-values for a match, so I am doing it as written in the code below.
My problem is that if I search: "Orida"
I am not Finding: "Florida"
I believe I have the Predicate set correctly...
self.filteredData.removeAll(keepCapacity: false)
let searchPredicate = NSPredicate(format: "SELF CONTAINS[cd] %#", self.searchController.searchBar.text!)
let array = (self.airportData as NSArray).filteredArrayUsingPredicate(searchPredicate)
self.filteredData = array as! [Dictionary<String, String>]
It is working correctly if I type the exact matching string that appears in any Value of the dictionary, but not if I search for a partial match...
This isn't a duplicate post - all of the existing posts about this that I've found either aren't searching multiple values (like multiple key-values in my dictionary) or are using the contains() method on strings themselves.
Update
I have tried the answer suggested below using filter:
let searchPredicate = NSPredicate(format: "SELF CONTAINS[cd] %#", searchController.searchBar.text!)
let array = (self.airportData as NSArray).filteredArrayUsingPredicate(searchPredicate)
self.filteredData = self.airportData.filter({(item: String) -> Bool in
var stringMatch = item.lowercaseString.rangeOfString(self.searchController.searchBar.text!)
return stringMatch != nil ? true : false
I get the following error:
'(String) -> Bool' is not convertible to '([String : String]) -> Bool'
I'm confused about how to get this to handle the dictionary of strings properly.
self.filteredData = self.airportData.filter({(item: String) -> Bool in
var stringMatch = item.lowercaseString.rangeOfString(self.searchController.searchBar.text!)
return stringMatch != nil ? true : false
})
Try to do this using the swift filter method on your array instead.
After a lot of advice from #pbush25, I was able to figure out an answer. It isn't exactly what I wanted, but it works. I was hoping to avoid specifying all the keys in the dictionary that I wanted to search the values of, but it ended up being the only way I could figure out to make it work. I would prefer to use the array.filter, but I couldn't figure out how to get that closure to cast as the right kind of array.
Functioning code:
let startCount = searchController.searchBar.text!.length
delay(1) {
if self.searchController.searchBar.text!.length >= 3 && self.searchController.searchBar.text!.length == startCount{
self.view.addSubview(self.progressHud)
self.appDel.backgroundThread(background: {
self.filteredData.removeAll(keepCapacity: false)
let searchText = self.searchController.searchBar.text!.lowercaseString
self.filteredData = self.airportData.filter{
if let ident = $0["ident"] {
if ident.lowercaseString.rangeOfString(searchText) != nil {
return true
}
}
if let name = $0["name"] {
if name.lowercaseString.rangeOfString(searchText) != nil {
return true
}
}
if let city = $0["municipality"] {
if city.lowercaseString.rangeOfString(searchText) != nil {
return true
}
}
return false
}
},
completion: {
dispatch_async(dispatch_get_main_queue()) {
self.tableView.reloadData()
self.progressHud.removeFromSuperview()
}
});
}
}
let str = "tHIS is A test"
let swapped_case = "This IS a TEST"
Swift noob here, how to do the second statement programatically?
This function works with all upper/lowercase characters
defined in Unicode, even those from "foreign" languages such as Ä or ć:
func swapCases(_ str : String) -> String {
var result = ""
for c in str.characters { // Swift 1: for c in str {
let s = String(c)
let lo = s.lowercased() //Swift 1 & 2: s.lowercaseString
let up = s.uppercased() //Swift 1 & 2: s.uppercaseString
result += (s == lo) ? up : lo
}
return result
}
Example:
let str = "tHIS is a test ÄöÜ ĂćŒ Α" // The last character is a capital Greek Alpha
let swapped_case = swapCases(str)
print(swapped_case)
// This IS A TEST äÖü ăĆœ α
Use switch statement in-range checks to determine letter case, and use NSString-bridged methods to convert accordingly.
let str = "tHIS is A test"
let swapped_case = "This IS a TEST"
func swapCase(string: String) -> String {
var swappedCaseString: String = ""
for character in string {
switch character {
case "a"..."z":
let uppercaseCharacter = (String(character) as NSString).uppercaseString
swappedCaseString += uppercaseCharacter
case "A"..."Z":
let lowercaseCharacter = (String(character) as NSString).lowercaseString
swappedCaseString += lowercaseCharacter
default:
swappedCaseString += String(character)
}
}
return swappedCaseString
}
swapCase(str)
I'm a bit too late but this works too :-)
let str = "tHIS is A test"
var res = ""
for c in str {
if contains("ABCDEFGHIJKLMNOPQRSTUVWXYZ", c) {
res += "\(c)".lowercaseString
} else {
res += "\(c)".uppercaseString
}
}
res
In Swift 5 I achieved it by creating a function which iterates through each character of the string, and using string methods to change each character I appended each character back into a new variable:
func reverseCase(string: String) -> String {
var newCase = ""
for char in string {
if char.isLowercase {
newCase.append(char.uppercased())
}
else if char.isUppercase {
newCase.append(char.lowercased())
}
else {
newCase.append(char)
}
}
return newCase
}
Then just pass your string through to the function when you call it in a print statement:
print(reverseCase(string: str))
You already have plenty of good succinct answers but here’s an over-elaborate one for fun.
Really this is a job for map – iterate over a collection (in this case String) and do a thing to each element (here, each Character). Except map takes any collection, but only gives you back an array, which you’d have to then turn into a String again.
But here’s a version of map that, given an extensible collection, gives you back that same kind of extensible collection.
(It does have the limitation of needing both collections to contain the same type, but that’s fine for strings. You could make it return a different type, but then you’d have to tell it which type you wanted i.e. map(s, transform) as String which would be annoying)
func map<C: ExtensibleCollectionType>(source: C, transform: (C.Generator.Element) -> C.Generator.Element) -> C {
var result = C()
for elem in source {
result.append(transform(elem))
}
return result
}
Then to write the transform function, first here’s an extension to character similar to the other answers. It does seem quite unsatisfying that you have to convert to a string just to uppercase a character, is there really no good (international characterset-friendly) way to do this?
extension Character {
var uppercaseCharacter: Character {
let s = String(self).uppercaseString
return s[s.startIndex]
}
var lowercaseCharacter: Character {
let s = String(self).lowercaseString
return s[s.startIndex]
}
}
And the function to flip the case. What I wonder is whether this pattern matching is international-friendly. It seems to be – "A"..."Z" ~= "Ä" returns true.
func flipCase(c: Character) -> Character {
switch c {
case "A"..."Z":
return c.lowercaseCharacter
case "a"..."z":
return c.uppercaseCharacter
default:
return c
}
}
Finally:
let s = map("Hello", flipCase)
// s is a String = "hELLO"
I hope this helps. inputString and resultString are the input and output respectively.
let inputString = "Example"
let outputString = inputString.characters.map { (character) -> Character in
let string = String(character)
let lower = string.lowercased()
let upper = string.uppercased()
return (string == lower) ? Character(upper) : Character(lower)
}
let resultString = String(outputString)
I am trying to validate a form to make sure the user has entered an integer number and not a string. I can check if the number is an integer as follows:
var possibleNumber = timeRetrieved.text
convertedNumber = possibleNumber.toInt()
// convertedNumber is inferred to be of type "Int?", or "optional Int"
if convertedNumber != nil {
println("It's a number!")
totalTime = convertedNumber!
}
My problem is I want to make sure the user has not entered any text, doubles etc. I only want integer numbers. The following code does not work because it evaluates true if the variable is an integer. What code should I use to evaluate if variable is not an integer?
if convertedNumber != nil {
let alertController = UIAlertController(title: "Validation Error", message: "You must enter an integer number!", preferredStyle: .Alert)
let alertAction = UIAlertAction(title: "OK", style: UIAlertActionStyle.Destructive, handler: {(alert : UIAlertAction!) in
alertController.dismissViewControllerAnimated(true, completion: nil)
})
alertController.addAction(alertAction)
presentViewController(alertController, animated: true, completion: nil)
Swift 2 changes this: as both Int("abc") and Int("0") return 0, integer conversion can't be used. You could use this:
class Validation {
static func isStringNumerical(string : String) -> Bool {
// Only allow numbers. Look for anything not a number.
let range = string.rangeOfCharacterFromSet(NSCharacterSet.decimalDigitCharacterSet().invertedSet)
return (range == nil)
}
}
It uses a decimalDigitCharacterSet, and can be changed to use whatever character set you want.
func testIsStringNumerical() {
XCTAssertEqual(SignUpLoyaltyViewController.isStringNumerical("123"), true)
XCTAssertEqual(SignUpLoyaltyViewController.isStringNumerical(""), true)
XCTAssertEqual(SignUpLoyaltyViewController.isStringNumerical("12AA"), false)
XCTAssertEqual(SignUpLoyaltyViewController.isStringNumerical("123.4"), false)
}
This is dramatically faster than the Regex answer. (2000 runs, 0.004s vs regex 0.233s)
If the number the user has entered is not an integer, convertedNumber will be nil. Just add an else clause in which you can show the alert.
Int initializer
This works in Swift 2.2 and above. It is based on Minhal Khan's answer which illustrates that Int has an initializer with this signature: init?(_ text: String, radix: Int = default). Since radix has a default value, it can be left out. *more info on this initializer is found here.
var totalTime: Int?
let possibleInt = timeRetrieved.text ?? ""
if let convertedNumber = Int(possibleInt) {
print("'\(possibleInt)' is an Int")
totalTime = convertedNumber
}
else {
print("'\(possibleInt)' is not an Int")
}
print("totalTime: '\(totalTime)'")
Note: I assumed timeRetrieved is a UITextField. The UITextField text property is an optional string (though programmatically not allowed to be nil). Therefore, the compiler requires it be unwrapped. I used the nil coalescing operator (??) to substitute a nil for empty string which does not yield an integer as desired. Here's a post that discusses the optionality of UITextfield.text.
What i had done was get the value and check if it could convert it, works for me
var enteredText = Int(textfield.text)
if enteredText == nil{
//String entered
}
else{
//Int entered
}
Based on #Graham Perks answer a Swift 3 Version as string extension:
extension String
{
var isNumeric: Bool
{
let range = self.rangeOfCharacter(from: CharacterSet.decimalDigits.inverted)
return (range == nil)
}
}
Usage:
"123".isNumeric // true
"abc".isNumeric // false
I really recommend using a REGEX, I was recently trying to validate 10 digit phone numbers using if let _ = Int(stringToTest)... and on 32 bit hardware, I faced range issues.
func validate(value: String) -> Bool {
let PHONE_REGEX = "\\d{10}"
let phoneTest = NSPredicate(format: "SELF MATCHES %#", PHONE_REGEX)
let result = phoneTest.evaluateWithObject(value)
if result == true {
log.info("'\(self.text!)' is a valid number.")
} else {
log.info("'\(self.text!)' is an invalid number.")
}
return result
}
I have a String, and I would like to reverse it. For example, I am writing an AngularDart filter that reverses a string. It's just for demonstration purposes, but it made me wonder how I would reverse a string.
Example:
Hello, world
should turn into:
dlrow ,olleH
I should also consider strings with Unicode characters. For example: 'Ame\u{301}lie'
What's an easy way to reverse a string, even if it has?
The question is not well defined. Reversing arbitrary strings does not make sense and will lead to broken output. The first (surmountable) obstacle is Utf-16. Dart strings are encoded as Utf-16 and reversing just the code-units leads to invalid strings:
var input = "Music \u{1d11e} for the win"; // Music 𝄞 for the win
print(input.split('').reversed.join()); // niw eht rof
The split function explicitly warns against this problem (with an example):
Splitting with an empty string pattern ('') splits at UTF-16 code unit boundaries and not at rune boundaries[.]
There is an easy fix for this: instead of reversing the individual code-units one can reverse the runes:
var input = "Music \u{1d11e} for the win"; // Music 𝄞 for the win
print(new String.fromCharCodes(input.runes.toList().reversed)); // niw eht rof 𝄞 cisuM
But that's not all. Runes, too, can have a specific order. This second obstacle is much harder to solve. A simple example:
var input = 'Ame\u{301}lie'; // Amélie
print(new String.fromCharCodes(input.runes.toList().reversed)); // eiĺemA
Note that the accent is on the wrong character.
There are probably other languages that are even more sensitive to the order of individual runes.
If the input has severe restrictions (for example being Ascii, or Iso Latin 1) then reversing strings is technically possible. However, I haven't yet seen a single use-case where this operation made sense.
Using this question as example for showing that strings have List-like operations is not a good idea, either. Except for few use-cases, strings have to be treated with respect to a specific language, and with highly complex methods that have language-specific knowledge.
In particular native English speakers have to pay attention: strings can rarely be handled as if they were lists of single characters. In almost every other language this will lead to buggy programs. (And don't get me started on toLowerCase and toUpperCase ...).
Here's one way to reverse an ASCII String in Dart:
input.split('').reversed.join('');
split the string on every character, creating an List
generate an iterator that reverses a list
join the list (creating a new string)
Note: this is not necessarily the fastest way to reverse a string. See other answers for alternatives.
Note: this does not properly handle all unicode strings.
I've made a small benchmark for a few different alternatives:
String reverse0(String s) {
return s.split('').reversed.join('');
}
String reverse1(String s) {
var sb = new StringBuffer();
for(var i = s.length - 1; i >= 0; --i) {
sb.write(s[i]);
}
return sb.toString();
}
String reverse2(String s) {
return new String.fromCharCodes(s.codeUnits.reversed);
}
String reverse3(String s) {
var sb = new StringBuffer();
for(var i = s.length - 1; i >= 0; --i) {
sb.writeCharCode(s.codeUnitAt(i));
}
return sb.toString();
}
String reverse4(String s) {
var sb = new StringBuffer();
var i = s.length - 1;
while (i >= 3) {
sb.writeCharCode(s.codeUnitAt(i-0));
sb.writeCharCode(s.codeUnitAt(i-1));
sb.writeCharCode(s.codeUnitAt(i-2));
sb.writeCharCode(s.codeUnitAt(i-3));
i -= 4;
}
while (i >= 0) {
sb.writeCharCode(s.codeUnitAt(i));
i -= 1;
}
return sb.toString();
}
String reverse5(String s) {
var length = s.length;
var charCodes = new List(length);
for(var index = 0; index < length; index++) {
charCodes[index] = s.codeUnitAt(length - index - 1);
}
return new String.fromCharCodes(charCodes);
}
main() {
var s = "Lorem Ipsum is simply dummy text of the printing and typesetting industry.";
time('reverse0', () => reverse0(s));
time('reverse1', () => reverse1(s));
time('reverse2', () => reverse2(s));
time('reverse3', () => reverse3(s));
time('reverse4', () => reverse4(s));
time('reverse5', () => reverse5(s));
}
Here is the result:
reverse0: => 331,394 ops/sec (3 us) stdev(0.01363)
reverse1: => 346,822 ops/sec (3 us) stdev(0.00885)
reverse2: => 490,821 ops/sec (2 us) stdev(0.0338)
reverse3: => 873,636 ops/sec (1 us) stdev(0.03972)
reverse4: => 893,953 ops/sec (1 us) stdev(0.04089)
reverse5: => 2,624,282 ops/sec (0 us) stdev(0.11828)
Try this function
String reverse(String s) {
var chars = s.splitChars();
var len = s.length - 1;
var i = 0;
while (i < len) {
var tmp = chars[i];
chars[i] = chars[len];
chars[len] = tmp;
i++;
len--;
}
return Strings.concatAll(chars);
}
void main() {
var s = "Hello , world";
print(s);
print(reverse(s));
}
(or)
String reverse(String s) {
StringBuffer sb=new StringBuffer();
for(int i=s.length-1;i>=0;i--) {
sb.add(s[i]);
}
return sb.toString();
}
main() {
print(reverse('Hello , world'));
}
The library More Dart contains a light-weight wrapper around strings that makes them behave like an immutable list of characters:
import 'package:more/iterable.dart';
void main() {
print(string('Hello World').reversed.join());
}
There is a utils package that covers this function. It has some more nice methods for operation on strings.
Install it with :
dependencies:
basic_utils: ^1.2.0
Usage :
String reversed = StringUtils.reverse("helloworld");
Github:
https://github.com/Ephenodrom/Dart-Basic-Utils
Here is a function you can use to reverse strings. It takes an string as input and will use a dart package called Characters to extract characters from the given string. Then we can reverse them and join again to make the reversed string.
String reverse(String string) {
if (string.length < 2) {
return string;
}
final characters = Characters(string);
return characters.toList().reversed.join();
}
Create this extension:
extension Ex on String {
String get reverse => split('').reversed.join();
}
Usage:
void main() {
String string = 'Hello World';
print(string.reverse); // dlroW olleH
}
Reversing "Hello World"