My understanding is that the new Hub control is supposed to replace the Panorama control in Windows Phone 8.1. However, the new Hub control does not have an ItemsSource property like the Panorama control did. I can still use the Pivot control, which supports the ItemsSource property, but its only available in my phone project. I would like to use the Hub control because it is available in both the Phone and Store projects.
Is it possible to extend the Hub control somehow so that it supports any given number of HubSections, depending on how many section items are provided to it via the ItemsSource collection?
I think I understand what you want to do is something like Hub.ItemsSource to create the different HubSection for you? This is dramatically against the recommendations of the control team. There are several reasons. The first is the intent of the control to be a curated list of items meant for the Hub page of your app. The second has to do with performance.
Having said that, there is nothing to stop you from creating an Attached Property that implements the same concept you are wanting. But dynamic HubSection are simply not how the control is intended. You might want to comment back saying "Then how is it supposed to replace the Panorama control?" The reality is, the Hub control is the closest thing we have to a Panorama control, not a one-for-one replacement.
I bet, for sure, you can live without it. But you certainly are not the first to ask. Developers want everything to be as dynamic as possible. But that isn't actually best for performance. And, performance is worth a second consideration here. I think, like you, a lot of developers are going to be rewiring as they start to build universal apps instead of Silverlight apps. I'm sorry it's not one for one.
Try this solution from Diederik Krols - http://blogs.u2u.be/diederik/post/2014/01/05/Using-the-Windows-81-Hub-as-an-ItemsControl.aspx
Related
I have developed a program using curses, everything is cool so far but I was wondering myself if there is a good pattern to split different views/panels of my program into smaller chunks callable by my main loop?
Further informations:
This program is a rather small automation tool/wizard aiming to ease our application for customers requiring the on-premise installation.
This wizard is a 3 steps one and it’s used to grab informations from our customer installation needs depending of it’s chosen architecture.
The first step is requesting the customer to give us its identification informations such has contract number, company name, licence number and preferred contact.
The second step is requesting the customer to give us informations about either he want a standalone installation (All-In-One install) or a N-Tiers installation plus the required informations like the requested custom SSL VHostName or Tiers IP/Credentials.
The third and final step is showing the customer a progress bar and informations of the required services (MySQL/HTTPd/HAProxy/PHP-FPM) and our application.
I know that I do not especially need to use curses library for such a program but our UX Team requested it as it is part of our customer experience with the solution.
You can look at the Forms library. It's a nice extension to ncurses that allows you to better manage input forms like yours. It offers a simple function interface to read the fields, change their properties, etc., as well as many different field types (including regexp-validated fields). In your case, you can simply create three forms, and post/unpost them in succession.
as such way to do things is not really usual, do not expect any framework to be available (like those available for WebUI for instance).
I so decided to create my own "Framework/factory" and so to be able to split every aspect of my app in a logic that would be similar of those used by web applications.
The source-code is dirty and really not pythonic, but it is well working so far and quite easy to maintain.
Thanks everyone for your answers and ideas.
I am still a relative newcomer to Expression Engine as a developer and a user. I am faced with the problem that a lot of my knowledge is being passed to me by users who have found ways to accomplish tasks traditionally undertaken by developers (eg product libraries) by using the channels system.
What I wondered was what people's views are on when it is best to advise a client to use this and when not to.
Let me use an example, a client wants a system which had venues where events could take place. The previous developer had chosen to use the membership system for the venues and the channels system for the events and write some custom code to attempt to knit the two together, specifically because there are not enough hooks to accomplish some background automated tasks like looking up the long/lat of the address of a venue when it is created or updated.
I am picking up after someone else's work largely but its not their fault, it was the information they were given as they were also new to the system.
In any other project this would be a master-detail type setup, events belong to venues, i'd probably write 2 custom tables, editors in the admin area via modules and then use regular custom code in the pages to display and act upon the info - this way, I could control what's happening when a user hits submit.
However, the instigating party is a veteran user of Expression Engine and instructed the previous developer in the manner of "oh, just put it all in the channels and then there's this tag and that tag and so on".
So, am I missing the point or am I right that this does not fit the channels system and when should you use channels and when not?
Thanks friends.
This question is very hypothetical and every developer will give you a different answer as it all depends on the requirement and how that EE developer rolls.
Fundamentally ExpressionEngine allows you to approach builds in many ways, none are right and wrong, albeit some are easier, some harder, others just plain daft.
Basically Channels are groups of data "entries" - these can be anything. Using your example, venues could be one channel with fields created relevant to the subject (e.g. location, size, price, etc). And another channel for events with different fields (e.g. date, type, location).
Mostly anything can be slotted into a channel. But member details are best held within the native member functionality (although there is a commercial add-on that holds member data in a channel).
You reference the previous developers approach - this could be because they used a third-party add-on that required the data to be held separately to channels, or a lack of understanding on best approach. Or just because the developer decided to approach it that way! I suspect the last developer then associated a member (venue) to an entry (event) to link the event to the venue. Basic EE functionality allows for related entries which allows you to associate 1 entry with another (e.g. Event -> Venue), or using the excellent Playa add-on, so this approach is really not necessary.
Personally I would always store the data in channels, and people/members in the native membership functionality (e.g. admin, visitors to the site, customers, etc). I'd only build an add-on (utilising it's own tables/data) to store additional information if it was way outside what EE could store.
To answer your practical question (it's stretching the scope of what Stack Overflow questions are supposed be honestly): you should use a channel for Venues and channel for Events, and the Venue field in the Event entry is a "Related Entries" fieldtype linked to the Venues channel. That's the "standard" EE way, and the most similar to a traditional database schema.
I've recently switched to JIRA from another bug tracking system, and previously we were not using the "component" field. The project was pretty small, so it didn't seem to need it at the time. As the project is getting a little bigger, I'm finding that the component field may useful, but I'm not exactly sure of how to split the components.
For example, let's say I have a banking application and I am adding a feature to transfer money between accounts. That feature might be classified as an "Accounts" component, but it also would affect the user interface, as well as have some security issues associated with it. It seems like many issues will have this cross-cutting concern.
Is there a best practice for determining how to divide a project into components? Are things like "User Interface" and "Security" too broad?
I'm not sure this question has a single correct answer, so maybe it should be moved to a community wiki, but any insight people can provide would be helpful here.
Components are most useful if they have obvious default assignees for each one (component leads). Another approach is to wait for a while and use labels. See if there are common labels that your users like to use, and then create components in a few weeks for those labels.
A user creating a bug can add multiple components when reporting the issue. So they could select Account, transfers and security issue (or Loan, Payments, and security issue) as all components effected by a particular bug. Any combination of components can be put together so that the development team knows exactly where this bug is occurring.
We use the component field in our company mostly to cluster the issues in a meaningful way, so that reports to these components may give you feedback which part of your application development gets the most issues, or where the most changes (with the most resulting bugs) are happening. Sometimes, the components reflect the organization of a project, then the aspect of the default assignee is a valid one (as answered by #mdoar). But even then, the overview of the project is the most interesting aspect here.
Is there a way to determine what kind of data plan a device has so an app provides a less rich experience if a data plan is not available? I imagine the connector factory would still be able to return me an HTTPConnection but it would cost the user serious money for lots of data, and I'd like to be nice and prevent that.
I thought there would be a way to query device capabilities in the MIDP API, but maybe it's in CLDC?
Since you mention it in your comments, you can probably make a Symbian OS C++ application that only connects via a specific set Wi-Fi access points (and just stay offline if none of these are available) but I can't think of a way to figure out the current user data plan or whether a given Wi-fi network is free.None of that is available in J2ME, at least not until something like JSR 307 is implemented.
You might want to look into how the Nokia IAPInfo API behaves on actual phones (including Sony-Ericsson and Samsung Series60 phones, potentially) since it is the closest thing to what you want.
No there is no way to do this.
As far as I know there is no way to do this. To address this precise issue, on first download we provide a big bold letter warning saying our apps require data plan. You can do something similar.
Or you can provide an option on first download for the user to say whether he has a data plan or not, and provide a degraded user experience if he doesnt. Dont forget to keep this as an option in application settings and allow the user to enable data services later, as he/she may get a data plan and want to use your app.
I'm trying to write a tool which lets me inspect the state of a PowerBuilder-based application. What I'm thinking of is something like Spy++ (or, even nicer, 'Snoop' as it exists for .NET applications) which lets me inspect the object tree (and properties of objects) of some PowerBuilder-based GUI.
I did the same for ordinary (MFC-based) applications as well as .NET applications already, but unfortunately I never developed an application in PowerBuilder myself, so I'm generally thinking about two problems at this point:
Is there some API (preferably in Java or C/C++) available which lets one traverse the
tree of visual objects of a PowerBuilder application? I read up a bit on the PowerBuilder Native Interface system, but it seems that this is meant to write PowerBuilder extensions in C/C++ which can then be called from the PowerBuilder script language, right?
If there is some API available - maybe PowerBuilder applications even expose some sort of IPC-enabled API which lets me inspect the state of a PowerBuilder object hierarchy without being within the process of the PowerBuilder application? Maybe there's an automation interface available, or something COM-based - or maybe something else?
Right now, my impression is that probably need to inject a DLL into the process of the PowerBuilder application and then gain access to the running PowerBuilder VM so that I can query it for the object tree. Some sort of IPC mechanism will then let me transport this information out of the PowerBuilder application's process.
Does anybody have some experience with this or can shed some light on whether anybody tried to do this already?
Best regards,
Frerich
First, the easy answer: I think what you're trying to do has been done, sort of. Rex from Enable does what I think you're after, but IIRC from talking with the developers, it depends on code hooks built into the application.
Which leads to the suggestion that I don't think you'll be able to do what I think you're trying to do completely externally from the application. You can grab window handles with WinAPIs and do some basic things with that, but not as much as you want. And getting information about DataWindows with WinAPIs? Forget it.
I believe I've heard of an API like the one you're asking about, but I've never heard of anyone other that automated testing software tool manufacturers getting their hands on it. If this is true (and the quality of this information is along the lines of "heard it in the hallway"), I suspect there might be some application security issues in letting this get out. (I know you'd never want to infect my application, or poke around and find out my secrets. grin)
Even with hooks into the PowerBuilder VM memory space, I'm not aware of being able to get a list of objects in memory without some PowerScript framework hooks (e.g. populating a list on every open and constructor with object handles). Once you've got a window handle, you can easily traverse its control arrays (and its subclasses control arrays) to get a list of objects on the window, but things like handles to NVO instance variables would be problematic.
I admire the idea. I wish I had better news (other than maybe Rex might solve your problem without the headaches of doing it yourself). Now I'm looking forward even more to what eran may release! grin
Good luck,
Terry.
I've just created such a tool, but I cheated a bit. Was actually about to ask the same question myself on the PB newsgroups. My solution is made of two parts:
Spy-like tool - a stand-alone app that like Spy++, i.e. lets you drag a target onto a control, using Windows API functions (though written in PB).
Internal infrastructure for target applications - located at the ancestor of all of the application's windows. Once given a certain (windows) handle, it goes through the Control[] array and looks for the control whose handle matches the given one. If necessary, it also recurses into control-containers such as tabs.
When the user selects a control, the spy tool first looks for its containing window using Windows API. When found, the tool sends a custom message to that window, which is then handled by the app's infrastructure. The control is then located in the PB app, and its details are finally sent back to the spy tool, which presents them to the user.
I suspect the infrastructure part can be replaced with some external thing, as I've seen tools that seem to be able to do that (Visual Expert, QTP). However, I haven't had the time to further investigate, and this solution was relatively easy to develop.
I've got to say, your question comes on a surprising timing. See this recent question of mine. If you're interested in the tool I've created, drop me a comment.