I tried to install a hardware I've installed in my previous computer under Windows 7, basically an external network card with antenna, but when I try to use it, after installed it I get this bluescreen error:
BUGCODE_NDIS_DRIVER
I don't know if it's possible to fix it, any useful information?
PS: If this isn't the best Stack forum, please guide me to the right one.
There is some technical information on Windows Dev Center - Hardware on this bugcheck. Driver developers can find the cause from the bugcheck code and parameters.
I can duplicate the BUGCODE_NDIS_DRIVER blue screen on my Windows 8.1 developer box fairly easily by opening two different VPN tunnels. Luckily, I don't need both running at the same time, so my solution is "don't do that".
For example, I open SonicWALL Global VPN Client to connect to one network. Then, I open the Cisco VPN client to connect to another. The crash happens almost immediately.
If you have two active network card, deactivate one, that is all.
Related
I have been working with web-bluetooth for the past several months on iOS and ChromeOS without any problems. But today, I tried to run some of my examples on Windows for the first time, and to my surprise, most of the things I had implemented didn't work with Windows. I am able to successfully connect to my peripheral, but whenever I try reading or writing anything to a custom service with a custom characteristic, I get the error "GATT operation not authorized". I have tried looking around but there is no information anywhere about this.
I am including below the simplest example I have which is just for turning the LEDs on / off on an nrf52832 board. There is only one custom service and one custom characteristic implemented, the value of which controls the states of the LEDs. This works without any problems on Chromebooks and Macs but does not work on Windows. Here is the link to this simple project including the embedded code and the web-app.
https://github.com/shtarbanov/WebBluetooth-Feather-nRF52832/tree/master/LED%20Control
I have made two implementations of the same thing, one based on promises and another based on async-await located in the folders "WebApp (Async)" and "WebApp (Promises)", respectively. Both of those implementations work fine on Mac and Cromebook, but not on Windows.
It is a known issue that secure characteristics are not accessible using Web Bluetooth on Windows. On other platforms the pairing occurs automatically, but not on Windows. There is an issue tracking this:
https://bugs.chromium.org/p/chromium/issues/detail?id=960258
Stuck with this also and as for workaround i can recommend for windows platform to pair device firstly using windows itself and than to pair it via browser(as a workaround). Not much but hope this helps, at list a little.
P.S. it should be paired via windows only once, so PC will remember device, and than you can pair via browser as long as PC remembers device.
I accidently broke my centos VM in azure by twiddling firewall rules within it. After a reboot, the normal ssh access is not working anymore. Is there any chance to get into that VM, any console login directly to the machine somehow?
After reading the current state (April 2016) at microsoft about this, I've decided to dump the virtual machine and set it up again:
This one-directional access is just a start. Console screenshots and serial output can help identify a problem, but they are not the solution for resolving the problems. We are working on enhancements that will enable secure bi-directional access to the console of the virtual machine. This will enable additionally debugging capabilities, and, more importantly, the ability to resolve a set of common problems through the bi-directional access. Right now, I don’t have a timeline but we know this is critical.
(article)
We've created a Windows 10 application that runs on tablets in Windows 10 kiosk mode. It works just fine, however, the wifi connection gets lost sometimes since the locations are very remote. We tried fixing the issue from the networking side, but when the devices lose and regain internet access the application will still hang as if it doesn't have internet access displaying a blank page. Where these devices are used, they are bolted into the wall to prevent theft. Which means if we want to reboot its very time consuming as we have to unscrew the cases off the wall and then open the cases to gain access to the power button, and the only way to get the application to run successfully again is to do a reboot on the device.
It was suggested that we have a way to perform a reboot from the application, however, every code example I've tried doesn't work in Windows 10 UWP. Here is the most common one I've found:
System.Diagnostics.Process.Start("restart", "/r");
I have access to the namespace
System.Diagnostics
but the Process class does not exist. Anyone have suggestions on rebooting via code on Win 10 UWP? Or a better solution to our issue? Thanks in advance.
It's also worth mentioning I tried execute a Powershell command too and the dll I need to reference for the Powershell class is not compatible with UWP.
What you require is not possible with the APIs available to UWP apps. This was a security decision. An app distributed through the store shouldn't be able to do things like restart machines.
Based on your scenario though you shouldn't need to go through the store. This means that you could PInvoke native code to do whatever you want. This would still need to be initiated on the actual device.
Yes you can do that!
You should add IoT System Administration in App capability declarations:
<Capabilities><iot:Capability Name="systemManagement"/></Capabilities>
and also You need to have "Windows IoT Extension for UWP" added to your project
using this for Shutdown
Windows.System.ShutdownManager.BeginShutdown(Windows.System.ShutdownKind.Shutdown, TimeSpan.FromSeconds(1)); //Delay is not relevant to shutdown
or for Restart
Windows.System.ShutdownManager.BeginShutdown(Windows.System.ShutdownKind.Restart, TimeSpan.FromSeconds(1)); //Delay before restart after shutdown
You can get more information in this Link
I connected two laptops using a cross-over cable. My IP Address is 192.168.1.1 and the other IP Address is 192.168.1.16. We both are able to ping each other and the reply is perfect. There is no loss of packets.
The problem is I shared a file and the other system is not able to open my IP Address using the run command. Even I am not able to open my Shared folder by giving in the run (\\192.168.1.1). A dialogue box with the message \\192.168.1.1, The Network Path was not found opens each time we try this.
But I am able to open his shared folder by giving in run command (\\192.168.1.16). I closed all the firewall services in my system. But still my system is not able to respond. Also we are not able to use remote desktop connection.
Can anyone please help me in solving this?
Additional Details: I use Windows XP and the other machine uses Windows 7. We both are in the same work group.
Here are some steps to solve your problem:
Did you set the static IP by yourself or that come automatically?
If yes then please go and set the IP manually
Then share the file and put the permission of that file to Maximum (If you believe your partner)
Then power down the firewall or antivirus for some moments (say 10 minutes)
Now try to connect using the \192.xxx.xxx.xxx method using the Run window
If the 5th step is not working, then try disabling and reenabling the LAN card, then try the 5th step again.
Hope that solved your problem.
Remote Desktop needs to be explicitly enabled. Right click on "My computer", go to properties and look at the remote settings tab.
I advice you to use Radio Access Point to connect both windows 7 and windowsXP. I think this is best choice of troubleshoting jaringan. why?
Because I already do anything to connect both Operating System but can't solve that problem.
For Remote Desktop Sessions in Linux, I want to know if there something available equivalent for what Team Viewer does for windows?
The main advantage I find of Team viewer is that it can bypass firewalls, needs no NAT configurations or port forwarding rules to be setup in the router.
One of the vnc family?
You will have to make the computer visible to the client machine, if you don't want to mess around with firewalls you will need a third party reflector service to connect both of you.
The price of dog food being what it is, we should probably plug copilot, although there are probably a bunch of free ones.
Erm, TeamViewer is not only for Windows - besides full Mac implementation, it also has Linux support (although it's beta). I haven't tried, but... Did you?