I'm associating record to some other entity using AssociateRequest.My question is how to Associate multiple records to subgrid.could you plz anyone clarify me.
Entity en=(Entity)context.InputParameters["Target"];
AssociateRequest assreq = new AssociateRequest();
assreq.Target = new EntityReference(en.LogicalName,en.Id);
assreq.RelatedEntities = new EntityReferenceCollection();
assreq.RelatedEntities.Add(new EntityReference("contact", new Guid("72C8B80B-FEF1-E311-9345-D89D67642EB0")));
assreq.Relationship = new Relationship("contact_customer_accounts");
AssociateResponse assresponse = (AssociateResponse)service.Execute(assreq);
The AssociateRequest can only be used to create a relationship between two records. If you need to associate a record multiple times, you will have to repeat the procedure for every single relationship.
You can pack the AssociateRequest's into an ExecuteMultipleRequest and save some roundtrips to the server. Please, keep in mind: the requests that are in the ExecuteMultipleRequest do not participate in the same database transaction.
OrganizationRequestCollection associateRequestCollection = new OrganizationRequestCollection();
Entity en = (Entity)context.InputParameters["Target"];
you will have to create AssociateRequest for every single
relationship and add them int associateRequestCollection object like below
AssociateRequest assreq = new AssociateRequest();
assreq.Target = new EntityReference(en.LogicalName, en.Id);
assreq.RelatedEntities = new EntityReferenceCollection();
assreq.RelatedEntities.Add(new EntityReference("contact", new Guid("72C8B80B-FEF1-E311-9345-D89D67642EB0")));
assreq.Relationship = new Relationship("contact_customer_accounts");
associateRequestCollection.Add(assreq);
//Process the Create Multiple emails against Contact Ids;
ExecuteMultipleResponse emResponses = ExecuteCRMMultipleRequest(associateRequestCollection);
private ExecuteMultipleResponse ExecuteCrmMultipleRequest(OrganizationRequestCollection associateRequestCollection)
{
ExecuteMultipleRequest emRequest = new ExecuteMultipleRequest
{
Requests = associateRequestCollection,
Settings = new ExecuteMultipleSettings
{
ContinueOnError = true,
ReturnResponses = true
}
};
return (ExecuteMultipleResponse)service.Execute(emRequest);
}
Related
I want to create an new entity in crm
OrganizationService_orgService ;
var connection = CrmConnection.Parse(conn);
_orgService = new OrganizationService(connection);
Entity newEntity = new Entity("this_is_a_new_entity");
Guid newEntityID = _orgService.Create(newEntity);
I wrote the above code where the conn is the connection string in the format which is correct (i checked)
string conn = "Url=https://damnidiot.crm5.dynamics.com; Username=XXXXXXXX#damnidiot.onmicrosoft.com; Password=XXXXXXXXX;";
but when i run the code i get an exception {"The entity with a name = 'this_is_a_new_entity' was not found in the MetadataCache."}
i am asuming i got this error because my crm does not have defination for the entity this_is_a_new_entity .
Is it possible to retrive And update the metadata cache of my MS CRM ?(I AM USING Microsoft Dynamics CRM 2013 )
If you use new Entity("new_entity_name") you are telling the code that you want to create a new record inside the already existing entity named new_entity_name.
To create a new entity altogether you have to issue a CreateEntityRequest (link to MSDN)
// PART OF THE LINKED SAMPLE
CreateEntityRequest createrequest = new CreateEntityRequest
{
//Define the entity
Entity = new EntityMetadata
{
SchemaName = _customEntityName,
DisplayName = new Label("Bank Account", 1033),
DisplayCollectionName = new Label("Bank Accounts", 1033),
Description = new Label("An entity to store information about customer bank accounts", 1033),
OwnershipType = OwnershipTypes.UserOwned,
IsActivity = false,
},
// Define the primary attribute for the entity
PrimaryAttribute = new StringAttributeMetadata
{
SchemaName = "new_accountname",
RequiredLevel = new AttributeRequiredLevelManagedProperty(AttributeRequiredLevel.None),
MaxLength = 100,
Format = StringFormat.Text,
DisplayName = new Label("Account Name", 1033),
Description = new Label("The primary attribute for the Bank Account entity.", 1033)
}
};
To create new entity you should use Create Entity Request. Your code creates record of this_is_a_new_entity.
I just started playing with Azure DocumentDB and my excitement has turned into confusion. This thing is weird. It seems like everything (databases, collections, documents) needs to be accessed not by its id, but by its 'SelfLink'. For example:
I create a database:
public void CreateDatabase()
{
using (var client = new DocumentClient(new Uri(endpoint), authKey))
{
Database db = new Database()
{
Id = "TestDB",
};
client.CreateDatabaseAsync(db).Wait();
}
}
Then later sometime I want to create a Collection:
public void CreateCollection()
{
using (var client = new DocumentClient(new Uri(endpoint), authKey))
{
DocumentCollection collection = new DocumentCollection()
{
Id = "TestCollection",
};
client.CreateDocumentCollectionAsync(databaseLink: "???", documentCollection: collection).Wait();
}
}
The api wants a 'databaseLink' when what I'd really prefer to give it is my database Id. I don't have the 'databaseLink' handy. Does DocumentDB really expect me to pull down a list of all databases and go searching through it for the databaseLink everytime I want to do anything?
This problem goes all the way down. I can't save a document to a collection without having the collection's 'link'.
public void CreateDocument()
{
using (var client = new DocumentClient(new Uri(endpoint), authKey))
{
client.CreateDocumentAsync(documentCollectionLink: "???", document: new { Name = "TestName" }).Wait();
}
}
So to save a document I need the collection's link. To get the collections link I need the database link. To get the database link I have to pull down a list of all databases in my account and go sifting through it. Then I have to use that database link that I found to pull down a list of collections in that database that I then have to sift through looking for the link of the collection I want. This doesn't seem right.
Am I missing something? Am I not understanding how to use this? Why am I assigning ids to all my resources when DocumentDB insists on using its own link scheme to identify everything? My question is 'how do I access DocumentDB resources by their Id?'
The information posted in other answers from 2014 is now somewhat out of date. Direct addressing by Id is possible:
Although _selflinks still exist, and can be used to access resources, Microsoft have since added a much simpler way to locate resources by their Ids that does not require you to retain the _selflink :
UriFactory
UriFactory.CreateDocumentCollectionUri(databaseId, collectionId))
UriFactory.CreateDocumentUri(databaseId, collectionId, "document id");
This enables you to create a safe Uri (allowing for example for whitespace) - which is functionally identical to the resources _selflink; the example given in the Microsoft announcement is shown below:
// Use **UriFactory** to build the DocumentLink
Uri docUri = UriFactory.CreateDocumentUri("SalesDb", "Catalog", "prd123");
// Use this constructed Uri to delete the document
await client.DeleteDocumentAsync(docUri);
The announcement, from August 13th 2015, can be found here:
https://azure.microsoft.com/en-us/blog/azure-documentdb-bids-fond-farewell-to-self-links/
I would recommend you look at the code samples here in particular the DocumentDB.Samples.ServerSideScripts project.
In the Program.cs you will find the GetOrCreateDatabaseAsync method:
/// <summary>
/// Get or create a Database by id
/// </summary>
/// <param name="id">The id of the Database to search for, or create.</param>
/// <returns>The matched, or created, Database object</returns>
private static async Task<Database> GetOrCreateDatabaseAsync(string id)
{
Database database = client.CreateDatabaseQuery()
.Where(db => db.Id == id).ToArray().FirstOrDefault();
if (database == null)
{
database = await client.CreateDatabaseAsync(
new Database { Id = id });
}
return database;
}
To answer you question, you can use this method to find your database by its id and other resources (collections, documents etc.) using their respective Create[ResourceType]Query() methods.
Hope that helps.
The create database call returns a the database object:
var database = client.CreateDatabaseAsync(new Database { Id = databaseName }).Result.Resource;
And then you can use that to create your collection
var spec = new DocumentCollection { Id = collectionName };
spec.IndexingPolicy.IndexingMode = IndexingMode.Consistent;
spec.IndexingPolicy.Automatic = true;
spec.IndexingPolicy.IncludedPaths.Add(new IndexingPath { IndexType = IndexType.Range, NumericPrecision = 6, Path = "/" });
var options = new RequestOptions
{
ConsistencyLevel = ConsistencyLevel.Session
};
var collection = client.CreateDocumentCollectionAsync(database.SelfLink, spec, options).Result.Resource;
The client.Create... methods return the objects which have the self links you are looking for
Database database = await client.CreateDatabaseAsync(
new Database { Id = "Foo"});
DocumentCollection collection = await client.CreateDocumentCollectionAsync(
database.SelfLink, new DocumentCollection { Id = "Bar" });
Document document = await client.CreateDocumentAsync(
collection.SelfLink, new { property1 = "Hello World" });
For deleting the document in partitioned collection, please leverage this format:
result = await client.DeleteDocumentAsync(selfLink, new RequestOptions {
PartitionKey = new PartitionKey(partitionKey)
});
I have a problem with my website crawler as I get System Out of Memory Exception after it crawls something around 700 URLs. Memory usage is raising from the start and in one moment program just stops.
It is a console application written in C#.
I think the problem is that i instantiate 6 new objects at every foreach loop. Than i pass through them, get property values with reflection and create the final object that i use to DB save.
I expect .NET to destroy those object when not using them anymore but that is not the case. What are my options? Is BAckground Worker any better?
My code is something like this....
Parallel.ForEach(Globals.Urls, url =>
{
progCtrl.indexIsSet = false;
var urlHelper = url.Split(';')[1].TrimStart('\t');
// var urlHelper = Globals.replaceGermanUmlauts(url.Split(';')[1].TrimStart('\t'));
HtmlDocument htm = new HtmlDocument();
try
{
Company comp0 = new Company();
Company comp1 = new Company();
Company comp2 = new Company();
Company comp3 = new Company();
Company comp4 = new Company();
Company comp5 = new Company();
Company comp6 = new Company();
//then I do some logic, add those companies to list and go further.
How to destory them? I have tried making them IDisposable but that didn't help.
Thanks.
Can a record be created as closed?
If I create the records and then change the state, that could work, but is it possible to do it in a single step?
I am using ExecuteMultipleRequest to create Cases.
No, You have to make two request to create and resolve the case. See the examples below:
// Create an incident.
var incident = new Incident
{
CustomerId = new EntityReference(Account.EntityLogicalName, _accountId),
Title = "Sample Incident"
};
_incidentId = _serviceProxy.Create(incident);
// Create the incident's resolution.
var incidentResolution = new IncidentResolution
{
Subject = "Resolved Sample Incident",
IncidentId = new EntityReference(Incident.EntityLogicalName, _incidentId)
};
// Close the incident with the resolution.
var closeIncidentRequest = new CloseIncidentRequest
{
IncidentResolution = incidentResolution,
Status = new OptionSetValue((int)incident_statuscode.ProblemSolved)
};
_serviceProxy.Execute(closeIncidentRequest);
Ref: sdk\SampleCode\CS\BusinessDataModel\Service\CloseAnIncident.cs
You will always need two request, one to create the record and one to change the state.
You could have a plugin close the record on the create, so that way it happens in the same database transaction, but I'm guessing that it wouldn't be worth the over head.
I'm trying to retrieve a list of entities from CRM, but I'd like to get each one with the related entities. So far, I've the following code:
FilterExpression filterExpression = new FilterExpression();
ConditionExpression condition = new ConditionExpression(Constants.ModifiedOnAttribute, ConditionOperator.GreaterEqual, lastSync);
filterExpression.AddCondition(condition);
QueryExpression query = new QueryExpression()
{
EntityName = entityName,
ColumnSet = new ColumnSet(attributesMetadata.Select(att => att.Name).ToArray<string>()),
Criteria = filterExpression,
Distinct = false,
NoLock = true
};
RetrieveMultipleRequest multipleRequest = new RetrieveMultipleRequest();
multipleRequest.Query = queryExpression;
RetrieveMultipleResponse response = (RetrieveMultipleResponse)proxy.Execute(multipleRequest);
In the variable response, I can see the EntityCollection attribute, but inside, Related entities always come empty.
I'd like to know if it is possible to retrieve the set of a given entities, with the related entities, using RetrieveMultipleRequest, rather than go one by one using RetrieveRequest.
One approach to retreive related entities data - adding LinkEntities to your query. Example below will make you an idea how to make this:
LinkEntity linkEntity = new LinkEntity("email", "new_emails", "activityid", "new_relatedemail", JoinOperator.Inner);
linkEntity.Columns.AddColumn("versionnumber");
linkEntity.Columns.AddColumn("new_emailsid");
linkEntity.EntityAlias = "related";
query = new QueryExpression("email");
query.ColumnSet.AddColumn("activityid");
query.ColumnSet.AddColumn("versionnumber");
query.Criteria.AddCondition("modifiedon", ConditionOperator.NotNull);
query.LinkEntities.Add(linkEntity);
And then you can access attributes from related entities using EntityAlias you specified above:
foreach (Entity entity in entities.Entities)
{
if ((long)(entity["related.versionnumber"] as AliasedValue).Value > 0)
{
stop = false;
}
}
The RetrieveMultipleRequest is for returning multiple instances of a particular type of entity. I have spent a year using the CRM SDK from C# and I have found no way of populating those related entity collections in a single query. This basically leaves you with two options:
Use the AliasedValue as SergeyS recommends. Remember when querying 1:Many relationships, be aware that you could be returning multiple results for the same parent entity. This is what I use most of the time.
Perform a second query for each relationship you want access to. You'll probably get better performance if you can use an IN statement in your second query, based on the results of the first, rather than performing a separate query for each result of the first.
Below is some pseudo code to show the difference.
var contacts = GetContacts();
// One Request to get the cars for the contacts
var cars = GetCarsWhereContactIdIn(contacts.Select( c => c.new_ContactId));
foreach(var c in contacts){
c.new_Cars.AddRange(cars.where(car => car.new_contactId = c.ContactId));
}
// Verses
var contacts = GetContacts();
foreach(var c in contacts){
// One Request for each contact
c.new_Cars.AddRange(GetCarsForContact(c.ContactId));
}