I am using Ubuntu 16.04.3 LTS with ext4 filesystem.
When I make a file like:
touch ../blah.sh
It does not show up when I use:
ls -al
When I try to delete the file with:
rm * --> : rm: cannot remove '*': No such file or directory.
However when I delete it with:
rm ../blah.sh ---> it succeeds.
Besides this I am able to edit the file with vim, put code in there and then run it like:
./../blah.sh
How is this behavior possible? Is this bash specific behaviour or from the operating system? and is it possible to hide a file like this?
When you use .. you are creating the file in the parent directory of where you currently are.
If you try this it should show the file:
ls -al ..
Also for rm you'd have to do the following, though it's dangerous obviously.
rm ../*
Say that I have the folder /dir. Is there a command in bash that I can use so that after performing it, no one could create new files in /dir?
Edit: important to mention that after performing the command, there will be same permissions to the directory files as they were before. For example, if I have folder /dir with file a.txt in it - so after I use my desired command I cant create new files, but I can modify/delete a.txt if I want.
you could change the permission with chmod to only let people read the folders content.
chmod a-w /dir
Will remove all write permissions of all (ugo), but keep x (execute) and r (read) permissions intact.
Yes, it's pretty simple. Just chmod to read only. Here is a sample
chmod -R 0444 /path/to/your/dir/
Where the last 3 4's mean User-readonly, Group-readonly and others-readonly respectively.
I can not delete this directory admin when under the root permission. Can anyone help?
This is mainly due to the improper uninstall of the Vesta control panel. And the file attributes are shown here:
-------------e- admin/conf/mail
-------------e- admin/conf/web
-------------e- admin/conf/dns
and the attributes for directory admin are:
----i--------e- admin/conf
It seems the attribute i is causing problems, that attribute means the file is immutable.
With files like this not even root can change them, you need to change permissions first and then try to delete.
if you have a ext2, 3 or 4 filesystem you can use the chattr command to change the attribute.
Try executing the command:
>sudo chattr -i {filename}
This commands removes the attribute, and you should be able to delete the files.
If you want to set this bit to another file, is a trick to secure some files from deletion even from root, you can try:
>sudo chattr +i {filename}
I am the root user of the system there is a file:
D:\XAMPP\htdocs\magento_41\magento\
which is under htdocs directory.
when in [root#localhost htdocs] i use rm -rf D:\XAMPP\htdocs\magento_41\magento\. it can't remove this file. how to delete it? thank you.
Try
rm 'D:\XAMPP\htdocs\magento_41\magento\'
backslashes are special in the shell (escaping)
Probably your path is wrong. When you're in htdocs dir, try using rm -rf magento_41/magento. Linux doesn't know windows' paths/drive names by default.
I have a symlink to an important directory. I want to get rid of that symlink, while keeping the directory behind it.
I tried rm and get back rm: cannot remove 'foo'.
I tried rmdir and got back rmdir: failed to remove 'foo': Directory not empty
I then progressed through rm -f, rm -rf and sudo rm -rf
Then I went to find my back-ups.
Is there a way to get rid of the symlink with out throwing away the baby with the bathwater?
# this works:
rm foo
# versus this, which doesn't:
rm foo/
Basically, you need to tell it to delete a file, not delete a directory. I believe the difference between rm and rmdir exists because of differences in the way the C library treats each.
At any rate, the first should work, while the second should complain about foo being a directory.
If it doesn't work as above, then check your permissions. You need write permission to the containing directory to remove files.
use the "unlink" command and make sure not to have the / at the end
$ unlink mySymLink
unlink() deletes a name from the file system. If that name was the last link to a file and no processes have the file open the file is deleted and the space it was using is made available for reuse.
If the name was the last link to a file but any processes still have the file open the file will remain in existence until the last file descriptor referring to it is closed.
I think this may be problematic if I'm reading it correctly.
If the name referred to a symbolic link the link is removed.
If the name referred to a socket, fifo or device the name for it is removed but processes which have the object open may continue to use it.
https://linux.die.net/man/2/unlink
rm should remove the symbolic link.
skrall#skrall-desktop:~$ mkdir bar
skrall#skrall-desktop:~$ ln -s bar foo
skrall#skrall-desktop:~$ ls -l foo
lrwxrwxrwx 1 skrall skrall 3 2008-10-16 16:22 foo -> bar
skrall#skrall-desktop:~$ rm foo
skrall#skrall-desktop:~$ ls -l foo
ls: cannot access foo: No such file or directory
skrall#skrall-desktop:~$ ls -l bar
total 0
skrall#skrall-desktop:~$
Use rm symlinkname but do not include a forward slash at the end (do not use: rm symlinkname/). You will then be asked if you want to remove the symlink, y to answer yes.
Assuming it actually is a symlink,
$ rm -d symlink
It should figure it out, but since it can't we enable the latent code that was intended for another case that no longer exists but happens to do the right thing here.
If rm cannot remove a symlink, perhaps you need to look at the permissions on the directory that contains the symlink. To remove directory entries, you need write permission on the containing directory.
Assuming your setup is something like: ln -s /mnt/bar ~/foo, then you should be able to do a rm foo with no problem. If you can't, make sure you are the owner of the foo and have permission to write/execute the file. Removing foo will not touch bar, unless you do it recursively.
I also had the same problem. So I suggest to try unlink <absolute path>.
For example unlink ~/<USER>/<SOME OTHER DIRECTORY>/foo.
On CentOS, just run rm linkname and it will ask to "remove symbolic link?". Type Y and Enter, the link will be gone and the directory be safe.
I had this problem with MinGW (actually Git Bash) running on a Windows Server. None of the above suggestions seemed to work. In the end a made a copy of the directory in case then deleted the soft link in Windows Explorer then deleted the item in the Recycle Bin. It made noises like it was deleting the files but didn't. Do make a backup though!
you can use unlink in the folder where you have created your symlink
If rm cannot remove a link, perhaps you need to look at the permissions on the directory that contains the link. To remove directory entries, you need write permission on the containing directory.