I have an Schema model like this:
var propertySchema = new Schema({
name: {type: String, required: true},
surname: String
});
var objSchema = new Schema({
properties: [prepertySchema]
});
var accountSchema = new Schema({
objects: [objSchema]
});
mongoose.model('account', accountSchema);
Then i have the operations:
account.objects.push(null);
account.save(function(error, account) {
//Error checking and response
})
In that case, i'm getting a ValidationError because of the null value. This is expected. But, in the next operations:
var obj = {properties: null}
account.objects.push(obj);
account.save(function(error, account) {
//Error checking and response
})
Here the value is stored on database, and then i have an unexpected null value where it had been an array. Doing that with objects like this,
var obj = {
properties: [{name:'randname'}, null]
}
Also saves null values in the database that are prohibited to the data model.
I've read about validators, and middleware for checking things. Is there anyway to do this directly on the schema, or i have to parse the received object before i save it in the database? What is the best approach for this?
Well you could just use the model definitions for this. Even though you are embedding you can still do this but of course you do not want to actually save the objects to their own collection. Just feed them into the item as embedded:
var async = require("async"),
mongoose = require("mongoose"),
Schema = mongoose.Schema;
mongoose.connect('mongodb://localhost/prop');
var propertySchema = new Schema({
name: { type: String, required: true },
surname: String
});
var objSchema = new Schema({
properties: [propertySchema],
});
var accountSchema = new Schema({
objects: [objSchema]
});
var Account = mongoose.model( 'account', accountSchema );
var ObjMod = mongoose.model( 'ObjMod', objSchema, null, false );
var PropMod = mongoose.model( 'PropMod', propertySchema, null, false );
var account = new Account();
var prop = new PropMod({ "name": null });
var obj = new ObjMod({ properties: prop });
account.objects.push( obj );
account.save(function(err,account) {
if (err) throw err;
console.log( JSON.stringify( account, undefined, 4 ) );
});
So what happens there is the validation will work for each stage, in this case it will fail on the name of the property schema item not being a string or even if not included.
Related
I have been given some code to modify. It is a Node.js app using Mongoose to interact with a MongoDb instance. In Mongoose several schemas were already set up and I've added a few. Among those are these two schemas which break apart a previously existing schema (which was working fine with small data):
var mongoose = require('mongoose');
var Schema = mongoose.Schema;
var MapConvertedProjectSchema = new Schema(
{
project_id : {
type: String,
default: ""
},
dataset_id : {
type: String,
default: ""
},
properties:{
type: {},
default: {}
}
});
MapConvertedProjectSchema.pre('save', function(next) {
next();
});
mongoose.model('MapConvertedProject', MapConvertedProjectSchema);
and
var mongoose = require('mongoose');
var Schema = mongoose.Schema;
var MapConvertedLayerSchema = new Schema(
{
parent_id:
{
type: mongoose.Schema.Types.ObjectId
},
class:
{
type: String,
default: 'MapLayer',
trim: true
},
properties:
{
type: {},
default: {}
}
});
//Hook a pre save method to clean date
MapConvertedLayerSchema.pre('save', function(next) {
next();
});
mongoose.model('MapConvertedLayer', MapConvertedLayerSchema);
I use the MapConvertedLayer schema like so:
var mongoose = require('mongoose');
var LayerConverted = mongoose.model('MapConvertedLayer');
var newLayer = new LayerConverted();
//newLayer._id is automatically populated with a value
//... add other properties
newLayer.save(function(err)
{
if(err)
{
//...
}
});
This works without any issues that I can discern. However if I try similar code with MapConvertedProject I get an error:
var mongoose = require('mongoose');
var ProjectConverted = mongoose.model('MapConvertedProject');
var map_converted = new ProjectConverted();
//map_converted._id is undefined
//I tried adding the comment below to create an _id manually, but it didn't make a difference when I tried to save
//map_converted._id = mongoose.Types.ObjectId();
console.log("Project Converted ID: " + map_converted._id);
//... fill out the other properties on the schema
map_converted.save(function(err)
{
if(err)
{
//...
}
});
The save generates this error:
ValidationException: One or more parameter values were invalid: Missing the key _id in the item
Does anyone know what is causing this?
I figured this out. There was another place in the code that had a dynamoose model with the same name that was messing things up. I was able to remove all references to dynamoose since it doesn't appear to be used anymore and that cleared up this issue.
I have the following scheme in the mongoose
var Schema = mongoose.Schema;
var CellSchema = new Schema({
foo: Number,
});
CellSchema.methods.fooMethod= function(){
return 'hello';
};
var GameSchema = new Schema({
field: [CellSchema]
});
if create new document like:
var cell = new CellModel({foo: 2})
var game = new GameModel();
game.field.push(cell);
game.field[0].fooMethod();
it's correctly work. But if you run this code:
GameModel.findOne({}, function(err, game) {
console.log(game);
game.field[0].fooMethod()
})
i get TypeError: game.field[0].fooMethod is not a function
and console log is
{
field:
[ { foo: 2,
_id: 5675d5474a78f1b40d96226d }
]
}
how correct load sub-document with all schema methods?
You have to define the methods on the embedded schema before defining the parent schema.
Also you have to reference CellSchema instead of 'Cell'
var CellSchema = new Schema({
foo: Number,
});
CellSchema.methods.fooMethod = function() {
return 'hello';
};
var GameSchema = new Schema({
field: [CellSchema]
});
I have a schema that defines location as an array, into which I would like to write 2 strings (gmaps geocoding lat, long). So far I can't get it to work and can't figure out why. Any help is appreciated.
My schema:
var mongoose = require('mongoose');
var uniqueValidator = require('mongoose-unique-validator');
var Schema = mongoose.Schema;
//shop schema
var ShopSchema = new Schema({
name: { type: String, required: true, unique: true },
address: { type: String, required: true },
location: [{
latitude: String,
longitude: String
}]
});
ShopSchema.plugin(uniqueValidator);
module.exports = mongoose.model('Shop', ShopSchema);
post request:
.post(function(req, res) {
//create a shop
var shop = new Shop();
//set the shop information
shop.name = req.body.name;
shop.address = req.body.address;
//get lat and long before saving from gmaps API
//build gmaps API URL
var urlAddress = req.body.address.replace(/ /gi, '+');
var urlAPIKey = '&key=AIzaSyChkPdCaAaVZwYof8ZbKspokuYt41NlJ_0';
var url = 'https://maps.googleapis.com/maps/api/geocode/json?address=';
url = url.concat(urlAddress).concat(urlAPIKey);
//make a request
request({
uri: url,
method:"GET",
timeout: 1000
}, function(error, response, body) {
var gmaps = JSON.parse(body);
//display the geometry array
shop.location.latitude = gmaps.results[0].geometry.location.lat;
shop.location.longitude = gmaps.results[0].geometry.location.lng;
//save shop and check for errors
shop.save(function(err) {
if(err) {
return res.send(err);
}
else {
res.json({ message:'Shop created! '});
}
});
});
}) //closes .post on /shops
Basically I build an URL, make a request that returns JSON data, parse it, find it, and then try writing it. When I tried writing it without using an object (as properties on shop) it worked.
Thanks for the help
In your Shop schema, the location field is of type Array. You have to push the location object into the array after getting the response but you are trying to create an object instead of push object into array.
Change these two lines of your code from
shop.location.latitude = gmaps.results[0].geometry.location.lat;
shop.location.longitude = gmaps.results[0].geometry.location.lng;
to
shop.location.push({ latitude: gmaps.results[0].geometry.location.lat.toString(), longitude: gmaps.results[0].geometry.location.lng.toString() });
I have been trying this with the built in inheritance features of mongoose (rather than the extend plugin) but haven't been having much luck so far. This is a simplified example of code I am trying to use which exhibits the same problem. This is based on an expanded version of the mongoose documentation for schema inheritance using discriminators - http://mongoosejs.com/docs/api.html#model_Model.discriminator
var util = require('util');
var mongoose = require('mongoose');
mongoose.connect('mongodb://localhost/problem');
var Schema = mongoose.Schema;
var ObjectId = Schema.ObjectId;
function BaseSchema() {
Schema.apply(this, arguments);
this.add({
name: String,
createdAt: Date
});
}
util.inherits(BaseSchema, Schema);
var BossStatusSchema = new Schema({
status: String
});
var BossStatus = mongoose.model('BossStatus', BossStatusSchema);
var PersonSchema = new BaseSchema();
var Person = mongoose.model('Person', PersonSchema);
var BossSchema = new BaseSchema({
department: String,
bossStatus: {
type: ObjectId,
ref: 'BossStatus'
}
});
var Boss = Person.discriminator('Boss', BossSchema);
Example code to add the documents:
var superBoss = new BossStatus({
status: 'super'
});
var normalBoss = new BossStatus({
status: 'normal'
});
var andy = new Person({
name: 'Andy'
});
var billy = new Boss({
name: 'Billy',
bossStatus: superBoss._id
});
var callback = function(err, result) {
console.dir(err);
console.dir(result);
};
superBoss.save(callback);
normalBoss.save(callback);
andy.save(callback);
billy.save(callback);
So when finding a record without populate:
Person
.findOne({
name: 'Billy'
})
.exec(callback);
The result is as expected, the bossStatus refers to an _id from the bossstatuses collection:
null
{ name: 'Billy',
bossStatus: 52a20ab0185a7f4530000001,
_id: 52a20ab0185a7f4530000004,
__v: 0,
__t: 'Boss' }
When adding the populate call:
Person
.findOne({
name: 'Billy'
})
.populate('bossStatus')
.exec(callback);
The resulting bossStatus property of the Person result is null:
null
{ name: 'Billy',
bossStatus: null,
_id: 52a20ab0185a7f4530000004,
__v: 0,
__t: 'Boss' }
EDIT:
Ok I've just put together what is probably a better example of what I'm trying to achieve, the schema structure lends itself more to a relational DB but hopefully makes the problem clearer.
var util = require('util');
var mongoose = require('mongoose');
mongoose.connect('mongodb://localhost/problem');
var Schema = mongoose.Schema;
var ObjectId = Schema.ObjectId;
function BaseSchema() {
Schema.apply(this, arguments);
this.add({
name: {
type: String,
unique: true,
required: true
}
});
}
util.inherits(BaseSchema, Schema);
var DeviceSchema = new BaseSchema();
var LocalDeviceSchema = new BaseSchema({
driver: {
type: ObjectId,
ref: 'Driver'
}
});
var RemoteDeviceSchema = new BaseSchema({
networkAddress: {
type: ObjectId,
ref: 'NetworkAddress'
}
});
var DriverSchema = new Schema({
name: {
type: String,
unique: true,
required: true
}
});
var NetworkHostSchema = new Schema({
host: {
type: String,
unique: true,
required: true
}
});
var NetworkAddressSchema = new Schema({
networkHost: {
type: ObjectId,
ref: 'NetworkHost'
},
port: {
type: Number,
min: 1,
max: 65535
}
});
var Driver = mongoose.model('Driver', DriverSchema);
var NetworkHost = mongoose.model('NetworkHost', NetworkHostSchema);
var NetworkAddress = mongoose.model('NetworkAddress', NetworkAddressSchema);
var Device = mongoose.model('Device', DeviceSchema);
var LocalDevice = Device.discriminator('LocalDevice', LocalDeviceSchema);
var RemoteDevice = Device.discriminator('RemoteDevice', RemoteDeviceSchema);
var networkHost = new NetworkHost({
host: '192.168.2.1'
});
var networkAddress = new NetworkAddress({
networkHost: networkHost._id,
port: 3000
});
var remoteDevice = new RemoteDevice({
name: 'myRemoteDevice',
networkAddress: networkAddress._id
});
var driver = new Driver({
name: 'ftdi'
});
var localDevice = new LocalDevice({
name: 'myLocalDevice',
driver: driver._id
});
var callback = function(err, result) {
if(err) {
console.log(err);
}
console.dir(result);
};
/*
// Uncomment to save documents
networkHost.save(function() {
networkAddress.save(function() {
remoteDevice.save(callback);
});
});
driver.save(function() {
localDevice.save(callback);
});
*/
var deviceCallback = function(err, device) {
if(err) {
console.log(err);
}
switch(device.__t) {
case 'LocalDevice':
console.log('Would create a local device instance passing populated result');
break;
case 'RemoteDevice':
console.log('Would create a remote device instance passing populated result');
break;
}
};
Device
.findOne({name: 'myLocalDevice'})
.populate('driver')
.exec(deviceCallback);
The LocalDevice and RemoteDevice schemas could (and probably would) include other differences..
The switch would for example use a DeviceFactory or something to create the instances. My thinking was it should be possible to search the devices table for a device by 'name' and populate the collection references (if this is the correct terminology?) without having to specify the collection to search in - this was my understanding of the point of schema inheritance - or have I completely misunderstood?
Thanks for replies so far!
You are looking for a Boss, not a Person:
Boss
.findOne({
name: 'Billy'
})
.populate('bossStatus')
.exec(callback);
Looks like a bug. With debugging active, this is what's being shown for the population query:
Mongoose: people.findOne({ name: 'Billy' }) { fields: undefined }
Mongoose: people.find({ _id: { '$in': [ ObjectId("52a221ee639cc03d71000001") ] } }) { fields: undefined }
(the ObjectId shown is the one stored in bossStatus)
So Mongoose is querying the wrong collection (people instead of bossstatuses).
As #regretoverflow pointed out, if you're looking for a boss, use the Boss model and not the Person model.
If you do want to populate bossStatus through the Person model, you can explicitly state a model that needs to be searched for population:
.populate({
path : 'bossStatus',
model : 'BossStatus'
})
// or shorter but less clear:
// .populate('bossStatus', {}, 'BossStatus')
EDIT: (with your Device examples)
driver is part of LocalDeviceSchema, but you're querying the Device model, which has no notion of what driver is and populating driver within the context of a Device instance doesn't make sense to Mongoose.
Another possibility for populating each instance is to do it after you retrieved the document. You already have the deviceCallback function, and this will probably work:
var deviceCallback = function(err, device) {
if(err) {
console.log(err);
}
switch(device.__t) { // or `device.constructor.modelName`
case 'LocalDevice':
device.populate('driver', ...);
break;
case 'RemoteDevice':
device.populate('networkAddress', ...);
break;
}
};
The reason is that the document is already cast into the correct model there, something that apparently doesn't happen when you chain populate with the find.
Using node.js, mongodb on mongoHQ and mongoose. I'm setting a schema for Categories. I would like to use the document ObjectId as my categoryId.
var mongoose = require('mongoose');
var Schema = mongoose.Schema,
ObjectId = Schema.ObjectId;
var Schema_Category = new Schema({
categoryId : ObjectId,
title : String,
sortIndex : String
});
I then run
var Category = mongoose.model('Schema_Category');
var category = new Category();
category.title = "Bicycles";
category.sortIndex = "3";
category.save(function(err) {
if (err) { throw err; }
console.log('saved');
mongoose.disconnect();
});
Notice that I don't provide a value for categoryId. I assumed mongoose will use the schema to generate it but the document has the usual "_id" and not "categoryId". What am I doing wrong?
Unlike traditional RBDMs, mongoDB doesn't allow you to define any random field as the primary key, the _id field MUST exist for all standard documents.
For this reason, it doesn't make sense to create a separate uuid field.
In mongoose, the ObjectId type is used not to create a new uuid, rather it is mostly used to reference other documents.
Here is an example:
var mongoose = require('mongoose');
var Schema = mongoose.Schema,
ObjectId = Schema.ObjectId;
var Schema_Product = new Schema({
categoryId : ObjectId, // a product references a category _id with type ObjectId
title : String,
price : Number
});
As you can see, it wouldn't make much sense to populate categoryId with a ObjectId.
However, if you do want a nicely named uuid field, mongoose provides virtual properties that allow you to proxy (reference) a field.
Check it out:
var mongoose = require('mongoose');
var Schema = mongoose.Schema,
ObjectId = Schema.ObjectId;
var Schema_Category = new Schema({
title : String,
sortIndex : String
});
Schema_Category.virtual('categoryId').get(function() {
return this._id;
});
So now, whenever you call category.categoryId, mongoose just returns the _id instead.
You can also create a "set" method so that you can set virtual properties, check out this link
for more info
I was looking for a different answer for the question title, so maybe other people will be too.
To set type as an ObjectId (so you may reference author as the author of book, for example), you may do like:
const Book = mongoose.model('Book', {
author: {
type: mongoose.Schema.Types.ObjectId, // here you set the author ID
// from the Author colection,
// so you can reference it
required: true
},
title: {
type: String,
required: true
}
});
My solution on using ObjectId
// usermodel.js
const mongoose = require('mongoose')
const Schema = mongoose.Schema
const ObjectId = Schema.Types.ObjectId
let UserSchema = new Schema({
username: {
type: String
},
events: [{
type: ObjectId,
ref: 'Event' // Reference to some EventSchema
}]
})
UserSchema.set('autoIndex', true)
module.exports = mongoose.model('User', UserSchema)
Using mongoose's populate method
// controller.js
const mongoose = require('mongoose')
const User = require('./usermodel.js')
let query = User.findOne({ name: "Person" })
query.exec((err, user) => {
if (err) {
console.log(err)
}
user.events = events
// user.events is now an array of events
})
The solution provided by #dex worked for me. But I want to add something else that also worked for me: Use
let UserSchema = new Schema({
username: {
type: String
},
events: [{
type: ObjectId,
ref: 'Event' // Reference to some EventSchema
}]
})
if what you want to create is an Array reference. But if what you want is an Object reference, which is what I think you might be looking for anyway, remove the brackets from the value prop, like this:
let UserSchema = new Schema({
username: {
type: String
},
events: {
type: ObjectId,
ref: 'Event' // Reference to some EventSchema
}
})
Look at the 2 snippets well. In the second case, the value prop of key events does not have brackets over the object def.
You can directly define the ObjectId
var Schema = new mongoose.Schema({
categoryId : mongoose.Schema.Types.ObjectId,
title : String,
sortIndex : String
})
Note: You need to import the mongoose module
Another possible way is to transform your _id to something you like.
Here's an example with a Page-Document that I implemented for a project:
interface PageAttrs {
label: string
// ...
}
const pageSchema = new mongoose.Schema<PageDoc>(
{
label: {
type: String,
required: true
}
// ...
},
{
toJSON: {
transform(doc, ret) {
// modify ret directly
ret.id = ret._id
delete ret._id
}
}
}
)
pageSchema.statics.build = (attrs: PageAttrs) => {
return new Page({
label: attrs.label,
// ...
})
}
const Page = mongoose.model<PageDoc, PageModel>('Page', pageSchema)
Now you can directly access the property 'id', e.g. in a unit test like so:
it('implements optimistic concurrency', async () => {
const page = Page.build({
label: 'Root Page'
// ...
})
await page.save()
const firstInstance = await Page.findById(page.id)
const secondInstance = await Page.findById(page.id)
firstInstance!.set({ label: 'Main Page' })
secondInstance!.set({ label: 'Home Page' })
await firstInstance!.save()
try {
await secondInstance!.save()
} catch (err) {
console.error('Error:', err)
return
}
throw new Error('Should not reach this point')
})