I am trying to modify the parameters in openmodelica version 1.9.1 beta 2 using OMEdit.
But the the OK button is deactivated and no change takes effect.
Is there a way to modify and run the example?
You can not edit the system libraries e.g Modelica. But you can extend them and then you can change the parameters. Create a new model M and extend it from your example (You can do it in Create New Modelica Class Dialog).
Related
I am fresher to Coded UI Test Automation. I want to provide a support for 3rd party controls so i need to know about CUIT, if any levels available in CUIT please explain!!! Thanks.
First for your own controls you'll want to look at how to Overriding Control.ControlAccessibleObject on your custom controls by implementing a ControlAccessibleObject. Any and all properties you want to support you'll have to expose. This will explain in better detail of the specific details.
As for actual Coded UI, For Desktop controls, WPF or WinForms, you probably want to keep your Test UI's extra simplified Window with just your custom control so its easy to spawn.
From here, depending upon the control, you'll want to implement a matching CodedUI object. To do this, you must inherit from UITestControl, you should inherit from the appropriate family tree like HtmlControl, WinControl, or WpfControl. Also you will have to override the match PropertyNames inner class with any extra properties you are exposing in the ControlAccessibleObject
If you are doing Html Development I'd highly recommend using the Page Object Pattern to help give statefull changes of a webpage be more apparent based upon the return type of method calls using method chaining.
BEWARE if your choose to use a UIMap (from the builder) your Custom Coded UI controls will not be used in generation, most likely they'll be HtmlCustom, WinCustom, WpfCustom, which have very limited support. Usually I only use a UIMap to quickly define Search criteria for controls.
To note Coded UI uses hierarchy to help it locate the controls. So when looking for your control you should define relevant Hierarchy elements, which have a very high level of success when you define ID's for your controls
YourHtmlControl->HtmlDiv->HtmlDocument->BrowserWindow
Alloy theme definition interface allows to assign a customized image for each signature. It is possible to choose an image from a list of predefined images. But, I am wondering if it is possible to add my own image to this list?!
The alloy source code is available and you may edit it to your needs.
The source code is included in the jar you use to run the Alloy Analyzer.
There is no built-in customization to do this.
I want to add a new section in control panel of liferay and within that section I want to have my custom-portlet. I did it using ext. However I want to do it with hook . Is it possible ?
I don't think it would be that easy with a hook, because of the following reasons:
You can't modify in a Hook - the class com.liferay.portal.util.PortletCategoryKeys which contains the keys for displaying the different sections. The different sections are hard-coded in this class in a String array ALL.
You can't modify the logic of PortalImpl#isControlPanelPortlet() which uses the PortletCategoryKeys#ALL to determine if the request in question is for a control panel portlet.
Then you also have another method which you can't modify with a Hook and is used extensively PortalImpl#getControlPanelCategory()
Doing it with a hook:
I have not tried this but I think if you need to do it with a hook you would have to change all those JSPs which make use of PortletCategoryKeys#ALL and the methods of PortalImpl as stated above, and provide your custom implementation for all these methods in the JSP.
I would really like to know how you implemented it with an EXT may be just the steps or the methods you have overridden. So that I can try to convert those in terms of a hook.
This is as far as my understanding goes. Hope this helps.
With the advent of Marketplace, ControlPanel has a new category named "Marketplace" and that section is introduced in a plugin. However, I never checked if 6.1 GA2 introduced a new section that this plugin just fills. Check the marketplace plugin if you can find a trace of this section implemented there.
On the other hand, nobody has yet named any section that definitely required a new section (though some have asked me how to solve the same problem). For this reason, you might want to re-think the requirement and choose one of the existing sections. If you don't, at least I'd be interested in the name and purpose of the new section - I might find a first one actually justifying this kind of implementation...
I recently installed Papyrus and attempted to follow the tutorial for creating a model and generating Java code off it.
Unfortunately, I'm pretty much stuck right at the beginning. In the class definition, I added a static operation for main, and I'm able to specify its argument as an array:
in args: <Undefined> [*]
Unfortunately, it does not allow me to specify the type to be String. That is, I would like to specify it as follows:
in args: String [*]
No matter how I enter the type (or any type for that matter), the type reverts back to <Undefined>. I suspect something is wrong or missing with a profile it is supposed to use. Unfortunately, the documentation for this tool is rather sparse, and I cannot find an answer or solution to this.
Anyone has run into this same problem as well???
Have you imported the UML Primitive types package? This should allow you to define the type of the argument to Integer, String or Boolean.
In the model explorer, right click on your model, then choose 'Import package from registered library'
In the window that pops up pick 'UMLPrimitiveTypes' (or the Java ones, if you prefer that).
After this, it should work.
In the latest version of Papyrus, you have to go to model explorer, right click on your model and then choose Import. After that select "Import Registered Package." That will bring up a dialog with a list of registered packages. From that you can select either "UMLPrimitiveTypes" or "JavaPrimitiveTypes"
Papyrus consider that modeling is independent of languages and therefore no java type are usually possible. This is fully logical in a MDA approach but not in the real life :-)
There is an accelero plugin which is supposed to generate code from a diagram but it doesn't work with the latest Helios build so.....
The best is to do you class diagram and then manually code the related code. I am sure that your code will be better than the one you could get from accelero :-)
It's very simple, you can do it by just clicking on the attribute properties, then select type option, In the menu bar select Tree, then Primitive Types.
The String class is not able to see in java primitive types, you need import a package from java core library.
There is a java profile and library/package in Papyrus Software Designer extention.
You may install it via the market place.
More details: https://wiki.eclipse.org/Java_Code_Generation
I am creating a series of window mockup templates based on the excellent Mockups library available on CodePlex.
I'm using their BaseMockup as the base for my control as well, and I followed the same outline of the steps listed here for sub-deriving from existing controls (Create a new empty class, add your default style to /Themes/generic.xaml, etc.)
The control is working great - the only thing is that it doesn't show up in the Assets library. I think this is because it's sub-derived, or because I need some attribute (the equivalent of the ToolboxItemAttribute for WinForms controls? ... which didn't work) to get it hooked up.
When I modify the code to derive directly from Control, it shows up - no custom attribute necessary. Of course that defeats the purpose of what I'm trying to do though...
The only thing I can find are several articles telling me to muck with registry keys, and none of them are clear or suggest a definitive way to do this with Blend 4. That last one advertises as a Blend 4 tips article, but admits at the end that it plagiarizes the content from the other two (for Blend 3).
Is that my only option - register my DLL? Is there a better way to do this?
A while ago I wrote a blogpost about this. I've included a .reg file and a .bat file for setting up the register and some directories. I think that's what you are looking for.
I believe you do need to muck with registry keys. Specifically,
32 bit: HKEY_LOCAL_MACHINE\SOFTWARE\Microsoft\.NET Framework\v4.0.30319\AssemblyFoldersEx
64 bit: HKEY_LOCAL_MACHINE\SOFTWARE\Wow6432Node\Microsoft\.NET Framework\v4.0.30319\AssemblyFoldersEx
Create a new key with the name of your control assembly. Then edit the Default string value under this key and set the value to the directory where the control assemblies are installed. See here for a full example (using the Silverlight paths).
Found it - there is an analogue attribute after all, it's ToolboxBrowsableAttribute.
You have to go through a little more rigmarole to get it set up, but it works great - no registry mucking necessary. It requires creating a designer metadata provider class, attributing your assembly so it's designer-discoverable, and then adding the attributes to your sub-derived controls inside your metadata provider.
Make sure you choose the appropriate version of the page for your version of Visual Studio, because the interface changes a good bit between 2008 and 2010.
This article on CodeProject has some good, real-world examples of setting this up. They're all in the 2008 style though, so bear that in mind if you're using 2010.