i have a question regarding the size of objects that are used in EPC notation in Oracle Business Process Architect. Is there any possible way to change the default size of functions and events instead of changing the size of each object separately?
Thanks in advance!
Related
I have a scenario where I have Foxx service managing a collection with documents that follow a fixed schema for specific fields, but also allows extensions through a user-controlled "sub-document" (a field that can contain anything). While this works, I would like to limit the size of the "sub-document" to mitigate undesirable behaviors, such as users inserting large encoded binary data. Does anyone have recommendations on how to do this? I can't find any Javascript API calls to check document size (storage size).
Thanks!
I want to search change log under "cn=changelog". I can search the result normally if the result entries were not a lot. But if there are a lot of entries in the result, the memory will be not enough. So, I want to page the result. How can I define the size limit?
I also refered to https://bugster.forgerock.org/jira/si/jira.issueviews:issue-html/OPENDJ-1218/OPENDJ-1218.html. While, I wonder how to define a filter to support "changeNumber". And in my result, there is not this attribut "changeNumber". Why?
Please help me how shoud I do?
BTW, I am using OpenDJ 3.0.
Size limit is an option of the client call. You can always specify the maximum amount of entries you want to be returned (the server has it's own limit and will enforce the smallest between the 2).
How to define the size limit depends on what you are using as client, and you did not mention it.
Can you provide details on what you are using to search (tool, library...) and what is the filter and options you are currently using ? It's difficult to provide help and suggestions to improvement when there is no detail.
Is it possible to have an big size array like arr[200000] as output in top function of Vivado_HLS.
Yes BUT:
which kind of "type" are the elements of the array? int? char? a single bit?
which kind of interface do you want to use? if you want pass all the elements at the same time, the operation may be impossible because maybe you don't have enough space on the fpga. If you are using a streaming or serial interface you can do this.
Normally you don't have this kind of limitation but you should evaluate, case by case, what is the best solution with the hardware that you have.
The long-sized arrays are generally implemented on BRAM because the LUTS are used for small-sized arrays. So you have to consider whether you have enough resources to utilize.
If your application allows using FIFO or axi-stream or axi-full with burst then you may think to use them to transfer the data without holding the whole array on the PL, maybe you can use a buffer that holds a small chunk of your array.
So it depends both on your board and your algorithm.
I'm using mapdb 1.0.7 and my question is:
is there any limitation for the number of maps I can create with a single Db instance? Or is it theoretically unlimited.
I've tested to create 1.000.000 maps with 25 entries in each of it. This works fine. But is there any limitation?
Kind regards
Thorsten
Just got the answer in the mapdb google group:
there is no limit. But each opened map consumes under 1KB on heap. So I would recommend to keep it under thousands or millions.
i already searched for an answer but without finding one to my specific problem.
i am using core data to save profiles and display them in a table. since core data is already set up, i wanted to use it also for storing application settings.
i've set up the model, set up an array controller to retrive the data, but now, i have no clue on how to connect this array controller to a single textbox.
i try to explain: theoretically my model could have more entries, just like the profile model has. but it has just one with some settings, as if a database would have only a single data row. is there a way i can specify that i want the data contained in the very first row? dont know if my question is clear, its not so easy to explain. please if it was not clear let me knwo and i will try to explain it again.
thanks
igor
Don't put application settings in Core Data. Any time you find yourself thinking that you want just one instance (row) for an entity, you're doing it wrong.
Cocoa Touch provides a class called NSUserDefaults specifically for the purpose of saving app settings. Look into that, it's almost certainly what you want.